Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir now a salesman of China and Turkey, trying to sell Chinese, Turkish weapons to two friends of India, they are...
Pakistan Field Marshal Asif Munir selling Chinese, Turkish weapons: In a significant development after India-Pakistan tensions and getting badly hit by India in Operation Sindoor, Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir has reportedly got a new role. As per media reports, Asim Munir is now acting as a salesman of Chinese and Turkish-made arms, promoting the weapons of these countries in various countries of Asia and abroad. Here are all the details you need to know about the newly reported role of Pakistan Field Marshal Asif Munir. Why is Pakistani Army Chief visiting Sri Lanka and Indonesia?
Media reports say that the Pakistani Army Chief will be visiting two of India's friends in the region, namely Sri Lanka and Indonesia. Talking about the schedule, Asim Munir will be visiting Pakistan and Sri Lanka from July 20 to 22 and from July 24 to 26 respectively.
As discussed in the media reports, the newly promoted Pakistan Army Field Marshall will be seen promoting Chinese and Turkish-made arms like JF-17 fighter jets and Bayraktar drones during his trip to Sri Lanka and Indonesia. Why is Pakistani Army Chief promoting Chinese, Turkish weapons?
Experts say that the Pakistani Army Chief is promoting Chinese and Turkish weapons in order to get more financial and military help from the two countries. Is Pakistan working as mercenary for US?
In another significant statement about Pakistan, the Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz (JSMM), a Sindhi nationalist organisation has warning that the meeting between between US President Donald Trump and Pakistan's Army Chief, 'Field Marshal' Asim Munir signals a resumption of Pakistan's mercenary role in a new American proxy war against Iran.
JSMM chair Shafi Burfat asserted in the recently released statement that the alliance between US an Pakistan military resurrects the dynamics seen in Afghanistan when Pakistani forces served as hired killers for US strategic interests.
Burfat stated, 'The Pakistani military and its ISI intelligence apparatus operate not as a defensive force but a mafia-style institution, crushing political movements, silencing journalists, and enforcing a colonial subjugation of Sindh and Balochistan.'
(With inputs from agencies)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Daunted by trade war, US firms in China report record-low investment plans
American companies in China are reporting record-low new investment plans for this year and declining confidence in their profitability, with uncertainty in US-China relations and President Donald Trump's tariffs their top concerns, according to a new survey. The companies are also challenged by China's slowing economy, where weak domestic demand and overcapacity in local industries are eroding profitability for the Americans. Businesses in China are less profitable now than they were years ago, but risks, including reputational risk, regulatory risk, and political risk, are increasing, said Sean Stein, the president of the US-China Business Council, a Washington-based group that represents American companies doing business in China, including major multinationals. The survey, conducted between March and May and drawing from 130 member companies, was released Wednesday. It came as the two countries clash over tariffs and non-tariff measures, including export controls on critical products such as rare-earth magnets and advanced computer chips. Following high-level talks in Geneva and London, US and Chinese officials agreed to pull back from sky-high tariffs and restrictions on exports, but uncertainty persists as the two sides are yet to hammer out a more permanent trade deal. Kyle Sullivan, vice president of business advisory services at the USCBC, said more than half of the companies in the survey indicated they do not have new investment plans in China at all this year. "That's a record high, Sullivan said, noting that it is a new development that we have not observed in previous surveys. Around 40 per cent of companies reported negative effects from US export control measures, with many experiencing lost sales, severed customer relationships, and reputational damage from being unreliable suppliers, according to the survey. Citing national security, the US government has banned exports to China of high-tech products, such as the most advanced chips, which could help boost China's military capabilities. Stein argued that export controls must be very carefully targeted, because businesses from Europe or Japan, or local businesses in China would immediately fill the void left by American companies. Silicon Valley chipmaker Nvidia won approval from the Trump administration to resume sales to China of its advanced H20 chips used to develop artificial intelligence, its CEO Jensen Huang announced on Monday, though the company's most powerful chips remain under US export control rules. While 82% of US companies reported profits in 2024, fewer than half are optimistic about the future in China, reflecting concerns over tariffs, deflation, and policy uncertainty, according to the survey. Also, a record high number of American businesses plan to relocate their business operations outside of China, Sullivan said, as 27% of the members indicated so, up from 19 per cent the year before. In a departure from past surveys, concerns over China's regulatory environment, including risks of intellectual property misuse and lack of market access, didn't make it to the top five concerns this year. That's likely a first, and not for a good reason, Stein said. It is not because things got dramatically better on the Chinese side, but the new challenges, often coming from the US, are now posing as much of a challenge, Stein said. Almost all the American companies said they cannot remain globally competitive without their Chinese operations. A survey from the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China in May found that European companies were cutting costs and scaling back investment plans in China as its economy slows and fierce competition drives down prices.
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
BrahMos Missile Demand Surges As Lucknow Facility Begins Advanced Materials Production
Following Operation Sindoor's successful strikes against terror and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, international interest in India's BrahMos supersonic missile has intensified significantly. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has announced that over 14 nations have expressed procurement interest in the Indo-Russian joint venture missile system. The heightened global demand has coincided with the establishment of a new BrahMos production facility in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, launched shortly after Operation Sindoor concluded. This development has been further strengthened by PTC Industries Limited's emergence as India's pioneering private sector manufacturer of titanium and superalloy components—materials essential for missile systems, naval vessels, and aircraft manufacturing. This manufacturing capability positions India as the sixth global producer of these sophisticated materials, alongside the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, and China. The facility operates within the Uttar Pradesh Defence Industrial Corridor framework, where over seven defence manufacturing units have commenced operations. PTC's Lucknow facility now provides titanium raw materials and precision-engineered components specifically for BrahMos production. Titanium's exceptional strength-to-weight characteristics and heat resistance properties make it invaluable for aerospace and defence manufacturing applications. Sachin Agarwal, Chairman and Managing Director of PTC Industries, emphasized India's previous import dependency for these critical materials. "Previously, we relied on international suppliers for essential aircraft and submarine components. Now, India maintains domestic production capabilities. This eliminates a significant vulnerability and prevents any nation from leveraging supply restrictions against us during critical periods," Agarwal explained. Beyond BrahMos components, PTC manufactures specialized alloys for international aerospace manufacturers, including Dassault Aviation's Rafale fighter aircraft program. The drive toward indigenous defence manufacturing has gained critical importance as India seeks to minimize foreign supplier dependence—a priority highlighted by supply chain disruptions during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Indian military leadership has consistently emphasized that future conflicts will rely on domestically produced weapons and equipment. Operation Sindoor represented not only BrahMos's first combat deployment but also showcased India's indigenous defence manufacturing capabilities to the international community. To address increasing demand, a comprehensive strategic materials complex featuring four specialized production units was inaugurated last month alongside the BrahMos manufacturing line in Lucknow. The integrated facility encompasses a primary metals unit for titanium and superalloy ingot production, a large-scale casting facility, a forging plant for critical components, and a precision machining center dedicated to aerospace parts including jet engine components and missile systems.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Jaishankar in China: A cooperative Beijing is desirable, but a less uncooperative one is India's best bet
Written by Udayan Das For the first time in five years, since the 2020 standoff along the Line of Actual Control, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar travelled to China and met President Xi Jinping, his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi and Vice President Han Zheng, before heading off to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation's Council of Foreign Ministers (SCO-CFM) meet. The meeting is consistent with the steps taken by New Delhi and Beijing since late last year to restore some normalcy to bilateral ties. This started with the Modi-Xi meeting on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan in October 2024, followed by a flurry of high-level meetings, including trips to China by National Security Advisor Ajit Doval in December 2024 and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh in June 2025. Evidently, we are witnessing the renegotiation of a new order on partly new foundations. The earlier order was facilitated through the Border Peace and Tranquillity Agreement in 1993, which agreed to incrementally resolve the boundary question through the maintenance of peace and status quo on the borders. As the treaty brought India and China to the table, it built a modicum of trust and transparency that allowed other avenues like trade to develop. This order, however, was broken with the skirmishes in Galwan five years ago. Compared to the presence of a bulwark of institutional commitments and operational trade, the new order possesses an unpredictability of conflict and weaponisation of trade. The road to a new arrangement, like most diplomatic formulations, would not be easy, quick or foolproof. The visit is one of the many steps necessary to create a positive foundation. The meeting indicates India's strategy of simultaneously cooperating and competing with China. There has always been a consensus that New Delhi and Beijing need not agree and cooperate on every issue. The optimal outcome for India would be to cooperate with China wherever possible and evade conflict entirely. Therefore, a sub-optimal outcome is more plausible for India, where they initiate piecemeal cooperation on immediate issues and simultaneously develop instruments that would restrict the chances of conflict. This would also allow both parties to find passages to de-escalate, in case a conflict breaks out. New Delhi has taken this route, evident from Jaishankar stating to his Chinese counterpart that the emerging foundation should be on the principle that 'differences should not become disputes, nor should competition ever become conflict'. There is a clear division of impending issues that need to be resolved rather quickly, while the rest are put on a slow burner. For India, there is a third kind as well: Issues that have a bearing on the relations but are extremely difficult to resolve, and as a result, remain undiscussed. The border question, in this context, remains the most significant and vexed. It is likely to be put aside for a while, again, as there are no immediate resolutions in sight. For India, the answer remains elusive to the question: How do you deal with a militarily superior power in a border conflict? India has initiated internal strengthening, but that is not going to provide results overnight. External intervention remains unreliable as this is strictly a bilateral issue where third parties would not invest or engage without interests. The plausible ways are to simultaneously keep closing the gap and engage with the rival via diplomatic mechanisms. As disengagement is underway at crucial junctures of Eastern Ladakh, the onus is now to arrange a modus vivendi. The issues that can be resolved quickly are in the domain of trade. China's curbs on exporting rare earth magnets are hurting India's automobile sector badly. The Indian government has rightly initiated incentives for home-grown solutions, but developing an alternative supply chain would take time and not immediately compensate for the Chinese withdrawals. EAM Jaishankar specifically brought up the issue of 'restrictive trade measures and roadblocks' that need to be discussed ahead. Finally, there are issues that are undiscussed, like the case of the China-Pakistan relationship and the issue of the Dalai Lama's succession. India's consistent stand on terrorism is commendable, but that is unlikely to have any effect on Beijing's relations with Islamabad. Irrespective of India's symbolic measures, influence or pressure, China and Pakistan would continue to work according to their realist calculations. It is unlikely that India would bring up the Dalai Lama in official discussions. While China has asserted its role in choosing the successor, India has stated that this remains an issue of cultural conventions and not the state. Despite this, China continues to be irked by the Dalai Lama being housed in Dharamsala, acknowledged as a spiritual leader by many in India. In the months to come, India and China are likely to engage further in the making of this new bilateral order. It will not be easy for New Delhi: It has to hold its ground on many issues, continuously strengthen itself internally, and find ways to engage with Beijing for mutual goals. A cooperative China is desirable, but a less uncooperative one is India's best bet to preserve its core interests. The writer teaches at the Department of Political Science, St. Xavier's College, Kolkata and is a Visiting Fellow with Asian Confluence, Shillong
