logo
Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House

Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House

Economic Times6 days ago
Donald Trump is the 14th US president of my lifetime, and he claims a unique distinction. Through all the previous White House incumbencies, months went by when even educated, informed British, German, Indian, Brazilian, French or Australian people did not give a moment's thought to America's leader.Sure, we noticed when a president visited our country or started a war or got impeached or had an incredibly beautiful wife who dressed wonderfully. We knew that the US was the richest and most influential nation on earth, and that on the big things we needed to play follow-my-leader. But even somebody like me, who lived in the US for a couple of years, and visited regularly until January 2025, did not lie awake nights wondering what our neighborhood superpower might do next.Today, that has changed. We used to mock nervous nellies who went through life terrified that a plane might crash onto their house. Now, however, we know exactly how the plane-crash neurotics feel. We are mesmerized, haunted, by everything Trump says and does, because nobody can predict his next mood swing. This delights the man himself. All he wants from life is unimaginable wealth and the rest of us bowing to his every whim. He is the Sun King, the epicenter of global attention, because he has shown the willingness as well as the power to make rain or shine in accordance with impulse.Nobody should be allowed to pretend that this is normal. It is absolutely abnormal. It represents political climate change in some ways more bewildering than living on a planet that is getting hotter, because on some days our country — whichever that may be — finds itself microwaved by the White House, while on others it is suddenly exposed to permafrost.
The latest example is Trump's announcement that the US will send new air-defense systems to Ukraine, purchased by NATO members, together with long-range missiles. This is unequivocally a good thing. Ukrainian city-dwellers have been enduring a nightly battering from Russian missiles and drones against which they have become almost defenseless, as the flow of US weapons has slowed. The big question is how serious is the president's change of heart after months of rubbishing Ukraine and its leader — and how long it will last. He himself says he is 'disappointed' by Vladimir Putin, but 'not done with him.' Since the inauguration, Russian oligarchs have been freer to do business in the US, and Washington agencies charged with monitoring their activities have been shut down.Trump has renewed support for Ukraine mostly because he feels personally snubbed by Putin. If that changes, so once again could American policy.
Then there is the global economy. Some of the smartest economists say they are unsure whether US business can survive the roller-coaster ride launched by Trump, most conspicuously through tariffs, or whether the economy will tank. Willful uncertainty about the future of Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, with attacks renewed this week by Trump, further rocks confidence. The respected Martin Wolf of the Financial Times is among those who characterize the Trump tariffs as 'crazy,' an adjective he reprised this week. Mohamed El-Erian, formerly a Wall Street investment whiz and now a distinguished academic, is among those who admits that he has no idea how the Trump story will play out.
We should never underestimate America's resilience and stupendous capacity for innovation. But he writes in the current Foreign Affairs that the only rational course for other nations is to build robust financial defenses and reduce their dependence on the US, while forging new relationships, because there is no early prospect, and perhaps no prospect even after Trump, that the US will resume its historic role as a reliable partner. El-Erian warns both nations and corporations against what behavioral scientists call 'active inertia' — 'when actors recognize that they need to behave differently but end up sticking to familiar patterns and approaches regardless.' The question almost every government in the world is asking itself is whether it dares to defy Trump. Two weeks ago, he warned Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva that he would impose 50% tariffs on the country's exports to the US unless criminal proceedings are dropped against former President Jair Bolsonaro, for his 2022 attempt to stage a coup, to retain power after losing the last election. There is no pretense that this threat is linked to trade balances. It is merely a component in what we can call Trump's dictator protection program. He was a warm supporter of Bolsonaro, widely considered an appalling as well as corrupt national leader. Bolsonaro's son Eduardo has close personal relations with the Trump clan. Lula responded with outrage to Trump's threat, saying 'no one is above the law.' His country's exports to the US amount to only 2% of its gross domestic product, but a 50% tariff will undoubtedly cause disruption.
The European Union faces even more serious dilemmas in determining its response to lobbying by Trump, backed by tariff threats, on behalf of US Big Tech. There is an issue here that goes beyond mere commerce. The tech giants profit mightily from running almost open-house content policies, which some of us consider deeply corrupting, especially of the young.
Brussels has been striving to regulate social media, and to punish companies that spread anti-social material. But Trump is batting for the tech giants to enjoy free rein — 'free speech' as he and his acolytes call it — and to be spared from EU retribution. So great is Europe's fear of a wider trade war, that its regulators may yet bow to Washington. It is highly debatable whether the EU will risk deploying its Anti-Coercion Instrument against America, even though tariff blackmail offers an obvious justification for it. Then there is Iran. Will the US attempt to parley with the mullahs about their nuclear program, or revert to bombing? My friends, including one very well-informed Israeli, say that Benjamin Netanyahu suckered Trump into joining his war; that the Iranians, though unquestionably a malign force, were not about to produce a nuclear weapon; and that force alone cannot resolve the problems and threats posed by Iranian regional aggression. But whether Trump will fall out of love with Netanyahu as he now professes to have fallen out of love with Putin, we cannot tell. The president himself does not know what he might do, or not do, next Tuesday. It is the not knowing that scares the world so much — and which makes us talk about Donald Trump almost every day.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India asks citizens to avoid travelling to border areas of Cambodia, Thailand amid clashes
India asks citizens to avoid travelling to border areas of Cambodia, Thailand amid clashes

Scroll.in

time5 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

India asks citizens to avoid travelling to border areas of Cambodia, Thailand amid clashes

India's embassies in Thailand and Cambodia have asked Indian citizens not to travel to the border areas of the two countries amid clashes between Bangkok and Phnom Penh. The diplomatic mission in Cambodia on Saturday issued an advisory urging Indians to avoid going to the border areas. The embassy also shared emergency contact details for Indian citizens requiring assistance. 'In case of any emergency, Indian nationals may approach the Embassy of India, Phnom Penh at +855 92881676 or email it added. This came a day after the Indian embassy in Thailand advised Indian travellers to check updates issued by Thai authorities. A link to an update shared by the Tourism Authority of Thailand said that 'border zones' had been affected in seven provinces because of restrictions and that martial law had been imposed in select districts. These places are not recommended for travelling, the Indian embassy quoted the Thai tourism authority as saying. The advisories came amid the worst border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia in 13 years. Fighting, which began on Wednesday, has involved heavy artillery, air strikes and rocket fire across several disputed border areas. At least 33 persons have been killed in the conflict. Of the 13 deaths in Cambodia, eight were civilians and five soldiers. In Thailand, six military personnel and 14 civilians were killed, AFP reported. While Bangkok has accused Phnom Penh of targeting civilians and using rockets, Cambodia has condemned Thailand's alleged use of cluster munitions, Reuters reported. The fighting marks a sharp escalation in a long-running dispute between the countries that contest several stretches of land along their border. At least 28 persons had dead in previous clashes between 2008 and 2011. A 2013 United Nations court ruling had largely eased tensions. But the current crisis was triggered in May after a Cambodian soldier was killed in a fresh clash, AFP reported.

Trump calls FireAid a ‘scam', alleges mismanagement of $100M wildfire relief fund
Trump calls FireAid a ‘scam', alleges mismanagement of $100M wildfire relief fund

Indian Express

time5 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump calls FireAid a ‘scam', alleges mismanagement of $100M wildfire relief fund

United States President Donald Trump has accused California officials and FireAid organisers of mishandling funds meant for the victims of the devastating January 2025 wildfires. In a Truth Social post, Trump described FireAid as a 'total disaster', alleging that the $100 million raised for Los Angeles-area fire victims have gone missing. He wrote: 'FireAid is a total disaster. Looks like another Democrat-inspired scam. 100 million dollars is missing… fires that, with proper management, would never have even happened.' Trump also criticised California Governor Gavin Newsom, referring to him as 'Governor Newscum', for alleged failures in water management during the wildfire crisis. The president's remarks follow a series of fast-moving wildfires that swept through Southern California in January, a rare occurrence during the winter season. Reportedly, factors such as unusually dry conditions, Santa Ana winds, and power lines damaged by gusts fuelled the deadly blazes. As reported by California Globe, in early January, the Eaton and Palisades wildfires raged across parts of Los Angeles. And by the time they were fully extinguished in late January, 31 people had died, over 18,000 structures were destroyed, and tens of thousands of residents were displaced with destroyed or damaged homes. Total property and home loses have been estimated to be between $76 billion and $131 billion, as per the report. FireAid was a high-profile benefit concert held on 30 January in Inglewood, California, to raise funds for the victims of the wildfires. Organised by the Annenberg Foundation and partners, it featured prominent artists like Lady Gaga, Katy Perry, and Olivia Rodrigo, raising approximately $100 million through ticket sales, donations, and sponsorships. The funds were distributed primarily through grants to nearly 188 non-profit organisations providing emergency relief services such as housing, food, mental health support, and wildfire prevention efforts. FireAid clarified that it does not make direct payments to individual victims but works with trusted non-profits to reach affected communities. While some fire survivors expressed frustration over not receiving direct aid, FireAid's grant-based approach aims to broadly support recovery and resilience. The remaining funds are earmarked for long-term recovery projects including wildfire mitigation and sustainable rebuilding in the affected areas. FireAid said it has distributed approximately $75 million so far in grants to 188 non-profits and plans to allocate the remaining $25 million by August towards long-term wildfire mitigation, environmental resilience, and sustainable rebuilding efforts. Although no fraud has been proven, California Congressman Kevin Kiley called on US Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the relief effort. David Howard, when asked whether an investigation is warranted, replied, 'Yes. People need to know where this money went. That's the only way to rebuild trust.' (With inputs from California Globe)

Frequent disruptions in Parliament harm Opposition more than government: Kiren Rijiju
Frequent disruptions in Parliament harm Opposition more than government: Kiren Rijiju

Indian Express

time5 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Frequent disruptions in Parliament harm Opposition more than government: Kiren Rijiju

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Saturday said that frequent disruptions in the House hurt the Opposition more, as they lose the crucial opportunity to hold the government accountable. The remarks came after the first week of the ongoing monsoon session was largely washed out due to repeated protests by Opposition MPs. Speaking at the Sansad Ratna Awards event organised by Prime Point Foundation, Rijiju recalled how bureaucrats sometimes express relief when Parliament is adjourned. 'Let me tell you, officers are relieved when Parliament doesn't function because they escape the grilling. The government can be held accountable in Parliament. When the House runs, ministers face tough questions. When it adjourns within minutes, those questions don't even get raised. Opposition loses more than the government when Parliament is disrupted,' he said. 'Those who stall the House think they are damaging the government, but in truth, they are weakening their own role in a democracy,' Rijiju added. Reinforcing the importance of parliamentary accountability, the minister said, 'In any democracy, the government must answer to the people through Parliament. That is why allowing the House to run is essential for a functioning democracy.' Reflecting on his journey in Parliament, Rijiju said he never considered Opposition MPs as adversaries. 'We are all colleagues. Before 2014, most of my parliamentary career has been on the Opposition benches. Political rivalries may exist, but there is no enmity,' he said. Drawing from a quote by Winston Churchill, Rijiju said, 'A new MP once asked Churchill about the people sitting across the aisle, and he said they were political opponents. But when asked about those sitting on his side, he said they were our political enemies. That is politics, but we are not enemies.' Rijiju also said there is undue burden on Indian legislators compared to their counterparts in developed countries. 'There, one MP represents approximately 66,000 people. Here, it is over 20 lakh. They are not asked to fix drains or get someone out of jail. But our MPs deal with personal grievances, infrastructure and law enforcement issues and are still expected to perform in the House,' he said. 'Despite all this, they are often criticised. Every elected MP deserves respect, it is not an easy job.' Recalling his own early experiences, Rijiju shared a humorous but telling anecdote. 'The first time I met Speaker Somnath Chatterjee, I had gone to request a room for MPs who smoke. He scolded me, saying, 'This is your first meeting with the Speaker and this is what you've come for?' I got a good scolding that day and learned I should approach such offices with more purpose.' He also reflected on how senior leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee and L K Advani set examples of decorum. 'Back then, we would think twice before speaking because stalwarts were listening. Now disruptions begin on day one. Maybe social media has changed the game.' Calling for more constructive media reporting, Rijiju said, 'Earlier, journalists would arrive at 9 am and cover parliamentary debates till night. Good speeches got coverage. Today, headlines go to who created the most ruckus. I remember Sharad Pawar once presented an excellent agriculture policy, but the next day not a single paper mentioned it. So now, MPs chase headlines because good work is neither reported nor recognised.' 'Negative news drives TRPs, not constructive action. It is a vicious cycle — both the MPs and the media are trapped in it,' he said. Rijiju congratulated all the recipients of this year's Sansad Ratna Awards, including Supriya Sule, Bhartruhari Mahtab, N K Premachandran, and Shrirang Appa Barne, who received special jury awards for consistent performance in the 16th, 17th, and the current Lok Sabha. 'Whenever any parliamentarian is recognised for good work, we should all celebrate together, cutting across party lines,' Rijiju said. National Commission for Backward Classes Chairperson Hansraj Gangaram Ahir took a swipe at the Opposition, saying, 'Those who claim to be followers of Babasaheb Ambedkar bring disrepute to the country by speaking against it abroad'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store