logo
‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

New York Post6 hours ago

Former Vice President Kamala Harris' prospective gubernatorial bid is not striking up much excitement among Democratic fundraisers in California, Politico reported Friday.
The outlet spoke to multiple Democratic Party donors in California to see how they felt about Harris possibly running for governor. So far, her interest in exploring a gubernatorial run in the state following her 2024 presidential election loss hasn't enthused many.
Advertisement
'She still would probably lead, but honestly, no one is incredibly pumped,' one Southern California fundraiser told Politico.
Harris, who lost November's election to President Donald Trump, is seriously considering a 2026 bid to succeed term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif. A source close to Harris told Fox News Digital in March that she has told allies she will decide by the end of summer on whether to launch a gubernatorial campaign.
The two potential options for Harris are launching a gubernatorial run next year in her home state or seeking the presidency again in 2028. Extremely early polls in the next Democratic Party presidential nomination race — which are heavily reliant on name recognition at this point — indicate that the former vice president holds a significant lead over other potential White House contenders.
3
AP
Advertisement
'In interviews, several major donors in the state told POLITICO they fear her reemergence as a candidate would re-open still-fresh wounds from her defeat in 2024,' the outlet reported. 'Some harbor lingering frustration about how her billion-dollar campaign juggernaut ended in debt and want assurances she would have a clear plan to win the governor's mansion.'
Mather Martin, a party fundraiser from San Francisco who worked for multiple Harris campaigns, told Politico, 'There was more enthusiasm at first' for Harris' run. However, he added, 'I think it waned a bit.'
Another donor who gave a six-figure donation to Harris' presidential campaign last year told the outlet they had found the implosion of her White House bid 'traumatizing' and seemed reluctant to support her in the state.
3
REUTERS
Advertisement
'Kamala just reminds you we are in this complete s— storm. With Biden, we got bamboozled… I think she did the best she could in that situation, but obviously she knew about the cognitive decline too. I've written so many checks because I knew the Trump administration would be horrible, but we're living in a nightmare because of the Democrats. I'm furious at them, truly.'
The donor who declared that 'no one is incredibly pumped' about Harris' run also shared that donors 'realize it's just going to bring up the whole pathetic last presidential, which no one wants to hear about again. And then it's the whole 'Did you know Joe Biden?' thing.'
Scott Drexel, a donor-adviser based in the San Francisco Bay Area, noted, 'It's very fair to say there's not an overwhelming clamor' for Harris' gubernatorial run.
3
Gado via Getty Images
Advertisement
He also pointed out, 'It's very hard for there to be one if it's not 100 percent clear if she really wants to do it.'
'She's going to have to work for the nomination. Every day that passes, there's less of a sense of inevitability about her candidacy,' Drexel said.
Democratic donor and San Francisco trial lawyer Joe Cotchett told Politico, 'She is talking to people around the state about whether she is going to run. If she does, she's going to have very difficult problems.'
Harris' team did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stefanik fires back at ‘worst governor in America' after Hochul jabs on Medicaid cuts
Stefanik fires back at ‘worst governor in America' after Hochul jabs on Medicaid cuts

New York Post

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Stefanik fires back at ‘worst governor in America' after Hochul jabs on Medicaid cuts

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., a key Trump ally who is rumored to be planning a gubernatorial run in 2026, hit back hard against New York Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul, calling her the 'worst governor in America' after the Democrat dinged her over Medicaid cuts. In a Friday post on social media, Hochul accused Stefanik of voting 'to put five hospitals in her district on the chopping block, endangering her own constituents' lives, health, and jobs—all to serve Donald Trump.' 'I won't stand for it. I'm fighting like hell to save New Yorkers' health care,' said Hochul. In response, Stefanik posted on X, 'Hi @KathyHochul! Welcome to the fight.' 'You didn't get exposed enough during our last round when you testified and were totally exposed for your dangerous and failed sanctuary state policies ?? Let's do Medicaid now,' she wrote. Stefanik slammed Hochul for giving Medicaid benefits to illegal immigrants, 'putting New Yorkers most vulnerable LAST.' 3 Rep. Elise Stefanik is rumored to be planning a gubernatorial run in 2026 and called out Gov. Kathy Hochul as the 'worst governor in America.' FOX News 'NY's Medicaid program is rampant with tens of billions of waste, fraud, and abuse under Kathy's watch,' she wrote. 'Kathy Hochul, the Worst Governor in America oversees the worst run Medicaid program in the country harming NYers. Medicaid is an incredibly important program that I have worked to strengthen for New Yorkers.' 3 On X, Stefanik said, 'Hi @KathyHochul! Welcome to the fight.' FOX News The New York congresswoman then added, 'Oh and Kathy, your numbers in rural NY are plummeting' and 'I have been nationally recognized as the TOP advocate to deliver results for rural hospitals due to my work for hospitals in my district.' In another post, Stefanik said, 'Oh Kathy. I'm glad I set your schedule these days – from setting your Tweet schedule by forcing you to tweet on the Communist Mayor who just won in your Democrat Party in NYC. To you now scrambling to go to Saranac Lake because of news articles. When I have an announcement to make, believe me you'll know.' This comes after Stefanik pressured Hochul to say whether she supported the new Democratic nominee for New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani, who has made controversial statements criticizing Israel and promoting Palestine and who identifies as a Democratic Socialist. 3 Stefanik called out Hochul on social media for closing hospitals in her district, while she also criticized her policy of giving illegal immigrants Medicaid benefits. Christopher Sadowski Hochul has since said she plans to meet with Mamdani to discuss his ideas for the city but has not yet issued a full endorsement. Stefanik has said that as the leader of the New York Democratic Party, Hochul 'fully embraced the antisemitic, Communist nominee,' adding, 'she owns this catastrophe.' Earlier this month, Stefanik told a Republican crowd in Staten Island she was 'strongly considering' entering the race for governor. She unveiled a new state political action committee, Save New York, which appears aimed at further cementing her status as a heavyweight in Empire State GOP politics. Fox News Digital's Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report.

Nebraska Republican Don Bacon will not seek re-election to Congress
Nebraska Republican Don Bacon will not seek re-election to Congress

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Nebraska Republican Don Bacon will not seek re-election to Congress

WASHINGTON — Rep. Don Bacon, a centrist Republican who represents a key battleground district in Nebraska, is planning to announce his retirement from Congress, according to two sources familiar with the situation. He is expected to make a formal announcement as soon as next week, when the House is poised to vote on President Donald Trump's sweeping legislation dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Bacon did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday night. Follow here for live politics coverage. NOTUS and Punchbowl News first reported his retirement plans. Bacon has represented the state's 2nd Congressional District, which includes much of the Omaha metropolitan area, since 2017 when he defeated his Democratic opponent by less than 5,000 votes. Since then, Bacon has kept the seat in the GOP column but only narrowly emerged victorious in recent elections, including last year, when he won by less than 2 percentage points. Bacon's departure will provide Democrats an opportunity to pick up a seat in a district that has shown an appetite for supporting Democratic candidates on the ballot in recent elections. Then-Vice President Kamala Harris carried the district by nearly 5 percentage points in 2024 — making Bacon one of just three House Republicans to serve in a district Harris won. Joe Biden won Bacon's district by an even larger margin in 2020. Bacon has been among the few vocal Republican critics of Trump's agenda, sparring with the president at times over his use of tariffs and decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico, and accusing him of treating Russia with 'velvet gloves.' With his announcement, Bacon will join nearly half a dozen Republicans in the House who have opted against seeking re-election next year. Nine House Democrats also are not seeking re-election to their seats. This article was originally published on

Newsom sues Fox News for defamation over story about phone call with Trump
Newsom sues Fox News for defamation over story about phone call with Trump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom sues Fox News for defamation over story about phone call with Trump

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is suing Fox News for defamation, alleging that the news outlet intentionally manipulated its coverage to give the appearance that the governor lied about a phone call with President Trump. The governor's demand for $787 million in punitive damages escalates his aggressive effort to challenge misinformation. The lawsuit, announced Friday, places Newsom at the forefront of the political proxy war between Democrats and Republicans over the press by calling out an outlet that many in his party despise. "By disregarding basic journalistic ethics in favor of malicious propaganda, Fox continues to play a major role in the further erosion of the bedrock principles of informed representative government," the suit states. "Setting the record straight and confronting Fox's dishonest practices are critical to protecting democracy from being overrun by disinformation and lies." Newsom, a potential presidential candidate, said he decided to sue in part because Fox failed to change after admitting in a legal settlement two years ago to spreading falsehoods about the 2020 presidential election. In response to Newsom's lawsuit, Fox criticized the California governor, accusing him of undercutting the 1st Amendment. "Gov. Newsom's transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him. We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed,' Fox News said in a statement Friday morning. The case stems from comments Trump made about a phone call with Newsom as tensions heated up between the two leaders over immigration raids and the president's decision to deploy the National Guard to the streets of Los Angeles. Trump told reporters on June 10 that he spoke with Newsom 'a day ago.' 'Called him up to tell him, got to do a better job, he's doing a bad job,' Trump said. 'Causing a lot of death and a lot of potential death.' Newsom immediately rejected Trump's timeline on social media. The governor had already spoken publicly about talking to Trump on the phone late in the night on June 6 in California, which was early June 7 for Trump on the East Coast. Newsom said the National Guard was never discussed during that call. They didn't talk again, he said. 'There was no call,' Newsom posted on X. 'Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' Newsom's lawyers allege in the complaint that by making the call seem more recent, Trump could suggest they discussed the deployment of troops to Los Angeles, which they had not. Read more: L.A. immigration raids force the undocumented to trade their freedom for safety Trump attempted to fire back at Newsom through Fox and shared a screenshot of his call log with anchor John Roberts. The log showed that a phone call occurred on June 7 and provided no evidence of a call on June 9 as Trump claimed. "It is impossible to know for certain whether President Trump's distortion was intentionally deceptive or merely a result of his poor cognitive state, but Fox's decision to cover up for the President's false statement cannot be so easily dismissed," the complaint states. Newsom's legal team said Roberts initially misrepresented the situation to viewers "to obscure President Trump's false statement of fact." Then during an evening broadcast on June 10, Fox News host Jesse Watters showed a video of Trump's comments about the phone call but omitted the president saying that it happened 'a day ago.' The edit made it appear that Newsom alleged the two never spoke at all. 'Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him? Why would he do that?' Watters then asked. A banner at the bottom of the screen during the segment claimed "Gavin lied about Trump's call." Newsom's lawyers said Fox "willfully distorted the facts" and defamed Newsom to tens of millions of people. "Fox advanced this lie about Governor Newsom out of a desire to harm him politically," the complaint states. Newsom is particularly attuned to his critics on Fox, a conservative-leaning television network that he describes as the epicenter of a right-wing media ecosystem that misleads the public to benefit Trump and his allies. Similar to reports of Trump watching CNN, the governor regularly follows Fox political coverage. He pays close attention to the outlet's assessment of his leadership. Fox commentators and opinion hosts, such as Watters, are given a wide berth to express their views, even when they contradict the reporting of its nonpartisan correspondents. They aggressively defend Trump and his policies, while often casting California as a failed state with incompetent leadership. But Newsom has also benefited from Fox and used his appearances on the network to brandish his image as a brawler for Democrats and his standing as a potential future presidential candidate. Fox hosted a much talked about debate between Newsom and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2023. The California governor also participated in a sit-down interview with Sean Hannity, which drew praise from within and outside of his party. Read more: 'You gonna let him die?' Agents pile on protester, who convulses and struggles to breathe During a talk on the social media website Substack on Friday, Newsom said he started going on Fox to disrupt propaganda and the network's narrative about Democrats. "I have a high threshold for the bulls— on Fox, is the point," Newsom said. "I wouldn't do this unless I felt they really did cross the line." The amount of the governor's request for damages was a subtle dig at the outlet. Fox agreed two years ago to pay Dominion Voting Systems $787 million to drop a lawsuit related to the network's false claims that voting machines were manipulated to help President Biden win the 2020 election. The news organization settled the case rather than put its executives and on-air talent on the witness stand in a high-profile trial. Fox faces a similar lawsuit from Smartmatic, a Boca Raton, Fla.-based voting machine company that claims its business had been hurt because of the network's reporting. The news outlet has maintained that reporting on Trump's fraud claims was newsworthy and protected by the 1st Amendment. Barring a settlement, the case could go to trial next year. In a letter to Fox, Newsom's lawyers said they will voluntarily dismiss the governor's suit if the outlet retracts its claims that he lied about speaking to Trump. 'We expect that you will give the same airtime in retracting these falsehoods as you spent presenting and amplifying them,' his lawyers stated. 'Further, Mr. Watters and Fox News must issue a formal on-air apology for the lie you have spread about Governor Newsom.' The governor said any damages he might receive from the lawsuit, punitive or otherwise, would go to charity. Times staff writer Stephen Battaglio contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store