Four killed, 14 injured in mass shooting outside downtown Chicago lounge
According to authorities, the mass shooting took place around 11:00pm (04:00 GMT) on Wednesday, when shots were fired from a vehicle travelling along Chicago Avenue in the city's River North neighbourhood.
Chicago police reported that 13 women and five men, all between the ages of 21 and 32, were struck by the gunfire. Among the dead were two men and two women.
As of Thursday, at least three victims remained in critical condition. The injured were transported to local hospitals.
Police said the driver fled the scene immediately, and no arrests have been made. Chicago Police Superintendent Larry Snelling urged the public to submit anonymous tips to help detectives identify the suspects.
Local media reported that rapper Mello Buckzz, also known as Melanie Doyle, was hosting a private event at the lounge Wednesday evening to celebrate the release of her new album.
Snelling said police were trying to determine a motive and that the venue, Artis Lounge, is closed 'until we get to the bottom of this'. He did not identify the number of attackers involved in the incident but said police found two different calibres of casings and were still reviewing footage.
'Clearly, there was some target in some way,' Snelling said. 'This wasn't some random shooting.'
Artis Lounge confirmed they were working with authorities as the investigation continued.
A post shared by Ärt-is Restaurant and Lounge (@artischicago)
'I can only describe it as a warzone'
In the hours after the shooting, Buckzz asked for prayers and expressed her anger and sadness on social media.
'My heart broke into so many pieces,' the artist wrote on Instagram Stories.
In her posts, the rapper revealed that many of those injured were her friends, and that she had been in a relationship with one of the men who was killed.
'Prayers up for all my sisters god please wrap yo arms around every last one of them,' Buckzz wrote across several Instagram Story slides. 'Feel like everything just weighing down on me … all I can do is talk to god and pray.'
Chicago pastor Donovan Price, who works with communities affected by violence, described the scene as a 'warzone'.
'Just mayhem and blood and screaming and confusion as people tried to find their friends and phones. It was a horrendous, tragic, dramatic scene,' he told The Associated Press.
The shooting took place days before the Fourth of July weekend, when Chicago and other major cities often see a surge in gun crimes. In recent years, however, Chicago has seen an overall decrease in gun violence.
During the last Fourth of July weekend in Chicago, more than 100 people were shot, resulting in at least 19 deaths. Mayor Brandon Johnson said at the time that the violence 'has left our city in a state of grief'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Wrong': Trump administration completes deportations to South Sudan
The United States has confirmed it completed the deportations of eight men to South Sudan, a day after a US judge cleared the way for President Donald Trump's administration to send them to the violence-hit African country. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said on Saturday that the men were deported a day earlier, on US Independence Day on Friday, after they lost a last-minute legal bid to halt their transfer. The eight detainees – immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam – had been held under guard at a US military base in Djibouti for weeks. A staffer working at Juba airport in South Sudan told the Reuters news agency that the aircraft carrying the men had arrived on Saturday at 6am local time (04:00 GMT). Their current location is not known. In a statement, DHS said the eight men had been convicted of a range of crimes, including first-degree murder, robbery, drug trafficking and sexual assault. Their case had become a flashpoint in ongoing legal battles over the Trump administration's campaign of mass deportations, including removals to so-called 'third countries' where rights groups say deportees face safety risks and possible abuses. 'These third country deportations are wrong, period. And the United States should not be sending people to a literal war zone,' progressive Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal wrote on social media earlier this week, urging the deportations to be blocked. The eight men had been held in a converted shipping container in Djibouti since late May, when an earlier deportation flight to South Sudan was halted by the courts over due process concerns. The US Supreme Court has twice ruled that the Trump administration could deport them to countries outside of their homelands, issuing its latest decision on Thursday (PDF). That same night, the eight detainees had filed an appeal, arguing that their 'impermissibly punitive' deportation to South Sudan would violate the US Constitution, which prohibits 'cruel and unusual punishment'. But Judge Brian Murphy of Boston, whose rulings had previously halted efforts to begin deportations to the African country, ruled on Friday evening that the Supreme Court had tied his hands, clearing the way for the deportations to go ahead. On Saturday, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin hailed the removals as 'a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people'. The US State Department advises citizens not to travel to South Sudan due to 'crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict'. The United Nations has also warned that a political crisis embroiling the African country could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018. Last week, Blaine Bookey, legal director at the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, condemned the US's use of deportations to third countries. 'The administration's increased use of third country transfers flies in the face of due process rights, the United States' international legal obligations, and basic principles of human decency,' Bookey said in a statement.
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Migrants in US detention lose appeal against deportation to South Sudan
Eight migrants in United States custody have lost a last-ditch attempt to avoid deportation to South Sudan, a country facing ongoing criticism for human rights abuses. On Friday, Judge Brian Murphy of Boston denied the eleventh-hour appeal, which has been the subject of a flurry of legal activity throughout the day. The appeal argued that repeated efforts under President Donald Trump to deport the men to South Sudan was 'impermissibly punitive'. It pointed out that the US Constitution bars 'cruel and unusual punishment'. In the past, the US Department of State has accused South Sudan of 'extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, torture and cases of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment'. It advises no American citizen to travel there due to an ongoing armed conflict. But the US Supreme Court has twice ruled that the Trump administration could indeed deport the men to countries outside of their homelands. Its latest decision was issued on Thursday. The US Department of Justice indicated that the eight men were set to be flown to South Sudan by 7pm US Eastern Time (23:00 GMT) on Friday. They hailed from countries like Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan and Vietnam. The last-ditch appeal was filed on Thursday night, shortly after the Supreme Court rendered its decision. Initially, the case was assigned to US District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington, DC, who signalled he was sympathetic to the deportees' request. He briefly ordered the deportation to be paused until 4:30pm Eastern Time (20:30 GMT), but ultimately, he decided to transfer the case back to Murphy, the judge whose decisions helped precipitate the Supreme Court's rulings. Murphy had previously issued injunctions against the deportations to South Sudan, leading to successful appeals from the Trump administration. The eight men, meanwhile, had been held at a military base in Djibouti while the courts decided their fate. Before he transferred the case back to Murphy, however, Judge Moss said it was possible the deportees could prove their case that the Trump administration intended to subject them to abuse. 'It seems to me almost self-evident that the United States government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances in which their physical wellbeing is at risk simply either to punish them or send a signal to others,' Moss said during the hearing. Lawyers for the Trump administration, meanwhile, argued that the deportation's continued delay would strain relations with countries willing to accept migrants from other countries. Murphy, who denied Friday's request, had previously ruled in favour of the deportees, issuing an injunction against their removal to South Sudan and saying they had a right to contest the deportation based on fears for their safety. The Supreme Court first lifted the injunction on June 23 and clarified its ruling again on Thursday, giving a subtle rebuke to Judge Murphy. The Trump administration has been pushing for rapid removals as part of its campaign of mass deportation, one of President Trump's signature priorities. Opponents have accused the administration of steamrolling the human rights of undocumented people in order to achieve its aims, including the right to due process under the law. But the Trump administration has framed undocumented migration as an 'invasion' that constitutes a national security crisis, and it argued that its strong-armed efforts are needed to expel criminals. The eight migrants slated to be sent to South Sudan, it said, were 'barbaric, violent criminal illegal aliens'. It added that they had been found guilty of crimes, including first-degree murder, robbery and sexual assault. 'These sickos will be in South Sudan by Independence Day,' Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a news release on Thursday.
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
US and Colombia recall envoys as diplomatic rift deepens
The United States and Colombia have called home their respective top diplomats in an acceleration of worsening ties, against the backdrop of an alleged plot against Colombia's left-wing leader. Washington, DC went first, recalling its charge d'affaires John McNamara on Thursday, 'following baseless and reprehensible statements from the highest levels of the government of Colombia,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said, without giving specifics. In addition to McNamara's recall, Bruce said the United States 'is pursuing other measures to make clear our deep concern over the current state of our bilateral relationship', without further details. Within hours, Colombia's President Gustavo Petro announced he was calling home his top diplomat in Washington, DC, in response. Ambassador Daniel Garcia-Pena 'must come to inform us of the development of the bilateral agenda,' Petro wrote on X, such as tapping South America's 'great potential for clean energy' and the fight against 'drug lords and their international finances'. The diplomatic row came on the heels of the resignation of Colombia's foreign minister earlier on Thursday – the latest top-ranking official to exit Petro's government. 'In recent days, decisions have been made that I do not agree with and that, out of personal integrity and institutional respect, I cannot support,' Laura Sarabia, who was also Petro's former chief of staff, wrote on X. Deterioration of ties Colombia was until recently one of the US's closest partners in Latin America, with decades of right-wing rule, before bilateral relations sharply deteriorated. Prosecutors in the South American nation opened an investigation this week into an alleged plot to overthrow Petro with the help of Colombian and American politicians, following the publication by the Spanish daily El Pais of recordings implicating former Foreign Minister Alvaro Leyva. 'This is nothing more than a conspiracy with drug traffickers and apparently, the Colombian and American extreme right,' Petro said on Monday. During a speech in Bogota on Thursday, Petro said he did not think US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whom he had previously linked to the alleged overthrow attempt, was 'in the midst of a coup d'etat' against his government. 'I don't believe that a government that has Iran as its enemy and nuclear weapons pointed at it … is going to start fooling around with a coup d'etat' in Colombia, he said. In late January, the US briefly suspended consular services to retaliate for Petro's refusal to allow US military planes to return Colombian refugees and migrants to their homeland. Petro accused the US of treating them like criminals, placing them in shackles and handcuffs. The two countries issued threats and counter-threats of crippling trade tariffs of up to 50 percent. A backroom diplomatic deal involving the deployment of Colombian air force planes to collect the refugees and migrants averted a looming trade war at the eleventh hour. Al Jazeera's Alessandro Rampietti, reporting from Bogota, said the first crisis between the two countries over the deportation of migrants was resolved quickly in January. 'The current situation is obviously very worrisome as it is unclear what will happen in this case,' he said. 'But it shows that ties that were taken for granted might now be unravelling,' Rampietti added. Colombia's left-wing government also recently refused a US request to extradite two prominent rebel leaders wanted by Washington, DC, for alleged drug trafficking. Last month, Colombia was rattled by bombing attacks in Cali in the southwest of the country that killed seven people, and the attempted assassination of a conservative opposition senator and presidential hopeful, Miguel Uribe Turbay, at a campaign rally in Bogota. The eruption of violence raised fears of a return to the darker days of previous decades, of assassinations and bombings.
