Controversial proposal to pay hunters cash to kill feral animals in Australia
NSW Premier Chris Minns on Tuesday floated the idea as a potential solution to the state's $13million feral animal problem.
Invasive species such as pigs, cats, dogs, and rabbits cost farmers millions in damage each year and pose a serious threat to native wildlife and ecosystems.
But the 'barbaric' plan has been criticised, with NSW Upper House MP and Animal Justice Party member Emma Hurst condemning it as a waste of taxpayers' money.
'Bounties encourage mass cruelty to animals,' Hurst told Daily Mail Australia.
'A similar Victorian scheme has received extreme criticism for this. We can't copy the same ruthless and cruel program into NSW.'
She said mass animal killing programs, including poison and aerial shootings, have been proven to be 'both cruel and ineffective'.
Invasive Species Council CEO Jack Gough has also criticised the proposal, accusing the Premier and the Labor Party of cutting a political deal with the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party in exchange for its support.
'[It] has nothing to do with good feral animal management,' Gough said.
'Bounty hunters might be heroes on the big screen, but in the real world of feral animal control, they're just a waste of taxpayers' money.'
Hurst echoed his concerns, arguing that there are more humane alternatives.
'If the Premier and the Shooters Party were genuine about wanting to reduce the number of introduced animals, they would be relying on science and running immunocontraceptive programs,' she said.
'You don't need to be an expert to see that arming the general public with guns and sending them off on a yahoo killing spree is not the answer, and, in fact, creates a risk for everyone in the community.'
Shooters Party MP Robert Borsak has previously called for bounties to be offered, citing the failings of Local Land Services (LLS) regarding pest management.
In 2024, LLS spent over $13.2million on pest control and removed just 112,000 animals, most of which were feral pigs.
Mr Borsak said recreational hunters are both more efficient and more cost-effective.
'Recreational conservation hunters shot 1.69million pigs in the 2024 calendar year and contributed over $100million to the NSW economy, primarily benefiting rural and regional communities,' he told Parliament in March.
He has proposed a $20 bounty for pigs, foxes, and feral cats in New South Wales, arguing the initiative would assist farmers and volunteer hunters while addressing the widespread damage caused by invasive species.
According to Mr Borsak, a $2million program could result in the removal of 100,000 animals, a fraction of the cost of existing LLS programs.
He said it would also reduce financial pressure on farmers and encouraging greater community involvement.
NSW Farmers President Xavier Martin has backed the proposal and criticised its opponents, saying animal pests were costing $489million in damages each year.
'Online commentators who suggest we don't need additional efforts in this area are seriously out of touch with the realities of the landscape,' he said.
'That's a staggering amount of money, and that's why we welcome the Premier's approach to look at every option to slash the number of feral animals.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Australia and UK to sign 50-year defense agreement
Australia and the UK are pledging a half-century alliance, shifting the two nations closer together while the US wavers in its support for a crucial nuclear submarine program. A 50-year treaty to underpin the three-nation security pact will be signed after Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defense Minister Richard Marles meet their counterparts for talks in Sydney . The AUKUS security partnership involves the US, UK and Australia, but the fresh treaty is only between London and Canberra. In opening remarks with UK leaders, Marles said the two nations' relationship might be Australia's most important partnership. 'We rely on each other in so many ways and obviously, combined, we are part of a system that gives us tremendous intelligence capability and military capability,' he said. While negotiations over the defense agreement were flagged before US President Donald Trump took power, the document's inking shows the UK and Australia are strengthening ties in the face of American tariffs and the Pentagon's yet-to-be-completed AUKUS review. But the planned sale of US-built boats has been up in the air since the Trump administration launched a review of the deal to examine whether it aligns with his 'America first' agenda. Defence analysts believe a likely outcome of the US review will be a request for more money from Australia to support its submarine industrial base. Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior analyst Alex Bristow said holding ministerial meetings every six months, rather than the traditional annual timeline, highlighted strengthened ties between the two nations. 'The tempo of it increasing, I think, is a signal that Britain is moving into an elite category,' he said. The UK's Carrier Strike Group, led by the Royal Navy flagship HMS Prince of Wales, arrived in Darwin on Wednesday during Talisman Sabre multi-nation military exercises hosted by Australia. It's the first UK carrier strike group to visit Australia since 1997. The international task group includes five core ships, 24 jets and 17 helicopters, centered on the flagship aircraft carrier.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
An eco-friendly renovation doesn't need to be all about appliances and it needn't cost the Earth
When people think of undertaking an environmentally friendly renovation on their homes, the first thing they might think of is replacing old inefficient appliances or going electric. But for an increasing number of ecologically minded homeowners, reducing construction waste and recycling or repurposing existing infrastructure is just as important and even more affordable. Andrew Sweatman and his wife are empty-nesters approaching retirement who live in a century-old Edwardian house in Melbourne's inner north. The couple's renovation should ultimately lift their home's energy rating from 0.9 to 7.7 stars. But rather than following the trend of ripping the guts out of the house, they have elected to keep as much of the original building as possible intact and recycle the good parts, including elements of the back yard. 'This was a key philosophy of our architects too – we kept the same footprint with no massive rebuilds,' says Sweatman. 'We realised it was time to freshen things up for our retirement and fix some key problems to improve the environmental performance of the house so this would be our forever home.' The couple started by identifying the features they wanted to keep including the flooring, framing materials and some plasterworks and renovate around them, minimising costs and recycling where possible. They also maintained some original features like the front door and stained-glass windows. 'We wanted to maintain heritage aspects of the house instead of simply demolishing the whole home and keeping just a facade. We also decided we didn't want to destroy the back yard to extend the home to be a mega house.' The Sweatmans are improving the homes energy efficiency by installing solar, batteries, and more efficient electric appliances. They are also installing insulation under the floor, in the walls and the roof, triple glazed windows and designing upgrades to maximising passive solar exposure. In this way they share architect Brave New Eco's operating mantra of 'minimum change for maximum benefit' in their approach to the project. 'If you can minimise waste in this process it's an extra benefit, you can do lots of amazing things with an existing building, you don't need to demolish to get beauty just because home shows or designers tell you that it's not possible,' Sweatman says. Linden Thorley, a Sydney-based architect and chair of the Australian Passivhaus Association Retrofit Committee, says one of his top considerations is determining how much of a building can be kept intact in order to minimise construction waste, a principle called 'circularity'. He says in some cases the costs and risks associated with taking buildings apart, storing the materials and finding new uses for them can be costly, but there are huge benefits in reusing parts of the existing building. 'Many existing homes can be significantly improved to make them more comfortable and healthier to live in without completely demolishing them.' Thorley says he often renovates houses through incremental improvements rather than a complete rebuild, staggering work to target low-hanging fruit in a home and focusing on the potential for passive solar are key elements to consider. 'There's no point adding heaps of insulation if there is a draft blowing through it. We can test for improvements in air tightness before spending money on additional insulation that is harder or more expensive to install.' Maximising the use of available sunlight to warm the home in winter and exclude heat via well-placed shading is also a key consideration. 'To support this we need a really well insulated, and relatively airtight building envelope that allows us to maintain our preferred inside temperature. This includes really well sealed windows when they are closed and excellent ventilation.' 'Learning to reuse materials instead of always using new ones is something we have to learn to do in a finite world,' he says.
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia
WASHINGTON/CANBERRA/CHICAGO, July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said that the United States would sell "so much" beef to Australia after Canberra relaxed import restrictions on Thursday, but economists and traders said that high prices and tight supplies make major American exports unlikely. Australia said it would loosen biosecurity rules for U.S. beef. The move will not significantly increase U.S. shipments, though, because Australia is a major beef producer and exporter whose prices are much lower, analysts said. U.S. companies export small quantities of beef to Australian buyers. They import much more in the form of lean beef used to make hamburgers, particularly as U.S. production has declined due to tight cattle supplies. U.S. beef prices set records this year and the number of beef cattle fell to the lowest level since 1961 after ranchers slashed their herds due to drought that burned up pasturelands used for grazing. A ban on cattle imports from Mexico because of New World screwworm, a devastating livestock pest, and steep tariffs on Brazilian beef that are set to take effect on Aug. 1 could further tighten supplies, and require additional imports of Australian beef. "We can't get enough beef in the U.S. right now, so we're bringing it in from Australia and Brazil," said Dan Norcini, an independent U.S. livestock trader. "We're not going to be selling anything significant to anyone." Last year, Australia shipped almost 400,000 metric tons of beef worth $2.9 billion to the United States, with just 269 tons of U.S. product moving the other way. "They have more cattle than people," said David Anderson, an agricultural economist at Texas A&M University. "That's why they export so much." U.S. and Australian beef also taste different. Many Australians like the grass-fed beef raised there, not marbled beef from U.S.-raised cattle that are generally fed with grain, said Jerry Klassen, chief analyst for Resilient Capital in Winnipeg. He predicted the United States will not export substantial amounts of beef to Australia in the next five years. "We just aren't in a position to export much beef to anyone, and the reality is Australia doesn't really have much need for U.S. beef," said Karl Setzer, partner at Consus Ag. The barriers that remain to exporting significant volumes of U.S. beef to Australia appeared to be lost on Trump this week. "We are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that U.S. Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE." Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with numerous countries he says have taken advantage of the United States – a characterisation many economists dispute. "For decades, Australia imposed unjustified barriers on U.S. beef," U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement, calling Australia's decision a "major milestone in lowering trade barriers and securing market access for U.S. farmers and ranchers." Australian officials say the relaxation of restrictions was not part of any trade negotiations but the result of a years-long assessment of U.S. biosecurity practices. Canberra has restricted U.S. beef imports since 2003 due to concerns about bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease. Since 2019, it has allowed in meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. but few suppliers were able to prove that their cattle had not been in Canada and Mexico. The U.S. sources some of its feeder cattle from the two neighboring countries. On Wednesday, Australia's agriculture ministry said U.S. cattle traceability and control systems had improved enough that Australia could accept beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the United States. The decision has caused some concern in Australia, where biosecurity is seen as essential to prevent diseases and pests from ravaging the farm sector. "We need to know if (the government) is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump," shadow agriculture minister David Littleproud said in a statement. Australia faces a 10% across-the-board U.S. tariff, as well 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium. Trump has also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Asked whether the change would help achieve a trade deal, Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said: "I'm not too sure." "We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement," he said. "We think that they should do that anyway."
