UN summit celebrates ocean protections, but drops fossil fuels
Countries hoping for new financial pledges to assist with combating rising seas and overfishing were also left disappointed at the UN Ocean Conference in France.
More than 60 heads of state and government joined thousands of business leaders, scientists and environmental campaigners over five days in the southern city of Nice.
The United Nations says the world's oceans are facing an "emergency" and the Nice gathering was just the third -- and the largest yet -- dedicated entirely to the seas.
- Treaty tide -
Activists unanimously praised concrete progress toward ratifying a landmark pact to protect marine life in the 60 percent of oceans that lie beyond national waters.
"This week's ratifications of the high seas treaty mark a major milestone for ocean action," said Rebecca Hubbard from the High Seas Alliance.
Some 19 countries formally ratified the treaty at Nice, taking the overall tally to 50. Sixty nations are needed to enact the treaty.
France's special envoy for the oceans, Olivier Poivre d'Arvor, said the numbers would be ready in time for a formal ratification ceremony in September in New York.
The treaty should then take effect in January 2026, he added.
- Plastic push -
The conference sought to rally global action on marine protection as countries prepare to tussle over global rules for deep-sea mining in July and a plastics treaty in August.
More than 90 ministers issued a symbolic call in Nice for the hard-fought plastics treaty to contain limits on consumption and production of new plastics, something opposed by oil-producing nations.
- Elephant in the room -
The summit rallied a defence of science and rules-based oversight of common resources -- most notably the unknown depths of the oceans -- in a direct rebuke of US President Donald Trump.
Trump was not present in Nice and rarely mentioned by name but his spectre loomed large as leaders backed the global multilateralism he has spurned.
In particular, leaders condemned Trump's push to fast-track seabed mining, vowing to resist his unilateral efforts to exploit the ocean floor.
- Seabed row -
Leaders "made it unmistakably clear: deep-sea mining is one of the biggest threats facing our ocean, and the world is saying no," said Sofia Tsenikli from the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition.
French President Emmanuel Macron called it "madness" while Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva warned against a "predatory" race for critical minerals.
But a global alliance opposed to deep-sea mining, and spearheaded by France, only attracted four new members during the summit, taking the total to 37 nations.
Poivre d'Arvor said the alliance would flatly reject any call at a meeting of the International Seabed Authority next month to permit deep-sea exploration.
The authority, backed by the UN, has 169 member states.
- Overfishing -
Many nations took the opportunity to unveil plans to create vast new marine protected areas and restrict bottom trawling, which was recently captured in grisly detail in a new David Attenborough documentary.
Activists had wanted countries to go further, advocating for a total ban on the destructive fishing method that sees heavy nets dragged across the ocean floor.
- Missing millions -
Some 8.7 billion euros ($10 billion) was committed over the next five years by philanthropists and private investors for the sustainable development of ocean economies.
But pledges were less forthcoming from wealthy governments, with France announcing two million euros for climate adaptation in Pacific Island nations.
- Flat finish -
The summit will close later Friday with a joint political statement, negotiated over many months between nations, that critics slammed for omitting any reference to fossil fuels -- the key driver of ocean warming.
Laurence Tubiana, CEO at the European Climate Foundation, said Nice showed global cooperation was still possible "but let's not confuse signatures with solutions".
"No communique ever cooled a marine heatwave," she said.
Former US special climate envoy John Kerry, who was present in Nice, said in a statement that it was impossible to "protect the ocean without confronting the biggest root cause bringing it to the breaking point: the pollution from unabated fossil fuels pumped into the atmosphere".
By Nick Perry And Antoine Agasse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
Australia lifts trade barriers on US beef
CANBERRA - Australia said it would lift trade barriers on beef from the United States, removing a major point of friction between Canberra and the Trump administration. US President Donald Trump singled out Australia as he unveiled his "Liberation Day" tariffs in April, accusing the close ally of banning American meat while cashing in on exports to the United States. Australia's stringent biosecurity rules block imports of cattle slaughtered in the United States, but born in Canada or Mexico. Threatened with 10 percent tariffs on beef shipped to the United States, one of its largest red meat markets, Australia has now dropped these barriers. Agriculture minister Julie Collins said the United States had adopted new quality controls that soothed Australia's worries. "The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks," she said in a statement. "Australia stands for open and fair trade -- our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this." Australia suspended US beef imports in 2003 after an outbreak of mad cow disease, a fatal and infectious condition that slowly eats away at the nervous system of cattle. Most of these restrictions were lifted in 2019, although some barriers remained on cattle slaughtered in American abattoirs but born elsewhere. Trump said Australians were "wonderful people" but accused them of banning US beef while exporting billions of dollars worth of meat to America. "They don't take any of our beef," he complained in April. Almost five percent of all the beef eaten in America is Australian, and that largely goes into burgers. In the first three weeks of July, Australia shipped almost 25,000 tonnes of beef and veal to the United States, official figures show.
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
US legislators advance bill that could sanction SA over its foreign policy
US legislators have voted to advance a bill that proposes reviewing the US relationship with South Africa due to objections over its foreign policy and potentially imposing sanctions on South African officials. The US House foreign affairs committee voted 34-16 on Tuesday to send the US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act to the full House of Representatives, where it could be subject to a vote, according to a video of the proceedings. The measure would need to pass the House and the Senate before it could be signed into law. Many bills at this stage never go to a vote. However, the committee's approval took the bill a step further and underscored tensions between Washington and Pretoria as South Africa seeks to fend off a looming 30% US tariff and counter false claims of white 'genocide' made by President Donald Trump. South Africa's foreign ministry and a spokesperson for President Cyril Ramaphosa declined to comment. The bill was introduced in April by Ronny Jackson, a Republican congressman from Texas who cheered the move on X, writing: 'South Africa made its choice when they abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists.' The bill accuses South Africa of undermining US interests by maintaining close relationships with Russia and China, which are among its allies and trading partners. It also accuses South Africa of backing Palestinian militant group Hamas that is at war in Gaza with Israel, which South Africa has denied. South Africa has long been a supporter of the Palestinian cause and filed a case accusing Israel of genocide at the International Court of Justice in 2023, which is mentioned in the bill as one of its concerns. The bill proposes 'a full review of the bilateral relationship' and to 'identify South African government officials and ANC leaders eligible for the imposition of sanctions'. It says these would be people determined by Trump to have engaged in corruption or human rights abuses. No individuals are named. South Africa's relationship with the US has sharply deteriorated during Trump's second term, during which he has accused the government of anti-white racism and started a refugee programme for Afrikaners.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
How ANC hopes to stop Trump's sanctions
A US House Committee has passed a bill aimed at reassessing the United States' bilateral relationship with South Africa. Image: Armand Hough /Independent Newspapers THE ANC has expressed its intention to vigorously oppose the Trump administration's attempt to isolate it by imposing sanctions against the party after US lawmakers voted to advance a bill that proposes reviewing the relationship with South Africa. The US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 was now to be sent to the full House of Representatives, where parliamentarians will vote for it. However many bills at this stage never go to a vote, reports Reuters. The committee's approval took the bill a step further and underscored tensions between Washington and Pretoria as South Africa seeks to fend off a looming 30% U.S. tariff and counter President Donald Trump's false claims of white "genocide". The bill was introduced by US Congressman Ronny Jackson to punish ANC leaders for supporting America's enemies, such as China, Russia, and Iran. 'South Africa has brazenly abandoned its relationship with the United States to align with China, Russia, Iran, and terrorist organisations, a betrayal that demands serious consequences,' Daily Investor quoted Jackson. In the Bill, Jackson claims that the South African government's foreign policy actions have long ceased to reflect its stated stance of nonalignment, and now directly favour China, the Russian Federation, and Hamas, a known proxy of Iran, and thereby undermine US national security and foreign policy interests. Certain ANC leaders, who are predicted to be the target of the bill, have been accused of mismanaging South Africa's state resources, which led to the poor performance of state-owned entities such as Eskom, resulting in load shedding, and Transnet's failure to operate train transport. President Cyril Ramaphosa could be among the first leaders to be impacted by the sanctions for publicly accusing the Israeli government of committing genocide against residents of Gaza on October 14, 2023. The ANC is now pinning its hope on the Democrats, who opposed the apartheid government, to protect its leaders, including Ramaphosa. ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri said: 'There are many Democrats, including those who were part of the anti-apartheid movements, who will stand up to caution Americans against supporting a president (Trump) who wants to censor and undermine the sovereignty of other nations.' Bhengu-Motsiri said the ANC would vigorously oppose an attempt to isolate it from the rest of the nation by reimposing sanctions against it. 'Remember, we come from a history where sanctions were imposed against the apartheid system. 'But also the ANC was isolated by some of those countries that were working closely with the apartheid government, including the United States,' she said. Weighing on the matter, Good Party secretary general Brett Herron said that the passing of the Bill was another blow to the country's hopes to be able to undo punitive trade tariffs set for introduction by the US next week. 'The US and SA are sovereign nations led by politicians with a mandate from their citizens. The US is an important trading partner, with more than enough economic muscle to hurt South Africa - an important consideration. 'SA's options, in response, are to back down or double down on its values. Backing down would be a poor choice. The first move the President should make is to appoint a trusted ambassador skilled in diplomacy. As stated last week, a briefing from the SA President on developments in the relationship with the US is overdue.' Cape Times
