Calls for SNP to drop nuclear opposition but party says Starmer is 'pandering' to Trump on defence
The Scottish Secretary said Scotland should reap the 'defence dividend' but the SNP's Westminster defence spokesperson said his party's stance on nuclear was in line with the Scottish population.
In a week that began with the US launching strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the world's most powerful nations have now turned their attention to their own defence.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK would buy 12 new F-35A fighter jets capable of transporting nuclear bombs while at the NATO summit in the Netherlands Donald Trump praised members for agreeing to spend five per cent of their GDP on defence.
A newly-published National Security Strategy stated the UK has to 'actively prepare for the possibility of the UK coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario'.
Politicians from across the spectrum have been debating what this preparation looks like and whether it should include nuclear weapons.
Here the Sunday Mail speaks to Labour's Scottish Secretary Ian Murray and the SNP's defence spokesman Dave Doogan about their very different views on how to protect the nation from foreign threats.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray has called for the SNP to rethink its stance against nuclear weapons.
The Labour MP for Edinburgh South changed his stance on nukes in recent months, having been a 'lifelong' opponent of the weapons previously.
In February he was praised by disarmament campaigners for his support of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, but a month later he said he was 'proud' that Scotland hosted Trident.
Last week he re-stated his support of the deadly weapons and said 'It's really important when circumstances change for that to happen.'
He made the comments the day before Starmer announced he was buying 12 new US-made fighter jets, which are capable of carrying conventional weapons as well as American nuclear bombs.
Speaking exclusively to the Sunday Mail Murray said the First Minister and his party should review their opposition to nukes.
He said: 'Any responsible government has to make sure they put their national security and the safety of their own people first.
'Scots only have to turn on their TVs and pick up their newspapers to read about the fact that there is a changing global instability.
'I do think the Scottish Government should readdress it.
'Defence is really important and the two key things that come from that defence posture are jobs and growth in Scotland.'
Murray said the country played a 'disproportionate role' in Britain's defence and he wanted to exploit the 'dividend' that comes from that.
He said: 'My views on nuclear weapons changed some time ago but they have been underlined and emphasised by the fact that the issue of nuclear weapons and deterrence have become a huge global stability issue.
'For the Scottish government to tell Rolls Royce, one of the most respected British institutions, that they will not contribute to them investing in a highly skilled welding academy in Glasgow tells the public that they don't care about jobs, growth and opportunities for the future.
'That is a huge part of the defence dividend we should be trying to capture. Places like Babcock and BAE systems are hiring foreign welders from the Philippines and South Africa to do the work local people should be doing.
'So yes their stance should change, not just on defensive nuclear but on civilian nuclear as well.'
The SNP's Westminster defence spokesman accused Keir Starmer of pandering to Donald Trump to 'make him relevant' after agreeing to buy a dozen new fighter jets capable of transporting US nuclear weapons.
Dave Doogan, MP for Angus and Perthshire Glens, said his party's stance on nuclear was in line with the Scottish population and said the UK Government was not being honest about the country's own nuclear capability.
He said: ' The SNP's position on nuclear remains resolute insofar as we're against it. We believe we're firmly in step with the vast majority of civil society in Scotland on that point.
'Ian Murray, consistent with many other issues, is not in step with the majority of civil society in Scotland.
'I've spoken to armed forces professionals who deal with the nuclear deterrent and nobody talks about it in the triumphant way in which Westminster politicians of the two main parties do.
'They know keenly that nuclear weapons are an evil. They would see it as a necessary evil, I take a different view.'
Doogan said the public were 'being taken for mugs' by Starmer following the announcement about the dozen F-35A jets and said the US would really be in control if it came to delivering nuclear attacks.
He said: 'The announcement is an absolute disgrace. The Americans have instructed the United Kingdom to not buy 12 F-35B variants, which is the vertical takeoff model that the UK wanted, and swap them for 12 'A' variants that can't be operated off the UK's aircraft carriers.
'They have to operate off land so they can carry America's nuclear weapons for America, store them in the United kingdom and launch them in a way that America determines, without a debate or a manifesto commitment on any of this.
'People are being taken for mugs.'
Doogan said the purchase will see the UK 'become an arms-length nuclear franchise for the United States' and said: 'No other nuclear power delivers another nuclear power's nuclear weapons.
'There are five nuclear sharing nations in Europe who have agreed that in time of war they will assist with United States nuclear weapons. None of those countries have massive nuclear weapons bills like the UK.
'Only the UK is lining up to deliver America's nuclear weapons for America while being a nuclear power.
'It is yet another example of the current Labour government falling at the feet of the Trump administration, begging for him to make them relevant.'
He said the money spent on nuclear weapons in the UK was 'one of the reasons why the conventional armed forces are in the state that they are in.'
He said: 'The SNP believe not that we should be disinvesting from nuclear weapons so that we can disinvest in defence - far from it.
'We could have a far more robust defence posture of conventional armed forces, that Scotland deserves, without the hundreds of millions that's getting spent on dreadnought-class submarines and weapons.
'We believe nuclear weapons are morally wrong and that the UK's possession is surplus to requirements that exist in a genuinely independent way within NATO.
'They certainly shouldn't be in Scotland's waters without a by your leave.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Welfare concessions to be set out ahead of crunch vote
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Bill aims to deliver a 'fairer, more compassionate system' ahead of the legislation's second reading on Tuesday. The Government will amend the Bill at the Commons committee stage to put the changes in place. The original plans restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit. The changes to Pip will now only apply to new claims from November 2026. Plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit have also been rowed back, with all existing recipients to have their incomes protected in real terms. Details of a review of the Pip assessment, to be led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people, will also be published. Draft regulations for the 'right to try', to enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment, will also be laid in Parliament. The Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. 'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. 'This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.' Some £300 million in employment support will also be brought forward over the next three years. Those with severe conditions who are unlikely to recover – about 200,000 people – will not be called for a reassessment of universal credit. From next year to 2030, all those who already receive the health element of universal credit and new claimants with severe conditions and 12 months or less to live will see an annual rise to their combined standard and limited capacity for work allowance at least in line with inflation. Ms Kendall had confirmed concessions to the plans after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at its first Commons hurdle. That is now expected to be withdrawn after the move appeased some rebellious MPs, but others are considering backing a similar amendment to be tabled on Monday. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News the changes 'have put us in a much better position' and give 'peace of mind' to those receiving Pip, but he did not rule out further concessions. Labour MP Rachael Maskell said she would sign the new amendment aiming to stop the Bill, saying it was not clear how the promised concessions would be brought in. 'There's no confidence… we're being asked to sign a blank check even with these changes,' she told the PA news agency. Vicky Foxcroft, who quit as a Labour whip over the reforms, told The Guardian there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement' and that she had not decided how to vote. Olivia Blake, a Labour MP with a disclosed disability, told the paper the changes could create 'an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently'. The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against and have called for the Government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce. Deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: 'Liberal Democrats simply cannot support any measures that make things harder for unpaid carers, disabled people who rely on support with daily tasks in order to stay employed, and those whose disabilities mean that they will never be able to work. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has called the concessions 'the worst of all worlds'. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately would not say on Sunday how the Tories would vote and that the party would wait to see what the Secretary of State sets out.
Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Disabled people ‘could face extra annual costs of £15,000 by end of the decade'
Disability equality charity Scope has warned that Government concessions on welfare cuts will simply lead to a 'two-tier system' where 'huge numbers' of people in need are still out of pocket. Its analysis has estimated average monthly costs – not taking into account welfare reforms – to cover extras such as higher energy bills or specialist mobility equipment, are likely to rise to £1,244 for disabled people in the UK, totalling almost £15,000 a year, by April 2029. 'The concessions put forward by Government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from Pip. James Taylor, Scope The annual disability price tag report comes just a day before MPs are expected to debate and vote on the Government's welfare reform Bill. Ministers were forced into an eleventh-hour climbdown on Friday in the face of a major backbench rebellion, offering concessions on some aspects of Labour's proposed cuts plan. The Government's original package, first presented in March, included restrictions on eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit. But, in the face of pressure from more than 100 Labour MPs, the Government U-turned last week, saying existing claimants would be protected, with tightened eligibility only applying to new claimants. While Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said his welfare reforms now strike 'the right balance', Scope argued the changes will still result in 'catastrophic cuts', with some disabled people protected and supported but others not. The charity's latest report is based on analysis of the Family Resources Survey (FRS) and makes calculations using Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) inflation forecasts to show the likely extra costs faced by disabled people in the coming years. It does not take into account the impact of the welfare reforms, with the charity warning that the figures highlight that those people who do not get Pip could end up in a 'precarious financial position and will still face high extra costs'. It estimated extra costs for disabled people are currently at £1,095 a month, up from last year's price tag, which stood at £1,010. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has made concessions on his Bill in the face of opposition from Labour MPs (Paul Currie/PA) Scope said benefits do not cover the entirety of these costs, with a current monthly shortfall of around £630, likely to rise to a £704 shortfall by the end of the decade. James Taylor, executive director of strategy at Scope, said: 'Life costs an enormous amount more when you're disabled. Whether it's higher electricity bills because of medical equipment to power, or higher heating bills because of health conditions affected by the cold. 'Our latest analysis finds the price tag of disability is now £1,095 a month. A figure only set to increase in the coming years unless action is taken. 'The concessions put forward by Government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from Pip. 'The Government must change course on these catastrophic cuts now, and properly co-produce with disabled people on how to reform our welfare system.' Responding to the 'two-tier' claims from other critics last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: 'The changes that we are introducing will make sure existing claimants are unaffected, but we also all agree that there do need to be changes in the future to make sure that people who can work do, so we protect those who can't but we make the welfare state sustainable for the future.' While all of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill. A Government spokesperson said: 'We're delivering one of the biggest packages of welfare reforms in a generation – including scrapping the Work Capability Assessment, rebalancing Universal Credit, and investing in tailored employment support. 'Protecting people is a principle we will never compromise on, which is why we're delivering long-lasting and meaningful change that puts the welfare system on sustainable footing so the safety net will always be there for those who need it. 'We're restoring trust and fairness in the system, ensuring existing Pip claimants will be able to keep their award and putting the voice of sick or disabled people at the heart of our plans, whilst ramping up support to help them into work.'
The Herald Scotland
43 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ian Blackford urges SNP to support defence spending
At this week's NATO summit, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer committed to raising defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. READ MORE Mr Blackford said this was a "seismic shift" and would have "massive implications for the budgets of every government department over the next decade." "Though in these islands we have excellence in many aspects of our armed forces, to a large extent our military capability has been hollowed out," he wrote. "The need to enhance defence capability and at pace is stark. "There is now a race to invest and if we take last year's defence spending of £53.9 billion as our base, we are going to have to find by 2035 an extra £60 billion plus a year to invest in defence. "Where is this to come from?" The former MP said 'difficult choices' would need to be made. He argued that defence funding should not be seen as a moral compromise, but as an economic lever. "Austerity will be a price to be paid as a consequence of having to invest in our national security. "Investment in defence, though, can be a lever and transformative in itself in generating economic growth." He noted that the industry already supports 33,500 workers in Scotland and contributes £3.2 billion in gross value. "We all want a high-growth, high-wage, high-productivity Scotland—a society that drives investment in skills and innovation." The SNP has long opposed public money being spent on munitions. The Scottish National Investment Bank's ethical investment policy currently bars organisations 'primarily engaged in the manufacture of munitions or weapons' from receiving support. Ian Blackford calling on the SNP to embrace the defence sector (Image: PA) Recently, a new welding centre—backed by Rolls-Royce and intended to support Royal Navy submarine construction—was denied funding by Scottish Enterprise. The UK Government has since stepped in to fund the initiative. The SNP has faced accusations of hypocrisy, as the Scottish Government funds Ferguson Marine, which is subcontracted by BAE to work on Royal Navy frigates. Mr Blackford's intervention comes as John Swinney faces mounting internal and external pressure to reconsider his government's position. Recently, the First Minister suggested the policy could be "reconsidered" given the growing threat from Russia. Speaking on the Holyrood Sources podcast, he said: "I'm conscious we are living in a very different context today. I do think the Russian threat is very real. We have to consider these questions." He added he had no objections if a company wished to set up a munitions factory in Scotland. The First Minister added: "We do not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions but will support skills and defence companies." Speaking to Scotland on Sunday, Stewart McDonald, the SNP's former defence spokesperson at Westminster, said it was time for the party to look again at the policy. "It hasn't had a proper defence debate since 2012, when we changed the policy on NATO," he said. "All of this is moving at such pace. The entire international picture is moving at a rapid pace and if we are a party that seeks to be an independent state—and an independent state in NATO and the EU—then we should have stuff to say on this." Mr McDonald warned: "There is a risk the party falls behind in that debate." He said: "That's a debate going on in capitals across Europe. And although Edinburgh is not a state capital, the Scottish Government has a role to play as a domestic partner. "We have an industry in Scotland worth many billions of pounds, employing somewhere between 33,000 and 35,000 people, and it has a very awkward relationship with the Scottish Government—it has done so for a long time." He suggested Mr Swinney should gather major and smaller defence employers in Scotland, invite the defence procurement minister from London, and ask: "How do I marshal the resources of the government—spending, policy, legislative—to better support this?" "I understand there's a bit of political balancing to be done here, but I think that can be over-thought and over-egged," he added. "We do live in much more dangerous times and there's a risk we are just saying the same stuff we've been saying for a long time—and that just would not be credible to stand still politically as the entire world changes around you." Mr McDonald branded the Scottish Enterprise ban on munitions-related investment "a stupid policy" and criticised restrictions at the Scottish National Investment Bank. Meanwhile, in the Sunday Mail, Labour's Scottish Secretary, Ian Murray, called on the SNP to reverse its opposition to nuclear weapons entirely. "Any responsible government has to make sure they put their national security and the safety of their own people first. "Scots only have to turn on their TVs and pick up their newspapers to read about the fact that there is a changing global instability. "I do think the Scottish Government should readdress it." Previously, Mr Murray described himself as a 'lifelong unilateralist' and was one of 2000 parliamentarians to have signed the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) pledge, which obliges signatories to work for their respective nations to sign up to a worldwide ban on nuclear weapons through the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). He added: "My views on nuclear weapons changed some time ago but they have been underlined and emphasised by the fact that the issue of nuclear weapons and deterrence has become a huge global stability issue. "For the Scottish Government to tell Rolls-Royce, one of the most respected British institutions, that they will not contribute to them investing in a highly skilled welding academy in Glasgow tells the public that they do not care about jobs, growth and opportunities for the future. "That is a huge part of the defence dividend we should be trying to capture. Places like Babcock and BAE Systems are hiring foreign welders from the Philippines and South Africa to do the work local people should be doing." READ MORE However, SNP defence spokesperson Dave Doogan told the paper that the party remained 'resolute' in its opposition to nuclear weapons. "We believe we're firmly in step with the vast majority of civil society in Scotland on that point. "Ian Murray, consistent with many other issues, is not in step with the majority of civil society in Scotland. "I've spoken to armed forces professionals who deal with the nuclear deterrent and nobody talks about it in the triumphant way in which Westminster politicians of the two main parties do." Any change in the Scottish Government's policy would likely be met with opposition from the Scottish Greens.
