
Wrap of Mbenenge tribunal: Judge awaits his fate
In perhaps one of the most contentious hearings against a judge, with witnesses contradicting each other, the Judicial Conduct Tribunal started the year with a hearing that seeks to determine whether Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge sexually harassed the secretary for the judges, Andiswa Mengo.
The Tribunal, comprising Judge B M Ngoepe, retired Judge-President of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Tribunal President, and Judge C Pretorius, retired Judge of the Gauteng Division of the High Court and Advocate G Mashaba SC, as a non-judicial member of the Tribunal, commenced in January and is expected to resume again in October.
Mengo's accusations
Mengo lodged a complaint against Mbenenge, accusing him of sexual harassment after he allegedly persistently asked her to send him explicit images and also sent him his in exchange.
In her testimony, Mengo told the Tribunal she found these requests for pictures 'annoying' and felt that he was forcing her to send them.
She accused him of sexually harassing her through messages on WhatsApp, inappropriate comments, gestures regarding her appearance, and another incident that occurred in his chambers in November 2022.
She also claimed he sent her an image of his penis, which was subsequently deleted on the evening of 17 June 2021.
The complainant told the Tribunal it showed 'his private part with hair the same colour as his hair on his head'.
He also allegedly sent her pornographic pictures.
ALSO READ: 'How will Mbenenge defend himself?' Tribunal chair asks evidence leader during tense proceedings
Mengo has accused the judge of asking her if she was aware of the effect she had on him as he pointed towards the front of his pants. She told the Tribunal that there was a bulge in his pants and that he was fiddling with his zip.
'He asked me if I didn't want to suck it,' she previously told the Tribunal.
This incident is reported to have occurred on 14 November 2022, after he summoned her into his chambers at the Umtata High Court.
Mbenenge's defence
The judge has claimed that the sexual interactions between him and Mengo were consensual.
Mengo, however, told the Tribunal that she reciprocated Mbenenge's sexual messages to 'satisfy him in order for peace at the workplace'.
Mbenenge, the first senior judge in the country to risk impeachment for sexual misconduct, has also denied sending an image of his penis.
'In light of what you are saying, I am saying to you, the persistence in saying I sent K8 [penis] is crystal lies and in the direction of being malicious,' argued Mbenenge.
He argued that he was trying to pursue a romantic relationship, but there was no clear guide on how to do so.
Although he admitted to asking her to remove her jacket, he denied that the request was indecent.
'I wanted her to remove her jacket because I wanted to appreciate her appearance. It was obstructing my view of how she looked,' Mbenenge said, with hand gestures painting her figure.
'Reinforcement'
The witnesses called to testify at the Tribunal muddied the matter, as some seemed to suggest that Mengo was a willing participant in the conversations, while others stated that she was not.
In May, forensic and legal linguist Dr Zakeera Docrat testified that some of the emojis used by Mengo in her conversations with Mbenenge suggested 'agreement' and 'warmth'.
ALSO READ: Did she mean it or not? Analysis of Mengo's WhatsApp messages to Judge Mbenenge questioned
She testified that the exchanges between Mbenenge and Mengo started professionally but slowly degenerated with the use of emojis to 'convey sexual acts'.
Mengo sent a 'monkey's closing its eyes' emoji. Docrat said this emoji represents 'reinforcement'.
'Reinforcement because she's used it more than once, even though there's no text. But based on the text chain that was unravelling, and in that instance, her shyness on her part, embarrassment.'
'Not much mutuality'
In June, gender violence expert Dr Lisa Vetten testified that there was not much mutuality in the WhatsApp message exchanges between Mengo and Mbenenge.
'I looked at who initiated the conversation, how many conversations were sent by the Judge President, and by Mengo. I used that as an indication of who is initiating the conversation and who is more active in the conversation, and it gives you a sense of who is asking more often and engaging more often. It gives you an indication of who is the more interested party. I counted 837 WhatsApp messages, 526 from the Judge, and 311 from Mengo,' said Vetten.
Eastern Cape High Court judge's secretary Andiswa Mengo gives testimony before the Judicial Conduct Tribunal. Picture: X / @OCJ_RSA
Mengo's unclear responses, according to Vetten, were her way of evading Mbenenge's advances.
Vetten said while Mbenenge used emojis to ask for things from Mengo, she used evasion to avoid direct responses to his advances.
Did he send explicit images?
Another witness, Dr Vincent Mello, in July questioned the format of some of the photos allegedly sent by Mbenenge to Mengo.
He was asked to assess the usage of emojis and the disputed pictures allegedly exchanged between the two.
Mello said some of the pictures were inconsistent with the WhatsApp format.
'Based on my analysis, it is clear that the photos are below the typing message area, and they depict as though the message was still being compiled, and possibly, it was a screenshot taken. A message that would have been sent would have had the ticks, but I didn't see them as I expected. The photos are not consistent with the WhatsApp template or indicate that they were sent,' said Mello.
'The photo [of Mbenenge's private part] cannot be confirmed if it was from WhatsApp since it is not consistent with the WhatsApp template or format. You don't see the name, followed by a typing space.'
ALSO READ: Did Judge Mbenenge send Mengo explicit pictures? Expert testifies
'He does it to everyone'
Another witness, Mbenenge's former secretary, Zinhle Nqkayi, in July, told the Tribunal Mbenenge used to comment on everyone's outfits at work, not just Mengo's.
'It was in the morning, I think around teatime. One of the judges' secretaries arrived in my office, and the JP [Mbenenge] was in his office at the time. The JP came out, and he stood by the door that interlinks our offices,' said Nqkayi.
'Mengo was passing by while the JP was having a conversation with Ms Gugushe, asking how she was. Mengo passed by and greeted me, and the JP called her, and she came into my office. The JP then uttered a statement, exclaimed and said, 'What is it, big girl? Why are you wearing a curtain today?' He then went further on to say, 'Do you see how other children are dressed well?' He was referring to Ms Gugushe and me as we were standing by my table.'
ALSO READ: Mbenenge commented on everyone's outfits, not just Mengo's, says former secretary
Advocate Griffiths Madonsela, for Mbenenge, asked Nqkayi: 'Was it usual for the judge to raise such issues?'
'Yes, that is his daily talk. Yes, he is like that; he would even pass this comment to a lawyer who would be coming into his office. The first thing he will notice is how that particular person is dressed, even with me; he will notice when I walk into the office and ask me, 'Haibo, big girl, are you awake? Why do you still seem to be dressed in your sleepwear?' Nkqayi responded.
The Tribunal will reconvene on 21 and 22 October 2025 for oral arguments.
After hearing all the evidence, the Tribunal will decide whether to recommend to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) that Mbenenge is guilty of gross misconduct.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ballito NPO's phone hacked in voice phishing scam
A single phone call compromised Smile with United States NPO co-founder Cindy Bansi's cellphone number, putting more than 1 000 contacts, including sponsors, at risk. Based in Frasers near Ballito, the non-profit provides vital nutrition, shelter and clothing to the poor. Bansi's number was hacked after she answered a call from an unknown number. 'I have various contacts and groups. The man who took control of my number contacted them asking for money,' she said. Bansi said the cyberattack jeopardised the organisation's reputation and operations as she had used the same number for over 20 years, with all her work linked to it. To make matters worse, she received minimal support from her service provider. 'My bank did not want to block the number that night, even though I explained it was fraudulent. I phoned five times,' she said. It took two days to regain access to her number. Fortunately, no funds were lost. Enrico Botha, an IT technician from Teamwork Computers, explained that this type of cyberattack is known as vishing (voice phishing). It involves a phone call used to manipulate victims into sharing sensitive information or unknowingly granting access to their devices. 'To protect yourself, avoid weak passwords or reusing the same password across sites,' said Botha. 'Use long, complex passwords, ideally at least 12 characters and store them securely with a password manager.' He also recommended enabling two-factor authentication on all important accounts. 'Even if your password is stolen, a second layer of verification can stop the hacker.' Other tips include: • Only download apps from trusted sources, like Google Play or the Apple App Store, and always check the permissions apps request. If an app requests more permissions than it needs, like access to your contacts or microphone when it does not seem necessary, that's a red flag. • Set a PIN or password with your mobile provider to prevent SIM swap fraud. 'Without one, a hacker may easily impersonate you using basic personal details,' said Botha. • Use identity protection services like LifeLock or IDShield to monitor your personal data and alert you to suspicious activity. 'Cybercriminals are becoming more sophisticated, but by taking simple steps, you can stay one step ahead,' he said. Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news. Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here, or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.


The South African
10 hours ago
- The South African
'I believe Kenny 100%': McKenzie defends Kenny Kunene
Patriotic Alliance leader Gayton McKenzie has defended his deputy, Kenny Kunene, amid controversy over alleged ties to a mastermind in DJ Sumbody's murder case. This follows Kunene's presence during the arrest of Katiso 'KT' Molefe, a suspect in DJ Sumbody's murder investigation. Molefe was arrested for his alleged role in the killing of amapiano star Oupa 'DJ Sumbody' Sefoka in November 2022. DJ Sumbody and his bodyguard died in a drive-by shooting on a Woodmead road after their vehicle was shot at. The arrest occurred on Monday, with Kunene present at Molefe's home, raising questions about their relationship and possible associations. Kunene insisted he was only there to assist journalists with a scheduled interview at Molefe's house. He explained that his contact had helped the journalist secure an interview with Molefe and had accompanied them there. Kunene maintains he does not have Molefe's contact details and had never visited the suspect's home before the arrest day. 'Then there was an opportunity to interview Molefe and somebody that I know who knows Molefe, and then I arranged the interview. I then had to transport the journalist to Molefe's home,' he told eNCA. He added he was shocked when the police raided Molefe's home and arrested him. Following this, on Tuesday, McKenzie announced that Kunene has been placed on thirty days of special leave while the matter is investigated internally. In a post on X, McKenzie said his believe that Kunene had no direct link with Molefe, and they are launching a probe. 'Firstly, I believe Kenny 100%. I can't expect everyone to believe him, hence we are launching a full investigation to prove what we already know, which is that he is innocent. We will share the whole process and findings,' he said. He added, 'People are saying that I shouldn't vouch for @Kenny_T_Kunene, but I will vouch for him a million times. I know this man. He is a socialite, and his only crime is the accessibility of everyone to him. I believe his version. The party has a duty to treat everyone the same.' WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.


The Citizen
11 hours ago
- The Citizen
Two children hit and killed walking home on N2 near Amatikulu, mother critical
Two children hit and killed walking home on N2 near Amatikulu, mother critical Two children, aged six and ten, were killed after being struck by a vehicle on the N2 near Amatikulu on Tuesday evening. The boys had been walking home with their pregnant mother when the incident occurred shortly after 7pm. The woman suffered critical injuries and was treated on scene by IPSS Medical Rescue paramedics. The incident was initially reported as a hit-and-run, but it is understood the driver has since been identified. This comes just three days after five people, including a family of four, were killed nearby in a terrible crash on the R66 near the Dokodweni bridge. Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news. Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here, or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.