Former Premier League club could build 55,000-seater stadium as buyer says ‘we should be way bigger than Wrexham'
SHEFFIELD WEDNESDAY'S potential new owners have declared plans to become 'way bigger than Wrexham' with a new 55,000-seater stadium.
Florida property investor John Flanagan and Sheffield-born businessman Adam Shaw, also based in the USA, front a consortium looking to buy the Owls from current owner Dejphon Chansiri.
2
2
It's believed the group of 16 contains an ex- Premier League star, a major celebrity and several pro baseball stars – both past and present.
Talks are ongoing over a price for Wednesday, who finished 12th in the Championship this season and are struggling with finances after Chansiri stopped his investment.
The Thai businessman has already turned down an offer of £48million.
But a breakthrough could be close following fresh negotiations.
And Wednesday's prospective new owners have now given an insight into their plans for the club.
They declared that as the second-old pro club in English football, the Owls will be brought back to the top of the perch.
A new 55,000-seater stadium, to replace current 34,000-seater home Hillsborough, and an elite academy are part of the proposal to return Wednesday to the Premier League – which they helped found in 1992.
And after seeing Wrexham's success under Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney, Wednesday's hopeful proprietors insisted that the Owls should be 'way bigger' than the Welsh club.
Lifelong fan Shaw told The Athletic: 'Sheffield Wednesday are nowhere in America. We sell zero shirts and have no commercial presence there – that's got to change.
'With the World Cup in the US next year and with the individuals we have in our ownership group, we could easily become Florida's English football team.
'We should and can be way bigger than Wrexham. Ryan Reynolds would give his left leg to have what we already have at Wednesday in terms of our history and fanbase. Let's use that.'
As well as boosting Wednesday's academy, the consortium are also eyeing a brand new 55,000-seater stadium.
Shaw added: 'We wouldn't do anything without consulting the fans, but we think the club should have a home where people can park more easily and have up-to-date facilities.
'If we want to create a culture that ensures we become a sustainable, competitive and successful Premier League side, then we must be proactive. Premier League clubs are all upgrading their stadiums.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
'What's not to get excited about?' - your views on 'real deal' Nygren
We asked you for your views after Benjamin Nygren signed a five-year deal with what some of you said:Gordy: A good signing and hopefully just the start - we need cover all over the pitch. Centre back, right and left-back cover is essential and a goal-scoring centre forward, while holding onto to what we have, unless a massive offer comes in that will help buy other players. We need to show more ambition in the transfer market this season to be successful at home and in Nygren scored a hat-trick against Fenerbahce in Europe, and is obviously a very good What's not to get excited about? Another Scandinavian with a clear determination to advance his career and full of positivity. I've seen him play for Sweden and he has bags of energy and drive. Almost looks like he's a mini Daizen, but let's not burden the boy with too much The signing of Nygren could turn out to be a very shrewd piece of business. He appears to be a player on an upward path and with the guidance of Brendan Rodgers, we can hopefully continue his progression. If we can get two/three good seasons out of him then we could end up with a £30m+ asset. Either way it certainly looks like £1.5m well Nygren looks like the real deal. It's difficult to make one's mind up based on highlight reels, right enough. He is saying the right things in the media, regarding his winning mentality, his experience and what he thinks will be expected of him while wearing the hoops. I just hope he has the longevity to do it season after season, on a cold wet Wednesday night in the north east of Scotland!
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves must rethink how tax and spend decisions are made after welfare U-turn
There are many lessons for Labour's bruised leadership from last week's embarrassing U-turn on welfare cuts, but one is surely that how – and when – fiscal policy is set is not working. Binary fiscal rules, a slim margin for error (less than £10bn), and the Office for Budget Responsibility's twice-yearly forecasts, have combined to turn tax and spending decisions into a grim spectator sport. City analysts are constantly second-guessing exactly how Rachel Reeves's hand will be forced next. As the Bank of England governor, Andrew Bailey, put it last week, before the benefits climbdown, 'having the financial markets marking fiscal policy to market on a daily basis is not a good state of affairs'. The chancellor promised to hold only one budget a year, at which tax changes would be announced: a decision aimed at demonstrating stability and strength. However, the Treasury began signalling during the bond market panic in January that she was prepared to use her spring statement to make spending cuts, if higher interest costs set her on course to break her fiscal rules. Some wise heads argued at the time against the idea of hastily drawing up cuts, tailored to close whatever gap the OBR identified in five years' time – the period over which the rules are assessed. As the former Bank deputy governor Charlie Bean put it: 'I think we want to get away from this idea that we continually have to be neurotically changing taxes and spending to try to control this OBR forecast so that it's hitting our target.' In his understated way, Bailey effectively agreed with that this week, arguing: 'There is a danger in overinterpreting a five-year-ahead forecast.' They are right: one result is hasty policy changes driven by cost-cutting targets (although the Treasury lays part of the blame on the Department for Work and Pensions for, it claims, dragging its heels over the reform package). Another consequence is that the debate over economic policy ends up being reduced to a desiccated row over tax and spend. That is especially depressing, given that the contours of an economic strategy are starting to emerge more clearly, a year into Labour's term. The focus last week was meant to be the 'modern industrial strategy' – a hefty document that set out a new approach to nurturing eight strategic sectors, including clean tech, advanced manufacturing and the creative industries. There was much to praise – a senior figure at one business lobby group joked that they would struggle to know what to campaign on next, as so many of their long-running asks had been met. Unions were gratified at the focus on creating jobs and funding additional training – and the promise of workforce strategies for sectors experiencing skills shortages. The government's pragmatic trade strategy, also published last week, was another victim of the overwhelming focus on the welfare row. All this was lost in the Westminster drama of defending the cobbled-together cuts and then negotiating the concessions that already looked inevitable when Reeves insisted on Monday that there would be 'no U-turn'. Her team now have two unenviable tasks ahead of them. First, they will have to start work on a possible package of tax increases to announce in the autumn. As her aides are keen to point out, she could yet strike lucky: growth could bounce back; inflation could ease more rapidly than expected, freeing the Bank of England to crack on with rate cuts; and gilt yields could slide. Treasury officials will be pushing hard over the summer to try to convince the OBR to take into account the growth-friendly nature of some of the government's policies, perhaps nudging forecasts in the right direction. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion However, the majority of independent experts currently believe it is more likely than not that the OBR will downgrade its expectations of productivity – and therefore growth – setting Reeves on course to breach her fiscal rules, even without the £4bn-plus cost of the policy swerves on winter fuel and disability benefits. Reeves could ditch those fiscal rules, of course – but that would be sticking two fingers up at flighty financial markets. Tweaking the rules to allow herself more leeway seems less unthinkable, given how many times previous chancellors rewrote their own rules – but she would have to proceed with caution. While they deny that they are poring over a menu of potential tax rises (although they surely must be), Reeves's allies privately concede that they are thinking about how to avoid another debilitating annual cycle of fevered speculation about fiscal policy. Here they have a number of options, some of which were set out by the International Monetary Fund in its recent report on the UK economy. One is just to build up a bigger buffer against the fiscal forecasts, of course, to reduce the constant sense of jeopardy – but that would probably require an even bigger tax grab. Another would be to commission only one OBR forecast a year instead of two – dodging the spring iteration that prompted the scramble for welfare cuts. This possibility alarms the Treasury, with its echoes of Liz Truss, who saw the OBR as part of the 'anti-growth coalition' and paid the price in the bond markets. A sensible halfway house might be to continue to commission two forecasts but treat the spring one – given there is no budget alongside it – simply as a useful waymarker, for what the chancellor might have to consider in the autumn. Whatever emerges from this rethink, it must allow Reeves to be more flexible in the face of changing economic circumstances because the framework she so carefully constructed to project strength has instead trapped Labour into decisions that ultimately proved untenable.
Auto Express
40 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Electric car appeal is at its lowest since 2019
It's been a manic few weeks. And here's the proof: my A-Z of the final days of the first half of 2025… on planet car. Antonio Filosa wins the bravest in the business gong for taking on the CEO role at Stellantis. Good luck, Ant. You'll need it. BYD founder Wang Chuanfu is more relaxed as he plays with his Yangwang and Fangchengbao brands. China's Government warns car makers not to brutally undercut each other – I think they should. De Meo's decision to quit as Renault CEO is a tragedy. The industry can't afford to lose Luca – its best and most respected chief executive. Electric car appeal is at its lowest since 2019 – at least in the US. Ferrari delays plans for a second EV thanks to lack of demand. Goodwood has an unlikely new lap record holder – an eight-year-old pedal car driver. HS2 is an 'appalling mess, a litany of failure,' says the Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander. Ideas for the Dragons' Den for Motorists stage at August's British Motor Show are being sought. Perhaps you have one? Jaguar remains disabled at the halfway point of the year. I've never known the firm to be saying, producing and selling less. It desperately needs its new plan to work. Kia's EV9 GT is marred by its greedy £82,000 price tag. Leaf EV from Nissan (starting at £30k-£35k) shows appropriate pricing is possible. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Musk's response to accusations of taking ketamine? A drugs test – which showed negative results, the Tesla boss says. Norris of McLaren crashed his F1 car then did what public figures rarely, if ever, do: admit guilt before apologising. Lando's honesty is refreshing. OneHealth is Renault's new wellbeing scheme to give global employees access to physical and mental healthcare and should therefore be applauded. Power outages adversely affected me and many others last week – just as France's energy industry was signed up to keep the lights on and the EVs recharged in Britain this winter. Yikes! Is Qoros the latest Chinese car brand bound for Britain? Maybe. Renault 4 the best car buy of the year so far? I think so. Suzuki's e Vitara: from £29,999, including free finance, home charger and a 10-year warranty. Tunnelling at Kent's Lower Thames Crossing will cost £9 billion, says the Government – which pays just £590 million towards it. Eh? UN warning: autonomous cars could be a terrorist threat. VW's Polo wins the official Best Car of the Half Century ('75-'25) prompting a special edition. WOMAC's cancer charity run by motor industry women staged its annual fundraiser (I was honoured to attend) – but the wealthy car business should do more voluntary work like this. X (as in Aygo X) emerges as Europe's 'cleanest' non plug-in car. Yuki Tsunoda wins my vote as worst-dressed driver at the F1 The Movie world premiere. Zero per cent finance deals are the new norm. At least that's what you must tell the hard-nosed sales execs you're negotiating with in the showroom! Find a car with the experts New Volvo EX60 electric SUV: latest details and confirmed reveal date New Volvo EX60 electric SUV: latest details and confirmed reveal date The upcoming, all-electric Volvo XC60 alternative is designed to 'keep learning and evolve with time' New Skoda Epiq vRS to headline brand's hot-SUV onslaught New Skoda Epiq vRS to headline brand's hot-SUV onslaught Every future Skoda will get the go-faster treatment, with the brand also working on making cars sharper and more engaging Nissan Qashqai e-Power hybrid gets more efficient, powerful and eco-friendly for 2025 Nissan Qashqai e-Power hybrid gets more efficient, powerful and eco-friendly for 2025 The mid-size family SUV segment has just got a whole load tougher thanks to Nissan
