
Mother run over by two Tube trains ‘caused' own injuries, claims TfL
Sarah de Lagarde, 46, had her right arm and leg partially amputated after she fell onto the tracks at High Barnet station, in north London, in September 2022.
She has brought a High Court case against TfL in which she will seek damages of more than £25 million. In court documents, TfL has claimed 'the incident was caused or contributed to by the claimant's negligence'.
Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, has previously told TfL to avoid 'victim-blaming' when passengers are injured or killed on public transport in the capital.
Ms de Lagarde, who now has two prosthetic limbs, was travelling home on the Northern Line on Sept 30 2022 when she fell asleep. She awoke at High Barnet, at the end of the line, at 9.53pm and alighted from the train onto a wet platform.
'The claimant took a few steps forward onto the platform and then took a few steps backwards, before the rear of her body struck the rear side of the door of the train she had exited from,' according to TfL's court documents.
'The claimant continued to move backwards and, approximately seven seconds after exiting the train, she fell into the gap between carriages five and six of the train.'
Ms de Lagarde, the global head of corporate affairs at Janus Henderson, an investment firm, was not noticed by other passengers or station staff and her shouts for help went unheeded.
Shortly before 10pm, the driver of the train noticed a brown leather bag wedged between the train and the platform. He picked it up and later handed it in to the lost property office at Morden, south London, but did not investigate further.
TfL's submissions say he 'did not see or hear the claimant at that point and did not look into the gap, having no reason to do so'.
Ms de Lagarde's right arm was run over when the train set off at 10pm. Five minutes later, her right leg was crushed when a second Northern Line train arrived at the station.
Despite the train's headlights being on, she was not found until a driver of a train on a different platform heard her shouts and called the emergency services.
Air Ambulance paramedics crawled under the train to reach her and later received a national bravery award. She was taken to the Royal London Hospital for surgery and later transferred to the Amputee Rehabilitation Unit in Lambeth. She was not discharged from hospital until Dec 1 2022.
Ms de Lagarde's claim states: 'The breaches of duty caused the claimant to suffer life-changing injuries.'
Representing Ms de Lagarde, Thomas Jervis, a Leigh Day partner, said: 'Like millions of other Londoners, Sarah de Lagarde was just trying to get home from work when she was hit by two tube trains at High Barnet station.
'Transport for London is refusing to accept liability and positively blames Sarah for what happened.'
A spokesman for TfL said: 'We are responding to a legal claim brought by Sarah de Lagarde. It is not appropriate to discuss details of our defence while this case is ongoing.
'Our thoughts continue to be with Sarah and her family following this terrible incident, and we will continue to make every possible effort to learn from any incident on the Tube network. Safety is our top priority, and we will always place it at the forefront of our thinking.'
The trial is due to open in January 2027.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Four remanded in custody after aircraft damaged at RAF Brize Norton
Four people have been remanded in custody after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in a demonstration allegedly carried out by members of Palestine Action. Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22, appeared at Westminster magistrates court in custody on Thursday. The defendants spoke only to confirm their names. The incident in Oxfordshire caused about £7m worth of damage to the aircraft on 20 June, police said previously. Counter-terrorism policing south-east on Wednesday charged the defendants with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. There was applause and chants of 'free Palestine' from the packed public gallery as the defendants were led away. They will next appear at the Old Bailey on 18 July.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bryson and McKay cleared in Nama trial
Three men, including loyalist activist Jamie Bryson and former Sinn Fein MLA Daithi McKay, have been cleared at Belfast Crown Court of charges relating to misconduct in public office. Mr Bryson, 35, from Rosepark in Donaghadee, and co-accused Thomas O'Hara, 41, from Lisnahunshin Road in Cullybackey, were found not guilty of conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office. The charges had related to a Stormont committee hearing that examined the sale of the National Asset Management Agency's (Nama) Northern Ireland assets in 2015. Mr McKay, 43, from Loughan Road in Dunnamanagh – who was chairman of the finance committee at the time – was found not guilty of misconduct in public office. Mr Bryson and Mr McKay said there are now questions for the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) over why the prosecution was brought. The PPS has said the available evidence had indicated it was in the public interest to prosecute. Trial judge Gordon Kerr KC said he believed Mr Bryson had lied while giving evidence in the case, but said he was not involved in a criminal conspiracy. The long-running Nama trial had related to Mr Bryson's 2015 appearance before the Stormont committee, chaired by Mr McKay, which was investigating the sale of Nama's Northern Ireland assets to a US investment fund. The criminal probe was launched after the publication of leaked Twitter messages between Mr Bryson, Mr McKay and the account of Mr O'Hara, who at the time was a Sinn Fein activist in north Antrim. Mr McKay quit as an MLA within hours of the Twitter messages being published in August 2016. The Stormont Finance Committee inquiry was set up in 2015 amid political controversy over the multimillion-pound sale of Nama's property portfolio. Nama, the so-called bad bank created by the Irish government to deal with the toxic loans of bailed-out lenders during the economic crash, sold its 800 Northern Ireland-linked properties to investment fund Cerberus for £1.2 billion. Giving evidence to the committee in 2015, Mr Bryson used Assembly privilege to name former DUP leader Peter Robinson as a beneficiary of the sale. The then-first minister of Northern Ireland strongly rejected any suggestion he benefited from the deal. All other parties involved in the transaction also denied wrongdoing. Delivering his judgment in the non-jury trial on Thursday, the judge said: 'Despite his lies in court, I am sure that Mr Bryson was at all times communicating with Mr McKay. 'I am sure that the communications were designed to give Mr Bryson the best advice and guidance to maximise his chances of giving evidence. 'My analysis of the messages do not show any occasion where Mr McKay undertook to say or do anything outside his duties as chairman to ensure Mr Bryson's evidence would be in open session. 'Clearing Mr Bryson, the judge said the evidence did not establish there had been a criminal conspiracy between him and Mr McKay. He said: 'In the absence of an agreement, the conspiracy charge must fail.' Turning to Mr McKay, the judge said there was 'no doubt he deliberately misled the committee to ease the way for Mr Bryson's presentation'. The judge pointed out the Assembly had its own code of conduct and said there was 'no precedent for a prosecution in these circumstances'. Clearing Mr McKay, he added: 'I do not consider it my role to expand the offence.' The judge said the evidence against Mr O'Hara 'fell well short' of anything which would convince him of his guilt.


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tommy Robinson denies harassing two MailOnline journalists
The far-right activist known as Tommy Robinson has denied harassing two journalists by allegedly telling them: 'I'm coming to get you' and 'I'll be knocking at your door'. Robinson, 42, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, appeared at Southwark crown court where he denied two offences of harassment causing fear of violence. He entered not guilty pleas after details of the charges were read out in court before a scheduled five-day trial, starting on 16 October next year. The charges relate to accusations that he used his X account over a number of days to harass two MailOnline journalists, Andrew Young and Jacob Dirnhuber, and family members. Robinson is charged with harassment causing fear of violence by making a telephone call in August last year in which he is alleged to have told Young he would visit his home and said: 'I'm coming to get you.' The activist is also alleged to have used his X account a day later to post three edited photographs depicting Young's wife, daughter, and his vehicle, with the message: 'Hey JDirnhuber get your colleague Andrew Young to call me back, you see he published pictures of my family and gave away their location. 'I'm working on a news piece myself about all of you, I won't identify any innocent people or give address as that's not morally right unlike you scum. You will all be questioned on camera about how you think endangering children is ok. My homework continues.' Robinson is also charged with harassment causing fear of violence by allegedly posting a direct message on X to Dirnhuber on 5 August at 8.50am in which he said: 'I'll be knocking at your door.' He is also alleged to have posted direct messages on the same day to Dirnhuber, saying: 'Let your bosses know I'm coming to all your houses', 'Okay got your address' and 'We need to talk'. On 6 August, Robinson is alleged to have posted on X: 'Got ya Jdirnhuber this is Jacob, he likes to locate and endanger families. Jacob and the rest of the Daily Mail journalists who were involved in endangering my children have today been located. 'I look forward to hearing on camera your justification for doxxing my children's location. I got all three of you tagged and bagged in one day.' Robinson is also alleged to have posted on 6 August at 10.50pm a direct message on X to Dirnhuber in which he said: 'I'll bring my questions to all of your doors.' A previous hearing at Westminster magistrates court heard that none of the alleged harassment contained direct threats of violence.