$18.6 million from SG Eco Fund disbursed to over 350 sustainability projects since 2020
$18.6 million from SG Eco Fund disbursed to over 350 sustainability projects since 2020
SINGAPORE - Over 350 individuals, groups and organisations received funding worth $18.6 million for their ground-up initiatives to promote sustainability in Singapore over the last five years.
Giving an update on the SG Eco Fund, a $50 million grant launched in November 2020, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Ms Grace Fu said the fund has since engaged over 700,000 people on sustainability-related efforts.
The initiatives span areas like waste reduction, community growing of food, conservation of nature and sustainability education.
Speaking at an event held at Vidacity to mark SG Eco Fund's fifth anniversary, Ms Fu said that climate action does not solely depend on government policies, but also the everyday choices Singaporeans make.
'This was why we launched the SG Eco Fund five years ago, recognising that policies itself is insufficient. We really need ground action... we need acceptance on the ground,' she said.
Grant recipient Altimate Nutrition used the fund to promote awareness of insect-based protein before their products were even approved for sale by the Singapore Food Agency.
Co-founder Mr Gavriel Tan, 23, said the start-up received funding in late 2023 and used it to run educational workshops in schools, introducing students to the concept of edible insects as an alternative and sustainable protein source.
Altimate Nutrition's Gavriel Tan, 23, at the SG Eco Fund fifth anniversary event at Vidacity on June 21, 2025.
ST PHOTO: SHINTARO TAY
'Insect protein is still very new, and most people don't even know it's edible or understand the benefits.'
'So we focused on education first, especially among students, who are more open-minded and represent the next generation of consumers,' he said.
With the grant, the company conducted 20 workshops, and over time, expanded to more than 80 sessions reaching about 800 students across primary to tertiary levels.
Mr Tan told The Straits Times that around 75 per cent of participants were willing to try insect-based products after learning about their sustainability benefits and sampling them during the sessions.
The company now plans to apply for a larger grant to explore farming crickets locally.
Ms Fu said that a recent report on the impact of SG Eco Fund showed that 90 per cent of those surveyed were satisfied with the activities, and a majority of them were more ready to adopt sustainable practices.
She said that she was encouraged to see more projects taking root in communities and growing beyond their initial scope.
For example, grant recipient Repair Kopitiam, trained residents to become handymen and help their neighbours during the pandemic.
Today, Repair Clinics and Repair Kampungs run at more than 10 locations, with 300 coaches and 6,000 volunteers to combat throwaway culture.
Project Black Gold, a community food scrap composting initiative, used the funding to conduct community composting events to teach residents how to reduce and recycle food waste. It has now expanded to over 30 composting clubs across Singapore.
Ms Fu also announced an enhancement to the fund's Sprout category, which supports smaller-scale projects. The maximum grant amount for projects submitted in 2025 has been raised from $8,000 to $30,000.
Senior Parliamentary Secretary for the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment Goh Hanyan (centre) and Vintage Wknd models taking part in a runway show as part of the fifth anniversary event of the SG Eco Fund on June 21.
ST PHOTO: SHINTARO TAY
Over 90 applications were received between January and April this year, the highest number to date within a four-month period since the category's launch in 2021.
'We did this in response to your desire to organise bigger projects and to reach out to more members of the community.
'And in part to celebrate the SG60 spirit, where each one of us can play our part in building Singapore,' she said.
A spokeswoman for the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment said that the focus of SG Eco Fund is to outreach to as many people as possible.
The fund utilisation will depend on the project take up rate and there is currently no expiration date.
Elisha Tushara is a correspondent at The Straits Times, specialising in Singapore's education landscape.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
Singapore could be most perfect example of a country that needs nuclear energy: IAEA chief
International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Mariano Grossi said Singapore has the potential to possess nuclear energy if it decides to do so. He added that Singapore could be the most perfect example of a country that needs such energy. Mr Grossi was speaking to the media after delivering a public lecture on the safe use of nuclear science. Meanwhile, Singapore will create training programmes to help developing countries build up their nuclear expertise. Minister of Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu inked the renewed deal with the IAEA today. Eugene Chow reports.
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Daily Debrief: What Happened Today (Jul 25)
Stories you might have missed Singapore manufacturing output grows by better-than-expected 8% in June Output in the key electronics sector is up 6.6%, extending May's 3.4% increase. Private home prices up 1% in Q2, rents rise 0.8%: URA The latest index figure is higher than the flash estimate released earlier; new home sales halve to 1,520 units, from 3,139 units in Q1. Median resale prices top S$1 million for 4-room HDB flats in three towns in Q2 BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Overall resale flat prices continue to moderate in the quarter with 0.9% rise. Most Singaporeans are unprepared and underinsured for long-term care: Singlife While long-term care costs close to S$3,000 a month on average, the insurance provider finds that more than half of those surveyed underestimate the amount. Home-based pet boarding in Singapore grows on low cost, high demand Unlicensed but in demand, informal pet sitters are reshaping the scene. But with regulatory hurdles, does this micro-industry have a future?


New Paper
3 days ago
- New Paper
'Should CDC vouchers be per pax or per household?': Scheme sparks debate on fairness
A new batch of Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers was rolled out in May, with Singaporean households receiving an additional $500 to help with daily expenses. But public response to the long-running scheme has been mixed, sparking renewed debate online over whether its distribution model is fair and effective. While many households welcomed the payouts amid rising costs, others argued that the current system, which allocates vouchers per household, disadvantages larger families. A Reddit post by Dizzy_Boysenberry499 in May titled "Opinion: CDC vouchers should be per pax and not per household" quickly gained traction on r/singapore, garnering over 1,400 upvotes and more than 300 comments. This was before the announcement that the one-off SG60 vouchers - meant to recognise all Singaporeans' contributions in the nation's 60th year of independence - would be given to individuals in July. These vouchers are also usable at all CDC voucher-accepting merchants. Netizens express scepticism "Imagine if a household has 5 people living in one address. This household is taking up less 'space' and yet they are being 'punished' because they get less voucher support per capita," wrote Dizzy_Boysenberry499. Redditor Auph agreed: "We vote as individuals, not by households. CDC vouchers should also be given to individuals, not by households. It doesn't make sense when $500 is shared among five house members vs $500 shared by a married couple." Some users went further, suggesting that wealthier households should receive less, and that financial assistance should be more targeted. "People that are doing well actually don't need it as much as the less well off," commented Redditor Ok_Set4063. Netizen CommieBird agreed: "This can't be emphasised enough. I'm okay with the principle of distributing vouchers and GST relief to those who need it the most. "Eventually the tax revenue has to come from somewhere, and the government shouldn't be building a society reliant on handouts." Questions were also raised about the long-term sustainability of the scheme. Some view it as a symptomatic response to the larger issue of rising costs of living, without actively preventing costs from skyrocketing further. Netizen ZaroPauper asked: "How sustainable is this voucher handout scheme that's touted to be a long-term plan?" "These vouchers are a band aid and lack proper targeting mechanisms," added Redditor ceddya. "No one's saying we should rush it, but I don't see why we can't have more discussion around other ways, like wealth taxes or making our income tax more progressive, to address the funding gap." Responsive measures are timely and effective Others, however, had a more positive take. Some defended the payouts as timely support that helps alleviate immediate pressure from inflation and strengthens local businesses. One user, InspiroHymm, suggested that the CDC vouchers are in fact a long-term measure to curb cost of living, by funnelling more money into the economy. "People always say 'do something permanent about cost of living'. In modern economics the only permanent measure is economic (GDP) growth, which boosts wage growth." "There is value in using band aids, especially when the source of the wound is by and large out of your control," quipped Reddit user vecspace. Government's decisions are for the benefit of Singaporeans In a press release issued on April 15, the Ministry of Finance announced that each household will receive $800 in CDC vouchers in FY2025 - $500 in May and $300 in January 2026 - on top of the $300 disbursed in January 2025. At the scheme's launch event in May, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said the Government was committed to helping Singaporeans cope with rising costs. He also addressed concerns about sustainability and such financial assistance as temporary measures. "I assure all of you that this is not a one-off exercise. The Government will provide the help for as long as it is needed. "We want to make sure that when we spend more, we are doing it for the benefit of Singaporeans, but the spending is also sustainable over the medium to longer term."