Most claims in lawsuit over fatal stabbing at Chicopee Housing Authority moved to Superior Court
In a 32-page memorandum and order June 27, Judge Katherine A. Robertson of U.S. District Court in Springfield said some but not all charges against the housing authority — which has been embroiled in several lawsuits — will move to the Hampden Superior Court.
In August, six plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the housing authority and its former executive director, Monica Blazic, saying she engaged in neglect and discrimination after a fatal stabbing at the public housing facility.
Two months later, attorneys representing the housing authority and Blazic asked the judge to toss all of the claims. That motion was partially denied, according to Robertson's memorandum.
'The plaintiffs are invigorated by the recent federal court decision,' the plaintiffs' attorneys, Cornelius W. Phillips and Richard Morrissey, said in an emailed statement. They said their clients look forward to pursuing their claims in Superior Court.
Defense attorneys Gerard Donelly and Wendy Quinn, both of Worcester, declined Thursday to comment about the case.
The plaintiffs include the daughters, girlfriend and neighbors of Domingo Arocho, a Hispanic man who in 2021 was fatally stabbed at the Governor George D. Robinson Apartments, a publicly subsidized apartment complex operated and managed by the Chicopee Housing Authority. He was 67.
The complaint alleged the housing authority was 'deliberately indifferent to residents' civil rights and racially discriminatory' toward its predominantly Hispanic housing community. It also alleged the housing authority failed to protect its residents by allowing Arocho's suspected killer, Urayoann Urimagua-Guaraboa, who is also Hispanic, to live in the apartment complex despite having a criminal history.
The housing authority, which is governed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, offers federal and state housing.
According to its policies, Robertson explained in her memorandum and order, the housing authority can '(deny) admissions or continued occupancy to families whose presence in a public housing neighborhood is likely to adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of other residents or the physical environment of the neighborhood.'
The housing authority is also responsible for requesting an applicant's criminal record, the memorandum said.
The plaintiffs argued the housing authority did not do that in Urimagua-Guaraboa's case. Prior to his tenancy at the housing authority, the man was charged with first degree murder stemming from an incident in Puerto Rico in 2010.
The plaintiffs allege the housing authority 'ignored his personal and criminal history before accepting him as a tenant.'
Almost a decade later, the plaintiffs allege the man grabbed a neighbor by her neck and threatened to kill her. Following that incident, he was slapped with an assault and battery charge and three other criminal offenses. This incident took place in 2019 outside of his Chicopee Housing Authority residence on Benoit Circle.
About four days after the alleged neighborhood assault, Blazic served Urimagua-Guaraboa with a notice-to-quit because his arrest and charges had violated the terms of his lease, the memorandum and order said.
The judge noted that the housing authority and Urimagua-Guaraboa came to an agreement that stayed his eviction for six months.
Then, Robertson wrote, an alleged pattern of violence from Urimagua-Guaraboa toward his neighbors unfolded.
The man was relocated to a new apartment after allegedly threatening to harm the woman on Benoit Circle.
An altercation between Urimagua-Guaraboa and a new neighbor, Candida Laracuente, in June 2020 led to the latter filing a police report against the man. She claimed he had threatened her life and she feared for her safety.
In September 2020, following more threats to Laracuente, Urimagua-Guaraboa allegedly fatally stabbed Arocho, who was visiting Laracuente's apartment.
The lawsuit alleges Urimagua-Guaraboa also attempted to stab Laracuente, and allegedly shouted, 'Who's next?' after the attack. Some of the plaintiffs say they witnessed the killing.
Robertson, the judge, agreed with the defendants that three of the plaintiffs' claims — violations of the Fair Housing Act, due process and equal protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution — were not well enough argued.
'The Supreme Court has acknowledged standing under the (Fair Housing Act) for plaintiffs suing to vindicate or advance the right to live in an integrated or racially balanced community,' the memorandum and order said.
The plaintiffs were not residents of the housing authority but made discrimination claims based on the trauma they experienced witnessing a violent offense, they assert.
However, Robertson said, 'the claims of these bystanders and the nature of the injuries for which they seek to recover are so distantly related to the interests intended to be advanced by the (Fair Housing Act) that these four plaintiffs cannot be said to be in the zone of interests protected by (the law).'
She said, the plaintiffs failed to identify how they suffered from violations of the Fair Housing Act. For similar reasons, the other two claims also failed, she said.
'The Constitution does not protect against all intrusions on one's peace of mind,' Robertson said.
While Arocho's family members do not have standing to bring these claims against the housing authority and Blazic, the court believes Laracuente does because she lived there.
Additionally, a claim that Blazic, the former executive director of the housing authority, committed a civil rights conspiracy was tossed. The judge alleged the plaintiffs did not properly state their claim or prove that Blazic had personally inflicted racial or discriminatory harassment on them.
Western Mass communities rally against ICE: What residents are doing
When government legalizes suffering — and the church is mum (Viewpoint)
Police: Holyoke man arrested with drugs and cash
'Just to be safe;' New Americans say uncertainty as immigrants spurred quest for citizenship
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Bodies of 3 men recovered from Mississippi River after swimming, fishing on sandbar
The bodies of three men were recovered from the Mississippi River near Memphis, Tennessee, on Wednesday after they went missing while fishing and swimming on a sandbar. The victims, who ranged in age from their 20s to their 50s, were reported missing Tuesday evening near a boat ramp at Meeman-Shelby Forest State Park, about 13 miles north of Memphis, authorities said. Advertisement Search and rescue teams with the Shelby County Sheriff's Office and other Memphis-area agencies began looking for the men Tuesday evening and eventually had to call off the search because of darkness, the Shelby County Sheriff's Office said. The search, which included aircraft, rescue boats, drones and the use of sonar, resumed Wednesday morning. The first two bodies were recovered at about 11 a.m. and the third at around 12:45 p.m., the sheriff's office said. A cause of death will be determined by the medical examiner. Advertisement The victims, who authorities said were all Hispanic, were identified as Marlon Mendez, 28, Rudy Perez, 31, and Jose Yanes, 52. Authorities said the men had been fishing and swimming on a sandbar – a natural ridge of sand formed when fast-moving water slows and deposits sediment. In rivers like the Mississippi, sandbars can be unstable and collapse under weight or shifting currents. AP Officials say the area has become increasingly popular but the river is treacherous, with several other hazards including strong currents, submerged items, branches and debris. Advertisement 'There are eddy currents that can pull an Olympic swimmer under. You can be drawn into the channel and find yourself staring at a 24-unit barge that's the size of a skyscraper on its side coming straight at you with no way for the barge crew to have any idea that you are there,' the fire department said on Facebook. Yanes' family told Fox 10 News that he has six children, the youngest of whom is 12 years old. Shelby County Sheriffs Office Doug Ammons, the owner of a general store a few miles from the river, told the outlet that the river is 'lethally dangerous.' Advertisement 'This is a horrific tragedy right here, and it happens way too often,' Ammons said. 'But I understand how it happens. The probability of one-on-one taking on the mighty Mississippi, you're going to lose. Especially without a flotation device.' The Associated Press contributed to this report.


CBS News
10 hours ago
- CBS News
Irvine man arrested for apparent hate crime during road rage incident
Irvine police arrested a 54-year-old man after he allegedly shouted racial slurs and threw a hot cup of coffee at a Hispanic driver on Tuesday morning. The road rage incident that's being investigated as a hate crime happened on Sand Canyon Avenue near the 5 Freeway, according to the Irvine Police Department. Detectives said Robert Leon Tackett, 54, started shouting at the other driver before following the victim through Irvine. Tackett allegedly drove aggressively and swerved into the victim's lane multiple times, nearly causing a crash. After, Tackett threw a hot cop of coffee that landed on the victim's face, hands and car interior, according to Irvine PD. Police said the victim recorded most of the incident and a family member posted it onto social. The driver contacted Irvine police late Wednesday night, and officers arrested Tackett the following day for a hate crime and aggravated assault. Detectives asked any possible victims, witnesses, or people with additional footage of the incident to contact the investigators at rsteen@


Boston Globe
11 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Migrant sent to El Salvador prison by the Trump administration says he was beaten by guards
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Homeland Security said in an email that Rengel was a 'confirmed associate' of the Tren de Aragua gang — though it did not specify how it reached that conclusion — who had entered the country illegally. It called his claims a fake 'sob story.' Advertisement 'President Trump and Secretary Noem will not allow foreign terrorist enemies to operate in our country and endanger Americans,' the email said. It added, 'We hear far too much about gang members and criminals' false sob stories and not enough about their victims.' Advertisement At El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, Rengel said guards hit him with fists and batons and, on one occasion, viciously beat him after taking him to an area of the prison without cameras. Rengel was sent to Venezuela earlier this month They are seeking compensation for emotional and psychological injuries. A federal judge ruled in June that the Trump administration must give some of the migrants sent to the prison in El Salvador a chance to challenge their deportations. U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg said the people hadn't been able to formally contest the removals or allegations that they were members of Tren de Aragua. He ordered the administration to work toward giving them a way to file those challenges. The judge wrote that 'significant evidence' had surfaced indicating that many of the migrants were not connected to the gang 'and thus were languishing in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations.' At a hearing on Thursday, an attorney for the Trump administration told Boasberg it would not immediately bring the migrants sent from El Salvador to Venezuela as part of the prisoner exchange back to the U.S. Trump officials planned to await the outcome of other court cases before deciding whether to allow the migrants to return, U.S. Department of Justice attorney Tiberius Davis said. Boasberg had ordered the administration to turn planes carrying the accused gang members around, but the demand was ignored. Rengel's attorneys say he was on one of those planes. Advertisement The judge has found probable cause that the administration committed contempt of court. Boasberg said Thursday he planned to expand his contempt probe to include a recent whistleblower complaint that claims a top Justice Department official suggested the Trump administration might have to ignore court orders as it prepared to deport Venezuelan migrants it accused of being gang members.