
Political analyst says GOP will have to continue to sell Trump's bill to the American people for years to come
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
Should Josh Allen be ranked over Patrick Mahomes despite 0–4 playoff record against him? Fox News Video
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Fox Business in Depth: Red, White and Blue Collar/Dagen McDowell Fox Business In Depth: "Reenergizing America" FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump expected to sign "Big Beautiful Bill" at Fourth of July picnic


Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
Will a team be hitting the jackpot with Dame Lilliard? Fox News Video
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Fox Business in Depth: Red, White and Blue Collar/Dagen McDowell Fox Business In Depth: "Reenergizing America" FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump expected to sign "Big Beautiful Bill" at Fourth of July picnic

Wall Street Journal
28 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Justice Sotomayor Endorses a Judicial Mutiny
Are lower courts obliged to heed rulings from the Supreme Court? The answer seems obvious, but not to some judges and apparently not to two members of the Supreme Court. That's the news in Thursday's 7-2 Court rebuke to a federal judge who failed to heed its earlier stay on his preliminary injunction. On June 23 the Supreme Court stayed federal Judge Brian Murphy's April 18 injunction on the Trump Administration's plan to deport to South Sudan eight men convicted of violent crimes. The order lets the Administration resume sending illegal migrants to countries other than their own, pending appeal on the legal merits to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. A few hours later Judge Murphy announced the eight men were still protected from removal by an order he issued modifying the original injunction. The men are currently held at a military base in Djibouti. The order 'remains in full force and effect notwithstanding today's stay of the preliminary injunction,' Judge Murphy said. That sure looks like willful resistance to a Supreme Court order, and the Administration sought a 'clarification' from the Justices. On Thursday they left no doubt. 'Our June 23 order stayed the April 18 preliminary injunction in full,' the Court said in an unsigned order. 'The May 21 remedial order [by Judge Murphy] cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable.'