Emissions Trading Scheme incentivising whole farm conversions into forestry, farmers say
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
Federated Farmers is urging the government to listen to its submission on legislation that looks to prevent whole-farm conversions into forestry.
The Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme-Forestry Conversion) Amendment Bill had its first reading in June and a number of submissions were heard in a parliamentary select committee on Tuesday.
Federated Farmers Forestry spokesperson Richard Dawkins told RNZ the future of rural communities was at stake if the government did not take this opportunity to make serious changes to the ETS.
"The logic is clear. We just can't continue to undermine our productive sector or we're never gonna get ahead as a country," he said.
Dawkins said Federated Farmers had no issue with forestry, but with the current ETS settings.
"There's no problem with the right tree in the right place.
"We encourage that, but with the way the ETS settings are at the moment, you're just incentivising whole farm conversions into permanent exotics and that, it's just no good, no good for anyone," he said.
Gisborne farmer and former Federated Farmers forestry spokesperson Toby Williams told RNZ the campaign was launched out of widespread concern for the increase in productive farm land being planted in pine trees.
"We're really concerned that the continuing government policy looks to drive down the available land for sheep production.
"We already know that our meat processors are struggling and we want to ensure that we actually have an industry still that can play its part in thriving rural communities, but also a thriving New Zealand and driving our export returns," he said.
Federated Farmers have put up a billboard in Wellington claiming "sheep are not the problem".
Photo:
Supplied
The Ministry for Primary Industries had a goal of doubling primary sector exports by 2035, but Williams said the sheep flock was declining.
"Shrinking the sheep flock and shrinking the area that we farm sheep on isn't a great way to drive that forward," he said.
Federated Farmers wants the government's review of the ETS to make two key changes - reducing the amount of emissions that large polluters can offset with trees, and capping the number of pine tree credits entered into the ETS.
"We'd like to see a sinking lid on how many offsets a polluter could do every year. For example, we'd say in 2025 this year you could do 100 percent, but next year it drops to 95 into 9085 and so on," he said.
The farming group was also keen to cap how many pine tree credits a polluter could enter into the ETS.
"That will also have the same effect of slowing conversions of sheep and beef land into pine trees just for carbon offsets, and it will bring some actual balance," he said.
Williams said if nothing changed with the ETS, then in 25 years time about 750,000 hectares of sheep producing land would be turned into pine trees.
Gisborne farmer and former Federated Farmers forestry spokesperson Toby Williams.
Photo:
RNZ / Jimmy Ellingham
Forestry Owners Association chief executive Elizabeth Heeg told RNZ it was not impressed with the Federated Farmers campaign targeting forestry.
"We are disappointed that trees, and particularly pine trees, are being singled out as being the primary cause of some kind of a decline in the sheep numbers where actually we are not the correlation or the cause of the decline in sheep numbers.
"Sheep numbers have been declining over the past 20 years and the forestry area has just started to come back in the last few years. So we are actually at a position at the national level of the same amount of forestry land area that we had 20 years ago," she said.
While Heeg agrees that land use had changed over the past 20 years, she said it was more complicated than blaming it on forestry.
"We're not seeing some kind of exponential growth in forestry planting. Actually, we did have an increase in forestry planting in the last couple of years, but we're seeing that largely kind of plateau at this stage," said Heeg.
The group was alarmed by Federated Farmers idea of a 'sinking lid' policy on how many trees a polluter could plant to offset its emissions.
"We would be deeply concerned if the government looked to take forestry out of the emissions trading scheme, because trees are still the only proven mitigation technology that we have.
"I find it interesting that farmers would be asking for that when it's one of the chief ways that they could mitigate their climate emissions. So the inclusion or not of trees in the Emissions Trading Scheme, I feel like that horse has already bolted," said Heeg.
The Forestry Owners Association says forestry is not the problem.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
The association was strongly against phasing forestry out of the ETS, instead
urging more action from polluters
.
"I think it's nuts that we would get rid of our only proven mitigation tool rather than look at achieving gross emissions reductions.
"It's a little bananas that when the rural sector needs as much support as possible, that we've got people pitting elements of the sector against itself when actually a lot of farmers are foresters as well and they're happily doing both in the landscape," she said.
However, Federated Farmers said its members were definitely not happy - and wanted to see more action from the government.
"We want to see an urgent review of the ETS as the government has held off doing it. There have been tweaks over the years, but that's it.
"We're not the only organisation calling for changes to how we're doing this because of the threat to our economy," said Toby Williams.
Minister for Forestry Todd McClay said the Federated Farmers' Save Our Sheep campaign highlighted exactly why his government was taking action to stop the wholesale loss of productive farmland to pine trees.
"Under the last government, sheep and beef farms across regions like Hawke's Bay were bought out by carbon speculators, driven by careless and unbalanced ETS settings. Labour made it more profitable to plant pine trees than to farm sheep - and rural communities paid the price," said McClay.
Minister for Forestry Todd McClay.
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
However, Labour Party forestry spokesperson Cushla Tangaere-Manuel said this was not a matter of sheep and beef farming versus forestry.
"It's a matter of striking the right balance between industry growth and environmental protection. Labour has always believed the right tree should be planted in the right place - anything to the contrary is scaremongering.
"This government has taken nearly two years to do anything about this. Labour were the ones with policy that put decision-making back into local hands on farm to forestry conversions and we are committed to finding long-term, locally-led, sustainable solutions," she said.
Todd McClay said his government was moving forward on the issue.
"On 4 December last year, we announced a ban on full farm-to-forest conversions, and legislation will be passed by October this year and backdated to that announcement - stopping blanket ETS planting on productive farmland and giving sheep and beef farmers a fair go," he said.
However, McClay said the ETS was not the only challenge the sheep sector faced, as the wool industry had struggled - which is why he was supporting the sector by using wool in government buildings and housing, and investing in new uses through public-private partnerships.
"We're not anti-forestry, but it can't come at the expense of highly-quality, safe and sustainable food production. We're levelling the playing field and backing farmers to grow the best lamb and mutton in the world - and sell it to the world," said McClay.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
Taranaki mayors want hydrogen kick-start from Wellington
Hydrogen is touted as a fuel with lower carbon emissions, especially for fuel-cell powered heavy trucks. Photo: Supplied / Hiringa Energy Taranaki mayors want central government to partner up with their councils to kick-start a hydrogen industry. This despite ongoing questions about the gas's effectiveness in reducing carbon emissions. The Taranaki Mayoral Forum said Wellington should financially back the region as it is the logical base for hydrogen energy production. That work would include both onshore and offshore exploration. As economies attempt to move away from fossil fuels, hydrogen is touted as a lower-carbon-emission alternative with no pollution from the exhaust pipe. It is especially promising for freight trucks, which are hard to power by battery. The mayors' submission to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Enterprise on regulating hydrogen has admitted drawbacks: hydrogen's green credentials depend on how it's made. The forum emphasised hydrogen is not a silver bullet for climate change - noting that other technologies, scaled-up mitigation and behaviour change were also necessary. Despite those doubts, the mayors enthusiastically pitched Taranaki as New Zealand's best bet for a hydrogen headquarters, asking the government to take "proactive action". "Government support may be required to help kick-start an industry in New Zealand and make sure risks are appropriately managed." The forum is made up of the New Plymouth, Stratford and South Taranaki district mayors and the chair of Taranaki Regional Council. Their submission points to Taranaki's experience in energy production, existing infrastructure, and promising geology - as well as councils' experience in regulating the energy sector. Hiringa Energy's project to make hydrogen at Kāpuni powered by windmills taller than Auckland's Sky Tower defeated a court challenge from Te Korowai o Ngāruahine. Photo: Supplied / Hiringa Energy "We would welcome Taranaki being considered as a home base for this industry." The mayors are clear that iwi and hapū need to be in the room from the start. "The Mayoral Forum supports a regulatory regime that provides mana whenua with early and meaningful engagement," their submission said. "Treaty settlements in Taranaki have clear provisions around oil and gas developments, and [we] recommend that the government consider how best to honour those commitments in regulating hydrogen, even if hydrogen may not strictly fall within definitions in Treaty settlements." Different ways to make hydrogen have varying carbon footprints. Manufacturing demands huge amounts of electricity in a relatively inefficient process: Hiringa Energy is gearing up capacity at Kāpuni to make "green" hydrogen with power from four giant windmills, taller than Auckland's Sky Tower. MBIE is investigating "natural" and "orange" hydrogen. Geological processes in the Earth's crust form natural hydrogen, while the orange version is made by injecting water and carbon dioxide into particular mineral formations to stimulate hydrogen generation. The MBIE paper points to two options to regulate the infant industry: The mayors' submission said mana whenua must be part of talks, whatever officials decide. "Whichever regulatory pathway the Crown adopts regarding the RMA or CMA, discussions will be required with iwi and hapū to define rights to the resource." They also suggest collaboration with local booster agency Venture Taranaki and Ara Ake, the region's nationally-focused energy innovation centre. - LDR is local body reporting co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air.

RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
In-fighting and claims of bullying at Southland licensing trust
The Mataura Licensing Trust has its office in Gore and services an extended area within Southland. Photo: Supplied / LDR / Wikicommons The president of a southern licensing trust said he will not accept his deputy's apology following a fiery meeting this week. Gore-based Mataura Licensing Trust operates a range of alcohol-related businesses in Southland with a mandate for redistributing profits within the community. On Thursday, tempers flared at one of its meetings after president Horace McAuley accused deputy Vince Aynsley of bullying in his president's report. The situation centred on an incident at the New Zealand Licensing Trusts Association conference in Invercargill on 19 July, where McAuley alleged Aynsley asked him how he would feel when he was no longer president next term. The Otago Daily Times was at Thursday's meeting and said Aynsley could not recall the exchange but would apologise for whatever he hypothetically said. An argument then began between president McAuley and board member Jeannine Cunningham over an employment issue - but not before she alleged the president had blown up at a previous meeting and was guilty of bullying himself. Cunningham claimed she was approached by multiple people at the Invercargill conference asking: "when are you getting rid of Horace?" Despite the in-fighting, McAuley shut down any suggestion that the licensing trust was dysfunctional. "Never in your life. Never, ever, ever," McAuley told Local Democracy Reporting . Mataura Licensing Trust president Horace McAuley, left, deputy president Vince Aynsley, and board member Jeannine Cunningham. Photo: Supplied / Local Democracy Reporting The issues had not dissuaded him from wanting to stay on at the trust, and he noted he had been elected president unopposed since 2010. "We're a busy trust, and as their president, I have an awful lot to do. And so I'm not focusing on this," he said. "To be fair to both myself and the Mataura Licensing Trust, it's a distraction, and the person responsible for the distraction is the person who should answer the questions. "That's Vince Aynsley." McAuley said he "received" Aynsley's apology, which was different to "accepting" it. Aynsley did not wish to comment on the situation but said he had asked McAuley how he would feel "hypothetically" if he wasn't president next year. "I'm in no rush to talk or bring down Horace or say anything in public at this stage." The president's dig at his deputy was not the only criticism Aynsley faced at the meeting. Another member, Bryan Burgess, claimed Aynsley underhandedly took his deputy role three years ago, which Aynsley accepted. Licensing trust elections run at the same time as local body elections, with the president selected by members. The next election is set for 11 October. Mataura Licensing Trust controls a total of 12 liquor outlets, bars, restaurants and accommodation providers from Tapanui in the north to Tokonui in the south. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
The value of Youth MPs put under a question mark
Photo: VNP/Louis Collins A former politician says change is needed to the Youth Parliament system if it's to stay relevant. MP-turned political commentator Peter Dunne says the scheme isn't just "a rag-tag collection of young people coming together for a couple of days to play at being MPs", but if the event is going to be taken seriously, more consistency is required around its processes. That's not the case at the moment, in everything from how the teens are selected to the quality of the mentorship they're getting. The tri-annual event usually passes under the media radar, but this year's event was overshadowed by what a handful of Youth MPs said was censorship of their speeches . Dunne says he could understand the intention behind the message from the Ministry of Youth Development, which asked some students to remove parts of their speeches where they lacked political neutrality, but the issue could have been handled better. In the end, none of the students were stopped from making their speeches, even if they didn't make the changes. Youth Parliament has been held every three years for the past three decades and is described by the government as, "a unique opportunity for young New Zealanders to learn first-hand about our democracy, influence government decision-making, and have their voices heard". In many ways it's like the real thing, with MPs selecting teens to represent them for a couple of days in Parliament where they debate, give speeches and discuss fictional legislation. Dunne says often the young adults outshine the older MPs. "The contrast has usually been between the impeccable behaviour of the youth MPs and the somewhat unruly behaviour of their adult counterparts," he says. The first Youth Parliament was held in 1995 and initially was just a couple of days. Now the programme has expanded, running from April to August and Dunne questions how much teens take out of those extra two months and 29 days. "And more importantly, what weight is attached to that? They've got no formal status in the community, so what role can they play?" he asks. Dunne says much of what the young aspiring politicians learn and do is dependent on the MP they are mentored by. "In some cases they won't do very much, in some cases the MP will work actively with them and assign them a particular project," Dunne says. There also aren't any rules around how MPs select their mentee. Some get applicants to write essays, this year David Seymour held an election, and Dunne says a couple just shoulder tap the kids of a mate. "The time is right to have a proper review into its function and purpose, including the role of the Youth MPs, how they're selected and what are reasonable expectations of them. "Because I think that with a much clearer focus the youth parliament can play a much greater role than it has done to date," Dunne says. Oscar Duffy, representing List MP Melissa Lee became interested in politics last year when his nan was in hospital. "She's a Māori lady and she didn't have the best experience ... so that was a pretty key driver in me being interested in what's going on. "Obviously there's so much tension between Māori and the Crown ... and that affects my family really directly," he says. Duffy agrees that the degree of mentorship varies. He spent substantial time working on projects in his community and in Lee's Mount Albert office but says others didn't have the same experience. "[Ministers] have no time right? Ministers are so busy, I roomed with Simeon Brown's Youth MP and he didn't really see Simeon a lot, if at all," he says. Duffy sees youth parliament as an opportunity for those interested in politics to get an insight into the system. He says everyone attending this year had a keen interest in advocacy and change-making, but he admits that at times some see their role as more important than it is. "There's just a lot of politically charged people in one room. "Putting them all in the same room is great and it gets everyone talking to each other and firing off really good initiatives ... but yeah I guess some of them do think they are a bit more important than they are which is a shame because they probably should be more important and have more of a say," he says. But if he could change one thing Duffy would raise the age bracket because he thinks 16 is too young. "Even just move it up one year, 17-19, so there's more first year uni students who have been through high school, who have seen the whole system," he says. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter .