Most US adults say child care costs are a 'major problem,' a new AP-NORC poll finds
But they're divided over how to solve the problem and what role the government should have in that solution.
About three-quarters of U.S. adults see child care costs as a 'major problem,' but only about half say helping working families pay for child care should be a 'high priority' for the federal government, according to the June poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
The coronavirus pandemic was a tipping point, revealing the child care industry's vulnerabilities. The latest congressional package of tax cuts included tax credits and benefits for parents and businesses that assist employees with child care. Those changes have been praised by some, while others say millions of families at lower income levels wouldn't get the full credit and would be affected by cuts in Medicaid and food stamps.
The poll findings help explain the difficulty advocacy groups, elected officials and families navigate in trying to address the high costs of care: While most agree it's a problem, there isn't a simple fix. For instance, while government-funded child care is popular, that might not be everyone's first choice. Many U.S. adults also think it's better for children with two parents to be cared for full time by a parent.
'Everyone kind of agrees that it's a problem that we need to address,' said Sarah Rittling, executive director of the First Five Years Fund advocacy organization. 'By having this issue out there, it really is driving a lot of bipartisan conversations.'
Some consensus on free day care and paid family leave
Most Americans support initiatives to offer child care or additional time for working families to spend with babies. About two-thirds support providing free or low-cost day care for children too young to attend public school, and a similar share favor requiring employers to provide paid family leave for new parents.
Women are more likely than men to support the proposals, and Democrats are more likely than Republicans, but each is popular across the board.
Mary Banek, a nurse anesthetist of Midlothian, Texas, said she helps take care of her 1-year-old grandson so he doesn't need day care. When she had her kids, she left the workforce and got a license to start a day care from her home to watch 12 children, including her own, so she could generate income.
Banek said she's surprised at the high fees at day cares these days.
'I don't know what's happened and why it is so expensive,' Banek said, adding maybe there's a way to cap costs. She doesn't feel the government should foot the cost.
Many think parents should be caregivers
While many solutions focus on families with working parents, there isn't broad agreement this is the best arrangement for children. Just under half of U.S. adults, 45%, say children with two parents are better off when one parent doesn't have a job and raises the children. Only about 1 in 10 say children are better off when both parents work full time, and about 4 in 10 say it doesn't make a difference.
Vice President JD Vance has tried to push for ideas that would encourage Americans to have families but has opposed government spending on child care, saying children benefit from having a parent or family member at home as a caretaker.
About half of men say children with two parents are better off when one is the full-time caregiver, compared with about 4 in 10 women.
Stephen Yip-Wineman, 45, a high school teacher from Murrieta, California, who describes himself as a moderate, said he feels society doesn't see the value of parents choosing to be caretakers.
'A lot of people are pushed into the idea that everyone in their family is going to work and that's the way of being a productive member of society,' Yip-Wineman said. 'They think staying home and taking care of the kids is somehow not contributing.'
Yip-Wineman has two children ages 12 and 14, and their mother stays home, but he says his ideas of having a parent do the caretaking don't have to do with making the mother the primary caretaker.
'Having a parent raise the kids is not about pushing traditional Christian values and trying to keep women out of the workplace,' he said. 'It's about trying to be more personally engaged with each other.'
Are changes happening?
Many Democrats and Republicans have endorsed expansions to the child tax credit as a way to support families and lift children and young families out of poverty.
While campaigning as Donald Trump's running mate, Vance raised the possibility of increasing the child tax credit to $5,000, saying that would help more parents stay home with their children.
About 7 in 10 U.S. adults said they'd support increasing the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,500 for parents who are U.S. citizens, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll from June found. Republicans and Democrats were similarly likely to support this: About 8 in 10 of each were in favor.
In the final bill, however, the child tax credit increased to $2,200.
Beyond expanding the child tax credit, the package also increased a benefit allowing most working parents to claim a higher percentage of their child care expenses and get more tax credits.
Organizations want increased funding for federal early-learning and care programs, including a child care program for low-income families and an early-education program called Head Start. Trump's Republican administration backed away from a proposal this year to eliminate funding for Head Start.
Other groups, including Child Care Aware of America, have pointed out the new law's cuts in Medicaid would result in a loss of health coverage for many child care workers.
___
The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Pleads With Followers to Back Bondi in Dispute Over Epstein Inquiry
President Trump on Saturday threw a political lifeline to Pam Bondi, his embattled attorney general, appearing to side with her over Dan Bongino, the F.B.I.'s deputy director, who has threatened to quit over Ms. Bondi's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. 'They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' Mr. Trump wrote in a lengthy post on Truth Social, his social media site. 'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening.' He went on to plead with his followers to 'not waste Time and Energy' on Mr. Epstein, the disgraced financier and registered sex offender he once socialized with and described in the post as 'a guy who never dies.' The post — which Ms. Bondi welcomed, according to officials — came a day after a bruising battle between her and Mr. Bongino burst into public view. Mr. Bongino has not shown up for work since Ms. Bondi accused him of planting negative news stories about her during a testy face-to-face encounter in the West Wing office of Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff and an ally of Ms. Bondi's. Mr. Bongino, who has groused about his workload and spoken wistfully of his lucrative old gig as a podcaster, where he promoted conspiracy theories, has told friends he might ditch his job. Even with the president's support, Ms. Bondi remains the target of withering criticism from the hard-right wing of Mr. Trump's coalition, which blames her for overhyping a modest tranche of new Epstein files as a bombshell revelation soon after she took office in February. Laura Loomer, the flame-throwing activist who wields significant influence with the president, has joined a growing chorus calling for Ms. Bondi's resignation. Mr. Bongino's boosters had hoped that Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, who has privately criticized Ms. Bondi's Epstein stunt, would also consider quitting in protest. It has not happened. A few hours before Mr. Trump posted his support for Ms. Bondi, Mr. Patel offered up his own statement on social media, calling it 'an honor to serve the President of the United States.' 'I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me,' Mr. Patel wrote. That would appear to leave Mr. Bongino in the lurch. Ms. Bondi's allies in the administration believe he has burned his bridges and needs to leave, according to two people familiar with her thinking. Justice Department and F.B.I. spokesmen declined to comment.


USA Today
8 minutes ago
- USA Today
A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies
Chadwick Lane Murray Issues a Scholarly, Soul-Shaking Clarion Call on Injustice-Rooted in History, Reaching Toward the Future With an eye on Orwell and a finger on the pulse of generational upheaval, Chadwick Lane Murray's A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies is not merely a book; it is a reckoning in print. Combining personal discovery with public inquiry, this genre-defiant work dissects war, racism, economic inequality, and planetary decline through the prism of history, sociology, and unapologetic moral urgency. Launched in 2025, A Vision of 1984 arrives at a time when public discourse has never been louder-nor truth more elusive. The echoes of the past are impossible to ignore; from soldiers' personal letters smuggled through trenches in Verdun to the dusty protest pamphlets of 1968's Paris uprisings, Murray excavates the forgotten margins of history to illuminate our present. The narrative threads converge into a singular message: systemic injustice isn't accidental; it's by design. 'The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.' – Steve Jobs A Book Anchored in Humanity-and Armed with Numbers Structured into four critical sections-Arbitrariness, Inequitable Distribution, Defective Correctives, and What Can Be Done-the book provides a rigorous framework for understanding how injustice operates across cultural, institutional, and economic lines. Murray doesn't simply ask what went wrong; he asks who made it so. Arbitrariness explores how imperialism, racism, and military conflict create environments where suffering becomes predictable; the author draws on personal family archives, including letters from the Battle of the Somme and Khe Sanh. Inequitable Distribution traces the legacy of wealth hoarding and monopolistic behavior; referencing post-war boom statistics, Murray cites that by 1982, the top 1% of Americans controlled 33% of national wealth-a number eerily similar to current figures. Defective Correctives critiques modern education, judicial, and political systems. As early as 1980, voter confidence in Congress had dropped below 30%; it has yet to meaningfully recover. What Can Be Done proposes moral advocacy over institutional neutrality; a radical thesis for a radical age. His prose is often poetic; his analysis, razor-sharp. There is a method behind the heartbreak. 'Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people into thinking they can't lose.' – Bill Gates The Ghost of Orwell Meets the Algorithm Age By resurrecting Orwell's prophetic spirit in the age of misinformation, A Vision of 1984 speaks not just to policy experts or historians, but to anyone questioning the trajectory of modern civilization. Murray juxtaposes the rigidity of bureaucracy with the chaos of human longing; he paints portraits of those ground down by economic gears too large to see. The book is both a historical synthesis and a sociological sermon. And there's data behind the drama. Murray pulls from the digital archives of post-war Britain; he examines U.S. labor participation trends since 1945; he even references the founding of Silicon Valley itself, noting that by 1984-the year Orwell imagined totalitarian surveillance-the seeds of the tech-industrial complex were already blooming in Palo Alto. In fact, by 1984, over 40% of the world's semiconductors were being produced in Santa Clara County; as Murray notes, 'Surveillance didn't come from the government; it came from an IPO.' It's this interweaving of ideology and infrastructure that makes the book both timeless and timely. The Rise of Humanistic Sociology-And the Moral Reckoning Ahead Inspired by the 'new sociology' and thinkers such as Morris Ginsberg, Murray refuses academic detachment. He considers objectivity overrated when facing systemic violence. Instead, he urges action; he views sociology not as a lens but as a lever. Readers will find themselves challenged-emotionally, intellectually, even ethically. 'This is not a bedtime story; this is a wake-up call,' said Ovais Riaz, who represents Murray. 'It challenges every reader-scholars, students, and citizens-to choose whether they want to be part of the solution or simply spectators to decline.' If Orwell gave us a dystopia to fear, Chadwick Lane Murray gives us one to recognize. Book Details Title A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies Author Chadwick Lane Murray Publication Date 2025 Format Paperback; eBook Genre Nonfiction; Sociology; Political Science; History Availability Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Independent Retailers About the Author Chadwick Lane Murray is an independent scholar, essayist, and human rights advocate. Raised between libraries and living rooms filled with war stories, his worldview was shaped not by ideology, but by testimony. He studied the intersections of history and sociology at the University of [Insert], and later worked in urban planning and policy research before devoting himself fully to writing. His passion for justice is more than theoretical; Murray has conducted oral history interviews with veterans of World War II, organized educational outreach in post-industrial cities, and contributed to policy whitepapers addressing economic inequality. His work is known for fusing raw human emotion with empirical rigor-making him a rare voice in a world of noise. Amazon Author Page Disclaimer This original article was independently researched and published by the author with the editorial team of the Evrima Chicago News Bureau. It has not appeared in any previously published form and is presented as a digital-first feature on the sociopolitical relevance of contemporary literary works. The piece is intended for educational, editorial, and syndication purposes across the World Wide Web, news distribution networks, and academic referencing channels. Endorsed by the Author The perspectives, interpretations, and contextual framing expressed herein are those of the Evrima Chicago editorial team and are officially endorsed by Chadwick Lane Murray, author of A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies . Publication Standards This piece qualifies as an official web syndication under W3C-recognized digital content frameworks and follows metadata tagging standards for news archives, search engine discoverability, and citation integrity. It is timestamped and licensed for redistribution under academic fair use and professional editorial guidelines. No Liability for Moral Reckonings Evrima Chicago assumes no responsibility for existential crises, civic awakening, or spontaneous acts of justice that may result from reading A Vision of 1984 . Proceed with caution; moral clarity is not always reversible. Publisher Note Evrima Chicago is an independent research and media outlet producing editorial content spanning literature, political thought, accessibility (A11Y), digital futures, and journalistic integrity. We aim to create thought-leading narratives rooted in credibility, depth, and meaningful public discourse. PR & Media Contact General Inquiries / Interview: PR@ PR & Media Contact: waasay@ SOURCE: Visions: Social Injustice & it's Enemies. View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire

Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
ICE memo outlines plan to deport migrants to countries where they are not citizens
Federal immigration officers may deport immigrants with as little as six hours notice to countries other than their own even if officials have not provided any assurances that the new arrivals will be safe from persecution or torture, a top official said in a memo this week. Todd M. Lyons, the acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, wrote in a memo to the ICE workforce Wednesday that a Supreme Court ruling last month had cleared the way for officers to 'immediately' start sending immigrants to 'alternative' countries.