logo
Editorial: A sexy novel for the beach? How about a radical state pension-funding idea instead?

Editorial: A sexy novel for the beach? How about a radical state pension-funding idea instead?

Chicago Tribune16-06-2025

To anyone looking for light summer reading, here's a tip: Stay away from the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability.
The civic do-gooders at CTBA, as it's known, are pushing a complicated solution to Illinois' ongoing pension crisis. Their latest report pairs nicely with the likewise complicated solutions advanced by the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club and Gov. JB Pritzker himself.
We pore over this stuff so you don't have to, and here's the familiar story: The state's grossly underfunded public-employee pension systems are getting ever more costly to sustain. Those costs are swamping other priorities, from law enforcement to education to transportation. And any fix worth the name is going to be — that's right! — complicated.
It's tempting to let out a groan and move on. After all, our clout-rich governor has failed to get his preferred version of these pension-funding rescue plans through a General Assembly packed with his fellow Democrats. From Pritzker on down, the political will to force the issue is missing, and, so far, CTBA's idea has gone nowhere as well, even though it deserves more serious consideration than it's getting.
In a 15-page report and 10-page PowerPoint, the group proposes 'reamortization' of state pensions. Its plan is roughly akin to the state of Illinois taking out a home equity loan and refinancing its mortgage, albeit on a grand scale.
The state would issue almost $10 billion in new pension obligation bonds over five years, putting every penny of the proceeds into the pension funds. Illinois would change the timing of its annual payments to the funds from the end of the fiscal year to the beginning, an administrative step that saves taxpayers a surprisingly large amount. Crucially, the deal would replace 1990s-era legislation that shortchanged pensions in its early years while ramping up costs in later years.
The bill for that so-called pension ramp is coming due with a vengeance. Left unchecked, it will eat into more and more of each year's budget. CTBA says its plan could smooth out the ramp and achieve 100% funding of the pension systems by 2048 (up from the ramp's 90% goal) at a cost of $23.8 billion less than current law would provide. No tax increase is required.
'This is ambitious, for sure,' Ralph Martire, CTBA's enthusiastic executive director, told us in a recent meeting. 'I don't think anyone needs it as much as we do.'
Saving tens of billions sure sounds like a no-brainer. But it's also, yes, complicated, and risky, too.
One big risk comes with issuing billions in new bonds. Those are known as 'hard debt' because they must be paid on time, or the state's credit rating gets trashed. The current unfunded pension liabilities are 'soft debt,' which the state has juggled for years to postpone a reckoning even as its credit rating for 'hard debt' has improved under Pritzker's tenure.
Pulling off those massive bond issuances would require a leap of faith. Under disgraced former Gov. Rod Blagojevich, the state issued billions in pension bonds but diverted a big chunk of the proceeds to plug immediate budget holes. 'The primary risk is that the money isn't used for pensions,' Martire noted, and temptations are sure to arise with 'emergency' funding demands for, say, transit or schools.
During its spring session, instead of seriously considering a comprehensive pension rescue option, the General Assembly focused on digging an even deeper hole for taxpayers.
Unions want to add billions in pension costs to upgrade the benefits for public employees hired after 2011. That Tier 2 pension system may indeed need additional funding to bring it up to minimal federal standards. But as far as we can tell, no one in Springfield has done the homework to determine what's absolutely required, vs. part of an unaffordable wish list.
As usual, Chicago is leading the state in soaking taxpayers. In the waning days of the spring session, we have already lamented, Illinois lawmakers awarded some Chicago police officers and firefighters more lucrative pensions that will cost tens of millions of dollars in the first year and billions over time. Sweeteners for the statewide Tier 2 pension plans have been tabled for now, but you can bet more backroom deals are coming.
We understand it's a lot more fun for politicians to give away taxpayer money than to painstakingly claw the state out of its deep hole. It's also more fun to read a bestselling novel than a dense pension-rescue proposal — or an editorial on the topic, for that matter. So thanks for getting this far.
Still, every year it gets harder and harder to ignore these enormous unfunded obligations. Public employees are entitled to the retirement benefits they earned during their service. The simple way to pay for these obligations is to drastically raise taxes. That's unfair, and it would be a disaster for Illinois, chasing away its most productive citizens and businesses and making the state uncompetitive for future generations.
The risky and complicated way to deal with the obligations involves plans like those of the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability. This board has also long advocated for a constitutional amendment that would allow the state to address its rigid pension clause. The state needs to think big and pursue a path other than taxing its way out of this ever-more-threatening disaster.
Governor, legislators, put away the sunscreen and get serious.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down
Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down

Washington Post

time16 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down

WASHINGTON — Just hours after she pleaded not guilty to federal charges brought by the Trump administration, New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver was surrounded by dozens of supportive Democratic colleagues in the halls of the Capitol. The case, they argued, strikes at the heart of congressional power. 'If they can break LaMonica, they can break the House of Representatives,' said New York Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down
Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down

San Francisco Chronicle​

time22 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down

WASHINGTON (AP) — Just hours after she pleaded not guilty to federal charges brought by the Trump administration, New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver was surrounded by dozens of supportive Democratic colleagues in the halls of the Capitol. The case, they argued, strikes at the heart of congressional power. 'If they can break LaMonica, they can break the House of Representatives,' said New York Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. Federal prosecutors allege that McIver interfered with law enforcement during a visit with two other House Democrats to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Newark, New Jersey. She calls the charges 'baseless.' It's far from the only clash between congressional Democrats and the Republican administration as officials ramp up deportations of immigrants around the country. Sen. Alex Padilla of California was forcibly removed by federal agents while attempting to speak at a news conference for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. At least six groups of House Democrats have recently been denied entry to ICE detention centers. In early June, federal agents entered the district office of Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and briefly detained a staffer. Congressional Republicans have largely dismissed Democrats' behavior as inflammatory and inappropriate, and some have publicly supported the prosecution of McIver. Often in the dark about the Trump administration's moves, congressional Democrats are wrestling with how to perform their oversight duties at a time of roiling tensions with the White House and new restrictions on lawmakers visiting federal facilities. 'We have the authority to conduct oversight business, and clearly, House Republicans are not doing that oversight here,' said New Jersey Rep. Rob Menendez, one of the House Democrats who went with McIver to the Newark ICE facility. 'It's our obligation to continue to do it on site at these detention facilities. And even if they don't want us to, we are going to continue to exert our right.' Democrats confront a stark new reality The prospect of facing charges for once routine oversight activity has alarmed many congressional Democrats who never expected to face criminal prosecution as elected officials. Lawmakers in both parties were also unnerved by the recent targeted shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers and the nation's tense political atmosphere. 'It's a moment that calls for personal courage of members of Congress,' said Rep. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania. 'I wish that we had more physical protection. I think that's one of those harsh realities that members of Congress who are not in leadership recognize: that oftentimes, we do this job at our own peril, and we do it anyway.' The arrests and detentions of lawmakers have led some Democrats to take precautionary measures. Several have consulted with the House general counsel about their right to conduct oversight. Multiple lawmakers also sought personal legal counsel, while others have called for a review of congressional rules to provide greater protections. 'The Capitol Police are the security force for members of Congress. We need them to travel with us, to go to facilities and events that the president may have us arrested for,' said Rep. Jonathan Jackson of Illinois. 'There's not a lot of transparency' As the minority party in the House, Democrats lack the subpoena power to force the White House to provide information. That's a problem, they say, because the Trump administration is unusually secretive about its actions. 'There's not a lot of transparency. From day to day, oftentimes, we're learning about what's happening at the same time as the rest of the nation,' said Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., who led a prayer for McIver at the Capitol rally. Democrats, to amplify their concerns, have turned to public letters, confronted officials at congressional hearings and digital and media outreach to try to create public pressure. 'We've been very successful when they come in before committees,' said Rep. Lauren Underwood of Illinois, who added that she believed the public inquiries have 'one hundred percent' resonated with voters. Tapping into the information pipeline Congressional Democrats say they often rely on local lawmakers, business leaders and advocates to be their eyes and ears on the ground. A handful of Democrats say their best sources of information are across the political aisle, since Republicans typically have clearer lines of communication with the White House. 'I know who to call in Houston with the chamber. I think all of us do that,' said Texas Rep. Sylvia Garcia of how business leaders are keeping her updated. Garcia said Democrats 'need to put more pressure' on leading figures in the agriculture, restaurant and hospitality sectors to take their concerns about the immigrant crackdown to Trump's White House. 'They're the ones he'll listen to. They're the ones who can add the pressure. He's not going to listen to me, a Democrat who was an impeachment manager, who is on the bottom of his list, if I'm on it at all,' Garcia said. Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, for instance, had a working relationship with a for-profit ICE facility in his district until DHS in February ended reports as part of an agency-wide policy change. A member of Crow's staff now regularly goes to the facility and waits, at times for hours, until staff at the Aurora facility respond to detailed questions posed by the office. Democrats say 'real oversight' requires winning elections Still, many House Democrats concede that they can conduct little of their desired oversight until they are back in the majority. Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, said that 'real oversight power and muscle" only comes 'when you have a gavel." 'Nothing else matters. No rousing oratory, no tours, no speeches, no social media or entertainment, none of that stuff," Veasey said. "Because the thing that keeps Trump up at night more than anything else is the idea he's going to lose this House and there'll be real oversight pressure applied to him.'

Zohran Mamdani's Viral Comments On Capitalism
Zohran Mamdani's Viral Comments On Capitalism

Buzz Feed

time33 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Zohran Mamdani's Viral Comments On Capitalism

This week, 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani — a self-proclaimed democratic socialist — won the New York City Mayoral Democratic Primary, beating out former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Since his victory, Mamdani has faced backlash from both Republicans and Democrats in his own party. President Donald Trump called his victory a "terrible thing for our country," while Democratic lawmaker Laura Gillen called Mamdani the "absolute wrong choice for New York." Some of Mamdani's political stances as a democratic socialist have been questioned, and in a now-viral clip from a recent interview with CNN, he was put on the spot regarding his beliefs. "Do you like capitalism?" the host questioned. "No. I have many critiques of capitalism." "I think ultimately, the definition for me, of why I call myself a democratic socialist, is the words of Dr. King decades ago. He said, 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism; there must be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.'" "And that's what I'm focused on, is dignity and taking on income inequality." In response to the clip, many people online have praised Mamdani for being willing to say something so controversial in American politics. "Thank god we have a politician who is finally brave enough to say that yeah capitalism does fucking suck actually," one person wrote in response to the clip. "I saw him say this on CNN and my jaw dropped. They straight up asked him if he 'likes capitalism' and he said 'no.' And I don't think that's gonna be a problem for him! Watershed moment," another person agreed. "One of my favorite things that Zohran does is that he has a quote for everything. A lot of times, they're from people like Mandela and MLK, figures whose progressive ideals often get downplayed. Try to critique this take and now you look like an anti-MLK asshole. Good stuff,' this person wrote. And finally, this person said: "Zohran is so skilled at flipping any gotcha question around to make it look like the person asking it is insane." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store