
The Apple Watch Turns 10. Here's How Far It's Come
April 24, 2025, marks 10 years since the Apple Watch first went on sale. It was actually announced during a special event on September 9, 2014, but only became available to buy over seven months later, on April 24, 2015.
While it seems hard now to recall a time when the Apple Watch, or something similar, did not exist, the market hasn't always been so obvious. It was only 10 years ago that we were still wondering if Pebble would actually pan out, and all anyone wanted a Fitbit for was to get in their 10,000 steps (an entirely arbitrary number, but I digress).
Customers in Sydney, Australia, queueing for a look at the first Apple Watch in April 2015. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images
When it debuted, the first Apple Watch was glitchy and expensive. Battery life sucked. Many publications, including mine, spent significant time and space wondering why anyone even wanted a smartwatch. Today, it is an Apple success story. 'Since 2015 til the end of 2024, we estimate that 281.2 million Apple watches have been shipped,' Jitesh Ubrani, a device research manager at IDC tells WIRED. That's at an estimated value of $127 billion. No wonder it has spawned a flotilla of imitators.
However, on its tenth anniversary (or perhaps more appropriately its aluminum anniversary), the Apple Watch Series 10 faces a tumultuous global market. Even before the Trump administration announced tariffs, global smartwatch sales were slumping. As innovation slows (or is blocked in patent disputes), people are now holding onto their Apple devices for longer, while newer smartwatches, such as the Galaxy Watch are also coming for Apple's lunch. Sleeping Beauty
Check Reddit's r/AppleWatch and you'll find people who still own—and use—the original Series 0. It's a reminder that Apple's Jony Ive poured years of work into a tiny design that was originally intended to be a piece of jewelry, before reportedly clashing with executives over what the watch's eventual function would be.
Potential buyers look at the various options offered by the first Apple Watch. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images
Initial unfortunate nomenclature aside—Tim Cook casually called it 'the iWatch', before that horrible name was kiboshed due to patent squabbles—it was beguiling, and Ive had his wish. Walking into an Apple Store and picking out your case and accessories was the closest many might have come to a luxury watch purchasing experience.
Because the Watch is not just a simple timepiece—you can change it to suit your needs, or mood. When you buy an Apple Watch, you can also pick or change your bands, from the now-classic Milanese loop to the company's successful collaboration with Hermès. You can change your watch face to suit your outfit, to check if Snoopy has a cute new cartoon for the day, to go sailing, or map your way back off the trail. Those two ingenious buttons on the case's back that let you easily switch out your straps at a whim with no tools are now copied by almost all manufacturers in the watch industry, not just smartwatch manufacturers.
'Apple showed that [the strap] was a critical part of the design language, but also laid down the gauntlet in engineering secure, easy-to-use quick-release systems that didn't require tools. Brands have put a lot of R&D into this,' said Tim Barber, WIRED's watch expert.
While the $10,000 Apple Watch was certainly a folly—you still have to update an Apple Watch, even when it's pure gold (except when you no longer can)—the watch itself is to my eyes both beautiful and declaratory: wearing one signifies that you're a serious person who cares about fitness and getting work done. It's the only watch that has ever outsold the entire Swiss watch industry, and actually, Barber notes, in part, reinvigorated the luxury watch industry.
The $10,000 Apple Watch Edition launched in 2015 and had an 18K gold case with sapphire crystal glass. Photograph: Apple
'Rather than wipe out mechanical watches, as some thought it would—hence the folly of TAG Heuer, Montblanc and others getting into ultimately inferior smart watches—Apple Watch reinvigorated them as a prestige item specifically apart, and in opposition to, digital culture,' says Barber. 'That undoubtedly benefitted watchmakers. It's almost certainly been a net positive.'
Ive and the Apple Watch design team hit upon a key concept when it comes to digital wearables: It's a form of self-expression that you wear on your wrist, and it must actually look good for you to want to wear it. It was a health tracker that wasn't as overtly health-coded as a Fitbit or a Garmin. In fact, when the Series 0 first launched, it had only a few simple health features—the now-iconic Activity Rings, the workout app, an optical heart sensor, and the heart app.
Ten years on, Activity Rings remains one of the best examples yet of fitness gamification. (Today is also Global Close Your Rings Day; if you close them today, you get a limited-edition award.) Every fitness tracker has a step counter, but the visual demonstration of how little you have left to do to close the Move ring has launched a thousand memes, and even a couple T-shirts. A Wellness Story
Prior to the Apple Watch, smartwatches were conceived as a kind of wrist-based mini smartphone, to ping you with notifications or to take calls off your wrist. David Naranjo, associate director of Counterpoint Research, noted in a phone call with WIRED that Apple's success in this category was largely due to completely changing the watch's use case—from being a smartwatch, to being a smartwatch with a dedicated health and fitness aspect.
'Fitbit and others had [an ecosystem and apps], but there were other things they were not able to do,' Naranjo said. 'Apple built out the ecosystem and made the healthcare story very strong. Not only did [the company] focus on fitness and heart rate, it went beyond fitness and looked at a much deeper level of healthcare. That's where Apple excelled.'
Apple's ECG sensor launched on the Apple Watch Series 4. Photograph: Apple
Every year, Apple launches one standout health feature, from measuring VO2 Max on the Series 3 to the ECG sensor on the Series 4, all the way to sleep apnea notifications on the Series 10. 'If you zoom out way into the future, and you look back and ask what Apple's biggest contribution was, it will be in the health area,' Cook said in an interview with WIRED last year.
This is a bold thing to say, especially given that the Series 10 and Watch Ultra 2 don't even have blood oxygen measuring, due to a patent dispute with the medtech company Masimo. For a while, Apple has been doing research into features that would transform the Apple Watch for people with chronic conditions, like adding noninvasive blood glucose monitoring for diabetics, or adding blood pressure measuring for people with hypertension. Alas, despite promising advances, these features have yet to materialize.
Apple's latest project, an AI-assisted comprehensive health service, is far behind other health manufacturers such as Oura, Whoop, or even Garmin. Imagine, for example, being able to take a picture of your meal with the Watch Ultra and uploading it to the (still rudimentary) Health app, the way you already can with the Meals feature on an Oura Ring 4. You have to imagine it for now, of course, because the Apple Watch doesn't currently have a camera, and Apple's Visual Intelligence is still limited to the iPhone 16. But it seems within reach.
Still, the Watch's wearability and seeming ubiquity does mean that it has a track record of saving peoples' lives, whether that's by notifying users of an irregular heart rhythm via the ECG feature or calling the emergency services if it recognizes the user has fallen or been in a serious crash. I also have a personal anecdote to report—before the blood oxygen feature was removed, I had pneumonia. How did I know? My blood oxygen level, as measured by the watch, was at 84 percent. I went to urgent care and got antibiotics, stat.
While Apple has not historically always been first to market with a new health feature, it's a fast follower, and the features nearly always work. 'Apple owners are very patient when it comes to Apple,' Naranjo says. 'They've come to believe that Apple doesn't rush to market with something that isn't almost perfect.' Why You Wear It
That point seems to bear out with the research. In 2022, nearly 80 percent of Apple iPhone owners also owned an Apple Watch, and it accounted for 56 percent of smartwatch sales in the North American market. Most importantly, research suggests most people who own an Apple Watch are pretty satisfied with their device.
As most of them are likely Apple users already, it helps that the Watch—like all Apple devices—integrates seamlessly with Apple's ecosystem. It's intuitive, easy to use, and has an interface that is pleasing to experience—both for the first time, and 10 years on. I still twirl and push every day the tiny digital crown every day, and find it a great way for navigating the device's smaller menus without obscuring text with your fingers.
The Taptic Engine that gently buzzes on your wrist has now been adapted to dozens of uses, from waking you up in the morning to gently pointing you in the right direction while you're walking or biking around and using Apple Maps. There is no way to count just how many tourists have not gotten robbed because they did not need to pull out their phone to figure out how to get back to the hotel from the bagel shop, but the number I imagine must be considerable. Whether you're pausing a podcast or doing a couple toe touches in the middle of the day, life seems a little easier with an Apple Watch.
The Apple Watch Series 10 and its many strap options. Photograph: Apple
I took a brief and stunningly informal essay of WIRED Gear team members who also wear Apple Watches on why they bought or wear one. Notifications, integration with the Apple ecosystem, and fitness tracking were the most common answers. 'Waterllama also helps me keep track of my hydration,' product reviewer Ryan Waniata says.
'Can I confess that … the only thing I use my Apple Watch for is to ding my iPhone and find out where I lost it at home?' asked senior writer Zeyi Yang. Yes! I use it to find my AirPods Pro, too. The UWB chip that debuted in the Series 9 has saved countless minutes every morning, even if you're just finding AirTags and your phone with it, but sadly not using it to unlock your self-driving Apple car.
It's so easy to use, we're still willing to forgive its most annoying flaws, most notably the battery life. Charging your Apple Watch every day is the bane of my existence, and despite years of efforts to improve it, the closest that Apple has come is to launch … fast charging? Loading media onto the watch, even basic offline maps, is such a hassle that even Apple has resigned itself to the fact that most people will end up carrying their phone instead. Apple Watch will even still buzz you to stand up when you're driving on a freeway.
But most of all, there is the unfashionably-late arrival of Apple Intelligence, which launched on iPhone last October. So far, the only Apple Intelligence features that you can use on the Watch (if you have not disabled it due to privacy concerns, or the fact that it's just kind of annoying or inaccurate) are notification summaries and the Reduce Notifications focus. This is underwhelming, to say the least. The only consolation is that Apple Watch users are not the only Apple customers waiting for Apple Intelligence to become useful.
In 2022, I wrote that Apple's wearables seem designed for an increasingly terrifying world. While I made fun of the marketing at the time, the world has gotten more uncertain and scary. I'm glad that I talked my husband into wearing an Apple Watch Ultra, and, thanks to Crash Detection, I will now know if he gets into a car accident on the way home. My aging parent now wears an Apple Watch with Fall Detection (and moved two blocks away from me, but that's another thing), which gives me peace of mind. Since I've gotten older, I'm glad that there are more cardio health features on the watch, particularly now that I know that nearly half of all adults in the United States have high blood pressure.
So despite the slowing market, I am still waiting to see what new features—health or otherwise—will be announced at this year's WWDC, and later on this year. 'I would never count Apple out in terms of what they're able to do,' said Naranjo. 'They've proven time and time again that they can create a new category and make that category grow.'
I can be patient and wait in Apple's sticky ecosystem biding time until blood glucose monitoring shows up. Ten years ago, we all asked if we could even find a use for Jony Ive's piece of glittery, buzzing jewelry; not even Apple knew the future success that it had on its hands (or its wrists). The Apple Watch is ubiquitous, and we're still waiting for more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: S&P 500 ekes out new record amid wave of earnings, trade updates
US stocks closed mixed Tuesday, but the benchmark S&P 500 (^GSPC) was able to eke out a new record as Wall Street digested a new batch of earnings, including a tariff warning from General Motors (GM), while also weighing the latest trade developments. The S&P closed just above the flat line to secure the fresh all-time high of 6,309.62. The Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) dropped around 0.4% ahead of Big Tech earnings, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) rose 0.4%. Markets bounced off earlier losses after President Trump announced a new trade deal with the Philippines, in a potential sign that more positive developments on the trade front could be on the horizon. So far, the market has proven resilient in the face of tariff uncertainty, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq hitting fresh record closes on Monday. Earnings season has been largely upbeat, buoying stocks and sentiment — though the market is now weighing how far the recent rally can run. Earnings results from a wave of companies on Tuesday were mixed. The stocks of General Motors (GM), Philip Morris (PM), RTX (RTX), and Lockheed Martin (LMT) sank after their quarterly results disappointed Wall Street. General Motors reported that its core profit sank over 32% in the second quarter as tariff headwinds sapped $1.1 billion from its results. The Big Three automaker warned the hit would be deeper in the current quarter, providing food for thought to investors assessing the impact of President Trump's trade policy. Read more: Full earnings coverage in our live blog At the same time, Wall Street awaits second-quarter results from "Magnificent Seven" members Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) and Tesla (TSLA) on Wednesday. As the valuation of large-cap tech stocks soars, investors are hoping for reassurance that the hype around AI is more than just buzz. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking on trade. Trump's August 1 deadline to strike a deal or raise tariffs is fast approaching but progress remains elusive. Talks with India are reportedly deadlocked, while negotiations with the European Union continue to stall. There is some movement on China. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he'll meet his Chinese counterpart next week in Stockholm with discussions expected to include a possible extension of the August 12 deadline to avoid sharply higher tariffs. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs LIVE 21 updates
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: CEOs have a new boss — Trump
If you're an American CEO, you might wake up one day to discover that President Trump has helped himself to a seat on your board of directors. Since first running for president in 2015, Trump has fashioned himself as a businessman-politician who knows what's best for American companies. Many CEOs appreciate his focus on deregulation and lowering taxes. But there's a catch: Trump has strong views on how managers should run their businesses and no compunctions about using the power of the presidency to bully bosses into doing it his way. Many CEOs are learning how to accommodate the micromanager in chief, some through lip service and others through actual business decisions. Some of Trump's interventions are remarkably mundane. He wants Coca-Cola to use real cane sugar in its soda instead of corn syrup. Coke says it will actually do what Trump wants, even though sugar is more expensive and Trumpa-Cola will probably cost more. Other demands are far more problematic. He wants the Washington Commanders football team and the Cleveland Guardians baseball team to revert to their former names, the racially insensitive Redskins and Indians, respectively. That's Trump using professional sports franchises to push his anti-woke agenda to the extreme, which may not hurt Trump, but it puts the two teams in a lose-lose position by reigniting controversies they thought they had finally put behind them. Trump's most meddlesome gambit is his trade policy, which is meant to literally force thousands of US companies to reorganize the way they do business by buying less abroad and more domestically. He directly threatened Apple with a 25% tax if it doesn't start making iPhones in the United States. After Mattel said it would have to raise prices because of Trump's tariffs, Trump threatened a 100% tax on products the toymaker imports and threatened that Mattel "won't sell one toy in the United States." Trump said he'd hit Harley-Davidson with a "big tax" if it went through with a plan to move some motorcycle production overseas. When Walmart said it would likely pass along the cost of Trump's tariffs to its own customers, Trump told Walmart it should "eat the tariffs" — pay the cost and accept lower profits — and warned, "I'll be watching." Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs Trump's manhandling of corporate America is hitting the bottom line. General Motors (GM) said on July 22 that Trump's tariffs shaved $1.1 billion off its second quarter profits and will likely cost the company as much as $5 billion this year. The day before, Jeep maker Stellantis (STLA) said the Trump tariffs contributed to a $2.7 billion loss in the first half of 2025. The second quarter earnings season is just getting started, so that may just be a taste of the losses related to Trump's rewiring of global supply chains. There's another category of Trump strong-arming: revenge. Trump has punished a dozen or so prominent law firms for working with Democrats or contributing to lawsuits or prosecutions targeting Trump himself. Trump typically issues an order limiting those firms' ability to work with the federal government, and in some cases makes deals in which those firms agree to do pro bono work for Trump's pet causes. Trump becomes the de facto chair of the firm's pro bono there's Trump's anti-woke crusade targeting Harvard, Columbia, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Virginia, and dozens of other universities for policies Trump considers too liberal. Trump has canceled billions of dollars' worth of federal grants to those schools, in some cases securing his desired policy changes as part of a settlement. Many companies have tried to preempt a Trump anti-woke crusade by rolling back diversity policies, including Google, (GOOG), Deloitte, Goldman Sachs (GS), Bank of America (BAC), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Paramount (PARA), UnitedHealth (UNH), and IBM (IBM). Trump, in these instances, runs the HR department for a stint. Trump's micromanaging is a stark departure from the free-market capitalism the Republican Party has espoused for decades. University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers likens Trump's interventionism to Soviet-style central planning. "There is not a single institution this guy doesn't want to call to tell them how to do their jobs," Wolfers said recently. There are at least three lessons for CEOs. One is to hide for as long as Trump is president and hope he never notices your company or any of its products. Trump seems to have targeted Coke for his new beverage formula because he's a famous fan of its products. He hasn't said anything about Pepsi using a similar formula. Pepsi probably hopes he never does, though CEO Ramon Laguarta is clearly hedging his bets. Another lesson is that it's OK to blame Trump's intervention for losing money, but not for raising prices. Trump hasn't publicly criticized any company for saying his tariffs have cost them money, as GM and Stellantis have done and many more are sure to do. Eating the cost of his policies causes Trump no heartburn. But if you publicly blame him for any pain that afflicts voters, he blows his stack and sometimes seeks revenge. Lose money loudly, raise prices quietly. A third lesson is to pal up with Trump — and watch your back. Nvidia (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang has become Trump's new business BFF, accompanying him on a high-visibility Mideast trip in May and counseling him behind the scenes on technology and trade policy. Nvidia benefited earlier this month when Trump reversed a prior position and once again allowed the sale of advanced Nvidia chips to China. The company's stock popped more than 5% on the news. Other corporate titans have courted Trump — and then fallen out of favor. Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, once considered Trump's "tech whisperer," seems to have offended Trump by declining to join his Mideast trip in May. That's when Trump threatened a 25% tax specifically on imported iPhones. Trump's most spectacular business breakup has been with Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk, who contributed millions to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign and became head of the DOGE commission. But Musk grew disillusioned with some of Trump's policies, criticized them publicly, and broke ties with the Trump administration. Trump retaliated by threatening to deport Musk to his home country of South Africa and cancel contracts or subsidies involving Tesla and another Musk company, SpaceX. Crony capitalism only works if the cronyship lasts. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Golden Dome set to get another $13B as project leader takes helm
President Trump's Golden Dome missile defense project officially has a new team lead and gained potentially another $13 billion, setting the effort on a race to hit its ambitious three-year timeline. The office will be led by Vice Chief of Space Operations Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, unanimously confirmed by the Senate on Thursday as the first Golden Dome for America Direct Reporting Program Manager, according to a Pentagon statement released Tuesday. Guetlein, who Trump named as the Golden Dome lead in May, will be 'responsible for developing the Golden Dome portfolio of capabilities,' and report directly to Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg. 'Golden Dome for America requires a whole-of-nation response to deter and, if necessary, to defeat attacks against the United States,' the Pentagon said in the release. 'We have the technological foundation, national talent, and decisive leadership to advance our nation's defenses. We are proud to stand behind Gen. Mike Guetlein as he takes the helm of this national imperative.' Intended to protect the skies over the continental United States, Golden Dome promises a network of space-based missiles launched from satellites to intercept missiles launched from the ground, an expensive, untested technology. The Trump administration has insisted the project is necessary to protect against ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles, and other next-generation aerial attacks and will only cost $175 billion. To fund the effort, $24.4 billion was included for the project in the One Big, Beautiful Bill, signed by Trump on July 4. Then on July 17, the House voted to pass the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, which includes roughly $13 billion for advanced initiatives to support Golden Dome. But the purported price tag, also announced by Trump in May, is far below estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, which pegged the figure at more than $500 billion over 20 years to develop. Other estimates have placed the cost at $1 trillion. What's more, missile defense experts highly doubt a Golden Dome system as Tump has described can be created in under three years. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) last month called out 'the physics' of Golden Dome, pressing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to seek out viability analysis from scientists instead of defense and space firms. 'This idea, you know, might not be fully baked,' Kelly, an engineer by trade, told Hegseth during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on June 18. 'You've got to go back and take a look at this. . . . You could go down a road here and spend hundreds of billions of dollars of the taxpayers' money, get to the end, and we have a system that is not functional,' Kelly added. In its statement, the Pentagon said Golden Dome would establish partnerships with industry, academia, national labs and other government agencies to rapidly develop and field the system, with an architecture to be developed within the next 60 days.