Government suing PPE Medpro because of ‘buyer's remorse', court told
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) wants more than £121 million back from PPE Medpro, plus storage costs of over £8 million.
PPE Medpro is also accused of supplying the gowns without CE markings, which shows if a product meets certain medical standards.
Following a month-long trial at the High Court in London, lawyers for PPE Medpro said in closing that the Government had ordered 10 years' worth of excess gowns by December 2020.
Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said in written submissions: 'That simple fact explains why, once the PPEM gowns landed in the UK, they were no longer needed or wanted.'
He described the Government's assessment at the time as 'wildly and hopelessly wrong', adding: 'DHSC's obvious buyer's remorse was channelled into looking for ways to escape from a contract it wished it had never made.'
PPE Medpro has issued a counterclaim saying DHSC owed a duty of care to the company to advise it on compliance with the contract.
Mr Samek said DHSC approved the gowns without seeing a valid CE mark because they did not need one, adding that it is 'obvious' that PPE Medpro 'did not have and did not pretend to have a valid CE mark'.
Testing of 140 gowns after delivery showed that 103 failed to meet the sterilisation standard, the court was previously told.
Mr Samek said that after delivery to the UK, the gowns were kept in shipping containers for 'at least three months'.
Contamination therefore likely happened 'subsequent to delivery, most probably during the subsequent transportation, storage and handling of the tested gowns', he added.
Paul Stanley KC, for DHSC, said PPE Medpro did not follow a validated sterilisation process and did not keep sufficient records.
He said the bioburden, or level of microbial contamination prior to sterilisation, was not properly assessed and that PPE Medpro has been unable to show evidence of this assessment.
In written submissions, he said: 'The absence of such documentation is compelling evidence that the assessment of bioburden did not take place.'
He continued: 'DHSC invites the court to find as a matter of fact that this fundamental step in a validated process for sterilisation was not done.'
The barrister also referenced photographs that he said showed how the gowns were not manufactured in a way that would reduce microbial contamination.
These included workers wearing short sleeves, gowns trailing on the floor and personnel wearing street shoes and working without hair protection, he said.
Mr Stanley denied that DHSC owed a duty of care to PPE Medpro and said DHSC 'is entitled to repayment of the price, and to recover damages for storage costs'.
He added: 'The gowns were not sterilised using a properly validated process and were not, as a result, compliant with the contractual standard or (in the true commercial sense) 'sterile' gowns at all.'
Closing submissions are expected to conclude on Thursday with a written judgment given at a later date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
It's time Scotland's NHS got into the digital age
Anyone who's spent time in a Scottish hospital in recent years may have noticed pagers continue to be widely used by clinical staff. Figures show health boards have spent at least £4.6million on the ancient devices since 2019. Which begs the question, why? Surely, in the 21st century and the era of WiFi, a more up-to-date digital device could be issued to staff working in hospitals? It doesn't seem fair that nurses are reliant on pagers while the vast majority of the patients in their care will own smartphones. Bureaucracy in the health service is legendary but the multiple levels of managers running the organisation must surely be able to come up with a better solution. And that's not to mention the 13 fax machines still being used in some arm of the Scottish NHS. This isn't down to a lack of money. The health service will receive a record £21billion from the Scottish Government this year alone. If money can't be found from that to end the reliance on 80s communication devices, senior NHS figures deserve to be asked why. It's another reminder that, for all the respect Scots have for the health service, it is frequently failing to offer the standard of care all patients should expect. Pagers may not be the most pressing issue facing hospitals but they illustrate a wider story. The NHS needs reform, as well as adequate funding. It can't continue to rely on antiquated devices, no matter how small. Air solution It's deeply concerning that a summer of strikes at Glasgow Airport look set to go ahead. Around 100 workers, including airside support officers, engineers and managers, will down tools in a two-day walkout in an ongoing dispute over pay. Unite, the union representing the workers, said its members were struggling with chronic fatigue and understaffing. Members will walkout for 48 hours from 6am on Thursday, July 24, until 6am on Saturday, July 26. The disruption is expected to affect thousands of holidaymakers setting off on their summer getaways. It's on company bosses at the airport to get back around the table with union reps and iron out these issues. It's not fair on the thousands of Scots holidaymakers who have saved hard all year to have their travel plans thrown up in the air. It's vital a resolution is found to satisfy workers and passengers alike.
North Wales Chronicle
9 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Plan to link rare cancer sufferers to suitable clinical trials clears Commons
Allison Gardner said the Rare Cancers Bill 'offers an entirely reasonable set of steps for research, for reviewing and hopefully enabling the development of so-called orphan drugs'. She thanked the Bill's proposer, Scott Arthur, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South West, before it cleared the Commons at third reading. If it clears the Lords after scrutiny at a later date, the Health Secretary would have to review the law relating to 'orphan' drugs, for life-threatening or chronically disabling conditions which affect fewer than five in 10,000 people or medicines which are unlikely to generate enough of a return to justify their further development. It would also demand that the Government sets up a system to enable potential clinical trial participants to be identified and contacted. 'We are indeed surrounded by cancer,' Dr Gardner told the Commons. The Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent South had earlier said her mother, Breeda, died with pancreatic cancer. 'She fell ill on a Saturday, was diagnosed on a Thursday, and was dead by the following Saturday,' she said. 'One week after that, my father died of oesophageal cancer – not a rare cancer, I believe, but a less survivable one.' Her voice cracked with emotion as she dedicated her support for the Bill to her mother; her partner Jim's sister, Stella Gilbert, who died with bile duct cancer; and her sister's mother-in-law, Doreen, who died with pancreatic cancer. Mr Arthur, whose father-in-law died of glioblastoma, told the Commons that the NHS was 'ill-equipped' to deal with rare cancer patients. 'Awareness levels are often low amongst clinicians, and this leads to the scourge of late diagnosis,' he warned. He said the Bill was about 'justice; it's about creating a more equal playing field for these patients and their families'. Mr Arthur won the support of Conservative shadow health minister, Luke Evans, who said: 'The Bill won't solve everything overnight, but it's a serious step forward and a statement that even the rarest conditions deserve our fullest attentions.' Care minister Stephen Kinnock said the Bill 'aligned' with Government commitments and added: 'The Rare Cancers Bill raises the profile of rare cancers research, ensures our international regulatory competitiveness, and also allows rare cancer patients to be contacted as quickly as possible about research opportunities.' It was one of three private members' bills which cleared the Commons on Friday. MPs called 'aye' to approve Labour MP for Amber Valley Linsey Farnsworth's Unauthorised Entry to Football Matches Bill, which would create a new offence for fans tailgating, 'jibbing' or barging their way into stadiums. They also backed the Secure 16 to 19 Academies Bill, proposed by Labour MP for Cramlington and Killingworth, Emma Foody. It would reduce the minimum notice period for mutual, no-fault termination of a secure schools funding agreement from seven to two years. A further 32 Bills were listed for debate, but MPs ran out of time to accept or reject them. Among these was Ian Byrne's proposal for a Hillsborough law, named after the deadly 1989 stadium crush in Sheffield, which would place a legal duty of candour on public servants and authorities and provide legal aid for victims of disasters or state-related deaths. When the Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby rose to push his Bill, formally titled the Public Authority (Accountability) Bill, Labour whips called 'object' to stall its progress beyond second reading. Former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell, the now-independent MP for Hayes and Harlington who was sat next to Mr Byrne, heckled 'how disgraceful'. Mr Byrne, who did not name a date for its consideration in the future, spoke from he seat when he said: 'We need to get on with this.'
Leader Live
11 hours ago
- Leader Live
Plan to link rare cancer sufferers to suitable clinical trials clears Commons
Allison Gardner said the Rare Cancers Bill 'offers an entirely reasonable set of steps for research, for reviewing and hopefully enabling the development of so-called orphan drugs'. She thanked the Bill's proposer, Scott Arthur, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South West, before it cleared the Commons at third reading. If it clears the Lords after scrutiny at a later date, the Health Secretary would have to review the law relating to 'orphan' drugs, for life-threatening or chronically disabling conditions which affect fewer than five in 10,000 people or medicines which are unlikely to generate enough of a return to justify their further development. It would also demand that the Government sets up a system to enable potential clinical trial participants to be identified and contacted. 'We are indeed surrounded by cancer,' Dr Gardner told the Commons. The Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent South had earlier said her mother, Breeda, died with pancreatic cancer. 'She fell ill on a Saturday, was diagnosed on a Thursday, and was dead by the following Saturday,' she said. 'One week after that, my father died of oesophageal cancer – not a rare cancer, I believe, but a less survivable one.' Her voice cracked with emotion as she dedicated her support for the Bill to her mother; her partner Jim's sister, Stella Gilbert, who died with bile duct cancer; and her sister's mother-in-law, Doreen, who died with pancreatic cancer. Mr Arthur, whose father-in-law died of glioblastoma, told the Commons that the NHS was 'ill-equipped' to deal with rare cancer patients. 'Awareness levels are often low amongst clinicians, and this leads to the scourge of late diagnosis,' he warned. He said the Bill was about 'justice; it's about creating a more equal playing field for these patients and their families'. Mr Arthur won the support of Conservative shadow health minister, Luke Evans, who said: 'The Bill won't solve everything overnight, but it's a serious step forward and a statement that even the rarest conditions deserve our fullest attentions.' Care minister Stephen Kinnock said the Bill 'aligned' with Government commitments and added: 'The Rare Cancers Bill raises the profile of rare cancers research, ensures our international regulatory competitiveness, and also allows rare cancer patients to be contacted as quickly as possible about research opportunities.' It was one of three private members' bills which cleared the Commons on Friday. MPs called 'aye' to approve Labour MP for Amber Valley Linsey Farnsworth's Unauthorised Entry to Football Matches Bill, which would create a new offence for fans tailgating, 'jibbing' or barging their way into stadiums. They also backed the Secure 16 to 19 Academies Bill, proposed by Labour MP for Cramlington and Killingworth, Emma Foody. It would reduce the minimum notice period for mutual, no-fault termination of a secure schools funding agreement from seven to two years. A further 32 Bills were listed for debate, but MPs ran out of time to accept or reject them. Among these was Ian Byrne's proposal for a Hillsborough law, named after the deadly 1989 stadium crush in Sheffield, which would place a legal duty of candour on public servants and authorities and provide legal aid for victims of disasters or state-related deaths. When the Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby rose to push his Bill, formally titled the Public Authority (Accountability) Bill, Labour whips called 'object' to stall its progress beyond second reading. Former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell, the now-independent MP for Hayes and Harlington who was sat next to Mr Byrne, heckled 'how disgraceful'. Mr Byrne, who did not name a date for its consideration in the future, spoke from he seat when he said: 'We need to get on with this.'
