logo
Does Antivirus Software Collect Your Data? Yes, But Here's Why You Shouldn't Worry

Does Antivirus Software Collect Your Data? Yes, But Here's Why You Shouldn't Worry

Yahoo09-05-2025
We count on antivirus software to keep our devices and personal data safe from cyber threats. But some of that software may be collecting data about you while it protects you.
That's the concern raised in a 2023 report by AV-Comparatives, an independent testing lab that evaluated how 20 of the most popular antivirus programs handle user data. The study looked at what data these products collect, how much control users have over it, and whether that data is shared with third parties. It also considered how easy companies' data policies are to understand and how transparent they are about these policies.
The takeaway? Antivirus tools do their job, but many gather more data than most people realize. Here's what you need to know.
Read more: Best Antivirus Software for Maximum Protection in 2025
Antivirus software must know some things about your system to keep it safe. But in many cases, it collects more information than it needs.
The AV-Comparatives report found that most antivirus programs gather a mix of system info, network details, user data and file-related information. That includes basics like your operating system version, how much RAM you have, your CPU type and even your computer's name. Some go further, collecting BIOS info, a list of installed apps, or details about running processes.
They also pull in network data, such as your local and external IP addresses, DNS server and network name. This helps them spot potential threats, but it also gives them a clear picture of where and how you connect.
User data is where things start to feel more personal. About half of the products in the study send your Windows username to the company. Depending on your setup, that could be your full name. Time zone, language and general location info are also collected. And if your antivirus includes web protection, it might track every URL you visit, the previous URL you came from and the site's IP address.
Then there's the stuff on your computer. Antivirus software often uploads file names, locations and hashes when scanning something suspicious. But in some cases, it also sends entire files -- including harmless ones like documents -- without asking first.
That could be a problem.
Let's say your antivirus software collected your data for legitimate reasons. What it does with that data matters.
According to the AV-Comparatives report, some antivirus companies are pretty responsible when it comes to how they handle your data. Others, not so much.
F-Secure, G Data and K7 were among the top performers when it comes to data collection and sharing practises. Norton, Panda and McAfee, however, scored poorly for how they share user data.
Now, to be fair, not all data sharing is bad. Some of it helps improve malware detection. For example, many antivirus programs send suspicious files or file hashes to services like VirusTotal, where different security companies work together to identify threats. That kind of collaboration makes sense and helps keep everyone safer.
But not every company draws the line in the right place. AVG, which was later acquired by Avast, collected users' browsing history and sold it to third-party advertisers. The FTC eventually banned Avast in June 2024 from selling or licensing users' web-browsing data and fined it $16.5 million. Not exactly the kind of behavior you want from software that's supposed to be guarding your privacy.
Some antivirus tools are clearer than others about what's going on behind the scenes. If privacy matters to you, it's worth digging into these details before hitting install.
In a perfect world, antivirus software would only collect and share data that was absolutely necessary. Since that's not the world we live in, you'll need to be proactive in protecting yourself. Here's how.
Most antivirus programs have options tucked away in their menus that let you opt out of things like:
Usage tracking
Cloud analysis
Uploading suspicious files
Logging the websites you visit
These features are often turned on by default, so it's worth spending a couple of minutes poking around and turning off anything you don't want running in the background. If you're not sure what's being shared right now, you can always disable the antivirus first and review the options later.
Many people fly through the software setup process without realizing they're agreeing to send all kinds of data. Look for any checkboxes related to product improvement or data sharing and uncheck them if you'd rather not participate.
Free antivirus tools can be tempting, but they need to make money somehow. That sometimes means collecting and selling user data. If you care about privacy, it's usually safer to go with a paid version from a vendor that's more upfront about how it handles your info.
In the AV-Comparatives report, F-Secure, ESET and G Data all scored well for how they handle and share data. Avoid the software that didn't do so well.
Yeah, we know. It's not the most fun thing to read, but the privacy policy and end-user license agreement will usually tell you what kind of data is collected and what the company does with it. Some vendors even have simplified versions or FAQs that make things easier to understand.
Here are a few you can check out:
Bitdefender
ESET
Kaspersky
It's fair to worry about how much data antivirus software collects, but that doesn't mean you should ditch it altogether.
Antivirus is still one of the most important tools you can have to protect yourself from malware, phishing attacks and all the other junk floating around online. Yes, some programs grab more data than they probably need, but most use it to improve security, not to spy on you.
The key is picking antivirus software that's upfront about what it collects and gives you some control over it. Plenty of great options offer solid protection without going overboard on data collection.
So yes, it's smart to be cautious, but going without antivirus software leaves you way more exposed than using a well-reviewed one that respects your privacy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The best Prime Day laptop deals on MacBooks, Chromebooks, Windows machines and more
The best Prime Day laptop deals on MacBooks, Chromebooks, Windows machines and more

Engadget

time5 hours ago

  • Engadget

The best Prime Day laptop deals on MacBooks, Chromebooks, Windows machines and more

If your laptop simply isn't cutting it anymore, Amazon Prime Day 2025 might have arrived just in time. As has been the case for the past few years, laptop deals are abundant this Prime Day (even now in the lead-up to the official dates), bringing discounts to MacBooks, Windows laptops, Chromebooks and more. But we wouldn't blame you if you didn't know how to figure out if that laptop you're eyeing actually has a good discount for Prime Day, or if the deal is stale. That's where Engadget can help. We've poured over the Prime Day laptop deals available this year to pick out the best ones you can get across all kinds of computers. If you're super picky about the specs you want in a new laptop, we always recommend going straight to the manufacturer so you can configure the machine exactly to your needs. But if you're willing to work with premade models, Prime Day deals could help you save some cash on your next laptop. Apple's latest laptops are the MacBook Air M4 and the MacBook Pro M4, but the M3-powered machines are still available and great values when you can get them at steep discounts. But for the most future-proof options, we recommend going with the M4 MacBooks. Amazon actually has decent MacBook deals throughout the year, most of the time on the base configurations of any given model. In a welcomed update, Apple recently made all base models of the MacBook Air M4 have 16GB of RAM by default (which is the same as you'll find on the base-level Pros). MacBook Air (15-inch, M4, 16GB RAM, 256GB SSD) for $1,049 ($150 off) MacBook Air (15-inch, M3, 24GB RAM, 512GB SSD) for $1,249 (26 percent off) MacBook Pro (14-inch, M4, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD) for $1,429 (11 percent off) Most Chromebooks start off pretty affordable, so that just means you can get them for even less during an event like Prime Day. If you're a Chrome OS lover, it's also a decent time to check out sales on premium Chromebooks, which can usually cost $500 or more. In general, we recommend looking for at least 4 to 8GB of RAM and at least 128GB of SDD storage in a Chromebook that you plan on using as your daily driver. You've got a lot of variety to choose from when it comes to Windows laptops, and that can be a blessing or a curse. We recommend looking for a laptop from a reputable brand (i.e. Microsoft, Dell, Acer, Lenovo and others like them), and one that can handle daily work or play pressures. That means at least 8GB of RAM and 245GB of SSD storage, plus the latest Intel or AMD CPUs. If you're looking for a new gaming laptop, you'll need a bit more power and a dedicated graphics card to boot.

This 6TB Crucial X10 SSD Costs Less Than the 4TB Version, With Limited Stock on Amazon for 4th of July
This 6TB Crucial X10 SSD Costs Less Than the 4TB Version, With Limited Stock on Amazon for 4th of July

Gizmodo

time6 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

This 6TB Crucial X10 SSD Costs Less Than the 4TB Version, With Limited Stock on Amazon for 4th of July

We may run out of superlatives when it comes to describing the Crucial X10 external solid-state drive, but we should cut to the most important detail of all right away — the massive 6TB model of the #1 new release in external SSDs is nearly half-price right now at Amazon, just $292. That's even cheaper than the 4TB model of the same highly rated drive. This phenomenal pre-Prime Day deal slashes over $260 from the price of one of the best external drives on the market. The Crucial X10 is palm-sized yet remarkably tough and rated IP65 dust and water resistant. It's blazing fast — twice as fast, in fact, as its formidable predecessor, the Crucial X9 SSD3. And it's nearly universally compatible, able to work seamlessly across computer platforms and handheld platforms and even gaming consoles. See at Amazon The 6TB Crucial X10 being even cheaper than the 4TB model is already incredible, but then you have to take into account just how huge a 6 terabyte drive is. You can stuff this palm-sized drive with up to half a million 4K photos, or 2.6 million MP3 music files. It also fits 114 games, or 133 4K videos. If you're a photo or video creator, you can live comfortably with an 6TB drive — provided it's a good, reliable model. There's no worries in that regard when you buy the Crucial X10. Even above the IP65 dust and water resistance, the Crucial X10 is drop resistant up to nearly 10 feet. It's perfect for travel or working in harsh outdoor conditions, which is essential if you're using the drive to store photos or videos at a shoot site. When you're moving gigantic files back and forth from a laptop or other device to an external SSD, you need pure, blinding speed. The Crucial X10 drive has read speeds up to 2,100MB/s, which is twice as fast as the prior-model Crucial X9. And all that speed and storage works whether you're using a Windows or Mac computer, a Chromebook, an Android or iOS smartphone or tablet, a PlayStation 4 or 5 — the Crucial X10 is nearly universally compatible. Crucial's somehow managed to combine all of this speed and storage capacity into an ultra-compact body that's 1.96 x 2.55 inches and just 0.39 inches thick. Incredibly, it weighs less than 1/10th of a pound. It's also 48% off at Amazon in a pre-Prime Day bonanza of a deal that makes it available for just $292. See at Amazon

The future of air combat: How long will the US military still need pilots?
The future of air combat: How long will the US military still need pilots?

Fox News

time7 hours ago

  • Fox News

The future of air combat: How long will the US military still need pilots?

As sixth-generation fighter programs ramp up, military insiders are divided over whether future warplanes need pilots at all. The Pentagon is pouring billions into next-generation aircraft, pushing the boundaries of stealth and speed. But as America eyes a future of air dominance, one question looms large: Should Americans still be risking their lives in the cockpit? Autonomous drones backed by AI are progressing faster than many expected, and that has some defense leaders rethinking the role of the pilot. Some are of the mindset that the F-35 should be the last manned aircraft. Many pilots, however, do not agree. "It's highly controversial," one former senior defense official told Fox News Digital. "There's a whole cohort of people who think we should not be thinking about building a manned fighter for the last half of this century." "Inside the Air Force, there are hard-line air dominance people. They're on cloud nine this week, after what the B-2s did in Iran… but in my mind, I say, why would we put men in that loop? Why wouldn't we fly those things in 2050 unmanned, completely?" Air Force pilots flew B-2 bombers on a 36-hour round trip to strike three Iranian nuclear facilities last weekend. Trump said the strikes left Iran's nuclear sites "obliterated like nobody's ever seen before." He praised the "brave" pilots who crewed the planes as "the best shots in the world." But the most rapid technological advancements in U.S. history have left defense officials stumped about how to plan for the future. "To date, the services are just scratching the surface on what manned versus unmanned TACAIR (tactical air) of the future might look like," the former official went on. "If AI technologies continue to evolve in five years, right when you're just in the infancy of beginning to make a decision about what F-47 would be, well, you're on exactly the wrong path." Others insist unmanned systems still lack the decision-making reliability and network resilience needed for high-stakes combat. "It's critically important that President Trump proceeded with the manned platform for the Air Force – obviously, F-47 being the solution," said former Rep. Mike Garcia, R-Calif., a former F/A 18 naval aviator. "This academic debate about unmanned-only platforms is aspirational – but the networks just aren't there yet. You need low latency, high-bandwidth, distributed networks with critical nodes, and we don't have that." But, he urged Boeing to move quickly. "Boeing needs to execute. They can't afford to have this turn into a tanker program. This is absolutely critical to get done correctly." With the famously lengthy acquisition timelines of the Pentagon, some worry sixth-generation aircraft won't make it to the battlefield before their autonomous counterparts match them in capability, with less risk to humans. Garcia emphasized that aircrews play a unique role in orchestrating combat operations. "You still need a quarterback in the air to manage unmanned aircraft and the situational awareness feeding back into the entire advanced battle management system," he said. At the core of this debate is America's ability to project power while preparing for near-peer conflict. Yet financial limitations are shaping what's possible. "We've ended up in a situation where the Air Force today is the oldest and the smallest and the least ready it's ever been in its entire history," said retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula, dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. Deptula told Fox News Digital the "only" debate about the F-47 was about money, because of "arbitrary budgets that aren't tied in any way, shape or form to our national defense strategy." Those who think drones will be ready to take the job of pilots anytime soon believe in "science fiction," he said. "It may be at some point in the future, but we're just not there yet." Others warn that both the Air Force and Navy may be taking different bets on how unmanned technology will factor into the need for their prized fighter jets. "To date, the services are just scratching the surface on what manned versus unmanned tactical air might look like," another former defense official said. "The Air Force wants to rush F-47 to IOC to beat unmanned advocates to the trough," referring to initial operational capacity (IOC). "The Navy seems to be taking a more measured path to F/A-XX than they were a couple of years ago. Perhaps part of that is to see where the unmanned technology goes."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store