US placed on rights watchlist over health of its civil society under Trump
On Wednesday, a new report released by the non-profit Civicus placed the US on its watchlist following 'sustained attacks on civic freedoms' across the country, according to the group.
Civicus pointed to three major issues including the deployment of military to quell protests, growing restrictions placed on journalists and civil society, as well as the aggressive targeting of anti-war advocates surrounding Palestine.
At Civicus, countries are assigned a rating over their civic space conditions. The ratings include 'open', 'narrowed', 'obstructed', 'repressed' and 'closed'. The group has declared the US's civic space as 'narrowed'.
According to the group, the 'narrowed' rating is for countries that still allow individuals and civil society organizations to exercise their rights to freedom of association, peaceful assembly and expression but where violations of these rights still take place.
'People can form associations to pursue a wide range of interests, but full enjoyment of this right is impeded by occasional harassment, arrest or assault of people deemed critical of those in power,' the rating description says, adding: 'Protests are conducted peacefully, although authorities sometimes deny permission, citing security concerns, and excessive force, which may include tear gas and rubber bullets, are sometimes used against peaceful demonstrators.'
With regard to the media, countries with a 'narrowed' rating allow media to 'disseminate a wide range of information, although the state undermines complete press freedom either through strict regulation or by exerting political pressure on media owners'.
Related: In Donald Trump, the morality of civil society has been abandoned
'The United States appears to be sliding deeper into the quicksands of authoritarianism. Peaceful protests are confronted with military force, critics are treated as criminals, journalists are targeted, and support for civil society and international cooperation have been cut back,' Mandeep Tiwana, Civicus's secretary general, said in a statement.
'Six months into Donald Trump's second term, a bizarre assault on fundamental freedoms and constitutional safeguards has become the new normal,' he added.
Pointing to Trump's deployment of marines and national guard troops to California in June in response to the widespread protests against immigration raids, Tiwana said: 'This level of militarisation sets a dangerous precedent. It's a line that democratically elected leaders aren't meant to cross.'
Tiwana also pointed to the Trump administration's latest attacks against media networks, including funding restrictions on public broadcast stations including PBS and NPR.
'What they're trying to do is actually defund critical news sources and deny American people the ability to receive truthful non-partisan reporting by pulling their funding,' Tiwana told the Guardian.
In its report, Civicus also warned of the growing criminalisation of peaceful advocacy, adding that 'authorities have continued reprisals against activists expressing solidarity with Palestinian rights.'
Citing the Trump administration's clampdown on foreign-born student activists including Mahmoud Khalil, Mohsen Mahdawi and Rümeysa Öztürk, as well as the sanctioning of Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, Tiwana said: 'We are seeing a wide-ranging attack on civic space in the US by the federal and some state governments. Authorities in the US should reverse course from the present undemocratic path by guaranteeing everyone's first amendment right to organise and dissent legitimately.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The former New Jersey governor said Trump just wanted 'someone to blame' for poor job numbers.
Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie ripped President Donald Trump as a 'petulant child' on Sunday for his dramatic firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Christie said Trump just needed 'someone to blame because he won't take the responsibility himself' about the July jobs report, where the bureau reported the U.S. had only added a paltry 73,000 new jobs. The bureau also sharply revised down the May and June jobs reports, prompting Trump to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer and accuse her of having 'RIGGED' the report to make him look bad. 'This is the action of a petulant child,' Christie said on ABC's This Week. "Like, 'You give me bad news, I fire the messenger.'"
Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Revision Economy And The Retraction Life
Last Friday, we learned we are less employed than we thought we were. A quarter million jobs vanished, yet no one new was fired and no one new quit. Those jobs never existed in the first place. Only our estimate of the truth changed, not the truth itself. This was definitely a large revision. The two-month downward revision in jobs hadn't been this negative since Covid, and before that, the global financial crisis in October 2008. Before that, it hadn't happened in decades, with only a handful of occurrences in 1979, 1980, and 1982. In response, the US equity market fell between one and two percent and Treasury bond yields collapsed, especially in the front-end, as the market began pricing in a substantially higher expectation of Fed rate cuts. President Trump ordered the firing of the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), citing 'a lengthy history of inaccuracies and incompetence.' Should he have? Revision History Usually, revisions are frequent and fairly modest. The monthly nonfarm payroll report is always revised twice, so there are three numbers: the preliminary estimate, the first revision the following month, and the second revision in the month following that. There are also annual revisions. The average magnitude of the revisions since 1979 are between 40,000 and 60,000 jobs. Sometimes we find out we are more employed than we thought we were, and sometimes less. On Friday, the May 2025 seasonally adjusted estimate was revised down 120,000 jobs from its first estimate and the June 2025 estimate was revised down 133,000 jobs. Each of those was historically extreme, worse than 95% of relevant monthly revisions since 1979. The two-month combination was basically a once-in-a-decade event, as the chart above shows. Big numbers. But ultimately, they are just one source of data. Jobs numbers help us think about the economy, but they are just one piece of the puzzle. What makes job numbers particularly useful is they may be forward-looking: rather than estimating historical consumer purchases, job creation can presage future spending. That's why revisions could matter too. You drive differently if you think your exit is three miles away than if you think it's a quarter mile away. But we can't live our lives in the past, constantly revising what we used to think about ancient history. So, when should a revision of the past change your perspective of the future? Estimates vs. Reality Surely, it should have some effect. One famous quote attributed to John Maynard Keynes summarizes this view: 'When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?' Of course, not all facts matter the same amount or at the same time. Yesterday's future is tomorrow's past. Eventually, other data should matter more than the jobs numbers. If the BLS announced an inadvertent and unnoticed typo in a jobs number from eight years ago, that should presumably have almost no effect on your views today, since so much additional data has already come in, about spending, saving, production, consumption, inflation, and more. In other words, those quarter million jobs either existed or not. Estimates and revisions won't change what actually happened. Even knowing the exact true number is only a proxy for the actual information you would be interested in, and as time has gone on, other data has come out that can be more valuable and important than a more accurate but more historically distant estimate. There is a devastating counterpoint, however, as anyone who has ever been in any kind of personal or professional relationship would know. If a piece of information about the ancient past can change or color your perception of the entire relationship, then almost no amount of time can reduce that emotional impact. In any fight with a loved one, the biggest pain isn't whatever action they did or did not do, or your best estimate of their action, or even the revisions of your best estimates of their actions: it's the possibility that they never loved you at all. Was it all a lie? President Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner may be controversial. But both the administration and its critics worry about the same thing: data ought to be as accurate and objective as possible. This issue is a lot like reading the news. The loud front pages say one thing, usually preliminary news. Later retractions or corrections are quiet and unnoticed. As a society, we can begin to split and live in two different worlds: those that did not know the truth and did not see the retraction, and those that knew the truth or saw the retraction. Therefore, we no longer even have the same facts. Some of us begin to live in the hallucinated, unrevised, unretracted world, a world much like the Mandela effect, where we swear we remember things that in fact never happened. Trust is a fragile thing. A good-faith revision here or a revision there can be fine. But if you notice a consistent bias or pattern in the revisions and retractions, if the errors are rarely in your favor, you may stop subscribing to that source of news or data. If you are in a relationship, you may look to end or fix it. If you are the President of the United States, you may seek a new commissioner. The primary challenge in all these cases is then the same: restore the trust. In the revision economy and the retraction life, beliefs can bend, but faith can snap.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canadian Trade Envoy Still Sees Chance to Ease Trump's Tariffs
(Bloomberg) -- Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump are expected to talk 'over the next number of days,' a Canadian official said, after the two governments failed to reach a deal before an Aug. 1 tariff deadline. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance 'We think there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down some of these tariffs and provide greater certainty to investment,' Dominic LeBlanc, Canada's minister in charge of US trade, said on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday. LeBlanc also said he plans to speak with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The Trump administration on Friday raised the tariff rate on some Canadian imports to 35% from 25% imposed in early March, while maintaining an exemption for goods traded under the rules of the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. The effective US tariff rate on Canadian products is estimated to rise slightly to between 6% and 7%, from about 5%. Carney and his government have described the talks with the US as difficult. LeBlanc on Sunday said talks have been 'informative, constructive and cordial,' and reiterated mutual benefits for both economies from reaching a deal. 'What we've said to our American counterparts is how can we structure the right agreement where we can both continue to supply one another in a reliable, cost-effective way that preserves jobs essential to the American economy and in Canada as well,' he said. The minister touted his government's One Canadian Economy Act as a Canadian version of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, the tax-cut and spending plan the president signed in July. Leblanc said the Canadian law seeks to ramp up investment in ports, pipelines and mines, 'all of which offer huge opportunities to American business.' How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio
