logo
The building blocks of life — how atoms form in extreme heat

The building blocks of life — how atoms form in extreme heat

Daily Maverick23-07-2025
Most of the universe is made up of hydrogen and helium atoms, which came into being after the Big Bang cooled down a little. Heavier atoms are formed during high-energy collisions in stars.
How do atoms form? – Joshua (7), Shoreview, Minnesota, US
Richard Feynman, a famous theoretical physicist who won the Nobel Prize, said that if he could pass on only one piece of scientific information to future generations, it would be that all things are made of atoms.
Understanding how atoms form is a fundamental and important question, since they make up everything with mass.
The question of where atoms come from requires a lot of physics to be answered completely – and even then, physicists like me only have good guesses to explain how some atoms are formed.
What is an atom?
An atom consists of a heavy centre, called the nucleus, made of particles called protons and neutrons. An atom has lighter particles called electrons that you can think of as orbiting the nucleus.
The electrons each carry one unit of negative charge, the protons each carry one unit of positive charge, and the neutrons have no charge. An atom has the same number of protons as electrons, so it is neutral − it has no overall charge.
Now, most of the atoms in the universe are the two simplest kinds: hydrogen, which has one proton, zero neutrons and one electron; and helium, which has two protons, two neutrons and two electrons. Of course, on Earth there are lots of atoms besides these that are just as common, such as carbon and oxygen, but I'll talk about those soon.
An element is what scientists call a group of atoms that are all the same, because they all have the same number of protons.
The first atoms form
Most of the universe's hydrogen and helium atoms formed about 400,000 years after the Big Bang, which is the name for when scientists think the universe began, about 14 billion years ago.
Why did they form at that time? Astronomers know from observing distant exploding stars that the size of the universe has been getting bigger since the Big Bang. When the hydrogen and helium atoms first formed, the universe was about 1,000 times smaller than it is now.
Before this time, the electrons had too much energy to settle into orbits around the hydrogen and helium nuclei. So, the hydrogen and helium atoms could form only once the universe cooled down to something like 2,760 degrees Celsius. For historical reasons, this process is misleadingly called recombination, but combination would be more descriptive.
The helium and deuterium − a heavier form of hydrogen − nuclei formed even earlier, just a few minutes after the Big Bang, when the temperature was above 556 million degrees Celsius. Protons and neutrons can collide and form nuclei like these only at very high temperatures.
Scientists believe that almost all the ordinary matter in the universe is made of about 90% hydrogen atoms and 8% helium atoms.
How do more massive atoms form?
So, the hydrogen and helium atoms formed during recombination, when the cooler temperature allowed electrons to fall into orbits. But you, I and almost everything on Earth is made of many more massive atoms than just hydrogen and helium. How were these atoms made?
The surprising answer is that more massive atoms are made in stars. To make atoms with several protons and neutrons stuck together in the nucleus requires the type of high-energy collisions that occur in very hot places. The energy needed to form a heavier nucleus needs to be large enough to overcome the repulsive electric force that positive charges, like two protons, feel.
Protons and neutrons also have another property – kind of like a different type of charge – that is strong enough to bind them together once they are able to get very close together. This property is called the strong force, and the process that sticks these particles together is called fusion.
Scientists believe that most of the elements from carbon up to iron are fused in stars heavier than our sun, where the temperature can exceed 556 million degrees Celsius – the same temperature that the universe was when it was a few minutes old.
But even in hot stars, elements heavier than iron and nickel won't form. These require extra energy, because the heavier elements can more easily break into pieces.
In a dramatic event called a supernova, the inner core of a heavy star suddenly collapses after it runs out of fuel to burn. During the powerful explosion this collapse triggers, elements that are heavier than iron can form and get ejected into the universe.
Astronomers are still figuring out the details of other fantastic stellar events that form larger atoms. For example, colliding neutron stars can release enormous amounts of energy – and elements such as gold – on their way to forming black holes.
Understanding how atoms are made requires learning a little general relativity, plus some nuclear, particle and atomic physics. But to complicate matters, there is other stuff in the universe that doesn't appear to be made from normal atoms at all, called dark matter. Scientists are investigating what dark matter is and how it forms. DM
First published by The Conversation.
Stephen L Levy is associate professor of physics, applied physics and astronomy at the State University of New York at Binghamton.
This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Silent killer': the science of tracing climate deaths in heatwaves
'Silent killer': the science of tracing climate deaths in heatwaves

Eyewitness News

time2 days ago

  • Eyewitness News

'Silent killer': the science of tracing climate deaths in heatwaves

PARIS - A heatwave scorching Europe had barely subsided in early July when scientists published estimates that 2,300 people may have died across a dozen major cities during the extreme, climate-fuelled episode. The figure was supposed to "grab some attention" and sound a timely warning in the hope of avoiding more needless deaths, said Friederike Otto, one of the scientists involved in the research. "We are still relatively early in the summer, so this will not have been the last heatwave. There is a lot that people and communities can do to save lives," Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College London, told AFP. Heat can claim tens of thousands of lives during European summers but it usually takes months, even years, to count the cost of this "silent killer". Otto and colleagues published their partial estimate just a week after temperatures peaked in western Europe. While the underlying methods were not new, the scientists said it was the first study to link heatwave deaths to climate change so soon after the event in question. Early mortality estimates could be misunderstood as official statistics but "from a public health perspective the benefits of providing timely evidence outweigh these risks," Raquel Nunes from the University of Warwick told AFP. "This approach could have transformative potential for both public understanding and policy prioritisation" of heatwaves, said Nunes, an expert on global warming and health who was not involved in the study. BIG DEAL Science can show, with increasing speed and confidence, that human-caused climate change is making heatwaves hotter and more frequent. Unlike floods and fires, heat kills quietly, with prolonged exposure causing heat stroke, organ failure, and death. The sick and elderly are particularly vulnerable, but so are younger people exercising or toiling outdoors. But every summer, heat kills and Otto -- a pioneer in the field of attribution science -- started wondering if the message was getting through. "We have done attribution studies of extreme weather events and attribution studies of heatwaves for a decade... but as a society we are not prepared for these heatwaves," she said. "People think it's 30 (degrees Celsius) instead of 27, what's the big deal? And we know it's a big deal." When the mercury started climbing in Europe earlier this summer, scientists tweaked their approach. Joining forces, Imperial College London and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine chose to spotlight the lethality -- not just the intensity -- of the heat between June 23 and July 2. Combining historic weather and published mortality data, they assessed that climate change made the heatwave between 1C and 4C hotter across 12 cities, depending on location, and that 2,300 people had likely perished. But in a notable first, they estimated that 65 percent of these deaths -- around 1,500 people across cities including London, Paris, and Athens -- would not have occurred in a world without global warming. "That's a much stronger message," said Otto. "It brings it much closer to home what climate change actually means and makes it much more real and human than when you say this heatwave would have been two degrees colder." UNDERESTIMATED THREAT The study was just a snapshot of the wider heatwave that hit during western Europe's hottest June on record and sent temperatures soaring to 46C in Spain and Portugal. The true toll was likely much higher, the authors said, noting that heat deaths are widely undercounted. Since then Turkey, Greece and Bulgaria have suffered fresh heatwaves and deadly wildfires. Though breaking new ground, the study has not been subject to peer review, a rigorous assessment process that can take more than a year. Otto said waiting until after summer to publish -- when "no one's talking about heatwaves, no one is thinking about keeping people safe" -- would defeat the purpose. "I think it's especially important, in this context, to get the message out there very quickly." The study had limitations but relied on robust and well-established scientific methodology, several independent experts told AFP. Tailoring this approach to local conditions could help cities better prepare when heatwaves loom, Abhiyant Tiwari, a health and climate expert who worked on India's first-ever heat action plan, told AFP. "I definitely see more such studies coming out in the future," said Tiwari from NRDC India. Otto said India, which experiences tremendously hot summers, was a "prime candidate" and with a template in place it was likely more studies would soon follow.

The Subconscious Revealed: Navigating Joseph Murphy's Insights
The Subconscious Revealed: Navigating Joseph Murphy's Insights

IOL News

time5 days ago

  • IOL News

The Subconscious Revealed: Navigating Joseph Murphy's Insights

Murphy doesn't treat the subconscious as a mystical black box. Instead, he frames it as a living system of belief and response, one that like soil requires conscious planting and nurturing. What makes this particularly relevant today is how closely it mirrors modern neuroscience. Murphy's premise is simple but powerful; the subconscious accepts whatever we repeatedly believe or emotionally internalise, whether helpful or harmful. Once accepted, those beliefs begin to shape our habits, emotional reactions, and even physical health. That idea may have seemed abstract decades ago. Today, science backs it up. When I first picked it up, I expected the usual motivational tone. Instead, I was met with something deeper: a quiet but firm reminder that the stories we believe, especially the ones we don't realise we're telling ourselves, shape our lives more than we dare admit. And those stories live not in the conscious mind, but in the subconscious. Joseph Murphy's work wasn't just a book. It was a reorientation. A reframing of reality. A deep breath in the noise of modern life. I didn't finish The Power of the Subconscious Mind in one sitting. I wasn't supposed to. Some books feel like conversations that unfold slowly, over days or even weeks. Neuroscience confirms that our brain is constantly processing information beneath the level of conscious awareness. According to Dr. Bruce Lipton, a developmental biologist, 95% of our behaviour is driven by subconscious programming. His work suggests that these deep patterns are largely formed in childhood and continue to run in the background like silent software. Psychologist Dr. Daniel Kahneman, in his Nobel Prize-winning work Thinking, Fast and Slow, distinguishes between 'System 1' (fast, automatic, subconscious thinking) and 'System 2' (slow, deliberate, conscious reasoning). His research shows that most of our daily decisions are made by System 1. In other words, we're often not thinking. We're reacting from deep programming. When I realised this, it became deeply personal. I saw how my own reactions to hesitation, people-pleasing, fear of visibility wasn't flaws. They were well-practised patterns that lived in my subconscious, quietly protecting me from outdated threats. Reading Murphy's work alongside contemporary research helped me bridge the spiritual and the scientific. Esther Hicks and the teachings of the Law of Attraction add yet another layer, emphasising emotional resonance. According to that perspective, our emotions are feedback indicators of whether our dominant vibration (or subconscious belief) is aligned with what we want. If fear, lack, or worry dominate, then we attract more of that experience not as punishment, but as reflection. In practice, I started combining Murphy's affirmations with visualisation techniques and emotional awareness. I'd picture myself already calm, successful, and free. Then pause and notice how my body responded. Did it tighten? Did a voice say 'you don't deserve that'? That was the subconscious speaking. Instead of overriding it, I began to gently reframe it. This practice wasn't about toxic positivity or wishful thinking. It was about consciously choosing what I feed my subconscious, day by day. Neuroscience calls this neuroplasticity, the brain's ability to rewire through repetition and experience. Over time, those small shifts created space for different choices, clearer boundaries and deeper trust in myself. Why is this still relevant? Because we live in a world flooded with information but starving for integration. We learn more, scroll more, achieve more and yet often feel disconnected, scattered and unsure. The subconscious doesn't speak at speed or noise. It responds to clarity, emotion and presence. Most of us are out of sync with that. Murphy's work reminds me that healing and transformation don't come from pushing harder, but from returning inward with intention. The subconscious isn't a mystery to be feared. It's a powerful ally, waiting for clearer instructions. 'Change your thoughts, and you change your destiny'—Murphy wrote that long before it became a social media quote. Now I understand what he meant. It's not about forcing thoughts. It's about gently replanting them, watering them with emotion and letting the deeper mind take root. Some books ask to be read. Others ask to be lived. This one? It asked me to pause, to rewire and to re-meet myself at the level where real change begins.

China urges global consensus on balancing AI development, security
China urges global consensus on balancing AI development, security

eNCA

time26-07-2025

  • eNCA

China urges global consensus on balancing AI development, security

BEIJING - China's Premier Li Qiang warned Saturday that artificial intelligence development must be weighed against the security risks, saying global consensus was urgently needed even as the tech race between Beijing and Washington shows no sign of abating. His remarks came just days after US President Donald Trump unveiled an aggressive low-regulation strategy aimed at cementing US dominance in the fast-moving field, promising to "remove red tape and onerous regulation" that could hinder private sector AI development. Opening the World AI Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai on Saturday, Li emphasised the need for governance and open-source development, announcing the establishment of a Chinese-led body for international AI cooperation. "The risks and challenges brought by artificial intelligence have drawn widespread attention... How to find a balance between development and security urgently requires further consensus from the entire society," the premier said. He gave no further details about the newly announced organisation, though state media later reported "the preliminary consideration" was that it would be headquartered in Shanghai. The organisation would "promote global governance featuring extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits", state news agency Xinhua reported, without elaborating on its set-up or mechanisms. At a time when AI is being integrated across virtually all industries, its uses have raised major questions, including about the spread of misinformation, its impact on employment and the potential loss of technological control. In a speech at WAIC on Saturday, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Geoffrey Hinton compared the situation to keeping "a very cute tiger cub as a pet". To survive, he said, you need to ensure you can train it not to kill you when it grows up. - Pledge to share AI advances - The enormous strides AI technology has made in recent years have seen it move to the forefront of the US-China rivalry. Premier Li said China would "actively promote" the development of open-source AI, adding Beijing was willing to share advances with other countries, particularly developing ones. "If we engage in technological monopolies, controls and blockage, artificial intelligence will become the preserve of a few countries and a few enterprises," he said. Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu warned against "unilateralism and protectionism" at a later meeting. Washington has expanded its efforts in recent years to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China, concerned that they can be used to advance Beijing's military systems and erode US tech dominance. Li, in his speech, highlighted "insufficient supply of computing power and chips" as a bottleneck to AI progress. China has made AI a pillar of its plans for technological self-reliance, with the government pledging a raft of measures to boost the sector. In January, Chinese startup DeepSeek unveiled an AI model that performed as well as top US systems despite using less powerful chips. - 'Defining test' - In a video message played at the WAIC opening ceremony, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said AI governance would be "a defining test of international cooperation". The ceremony saw the French president's AI envoy, Anne Bouverot, underscore "an urgent need" for global action and for the United Nations to play a "leading role". Bouverot called for a framework "that is open, transparent and effective, giving each and everyone an opportunity to have their views taken into account". Li's speech "posed a clear contrast to the Trump administration's 'America First' view on AI" and the US measures announced this week, said WAIC attendee George Chen, a partner at Washington-based policy consultancy The Asia Group. "The world is now clearly divided into at least three camps: the United States and its allies, China (and perhaps many Belt and Road or Global South countries), and the EU -- which prefers regulating AI through legislation, like the EU AI Act," Chen told AFP. At an AI summit in Paris in February, 58 countries including China, France and India -- as well as the European Union and African Union Commission -- called for enhanced coordination on AI governance. But the United States warned against "excessive regulation", and alongside the United Kingdom, refused to sign the summit's appeal for an "open", "inclusive" and "ethical" AI.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store