Widow of murder victim ordered to pay €11,000 for care of seized XL Bully dogs
Veronica Maher (54) pleaded that her four beloved restricted breed pets were all she had to remember her late husband, who was shot dead in a Blanchardstown steakhouse on Christmas Eve, 2023.
Advertisement
Ms Maher, of Sheephill Avenue, Blanchardstown, came before Dublin District Court on May 28th to challenge a Garda application under the Control of Dogs Act for an order to destroy Oddie, Reggie, their mother Medusa, and the fourth dog, Joe.
They have been in a dog pound and given veterinary attention since being taken from Ms Maher on April 4th.
Granting a destruction order for all four, Judge Anthony Halpin had noted evidence of six gardaí at the scene on March 28th when four officers fled from Oddie, who escaped from Ms Maher's garden.
He accepted they had to take 'evasive action to save themselves from being savaged by an XL Bully dog.' He said they were terrified, and 'I can only imagine the utmost horror which they experienced.'
Advertisement
However, Ms Maher is to appeal, attempting to overturn the ruling in the Circuit Court about Oddie and possibly bringing a judicial review of the destruction order being extended to the other three dogs.
This has led to a temporary halt on the animals being put down pending the outcome of the appeals.
On Wednesday, the case resumed, and she appeared again before Judge Halpin to consider costs.
Garda Sergeant Michael Harkin said the upkeep of the dogs for the past nine weeks was €10,716, and there was a €500 vet's bill.
Advertisement
Judge Halpin granted the costs order for Ms Maher to pay €11,216 but also acceded to Ms Maher's lawyer's application for a transcript of the original hearing for the appeal.
During the earlier hearing, Judge Halpin said Oddie 'left the premises and pursued the gardaí was dangerous and could easily have fatally wounded one or all those gardaí,' he remarked.
Visibly upset, Ms Maher denied opening a gate to unleash the unmuzzled dog on gardai patrolling in her cul-de-sac.
She said the dogs were part of her family, like their children, and Oddie slept in her king-sized bed.
Advertisement
The judge also noted evidence that she had these dogs to protect the property.
She testified that three-year-old Oddie jumped the front garden wall, and she denied the accusation that she set the dog on the garda. She also claimed Medusa had also been in the yard at the time.
The court heard the other two were in cages in the back garden, and Oddie had already damaged a rear garden exit.
Garda Sean McLoughlin alleged that when he got near her house, she told him, 'Get the f**k away from my house yous murderers'.
Advertisement
He was in absolute fear for his life that he would be viciously attacked by the dog, which chased and tried to bite him. He alleged she let the dog out her front garden gate.
He and three colleagues fled to different gardens, with one standing on a wall until backup arrived a few minutes later.
He believed that Oddie was a credible threat and he would be set on them again.
Ms Maher brought the dog back into the house, and she denied telling gardaí, 'If yous don't fuck off now, I'll get him back out here.'
Witness Kayleigh McEntee (26), of Waterville Row, Blanchardstown, was at the house and contradicted the evidence that Ms Maher opened the gate. She also said the dogs were safe and often around children.
Ireland
Judge orders 'destruction' of XL Bully dogs owned...
Read More
Three more gardaí said they also had had to flee to gardens in the cul de sac, with one telling Judge Halpin that he feared he would be killed.
Photographs were handed in showing some of the dogs with family and children.
In his ruling, Judge Halpin described one image of an infant surrounded by two enormous XL Bully dogs as upsetting 'given the potential ferocity of these animals'.
He found that the dogs were dangerous and not under proper control.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
24 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Murderer who shot man in front of infant son did not receive fair trial, barristers argue
Barristers have argued that a murderer who shot dead a man in front of his four-month-old son did not receive a fair trial, as the trial judge effectively 'closed down the defence case' in his charge to the jury. Michael O'Higgins SC told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Tony Hunt was 'entirely argumentative' throughout his charge to the jury at the conclusion of the trial of Wayne Cooney (34), adding that the judge argued 'with great vigour' what the jury's position should be. Advertisement Drug dealer Cooney, with an address at Glenshane Drive in Tallaght, had pleaded not guilty to the murder of Jordan Davis (22) at a laneway beside Our Lady of Immaculate National School in Darndale in Dublin on May 22nd, 2019. He also pleaded not guilty to possessing a 9mm semi-automatic pistol and to possessing ammunition in circumstances that give rise to the reasonable inference that he did not have them for lawful purposes. A jury took just a little over three hours to find him guilty following a trial in July 2022. The prosecution case was that Mr Davis owed €70,000 to a local drug dealer, Robert 'Roo' Redmond, who was the brother of Cooney's then girlfriend, Rachel Redmond (34). When Mr Davis's mobile phone was examined by gardaí they found a message from Robert Redmond (36) warning Mr Davis: "I'm on your case mate, it won't be long," and later telling him: "Soon, very soon, bang bang." Advertisement Rachel Redmond, from Coolock but with an address at Clifdenville Road, Cliftonville Avenue, North Belfast, Antrim was convicted earlier this year on two charges that on or about May 22nd and May 23rd, 2019, she impeded Cooney's apprehension or prosecution by picking him up after the shooting and later checking him into a hotel. Robert Redmond of Streamville Road, Kilbarrack, Dublin 13 pleaded guilty in April 2024 to conspiring with Cooney to murder Mr Davis and received a seven-year prison sentence. During Cooney's trial, prosecution barrister Bernard Condon SC told the jury that the circumstantial evidence against Cooney was such that he was either the shooter or the "most unlucky person ever". A garda had identified Cooney from CCTV footage as the cyclist circling Mr Davis. Cooney's DNA was found on a glove in an area on Belcamp Lane where the shooter could be seen discarding gloves and a black body warmer minutes after the shooting. Cooney was also identified returning to the same area to retrieve the body warmer about one hour and 20 minutes after the shooting. Advertisement The prosecution also relied on mobile phone evidence that showed Cooney's phone was calling Robert Redmond at moments when the person identified on CCTV as the shooter could be seen holding a phone to his ear. In a lengthy charge to the jury, Mr Justice Hunt said that if they were satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Cooney was the cyclist who came up behind Jordan Davis and shot him, they must find him guilty of murder. Mr Justice Hunt told the jury that if the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Cooney murdered Mr Davis, they could find that he impeded the arrest or prosecution of the murderer by taking away the body warmer. He said that, by his own admission, Cooney was seen on CCTV at Belcamp Lane about one hour and 20 minutes after the murder. He said the shooter disposed of the body warmer during a 40-second period when he was off-camera and when Cooney retrieved the body warmer, he also went off camera for almost exactly 40 seconds. Advertisement He said that the jury should consider that if Cooney wasn't the person who left the body warmer, he must have acquired some knowledge that it had been put there. He added: "If he didn't do the shooting, he acquired the knowledge of where the item was in that hour and 20 minutes. That has to be considered by you." On this view, Mr Justice Hunt said, Mr Cooney wasn't the shooter but might have been "covering up". He further told the jury: "If he didn't do the shooting, he didn't get to the laneway by accident. There had to be some information that brought him there, he had to know something about what he was retrieving and where he was retrieving it from." In launching an appeal against Cooney's conviction on Thursday, Mr O'Higgins said that a judge is at liberty to pass comment on evidence, which is well within his ambit, but he should tread with caution. 'This is entirely argumentative through the whole charge. He's not just summarising evidence, it's strident, relentless, merciless and without any restraint,' said Mr O'Higgins, adding that Mr Justice Hunt had been 'completely arguing with great vigour what the position should be'. Advertisement 'The line beyond a comment has been very well crossed,' he said, going on to argue that the defence was 'squashed' and never got the airing to which it was entitled. Counsel said that in the judge's charge, Mr Justice Hunt had reminded the jury that the defence had raised the possibility of the potential involvement of others in this offence, but he had also said to the jury that whether others were involved or not was not relevant. 'The judge said: 'Who was the man on the bike? That's all you have to decide.' That was effectively closing down the defence case,' said Mr O'Higgins, adding that Mr Justice Hunt 'denigrated all the points' made by the defence. Counsel confirmed to the court he was arguing that the trial against Cooney was unfair. He said that Mr Justice Hunt had told the jury: 'I won't lie to you that I haven't formed my own opinion.' Mr O'Higgins asked how a judge was to charge a jury on the presumption of innocence when he had made a comment such as this. 'He said things pumping up the prosecution case. The judge highlighted in a very granular level all points that were in favour of the prosecution,' said Mr O'Higgins. 'The judge has an obligation to deal with a case fairly. They must not, when giving a summation, end up with an imbalance between the parties.' Further grounds of appeal submitted included the identification evidence given by a garda, which Mr O'Higgins said was too vague to be admissible; and attempts by the defence to adduce background evidence of other people who had a motive in the case, which were shut down by the trial judge, meaning 'an important part of the defence case was cut off'. In response, counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions, Bernard Condon SC said that a lot of points were made by the defence during the trial which were 'weak points advanced with gusto'. He said the trial judge was correct to advise the jury 'not to be directed into rabbit warrens'. Ireland Rapist (37) jailed for taking advantage of 'sleepi... Read More 'Arguments were made to direct the jury into evidential wastelands,' said Mr Condon. He said there were probably ten people involved in this murder and maybe other people wanted to kill the deceased, but that did not change the fact that it was Cooney who actually killed him. 'Some judges are naturally people who speak a lot, so it can't be correct that because someone speaks a lot that they ought to be criticised,' said counsel, adding that the jury knew that the judge's commenting was not the last word. Mr Condon also said that Mr Justice Hunt gave the jury an excellent summation on the principles of the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof. Mr Justice John Edwards said the court would deliver its judgement on the appeal at a later date.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Extra jail time for arsonists who set car alight after ramming into building as families slept upstairs
Three men received unduly lenient prison sentences for their 'targeted' and 'premeditated' arson attack in which a car was doused in fuel and rammed into a tanning salon, causing an enormous fire while families slept in the apartments overhead, a court has ruled. At the Court of Appeal on Thursday, Keith McCormack Smith (24) had his four-year sentence increased to seven years; Jason Ryle (26) had his three-and-a-half-year sentence increased to six years; and PJ Lyons (21) had his three-and-a-half-year sentence increased to four-and-a-half years. Advertisement McCormack Smith – also known as Keith McCormick and Keith McCormick-Smith – of Riverview, Church Road, Mulhuddart, Dublin 15, pleaded guilty to arson at Tip Top Tanning Studio, Tullow Street, Carlow on May 17th, 2022, and arson to a Toyota car on the same date and at the same location. He also pleaded guilty to various other charges, including unlawful use of a motor vehicle, unlawful carriage in a motor vehicle and theft between May 1st and May 17th, 2022. Judge Eugene O'Kelly sentenced McCormack Smith to six years with the final two years suspended at Carlow Circuit Court on July 31st, 2024. Ryle, of Raithin, Mullingar, Westmeath and Lyons, of Cedarbrook Walk, Ballyfermot, Dublin 10, also pleaded guilty to arson arising out of the same incident. Advertisement Ryle and Lyons further pleaded guilty to a number of other charges, including unlawful use of a motor vehicle, attempted theft and theft on various dates in May 2022. Ryle was sentenced to five and a half years' imprisonment with the final two years suspended, while Lyons was also handed a sentence of five and a half years with the final two years suspended for a period of two years and three months. Appealing the leniency of these sentences in April last, Niall Storan BL, for the DPP, said the incident in Carlow occurred shortly before 5am on May 17th, 2022, when a stolen Toyota Avensis was rammed into a building on Tullow Street in Carlow and set alight, causing the building to catch fire. Mr Storan said the ground floor of the building operated as a tanning salon during the day, and the upper levels were residential apartments. He said McCormack Smith was driving the Toyota car while PJ Lyons recorded what was happening on his phone, and Ryle was also present. Advertisement Ryle had a bottle containing accelerant in his hand, which he then poured onto the car while McCormack Smith got out and the three fled the scene. A garda investigation revealed that multiple vehicles had been stolen in different locations and were involved in the commission of various offences, which ultimately led to the arson at the tanning salon. The offenders were ultimately identified through social media content from a TikTok account. Mr Storan told the Court of Appeal in April that it was 'difficult to conceive of a more serious arson offence' than this one, which was both 'targeted' and 'premeditated' to cause 'an enormous fire'. Advertisement He argued the headline sentence of eight years was too low, and the sentences imposed did not adequately reflect the gravity of the offence. The lawyer suggested the judge had misplaced the offending at the mid-range on the scale of gravity. Mr Storan also said insufficient weight was given to the many aggravating factors, including the fact that the apartments over the premises were occupied by families who were sleeping at the time, the premeditation involved, the use of an accelerant and the fact that the respondents were on bail. In delivering judgement on Thursday, Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy said that the arson was a very serious offence, with obvious aggravating factors including the planning involved, the use of a getaway vehicle, the attack on a business premises, the fact that residential apartments needed to be evacuated, and the fact that each man had previous convictions and was on bail at the time. She said that the court agreed with the DPP that the sentencing judge reduced the sentences by too much, with the sentences ultimately imposed not meeting the gravity of the offending. Advertisement Ruling that the sentences were unduly lenient, Ms Justice Kennedy said that the court would quash the sentences and move on to resentencing the three men. She said that the appropriate headline sentence for McCormack Smith was ten years for the arson offence, which was reduced to eight years with the final year suspended. In the case of Ryle, the headline sentence set was nine and a half years, reduced to seven years with the final year suspended. And in the case of Lyons, Ms Justice Kennedy fixed the headline sentence at nine years, reduced to six and a half years with the final two years suspended.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Whistleblower welcomes call to have debate over defective gun holsters
A former garda who made protected disclosures about alleged defective gun holsters previously worn by armed officers, has welcomed a call by a senator to have an urgent debate in parliament about the 'grave issues'. Speaking through his solicitor Kevin Winters, the former garda said he is 'greatly encouraged' by Senator Michael McDowell's call to have the issues brought into the public domain. Advertisement The former garda, who is not yet being named, is also taking High Court action against his former employers. Issues around defective gun holsters have been previously raised in the Dáil. Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan said in March that he met the family of murdered garda Det Garda Colm Horkan. The 49-year-old, who was originally from Charlestown, was murdered while on duty in 2020. Advertisement He was shot several times with his own gun on June 17th, 2020 in Castlerea, Co Roscommon. In an separate incident, the Dail heard about an accidental discharge of an officially issued garda firearm that occurred outside the Israeli Embassy on June 11 2020, just under a week before Mr Horkan's death. The discharge resulted in life-changing injuries to the garda. Labour TD Alan Kelly said forensic experts attached to the Garda National Technical Bureau (GNTB) discovered that the holster could engage the trigger and 'fire the weapon of its own accord'. Advertisement Michael McDowell criticised the 'gross mistreatment' of gardaí who have been affected by the issues surrounding defective holsters (Brian Lawless/PA) On Thursday, Mr McDowell called for a full debate on 'certain grave issues' relating to the armoury section of An Garda Síochána, as well as the 'misuse' of protected disclosures and issues concerning the procurement of defective ammunition. In a statement, a spokesman for KRW Law, which acts for the former garda officer who is also before the court charged in connection with a separate criminal matter, said their client will fully contest the charges. 'Earlier this year, he issued a High Court plenary summons against his former employers seeking damages for the loss, distress and anxiety he's been subjected to over the past few years,' the statement added. 'He is greatly encouraged today following the call made by Senator Michael McDowell SC in the Seanad for these thematically linked issues to be brought into the public domain.' Advertisement Human rights solicitor Kevin Winters said: 'We fully endorse Senator McDowell's call for increased scrutiny on serious issues around gardaí irregularities. 'We have spoken with our client this morning following the comments made and we are pleased to report he is greatly encouraged with what he's heard. 'It had been a lonely and difficult journey for him to get to this point. 'He's been ostracised and vilified for taking a firm stand on what he sees as serious wrongdoing. Advertisement 'It means an awful lot to him to hear someone of the stature of Senator McDowell refer to him as an officer of 'the utmost good character … facing charges which appear to be motivated by a desire to conceal abuses in the armoury section'. 'Following today's significant call by the senator we now call upon the DPP (Director of Public Prosecution) to review its decision to persist with the indictment against our client. 'Using the criminal justice system to try and silence an honest gardaí officer is not a good look. We wholeheartedly endorse this morning's call for our client's case to be brought into the public domain together with an urgent debate later in September.' On Thursday, Mr McDowell criticised the 'gross mistreatment' of gardaí who have been affected by the issues surrounding defective holsters. He told the Seanad: 'There is clear evidence that criminal and disciplinary processes have been launched to conceal major misfeasance and shortcomings in the management of the garda armoury. 'A senior garda officer of the utmost integrity has been sidelined for his part in raising these matters. A junior member of An Garda Síochána of the utmost good character is facing criminal charges on indictment which appear to be motivated by a desire to conceal abuses in the armoury section. 'Senior management in An Garda Siochana is aware of all these matters. 'Anyone who thinks that the culture in An Garda Síochána has been transformed by the outcome of the Disclosures Tribunal concerning Sgt Maurice McCabe is, I fear, gravely mistaken. I am shocked by what I have learned. 'These matters need to be brought into the public domain and an urgent debate is required when this House resumes in September.' An Garda Síochána has been contacted for comment.
