Trump's 'Deal' With China Leaves American Consumers and Exporters Facing Higher Tariffs Than Before
As part of the deal, the U.S. will temporarily lower tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent (which will be applied on top of other tariffs imposed by the first Trump administration). That may be enough to stave off the worst consequences of the tariffs and might unfreeze the flow of goods across the Pacific Ocean.
More broadly, however, the deal is a tidy illustration of how President Donald Trump has conducted his global trade war. With China, Trump hiked tariffs to astronomical levels while promising those taxes (which are paid by Americans) would unleash prosperity and create jobs. Then, the White House celebrated the agreement that reduced those tariffs as "the art of the deal." They are literally doing the meme.
But the "deal" means that imports from China will be subjected to significantly higher tariffs than when Trump took office. Those tariffs will continue to be a serious economic burden for American businesses and consumers, and the threat of even higher tariffs remains—because the "deal" only pauses those tariffs for 90 days, and because Trump's mercurial nature means no one can really be sure what is coming next.
"A pause is not a solution. It's a stay of execution for small businesses that still don't know future product costs, and in many cases have taken steps that can't be undone," wrote Dan Anthony, president of the Trade Partnership Worldwide, an international economic think tank.
Steve Lamar, president of the American Apparel and Footwear Association, called the 90-day pause "welcome" because it may thaw what had effectively become a trade embargo between the two countries.
However, the remaining 30 percent tariff, which is stacked on top of preexisting tariffs from Trump's first term, "will still make for an expensive back to school and holiday season for most Americans," Lamar said in a statement. "If freight rates spike due to the tariff-induced shipping disruptions—which will take months to unwind—we could see costs and prices creep up even further."
The Penn Wharton Budget Model's tariff simulator estimates that the remaining 30 percent tariff on all imports from China would be a $639 billion tax increase over 10 years.
Meanwhile, American exports to China will also face higher tariffs in the wake of this "deal" than they did in the pre-Trump status quo. The 10 percent tariff that China will continue charging on American imports will be one of the highest tariffs in the world for American goods entering foreign countries, notes Bryan Riley, director of the National Taxpayers Union's Free Trade Initiative.
That's despite the White House repeatedly claiming that Trump's trade war is intended to lower barriers to American exports. By their own metric, this deal fails.
Any de-escalation of what could be a catastrophic trade war between the world's two biggest economies is an encouraging sign, but both America and China are still worse off than they were a few months ago. Trump has used constitutionally dubious economic powers to raise and then lower tariffs, creating huge costs and even greater uncertainty.
Rather than praising the president for backing down from an insane position, as the White House believes Americans should do, the proper response to Trump's latest tariff maneuvers is the same as it has always been: Congress must take away his tariff powers.
The post Trump's 'Deal' With China Leaves American Consumers and Exporters Facing Higher Tariffs Than Before appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
HSBC profits slide 26% as tariff uncertainty puts brakes on investment
HSBC has cautioned over the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs with policy uncertainty prompting businesses to 'pause' investment plans, as the banking giant revealed sliding profits. The group also revealed that it was about halfway through its efforts to save 1.5 billion US dollars' (£1.1 billion) worth of yearly costs. It reported a pre-tax profit of 15.8 billion US dollars (£11.8 billion) for the first six months of 2025 – about 26% lower than the same period a year ago. The decline was driven by a 2.1 billion US dollar (£1.6 billion) charge to cover losses related to its stake in the Chinese Bank of Communications, as well as costs linked to exiting its businesses in Canada and Argentina. HSBC said the impact of higher tariffs would be 'relatively modest' on its revenues – but that the 'broader macroeconomic deterioration' could mean it misses some financial targets. It also cautioned that demand for lending is expected to remain 'muted' during 2025 amid the more uncertain global trade environment. Georges Elhedery, HSBC's chief executive, explained that some of its customers had 'paused a lot of their investments during this uncertainty – many of them pause, or are in 'wait and see' mode to see where we will land. 'So there are expectations that some of this pause of investments may resume once the uncertainty clears out. 'It will be ambitious to believe things will move on very immediately in H2 (the second half of 2025), but we continue to believe that in the course of the next few years, that growth will resume.' He added that the bank was 'encouraged' by recent trade agreements, with the UK striking deals with the US, the EU, and India. Meanwhile, Mr Elhedery has spearheaded an overhaul of the banking giant's structure, hoping to make it simpler and less costly to run. On Tuesday, HSBC said it had made 700 million US dollars' (£524 million) worth of cost savings – nearly half the 1.5 billion dollars (£1.1 billion) in annual savings it is targeting by 2027. Cost-cutting has seen the bank cut senior jobs across the business, focusing on 'de-duplication' – meaning stripping out roles that are deemed to have very similar responsibilities to others. Mr Elhedery said the savings target includes 'around 8% of our payroll expenses'. He added that the bank was not specifying how many roles it planned to cut, but said the focus on reducing duplication at senior level meant it expects 'headcount reduction to be less than the 8% overall payroll reduction' it was targeting. Mr Elhedery added: 'We're making positive progress in becoming a simple, more agile, focused organisation built on our core strengths. 'We continue to navigate this period of economic uncertainty and market volatility from a position of strength, putting the changing needs of our customers at the heart of everything we do.' HSBC shares fell by more than 4% on Wednesday morning.
Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
China Buys Up Property in America's Hottest Housing Market
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The New Hampshire city at the center of a recent controversy surrounding a Chinese company's local real estate purchase, Nashua, has been named the hottest housing market in the country. The metropolitan area of Manchester-Nashua, which includes the two New Hampshire cities, offers the best combination of good quality of life and projected home appreciation in the nation, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal and Why These Markets Are So Hot Manchester and Nashua are comfortably close to Boston, offering residents an easy commute to the big city if needed and much lower home prices compared to their big urban neighbor. But that is only one of the reasons these cities are so sought after by homebuyers, to the point that they are willing to face fierce competition on the market. Manchester and Nashua have a very stable economic profile, which means that an expensive home would still be a good investment even a few years down the line. They have excellent schools, jobs are plentiful in many sectors, and there are a lot of outdoor activities for summer and winter. These factors are enough to make sure that buyers are not completely thrown off by ever-rising home prices. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Canva In June, the latest data available on the median listing home price in Nasha was $525,000, up 8.3 percent from a year earlier. In Manchester, it was $428,400, up 7.1 percent year-over-year. While the rest of the country is slowly shifting in favor of buyers, with Florida and Texas already solidly into this territory, Manchester and Nashua remain strong sellers' markets. In Nashua, homes sold for 1.52 percent above asking price, on average, last month. In Manchester, they sold for 2.27 percent above asking price. Why You Might Have Heard of Nashua While Nashua is the second-largest city in northern New England, it is not often that it makes headlines in national media. Yet the city has recently been under the spotlight for a deal involving a billionaire Chinese businessman and his company, which quietly bought a commercial building in Nashua near the Pennichuck Water Works system. Nongfu Spring, China's largest beverage company, bought a 23-acre parcel in Nashua for $67 million, next to the New Hampshire watershed area that supplies drinking water to the city. Pennichuck said that it will supply water to the Chinese development as well. The main street bridge over the Nashua River in Nashua, New Hampshire. Inset: Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring mineral water, in May 2013. The main street bridge over the Nashua River in Nashua, New Hampshire. Inset: Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring mineral water, in May 2013. Getty Images The sale has raised questions over national security and the future of Nashua's water resources, as the Chinese company sets up operations in the city. According to LinkedIn posts, Nongfu Springs has been hiring for positions in Nashua in the past few months. The company, set up in the 1990s in China, has helped make owner Zhong Shanshan the richest man in the country, with a net worth of about $65 billion. While Zhong has recently come under fire in China for not being loyal enough to his country after criticizing Beijing for failing to control pricing on online platforms, New Hampshire lawmakers worry that his new Nashua plant stands too close to sensitive military locations in the state. "We always need to be extra careful about all potential sales of critical infrastructure such as our water supply. There has been a lot of concern throughout the Nashua community that this sale is being rushed through without proper scrutiny being paid to the buyer," Republican state Senator Kevin Avard, a vocal critic of the deal, told Newsweek. "I fully understand that sentiment and have been vocal about slowing down the process to make sure that we aren't putting the safety of our community needlessly in jeopardy. These concerns were so strong and so loud that Nongfu was forced to modify its original plan to purchase the water rights and focus solely on the water bottling plant," he said. For Avard, "it is an undisputed fact that there are agents of the Chinese Communist government attempting to commit acts of espionage throughout our nation." "We even had spokesmen for the military testify in front of the Senate this year about the potential threats to the Space Force base just down the road in New Boston. This is something we need to take seriously, and when a large multinational company Nongfu attempts to make such a major purchase in our state, we need to make sure that we have all of the facts," he added. This year, the New Hampshire legislature passed a provision in HB 2—then signed by Republican Governor Kelly Ayotte—that prohibits agents of hostile foreign nations such as Iran, China and Syria from purchasing land in New Hampshire. "Unfortunately, this bill was not in effect in time for this sale. I do believe that much can, and should, be done in the upcoming year to bring more transparency to the influence that hostile nations, like China, have in our state," Avard said. In a statement issued on Friday, Nashua Mayor James Donchess said that the city was "neither involved in nor informed of the sales and acquisitions of any private properties in the city, and it has no input on the purchase prices of any private properties. "The City of Nashua only became aware of this potential project when Nongfu Spring submitted a construction permit application, which they withdrew at the end of May."
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
Chicago comedians deny Stephen Colbert cancellation will lead to fewer Trump jokes
Chicago comedians argued on Tuesday that the cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' will lead to more jokes about President Donald Trump, not fewer, in contrast with liberal critics' concerns. After CBS announced the left-leaning comedian's show being canceled weeks earlier, several people ranging from commentators to lawmakers called out the move as authoritarian, suggesting CBS bent the knee to Trump after recently settling a lawsuit. Though some believed that this could lead to either more censorship or political capitulation, comedians from the windy city, where Colbert had trained in comedy, largely believed the opposite. 'That would go for whoever is the president,' late night host Mark Bazer told the Chicago Sun-Times. 'That's the gig. My guess is there's very few comedians or late-night talk show hosts who are going to bend the knee.' Bazer added that Colbert can now 'take the gloves off' regarding his jokes against Trump without the pressure of maintaining his show. 'We've all seen late-night talk shows over the years. It's a tradition to make fun of whoever's in power, like, that's what the job entails,' Bazer said. Local comic James Dugan, who frequently performs for the Chicago improv show Whirled News Tonight, told the Chicago Sun-Times that his team largely pulls jokes from the headlines, which have heavily featured Trump recently. 3 CBS cancelled 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.' CBS via Getty Images 3 Colbert has not shied away from making jokes about President Trump after CBS announced the end of his show. AP In fact, he described concerns about an oversaturation of Trump jokes. 'A lot of times with our show in particular, we get four or five newspapers and spread them out,' Dugan said. 'And there is a little bit of a sense of like, should we take out the Trump stuff? Because people are kind of sick of hearing about it.' However, some comedians are still worried about what Colbert's cancellation could mean for comedy on a larger scale. 'The fact that a sitting public official is doing so much private litigation, and that it results in this type of thing — it's dangerous,' stand-up comic Eunji Kim told the Chicago Sun-Times. 3 The show's cancellation was due to financial reasons, according to CBS and Paramount. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post Despite the timing of the announcement, CBS and its parent company, Paramount, have said that the cancellation was a financial decision, not a political one. Insider sources have also said that the decision was made days before Paramount's settlement with Trump. Colbert himself has not shied away from attacking Trump in the weeks after his show's cancellation. Last week, he told Trump to 'go f–k yourself' after the latter celebrated the end of 'The Late Show.'
