The most successful people are not the smartest—instead, they're both ambitious and lazy, career coach to the Fortune 500 says
Bill Hoogterp has spent decades advising celebrities, CEOs, and rising stars inside some of America's most powerful boardrooms. Through his coaching firm, LifeHikes, he's helped more than 700,000 professionals level up their communication and leadership skills—and personally worked one-on-one with 'thousands' of executives, many of whom appear on Fortune's most powerful lists.
But if you think the secret to their success is raw intelligence or long hours, you'd be mistaken. According to Hoogter, one of the most consistent—and perhaps surprising—qualities shared by the ultra-successful is laziness.
'I would say there's a juxtaposition of almost counterintuitive traits,' he tells Fortune. 'Most successful people, if you meet most famous politicians, they weren't necessarily the A students. They aren't necessarily the smartest.'
'What most CEOs have—that almost nobody else has—is that their ambition is way over the top. Now, if you combine that with lazy, you create a really nice blend because if you're really, really hungry to get success, but you're always looking for shortcuts, the combination of those two things leads to lots of little breakthroughs.'
By lazy, he doesn't mean they're kicking up their feet and taking a 'quiet vacation' instead of grinding. 'They're like: 'How can I get this done faster, easier, better, and have time and energy for other things?'' Hoogterp explains.
Tried and tested shortcuts for success: No big meetings, acronyms or one-to-ones
Plenty of high-profile founders embody Hooterp's paradoxical formula. They're not cutting corners to coast—but to outsmart the competition, innovate faster and remain agile in a fast-moving market.
Perhaps the most famous example of this is Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, who famously coined move fast and break things when scaling Facebook into the $1.8 trillion social media giant it is today.
Likewise, Jeff Bezos' top career advice for his once right-hand man, Greg Hart, was literally to do less himself and delegate more to his employees. 'The fewer decisions that have to go to the CEO, the faster the organization will move,' the billionaire Amazon founder told him.
Nvidia CEO and co-founder Jensen Huang doesn't have one-to-one meetings with his 60 direct reports—and it's a deliberate shortcut to innovation. Not only does it save time in their schedules, but more importantly, it ensures ideas and problems aren't siloed in private conversations. 'In that way, our company was designed for agility—for information to flow as quickly as possible,' he said.
Then there's Elon Musk, who has a whole list of time-saving and corner-cutting rules for staff, including a ban on big and frequent meetings, no chain of command or acronyms, and an encouragement to walk out of unnecessary conversations. 'Walk out of a meeting or drop off a call as soon as it is obvious you aren't adding value,' the Tesla boss outlined. 'It is not rude to leave, it is rude to make someone stay and waste their time.'
Brains alone won't get you to the top—or even hired
Hooterp's claim that the most successful aren't the smartest doesn't just apply to CEOs. It's a theme echoed when it comes to hiring too. Countless CEOs and founders have said that they value attitude over aptitude.
Amazon's AI boss exclusively told Fortune that stumbling your way through an interview question won't cost you the job. But being fake will. Andy Jassy, the company's CEO (and his boss), has similarly shared that attitude is the make-or-break trait that'll determine your success—especially, he says, in your 20s.
Likewise, Cisco's U.K. chief focuses on whether a potential new hire has a positive energy and can-do attitude because, she says, that can't be taught. 'It's more about the person first and foremost than it is about skills or experience,' Sarah Walker told Fortune.
And they're far from alone: About 80% of the Fortune 500 use personality tests in hiring, as well as tech giants like Amazon, Meta and Microsoft.
A positive attitude is so important that some chiefs would rather remain understaffed than risk having a bad apple spoil the bunch. As Duolingo's CEO told Fortune, 'it's better to have a hole than an asshole.'
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BofA Trims McDonald's (MCD) Price Target, Maintains Neutral Rating
McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) is one of the most profitable consumer stocks to buy now. Bank of America slightly lowered its price target on McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) to $322 from $327 while keeping a Neutral rating, as it fine-tunes estimates across its restaurant coverage ahead of the sector's upcoming earnings season. The revised target implies an upside of roughly 8.4% from the current market price of $297. saknakorn / The move reflects a broader recalibration by BofA analysts, who are adjusting their models to account for changes in market multiples and company-specific revisions. While McDonald's remains a stable performer, the firm signaled that valuation has grown less compelling in the short term, especially amid a backdrop of slowing same-store sales growth and cautious consumer trends in key international markets. BofA highlighted that while McDonald's continues to benefit from scale, operational efficiency, and strong brand equity, macro pressures, including FX headwinds and uneven traffic in Europe, could limit near-term upside. Still, the modest price cut is not a sign of deteriorating fundamentals but rather part of a broader sector-level housekeeping. Investors will be closely monitoring McDonald's quarterly update for guidance on pricing strategies, traffic trends, and progress in digital engagement, all of which will shape sentiment heading into the second half of the year. While we acknowledge the potential of MCD as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: Top 10 Healthcare AI Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds and 10 Best Industrial Automation Stocks to Buy for the Next Decade Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures trade flat as Wall Street braces for Big Tech earnings
US stock futures traded flat as investors prepared for earnings season to pick up steam, with Big Tech earnings ahead. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) and the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) ticked up 0.1%. Futures attached to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) held steady. On Monday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq cleared fresh records even as the EU prepared for a no-deal scenario with the US ahead of President Trump's Aug. 1 deadline to strike trade agreements. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Meanwhile, investors are eagerly waiting for second-quarter earnings results from tech heavyweights Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) and Tesla (TSLA) on Wednesday. As the valuation of large-cap tech stocks soars, investors are hoping for reassurance that the hype around AI is more than just hype. Tesla, with its stock down roughly 20% this year, faces particular scrutiny over how its core auto business is performing amid CEO Elon Musk's political activities and other headwinds. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Treasury Secretary suggests August 1 trade deal deadline doesn't matter one day after Commerce Secretary calls it a ‘hard deadline'
The Trump administration may be taking a flexible approach to what it previously described as a 'hard deadline' of long-promised tariffs taking effect on August 1. 'The important thing here is the quality of the deal, not the timing of the deals,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Monday, arguing the president's tariff threats had created 'maximum leverage as only he can do' for countries to swiftly reach trade deals with the U.S. 'Our trading partners were told that the rates could boomerang back toward the April 2nd levels,' he added. 'We can continue talking then. But again, we're proceeding apace with the negotiations, but we're not going to rush for the sake of doing deals.' Other Trump officials have described the August 1 deadline, when U.S. trading partners could face up to 40 percent tariffs, as a firmer cutoff point. 'That's a hard deadline, so on August 1, the new tariff rates will come in,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CBS News on Sunday. 'Nothing stops countries from talking to us after August 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on August 1.' The Trump administration is focusing more on the 'quality' of trade deals than White House's August 1 tariff deadline, though Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says U.S. is applying 'maximum leverage' through Trump to secure swift results (REUTERS) The president, for his part, has called the deadline "firm but not 100 percent firm.' Throughout July, the Trump administration has written letters to foreign leaders warning of the coming tariffs, expected to include a 35 percent tariff rate against Canada, a major U.S. trading partner, and a 30 percent rate for the European Union and Mexico. Since being unveiled in April, Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff agenda has been repeatedly delayed, and the administration has conceded it won't achieve its original promise of 90 trade deals in 90 days. 'There's 200 countries,'' the president said earlier this month. 'You can't talk to all of them.'' The president's hesitancy to fully implement the tariffs has prompted critics of the president to deem the tariff agenda the 'TACO' plan, for 'Trump always chickens out.' The markets 'shrugged' off Trump's move to push back the tariffs to August, Carolyn Kissane, a professor at NYU's School of Professional Studies Center for Global Affairs, told The Independent earlier this month, compared to the initial market plunge when the tariffs were first revealed. 'The pattern is familiar: dramatic declarations, walk-backs, and renewed threats. It's eroded his credibility and resembles the boy who cried wolf,' Kissane added. 'He believes this tactic gives him a unique leverage to negotiate, but it also weakens the threats.'