Astronomer reveals the exact time of this year's summer solstice
People around the world traditionally observe the change of seasons with bonfires and festivals, and Fête de la Musique celebrations.
Astronomers can calculate an exact moment for the solstice, when Earth reaches the point in its orbit where the North Pole is angled closest to the Sun.
That moment will be at 10.42pm Eastern Time on June 20 this year - or 3.42am on June 21 in the United Kingdom.
In Europe, Africa and points eastward, the moment of the equinox falls on June 21 locally, making that the day of the solstice. From Earth, the Sun will appear farthest north relative to the stars. People living on the Tropic of Cancer, 23.5 degrees north of the Equator, will see the Sun pass straight overhead at noon.
Six months from now, the Sun will reach its southern extreme and pass overhead for people on the Tropic of Capricorn, and northerners will experience their shortest days of the year at the winter solstice.
The Sun's angle relative to Earth's equator changes so gradually close to the solstices that, without instruments, the shift is difficult to perceive for about 10 days. This is the origin of the word solstice, which means 'solar standstill.'
This slow shift means that daylight on June 20 is only about 2 seconds longer than on June 21, at mid-northern latitudes in the United States. It will be about a week before there's more than a minute change to the calculated amount of daylight. Even that's an approximation — Earth's atmosphere bends light over the horizon by different amounts depending on weather, which can introduce changes of more than a minute to sunrise and sunset times.
Monuments at Stonehenge in England, Karnak in Egypt, and Chankillo in Peru reveal that people around the world have taken note of the Sun's northern and southern travels for more than 5,000 years. From Stonehenge's circle of standing stones, the Sun will rise directly over an ancient avenue leading away to the northeast on the solstice.
We know little about the people who built Stonehenge, or why they went to such great effort to construct it, moving multi-ton stones from rock outcrops as far as 140 miles away.
All this to mark the spot on the horizon where the Sun returns each year to rest for a while before moving south again.
Perhaps they, like us, celebrated this signal of the coming change of seasons.
Stephen Schneider is a Professor of Astronomy at UMass Amherst.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
NHS to get technology fast lane to roll out new equipment more quickly after it passes trials
THE NHS will get a technology fast lane to roll out new equipment more quickly after it passes trials. The 'innovator passport' is part of Health Secretary Wes Streeting 's bid to cut red tape and modernise the service. 1 He said: 'For too long, Britain 's leading scientific minds have been held back by needless admin. 'Suppliers are repeatedly asked for the same data in different formats by different trusts. 'These innovator passports will save time and reduce duplication, meaning our life sciences sector can work hand in hand with the health service and make Britain a powerhouse for medical technology." Under the new system, sign-off from one central office after a pilot trial will be enough for something to be funded and used nationwide. Examples of kit not yet being widely used despite successful trials include better wound dressings and rapid flu tests. Mr Streeting added 'Frustrated patients will no longer have to face a postcode lottery for lifesaving products.' Sam Roberts, chief of spending watchdog the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, said: 'Access to life-changing technologies that address the most urgent needs will no longer be a case of a postcode lottery. 'Patients will get access wherever they live, the NHS will get better value by buying at scale, and we can stop relying on outdated tools that lead to poorer outcomes.'
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Could your gut protect you from toxic plastics?
Could your gut protect you from the toxic impacts of forever chemicals? Forever chemicals, also known as 'PFAS,' are long-lasting, synthetic chemicals that have been used in consumer products around the world since the 1950s. They're found in waterproof clothing, non-stick pans, plastic food packaging, and firefighting foams. Exposure to the chemicals may be tied to negative health impacts, including fertility, developmental delays in children, a weakened immune system, increased cholesterol levels, and a heightened risk of some cancers. There are thousands of forever chemicals that have potentially varying effects and toxicity levels. Now, scientists say they've discovered that some bacteria found in the human gut have the ability to absorb the chemicals — and potentially protect from associated health impacts. 'We found that certain species of human gut bacteria have a remarkably high capacity to soak up PFAS from their environment at a range of concentrations, and store these in clumps inside their cells,' Dr. Kiran Patil, a member of the British University of Cambridge's MRC Toxicology Unit, explained in a statement. 'Due to aggregation of PFAS in these clumps, the bacteria themselves seem protected from the toxic effects.' Patil was the senior author of the research, which was published in the journal Nature Microbiology. To reach these conclusions, the researchers inserted several species of bacteria from the human gut into mice. The study found that nine species of the bacteria gathered the forever chemicals the rodents ate and then pooped out. When exposed to increasing levels of the chemicals, the bacteria worked even harder, consistently removing the same percentage of the toxic chemicals. Within just minutes of exposure, the bacterial species soaked up between a quarter and nearly two-thirds of the forever chemicals. The same effect has not yet been tested in humans, but the researchers said they plan to use their findings to create probiotic dietary supplements that boost the levels of these species in the gut to shield against any PFAS-related health harms. They are also looking at how they could turbo-charge the species' performance. 'The reality is that PFAS are already in the environment and in our bodies, and we need to try and mitigate their impact on our health now,' Dr. Indra Roux, a researcher at the University of Cambridge's MRC Toxicology Unit and a co-author of the study, said. Until then, the researchers say the best thing people can do to protect themselves is to avoid known risks for exposure. Although, even tap water has been contaminated: nearly half of all tap water in America. Under the Trump administration, the Environmental Protection Agency moved to weaken Biden-era standards limiting the pollution of potentially-toxic 'forever chemicals' in U.S. drinking water sources earlier this year. 'PFAS were once considered safe, but it's now clear that they're not,' added fellow researcher Dr. Anna Lindell. 'It's taken a long time for PFAS to become noticed because at low levels they're not acutely toxic. But they're like a slow poison.'
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Universities have been infiltrated by 'chilling' diversity culture, warns Scots academic
Universities have been infiltrated by a 'chilling' diversity culture that is stifling research into controversial issues such as puberty blockers, a major report warns. The review, commissioned by the last Tory government, said academics are being 'bullied, harassed and blocked from career progression' if they dare to question transgender ideology. It says Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) staff are 'over-reaching' and sometimes even 'generate harassment' against academics. It warns many EDI departments have been captured by trans activists, and calls for their power to be scaled back. The 433-page document, the most extensive research of its kind, also records dozens of personal accounts of academics being shut down. In one example, a paper was rejected by numerous journals because reviewers 'objected to the findings' that puberty blockers may not be safe. Its writer, Professor Sallie Baxendale, a consultant clinical neuropsychologist, was told her research 'risked stigmatising an already stigmatised group'. Another academic told how they had been 'ostracised' by a colleague for 'providing balance' during a seminar discussion of puberty blockers. Robert Gordon University academic Sarah Pedersen said the attacks against her were 'chilling' and were all but ignored by the Scottish government. The report accuses universities of presiding over 'systemic and institutionalised suppression' of academic freedom, with 'far-reaching chilling effects'. Titled 'Barriers to research on sex and gender', it is led by Alice Sullivan, Professor of Sociology at the UCL Social Research Institute. She said: 'Researchers investigating vital issues have been subjected to sustained campaigns of intimidation simply for acknowledging the biological and social importance of sex. 'When fundamental issues cannot be investigated or debated openly, this undermines our academic institutions, it hurts individuals and it compromises the integrity of research.' The paper is the second instalment of a review originally commissioned by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology under the Tories. The first instalment, published in March, found that biological sex had been erased from official data in the police, NHS and even the military. Among the many testimonies is that of Aberdeen-born Professor Kathleen Stock, who was hounded out of her job at Sussex University in 2021 for her gender critical views. And Professor of communication and media at Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, Sarah Pedersen told how she came under attack because of her gender-critical views. She warned of the 'chilling effect' on the university sector, and said: 'I don't think the Scottish Government has helped in the slightest. 'There has been a dereliction of duty towards things like freedom of speech and academic freedom. 'The statements made by, for example, Nicola Sturgeon about gender-critical women have definitely cast those of us who research the subject as being on the wrong side.' While she praised Robert Gordon University for supporting her and academic freedom, Prof Pedersen said other universities north of the Border had not been as supportive. She said: 'This report clearly demonstrates the chilling effect that the cancellation of high-profile gender-critical academics has had on the whole sector. 'My personal experiences of disruption, no-platforming and personal attacks have impacted not just my academic career but also my work for third-sector organisations, who were warned away from working with me.' She told how she was attending one event at the University of Edinburgh which included prominent feminist author Julie Bindel. Prof Pedersen said: 'We had an hour-long security briefing, which was one of the most terrifying things I've ever sat through - discussing duck and cover and what to do when we were attacked by the audience.' The latest report highlights concerns that EDI departments are being used as 'levers for activists pursuing agendas which are not compatible with the truth-seeking mission of universities'. It says EDI policies have a 'tendency' to 'promote highly contentious theories such as gender-identity theory as unchallengeable fact'. Universities are also tolerating 'toxic' behaviour by 'a small minority of university staff' who 'de-platform' gender-critical academics, it says. And it adds: 'The targets of these campaigns have disproportionately been lesbians.' There are also concerns about 'ethics committees', which 'use their positions to impose particular viewpoints or to block research that they dislike'. Giving evidence to the report, Professor Stock detailed the long campaign against her including one incident in 2020 when she 'became aware of a Sussex student's social media account in which they referred approvingly to my death'. The image was of a man with a gun to his dead complete with the words: 'Lay your weary head down Kathleen'. She made a complaint to the university, but was never informed of its outcome. Prof Stock told how she had been 'subject to a sustained campaign of intimidation from protestors on campus' in September and October 2021 who said they would 'come to campus every day until I was fired or resigned'. She said: 'Posters were placed in major thoroughfares describing me as a transphobe; stickers saying the same were placed in the bathrooms I used; a manifesto defaming me was distributed throughout my building; an open day was disrupted with a large protest, graffiti and flares, and there were several sub-protests. 'The nature of the protest was widely described in the Press at the time. In tandem with a statement by Sussex branch of UCU that expressed approval of the campaign, I was eventually caused to resign.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'The Scottish Government fully supports individuals' rights to freedom of expression and believes universities to be places where freedom of expression should always be promoted and fostered - but this should be done in a courteous and respectful manner. 'Universities in Scotland are expected to comply with relevant legal requirements, and carefully consider existing Equality and Human Rights Commission guidance on freedom of expression for higher education providers in Scotland.' A UK Government spokesman said: 'We are taking strong action to protect academic freedom and free speech, which are fundamental to our world-leading universities. 'This includes introducing new duties on universities to ensure they are robust in promoting and protecting free speech on campus. 'It also comes alongside the firm steps the Office for Students is already taking, through fines and new guidance, to ensure universities remain beacons of academic freedom.' A spokesman for Universities UK, which represents vice chancellors, said: 'We agree that universities must protect and defend academic freedom and freedom of speech. 'They are bound to do so by law and, in England, there is a new regulatory approach under the Freedom of Speech Act which is about to come into force. 'These are complex issues. In practice universities are bound by law to protect the free speech of individuals who have very different views on contentious topics. 'They are required both to allow and facilitate protest, and to prevent that protest creating an intimidatory or chilling environment on campus or from preventing staff and students from pursuing their work and studies. 'We will carefully consider this report as part of our work in supporting universities as they navigate these difficult issues.'
