Why China's fight against excessive competition is different from past reforms
Advertisement
In
a meeting chaired by President Xi Jinping on July 1, the Central Finance and Economic Affairs Commission said Beijing needs to 'focus on key and difficult issues, regulate enterprises' disorderly and low-price competition' and 'guide enterprises to improve product quality and promote the orderly exit of outdated production capacity'.
The rhetoric has brought back memories of Beijing's 2015 'supply-side structural reform' initiative, which aimed to eliminate excess capacity in major industries. But a decade later, Chinese leaders face a very different economic landscape.
The Post breaks down the views of analysts on China's current challenges, and why authorities have spurred efforts to target
neijuan – involution – the term used for excessive competition that yields diminishing returns.
What happened in China's 2015 supply-side reform?
Between 2015 and 2018, China
implemented reforms to reduce capacity in key industries, especially steel and coal, according to a note from Morgan Stanley published on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
30 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
How Hong Kong stock exchange has simplified the IPO process
Tech – particularly that from mainland China – is currently the cornerstone of Hong Kong's IPO market. Professional services company EY reported that a majority of the 10 biggest IPOs on the Hong Kong stock exchange (HKEX) in 2024 were tech firms. On June 12, it shared that for the first half of 2025, A-share deals and proceeds increased 14 per cent year-on-year, with large IPOs propelling Hong Kong to world-leading IPO proceeds of US$14 billion. Advertisement 'The surge is largely driven by substantial government investments in research and development, and support to enterprises spearheading the technology advancement and innovation ecosystem,' said Jack Chan, EY China chairman and Greater China regional managing partner. 'National strategic plans like Made in China 2025 have further enhanced market penetration, allowing Chinese enterprises to capture significant global market presence.' Jack Chan, EY China chairman and Greater China regional managing partner. Photo: Handout Made in China 2025 was unveiled 10 years ago and has largely succeeded in encouraging the development of technology and advanced manufacturing sectors. Responding to this, HKEX and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) jointly launched the Technology Enterprises Channel (TECH) in May to help ease the listing process for specialist technology companies (under Chapter 18C of the listing rules) and biotech companies (18A). The channel will make dedicated teams available to help new firms get advice on listing rules, requirements and eligibility, especially as they apply to firms with products the markets may not be familiar with. HKEX's Guide for New Listing Applicants repeatedly states that many examples were non-exhaustive, making assessments for eligibility a case-by-case exercise, particularly as many of the firms that would use TECH may be developing unfamiliar technologies. 'TECH is an important communication channel,' Chan said 'through which potential applicants can clarify their queries with HKEX in detail.' Advertisement Chan continued that other than this initial guidance, the IPO process remains the same. After enquiring via the channel, firms hope to have more clarity before meeting with the listing division and submitting pre-IPO enquiries. TECH helps these companies clarify the applicable listing rules before a new listing application is submitted.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
The Taiwan papers: academics suggest how mainland China might rule the island
As tensions between Beijing and Taipei rise, academia and the education sector reveal how each side is changing to adapt to – or shape – the new environment. In the first of a two-part series, we survey the vast research by mainland academics studying potential paths and models for governing the island. For decades, Beijing has talked about peaceful reunification with Taiwan and possibly governing it under the arrangement of 'one country, two systems', a term that means the island could have a different political system than the mainland. The idea was first proposed by late paramount leader Deng Xiaoping and written into the constitution as a legal foundation for future governance of Taiwan in 1982. Generations of Chinese leaders have shared their broad vision of how post-reunification governance would look for the island, including its military and political parties. Yet it was only under President Xi Jinping – or more specifically since Xi made a key speech on the matter of Taiwan in January 2019 – that detailed discussion of the issue picked up in public, including from policy advisers and academics. The growth in the discussion took place as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government in Taiwan continued to push the island towards pro-independence, and Washington kept up its support for Taiwan amid competition with Beijing.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
University of Michigan investigated after 2 Chinese scientists charged with bio-smuggling
The University of Michigan is under federal scrutiny after two Chinese scientists linked to the school were separately charged with smuggling biological materials into the United States. The US Education Department on Tuesday opened an investigation into the university's foreign funding, citing the pair of cases that were announced days apart in June. It said the 'highly disturbing criminal charges' raise concerns about Michigan's vulnerability to national security threats from China. 'Despite the University of Michigan's history of downplaying its vulnerabilities to malign foreign influence, recent reports reveal that UM's research laboratories remain vulnerable to sabotage,' said Paul Moore, chief investigative counsel of the department. US President Donald Trump has made it a priority to increase transparency around foreign gifts and contracts to US universities, especially those tied to China. Similar investigations have been opened at Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University of California, Berkeley. It joins efforts from Republicans in Congress who have urged universities to cut research ties with China, saying China exploits the relationships to steal technology. Michigan ended a partnership with a university in Shanghai in January amid pressure from House Republicans who called it a security risk. Chinese scientist Jian Yunqing is accused of trying to bring a toxic fungus into the US. Photo: Sanilac County Sheriff's Office via AP The new investigation demands financial records from Michigan, along with information about research collaborations with institutions outside the US. The Education Department accuses Michigan of being 'incomplete, inaccurate and untimely' in its public disclosures around funding from foreign sources.
