AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to HDI Global UK Limited
The ratings reflect HDI Global UK's inclusion as a member of the lead rating unit of HDI V.a.G., which has a balance sheet strength that AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its strong operating performance, favorable business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management.
HDI Global UK is strategically important to HDI V.a.G. as its carrier for writing delegated authority business (retail and small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as liability, motor and high net worth business in the UK.
HDI Global UK was established in 2024, as a UK-incorporated subsidiary of HDI Global SE. The company is identified easily as part of HDI V.a.G., carrying the same brand. Given the strategic importance of the company to HDI V.a.G., AM Best expects that sufficient support will be provided promptly by the HDI V.a.G. group, should it be needed.
This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments.
AM Best is a global credit rating agency, news publisher and data analytics provider specialising in the insurance industry. Headquartered in the United States, the company does business in over 100 countries with regional offices in London, Amsterdam, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mexico City. For more information, visit www.ambest.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where Liverpool transfer spend is coming from after 'rage' about £300m outlay
Among the many stunned responses from supporters of Liverpool's rivals online this week, one account in particular was moved to ask if oil had been found underneath Anfield. Such has been the incredulity, in fact, over a remarkable window so far that Reds fans are continuing to ironically peddle the theory that this summer's near £300m outlay has been brokered by the 'last of the Coutinho money'. That will be the same Philippe Coutinho, of course, who left for Barcelona in January of 2018 and his £142m switch to Barcelona was spent almost immediately on recruiting Virgil van Dijk and Alisson Becker. The raging online about Liverpool's apparent new spending prowess, however, has been enough for more than a few of a Reds persuasion to indulge themselves in the meltdown. READ MORE: Dominik Szoboszlai faces new challenge as Liverpool transfer sparks dramatic change READ MORE: Alexander Isak to fly out to Far East after Liverpool interest as Eddie Howe claim speaks volumes The £79m addition of Hugo Ekitike takes the club's spending, inclusive of the £29m agreement for Giorgi Mamardashvili which was agreed last summer with Valencia, to an eye-watering £294m on seven new arrivals. The club-record pursuit of Florian Wirtz, at £116m, came hot on the heels of Jeremie Frimpong's £29m release clause being triggered at the start of June before long-standing target Milos Kerkez joined at £40m from Bournemouth alongside goalkeepers Armin Pecsi at £1.5m and Freddie Woodman, whose free transfer from Preston North End sees him add home-grown competition in goal. On the face of it, this exorbitant, spendthrift summer is a considerable departure from the prudent, risk-averse approach of years gone by under owners Fenway Sports Group, but looking at these transfers through the prism of one single window is a view that is not shared inside Anfield itself. Prior to this summer, Liverpool had bought one first-team player in nearly two years in Federico Chiesa, whose £10m arrival from Juventus last summer was viewed as a low-risk gamble that could give Mohamed Salah the opportunity to rest up at key junctures. Before the Italian's August 2024 addition to the squad, you have to go back to Ryan Gravenberch's signing, 12 months earlier from Bayern Munich, as the most recent senior capture, meaning Liverpool's outlay, for a club of its size, had been minimal prior to this June. It's why Liverpool's powerbrokers will be relaxed at the £300m ballpark figure of 2025, even with the potential for further additions. Supporters may see transfer windows as their own separate and entirely individual entities but the player trading months do not exist in a vacuum where a club's more general financial health is concerned. Perhaps the source of the real consternation is how Liverpool have been able to dip into the market with such ease without having the dubious whiff that follows some of their rivals around when similar splurges are undertaken. The Reds aren't having to sell their women's team or club-owned hotels to show such ambition, nor do they have any historical spending charges hanging over them. They are not bankrolled by the impossible wealth of a nation state and have no issues when it comes to Profit and Sustainability Regulations. Liverpool's ability to finance this history-making spend has been facilitated by their own good practices across all departments. The discipline shown last year has helped, while the bounty that comes from being Premier League champions must also be factored into the mathematics. A new agreement with kit suppliers Adidas, which kicks in on August 1, is worth a reported £60m a year, and the new-look Champions League saw Arne Slot's team finish top of the group stage at a time when the competition has never been so lucrative. A money-spinning tour of Hong Kong and Japan will also boost the bottom line and sales this summer have so far brought in over £60m with more expected to head for the exit door. If some believe this is the end of the age of (relative) Anfield austerity, the more likely scenario is Slot and sporting director Richard Hughes are building a squad that will last, much in the same way Jurgen Klopp and Michael Edwards did all those years ago when the January 2018 capture of Van Dijk was followed in the summer months by Alisson, Fabinho, Naby Keita and Xherdan Shaqiri. That gave Liverpool's squad a new look about it and led to the eventual golden period that saw the club win every top-level trophy available between 2019 and 2022. The same sort of haul will now be the target for Slot and co, but a repeat of this summer's spending won't be desired inside the club itself this time next year. This is a team being built to win now, meaning another eye-watering splurge in 2026 won't be necessary. No, there are no oil reserves underneath the turf at L4, this is simply the result of a well-run club who are more than content to flex their muscle and strengthen while on top.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Battery site plan blocked after 1,000 objections
Plans for an energy storage plant have been blocked for a second time after more than 1,000 people objected. Harmony Energy faced renewed opposition to proposals for the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) on land off Newton Lane, between Ledston and Allerton Bywater near Leeds. Harmony said the development would help tackle climate change and stabilise energy supplies by storing electricity for future use. Leeds City Council planning panel members passed a motion not to accept a recommendation from council officers to approve the application. 'Green belt harm' Earlier this month, more than 1,200 residents, along with MPs and councillors, objected to other proposals by Harmony to install 72 containers storing lithium ion batteries on farmland at Heath near Wakefield. Leeds City Council initially refused planning permission for the Allerton Bywater proposals in November 2023 after environmental and fire safety fears were raised, along with the impact on green belt land. A plans panel was told national planning policy changes meant the site could now be downgraded to "grey belt" – deemed less environmentally important. But that was disputed by action group Save our Villages and council leader James Lewis, who represents Kippax and Methley. Lewis told the panel: "I don't believe this site is grey belt and therefore the harm to green belt, which this site is, should be a reason for refusal." Objector Adrian Appleyard said a fire at the site could see contaminated water run off in to Fairburn Ings Nature Reserve, 400m away, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Harmony's Tessa Fletcher said the company had an excellent safety record and the BESS would have the capacity to power thousands of homes. She said: "As a nation we are legally bound to reduce carbon emissions and must do so at pace." A final decision will be made after a report is drawn up on detailed reasons for refusal and the chances of losing an appeal. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. More on this story More than 1,000 objections to battery storage sites Battery storage plan approved despite objections UK's largest battery energy storage site goes live Related internet links Leeds City Council
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
British fintech boss accused of ‘backdoor' power grab in row over US move
The boss of British fintech champion Wise has been accused of a 'backdoor' power grab over claims he is hijacking a crunch shareholder vote to tighten his grip on the company. Kristo Käärmann, chief executive of Wise, has been attacked by his former partner for allegedly 'blindsiding' investors with a proposal that will award him extra rights. Taavet Hinrikus, who co-founded Wise with Mr Käärmann in 2010, told The Telegraph that the measures were 'buried' in a plan to move the £11bn payments business's main listing to the US, which will go to a shareholder vote on Monday. As well as proposing the shift from London to New York, Wise is seeking shareholder approval for a 10-year extension to super-voting shares held by a handful of insiders, including Mr Käärmann. Those shares, which represent 90pc of the total voting rights at Wise, had been set to expire in July 2026. Mr Hinrikus, 44, has claimed that bundling the two issues into one vote is 'entirely inappropriate and unfair', as he urged other investors to reject the plan. He said: 'The fact that most of the investors were surprised or blindsided is telling. Most of them agree that this governance change does not make Wise a better company.' Growing rift The row reveals a stark rift between Mr Hinrikus and Mr Käärmann, who launched the business together in 2010. Mr Hinrikus previously served as chief executive of Wise until 2017. He then served as chairman until Wise's listing in London in 2021 before stepping down. Mr Hinrikus said bosses appeared to be seeking to tighten their grip on Wise 'through the backdoor'. Super-voting shares are widely used by Silicon Valley founders to gain extra control over the business they set up. For example, Mark Zuckerberg holds ultimate voting control at Meta thanks to his special shares. However, critics argue they can undermine shareholder democracy and hand too much power to the chief executive. Mr Käärmann, who is worth close to £2bn, currently controls nearly 50pc of the voting rights in the company but owns just 18pc of shares. Meanwhile, Mr Hinrikus has about 12pc of voting control and a 5pc overall stake, worth more than £500m. The vote on Monday requires a 75pc majority to pass. Dissolving bond Mr Käärmann, 44, and Mr Hinrikus founded Wise – originally Transferwise – after bonding over their shared bugbear of sending money back home to Estonia. The business aimed to make sending money overseas cheap and painless. It has since expanded into savings products and spending cards. After attracting venture capital from Silicon Valley investors, the company went public at a valuation of around £8bn. It is now worth close to £11bn and reported profits before tax of £564.8m last year. In June, Mr Käärmann confirmed Wise planned to shift its main listing to New York while maintaining a secondary listing in London. He said this would help 'accelerate our mission' and bring 'capital market benefits to Wise and our owners'. The loss of such a substantial technology business risks fuelling fears of a death spiral for the London Stock Exchange, which has struggled to hang on to blue-chip listings and suffered an exodus of companies. Were it not for its unusual share structure, Wise would be a FTSE 100 company given its market capitalisation. On the shift to the US, Mr Hinrikus has said he is not 'in principle' opposed to the re-listing, but he claimed he did not see the 'urgency'. 'We have not had any clear answers as to why there is an urgency to move the listing to the US,' he said. Wise this week said it was 'disappointed' by Mr Hinrikus's opposition and that it 'disagreed' with his comments. It said: 'The dual-class share structure is essential to ensuring our continued successful performance.' David Wells, Wise's chairman, said last week the company had been 'clear and upfront' about the proposal. Even though Mr Hinrikus, through his fund Skaala Investments, stands to benefit from the extension to Wise's golden shares, he has forcefully opposed them. Mr Hinrikus said he believes he has changed some minds ahead of Monday's vote. He has also raised the spectre of legal action, warning that the voting process could be challenged in court by disgruntled shareholders. However, he adds that the row with one of his oldest business partners is, for him, merely part of doing business. 'In any business relationship, there are differences of opinion,' he said. 'Sometimes you need to argue – and sometimes you need to argue hard.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Sign in to access your portfolio
