Older drivers face £2,500 fine for breaking rules amid new crackdown on 'errors'
Drivers have been warned they could be hit with a massive fine for failing to disclose medical conditions correctly – which can lead to deadly consequences on UK roads. It follows the launch of a major campaign, which was aimed at raising awareness around the fitness to drive. The campaign, which was introduced by the Department for Infrastructure in Northern Ireland, is particularly focussed on elderly motorists and those with health conditions.
It also hopes to address increasing concerns about road safety across the country. Infrastructure minister Liz Kimmins highlighted the necessity of the campaign, stating that "too many people are killed and seriously injured on our roads every year."
She added that, based on evidence, over 95% of road deaths are due to human error. She said: "This campaign is a reminder to us all to keep ourselves and others safe on the roads by making sure we follow the appropriate steps in the event of illness or eyesight issues.'
She also warned that if people do not change their attitudes when driving on British roads, the death toll will continue to rise, as reported by GB News.
As part of the campaign, social media platforms will be utilised to reach drivers directly, and will point out crucial information about how to keep in line with road safety standards.
Kimmins added that the campaign "reminds us of our personal responsibility to behave in a way that keeps ourselves and others safe." As such, it contains two components which are aimed at covering different aspects of road safety.
The first component, 'Keep Yourself Right', is designed to remind drivers to take appropriate steps when experiencing health conditions or eyesight issues. This is because these can impact their driving ability.
They are also highlighting the importance of keeping driving licence details up to date. This includes bringing attention to the specific requirements that apply to drivers aged over 70, in which they are required to renew their license every three years.
Meanwhile, the second part, 'Time to Talk', focuses on those who have concerns about another person's ability to drive safely and hopes to encourage honest conversations between family members and friends about driving capabilities.
Under UK law, all drivers suffering from medical conditions affecting their driving ability must inform the Driver and Vehicle Agency. Failure to comply is an offence punishable by fines up to £1,000.
However, the agency has warned that those making false claims over their health may face an even steeper penalty and can be hit with fines of up to £2500.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
British woman trapped in US due to insurance after 'life-changing' fall
A British woman who suffered 'life-changing' injuries during a hiking fall in the US has now fallen victim to insurance and is trapped abroad as a result. Charlotte Hollins Anderton, from Abergele, north Wales, plummeted 30ft while celebrating Independence Day with children from the summer camp she works in. The 23-year-old endured an eight-hour wait to be rescued – with a fractured spine, two shattered feet and internal bleeding. She required numerous operations, intensive care treatment and on top of it, emotional trauma from the incident, which took place on July 4. If her suffering was not enough, her family now say her insurance coverage has been turned down. This means Charlotte now faces a bill of £45,000 to bring her back home to the UK. A GoFundMe page has been set up to assist in repatriating her and so far, more than £16,000 have been raised. A statement on the website reads: 'Our beautiful Charlotte was tragically involved in a life changing accident whilst working as a camp leader this summer.' 'She has suffered a life threatening fall on July 4 and has been hospitalised since. 'Her fall resulted in spinal and foot fractures requiring multiple surgeries, internal bleeding and admission to the intensive care unit. 'She is also dealing with intense emotional trauma from the fall, and it breaks our hearts that we can't be there to help. 'But on top of all of the unimaginable pain and suffering, while we have been deciding what to do as a family, we were just hit with another worry that her insurance company will not be covering the cost of repatriation from America to back home. 'She urgently needs to come home for her to access specialist care via the NHS and continue her recovery with family by her side.' The family explained that they never thought they would find themselves in such a situation, but all they want 'is to have Charlotte home'. More Trending The statement added: 'We will be keeping everyone updated every step of the way, and thank you all so much already for your kind words, promises of donations and support. 'It means more to us than you could imagine. Thank you so much.' Charlotte – a University of York St John graduate from a Professional Policing course – spent last summer at YMCA Camp Seymour in Gig Harbor, Washington. She had returned as a camp leader for a second year in a row when the fall took place. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: World's first gonorrhea vaccination programme to be rolled out in England MORE: British man killed after hair transplant in Turkey was 'inspiring teacher' MORE: Paralysed mum 'stuck in hell' after hospital staff 'refused to wash her'
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Study: Avoiding ultra-processed foods while dieting can double weight loss
By Consuming a diet low in ultra-processed foods could help supercharge weight loss , promising research suggested today. Additive-laden foods such as crisps and sweets have been vilified for decades over their supposed risks, with dozens of studies linking them to type 2 diabetes , heart disease and cancer . Experts have even called for UPFs—typically anything edible that has more artificial ingredients than natural ones—to be slashed from diets. Now, British scientists who tracked dozens of adults have discovered those who ate a diet rich in minimally processed foods and avoided UPFs, lost twice as much weight as those who often consumed UPFs. Sticking to meals cooked from scratch could also help curb food cravings, they also found. However, diets high in UPFs had little impact on blood pressure, heart rate, liver function and cholesterol. 'But not all ultra-processed foods are inherently unhealthy based on their nutritional profile.' In the study, the researchers tracked 50 people who were already consuming diets packed with UPFs and split them into two groups. Half were given an eight-week diet plan comprising minimally processed foods, such as overnight oats and spaghetti bolognese, while the other half were given foods like breakfast oat bars or lasagne ready meals. After completing one diet, the groups then switched. Researchers matched the two diets nutritionally on levels of fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrates, salt and fibre using the Eatwell Guide, which outlines recommendations on how to eat a healthy, balanced diet. They found those on the minimally processed diet lost more weight (2.06 per cent) compared to the UPF diet (1.05 per cent loss). The UPF diet also did not result in significant fat loss, the researchers said. Dr Dicken added: 'Though a 2 per cent reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their intake. 'If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13 per cent weight reduction in men and a 9 per cent reduction in women on the minimally processed diet, but only a 4 per cent weight reduction in men and 5 per cent in women after the ultra-processed diet. 'Over time this would start to become a big difference.' Those on the trial were also asked to complete questionnaires on food cravings before and after starting the diets. Those eating minimally processed foods had less cravings and were able to resist them better, the study suggests. However, researchers also measured others markers like blood pressure, heart rate, liver function, glucose levels and cholesterol and found no significant negative impacts of the UPF diet. The Eatwell Guide recommends the average woman should consume around 2,000 calories a day, while an average man should consume 2,500. Both diet groups had a calorie deficit, meaning people were eating fewer calories than what they were burning, which helps with weight loss. However, the deficit was higher from minimally processed foods at around 230 calories a day, compared with 120 calories per day from UPFs. Professor Rachel Batterham, senior author of the study from the UCL centre for obesity research, said: 'Despite being widely promoted, less than 1 per cent of the UK population follows all of the recommendations in the Eatwell Guide, and most people stick to fewer than half. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat, and prioritizing high-fibre foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses and nuts. Tracy Parker, nutrition lead at the British Heart Foundation, also said: 'The way this study was designed means it is more reflective of real-world conditions than previous research on UPFs. 'The small size of the study is a limitation, and the fact that most participants were women limits how much we can generalize the findings to the general population. 'We also can't be certain how closely the diets were followed, as participants self-reported what they ate during the study. 'Larger, longer-term studies will be needed to see if the greater weight loss on the minimally processed diets seen here translates into bigger improvements in risk factors, including blood pressure and cholesterol and blood sugar levels, and a reduced risk of developing heart and circulatory diseases.
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Avoiding ultra-processed foods while dieting can double weight loss, finds new study
Consuming a diet low in ultra-processed foods could help supercharge weight loss, promising research suggested today. Additive-laden foods such as crisps and sweets have been vilified for decades over their supposed risks, with dozens of studies linking them to type 2 diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Experts have even called for UPFs—typically anything edible that has more artificial ingredients than natural ones—to be slashed from diets. Now, British scientists who tracked dozens of adults have discovered those who ate a diet rich in minimally processed foods and avoided UPFs, lost twice as much weight as those who often consumed UPFs. Sticking to meals cooked from scratch could also help curb food cravings, they also found. However, diets high in UPFs had little impact on blood pressure, heart rate, liver function and cholesterol. Researchers today argued their findings echoed calls to limit certain types of UPFs but cautioned it also showed that not all UPFs are 'inherently unhealthy'. Dr Samuel Dicken, an expert in behavioural science and health at University College London and study co-author, said: 'We saw significantly greater weight loss on the minimally processed food diet. 'Previous research has linked ultra-processed foods with poor health outcomes. 'But not all ultra-processed foods are inherently unhealthy based on their nutritional profile.' In the study, the researchers tracked 50 people who were already consuming diets packed with UPFs and split them into two groups. Half were given an eight-week diet plan comprising minimally processed foods, such as overnight oats and spaghetti bolognese, while the other half were given foods like breakfast oat bars or lasagne ready meals. After completing one diet, the groups then switched. Researchers matched the two diets nutritionally on levels of fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrates, salt and fibre using the Eatwell Guide, which outlines recommendations on how to eat a healthy, balanced diet. They found those on the minimally processed diet lost more weight (2.06 per cent) compared to the UPF diet (1.05 per cent loss). The UPF diet also did not result in significant fat loss, the researchers said. Dr Dicken added: 'Though a 2 per cent reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their intake. 'If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13 per cent weight reduction in men and a 9 per cent reduction in women on the minimally processed diet, but only a 4 per cent weight reduction in men and 5 per cent in women after the ultra-processed diet. 'Over time this would start to become a big difference.' Those on the trial were also asked to complete questionnaires on food cravings before and after starting the diets. Those eating minimally processed foods had less cravings and were able to resist them better, the study suggests. However, researchers also measured others markers like blood pressure, heart rate, liver function, glucose levels and cholesterol and found no significant negative impacts of the UPF diet. The Eatwell Guide recommends the average woman should consume around 2,000 calories a day, while an average man should consume 2,500. Both diet groups had a calorie deficit, meaning people were eating fewer calories than what they were burning, which helps with weight loss. However, the deficit was higher from minimally processed foods at around 230 calories a day, compared with 120 calories per day from UPFs. Professor Rachel Batterham, senior author of the study from the UCL centre for obesity research, said: 'Despite being widely promoted, less than 1 per cent of the UK population follows all of the recommendations in the Eatwell Guide, and most people stick to fewer than half. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat, and prioritising high-fibre foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses and nuts. Tracy Parker, nutrition lead at the British Heart Foundation, also said: 'The way this study was designed means it is more reflective of real-world conditions than previous research on UPFs. 'The small size of the study is a limitation, and the fact that most participants were women limits how much we can generalise the findings to the general population. 'We also can't be certain how closely the diets were followed, as participants self-reported what they ate during the study. 'Larger, longer-term studies will be needed to see if the greater weight loss on the minimally processed diets seen here translates into bigger improvements in risk factors, including blood pressure and cholesterol and blood sugar levels, and a reduced risk of developing heart and circulatory diseases. 'Completely cutting UPFs out of our diets isn't realistic for most of us. But including more minimally processed foods—like fresh or home cooked meals—alongside a balanced diet could offer added benefits too.'
