logo
‘What if I can't go?': Florida repeals in-state tuition for undocumented students

‘What if I can't go?': Florida repeals in-state tuition for undocumented students

Miami Herald13-02-2025
Maria has always been the type of person to plan ahead.
At only 18, she's plotted a careful plan to become a mental health professional. The high school senior from South Florida has already racked up credits in community college that she can apply to her bachelor's degree. She dreams of becoming a forensic psychologist so she can support crime victims and put criminals behind bars. She was recently accepted to Florida International University, her top choice.
Her plans could soon have to change.
That's because Florida lawmakers on Thursday voted to no longer offer undocumented students — like Maria — the opportunity to pay Florida-resident tuition fees at public universities or colleges. The benefit — created by a 2014 law that lawmakers have now repealed — has given thousands of undocumented students the opportunity to more affordably pursue a college education.
Without the ability to pay in-state tuition fees, Maria now wonders if that will impact her ability to pursue her degree.
'Getting into FIU was a moment of 'Oh my God, I'm so excited!' But it was also a moment of, 'What if I can't go?' I'm really uncertain and worried,' said Maria, who came to the U.S. from Honduras as a child and declined using her name fearing repercussions on her college admissions.
Like other undocumented students, Maria doesn't qualify for federal loans, aid, or many scholarships. She also got accepted to the University of Miami, which is private. She doesn't know what sort of aid the school will offer. She could consider a private loan, but that would saddle her with significant debt at a young age. She's hoping she'll be able to cobble her tuition payments together with scholarships.
'This doesn't leave me with many options. Where would I get the money?' she said.
The bill will require state universities and colleges to reevaluate the eligibility of undocumented students who currently receive in-state tuition starting on July 1.
'We wanted to repeal in state tuition and focus on Floridians,' said Gov. Ron DeSantis at a news conference on Thursday as he prepared to sign a bill repealing the benefit.
Up until Thursday, state law allowed undocumented students to seek a waiver and pay in-state tuition rates if they've gone to high school in the state for at least three consecutive years and enrolled in college within two years of graduating from high school.
But Republican lawmakers said it was time to repeal those benefits because Florida is trying to crack down on illegal immigration and does not want to offer financial incentives to people who are in the country illegally.
Democrats tried to amend the bill by allowing undocumented students who are currently enrolled at a public university or college to continue paying the reduced tuition for the next four years, arguing that it will allow them to finish their education without being priced out.
'We made a promise to these students,' Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, D-Orlando said. 'I ask you to search your hearts, this is literally the least we can do for these Dreamers who have worked so hard to get here.'
Senate Minority Leader Jason Pizzo, D-Miami, argued 'families would have planned differently if they knew' the Legislature was planning to repeal the decade-old law.
The amendment failed in the Senate, but three Miami Republicans — Sens. Ileana Garcia, Ana Maria Rodriguez and Alexis Calatayud — voted with Democrats in support of it.
Hernan Moreno is a student at Seminole State College studying construction management who has benefited from the tuition waiver. When he was 4 years old, he came to the United States from Chiapas, Mexico, and eventually applied for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. He went through the K-12 system in Florida, and is now pursuing his bachelor's.
He says that without the waiver, he would have to pay three times the rate for classes, and that it would significantly slow down his studies.
'I will have to stop school and save for funds for classes down the line,' he said over text message.
'Those who have the desire for education should be given the same opportunities as everyone else regardless of their immigration status if done the right way!'
It is unclear exactly how many undocumented students will be impacted by the upcoming changes. But data collected from state universities, colleges and technical colleges shows that 6,581 students currently receive the out-of-state tuition waiver.
The waiver is not only for undocumented students. It is also given in other scenarios, such as students who attended public schools in Florida and left to live with a parent after they graduated. But Republican Sen. Randy Fine, R-Palm Bay, said the 'vast majority' of the students that receive the waiver are undocumented.
'There are people who come to the U.S. and other countries to have a better life. There are people who come here because they have no choice and they are looking to have a brighter future than what they could in their own countries,' Maria told the Miami Herald.
FIU hit hard
State data shows that Florida International University had the most students with in-state tuition waivers of any Florida university in the last academic year — 535 in total. Thursday's decision to repeal the in state waivers comes as Jeanette Nuñez, the current lieutenant governor of Florida, gears up to become FIU's interim president, with the school's leadership signaling that they will confirm her to the position permanently.
As a congresswoman in Tallahassee ten years ago, Nuñez sponsored and championed the in-state tuition waivers that gave undocumented students the ability to afford Florida's colleges and universities. As lieutenant governor, she has said the law had run its course and should be eliminated. Democrats and immigration advocates have criticized her reversal as a political move.
Now, if she becomes FIU's next president, she will have to deal with the aftermath of undocumented students on her campus struggling to afford their education without the waivers. On Thursday, about 150 students and faculty members staged a walkout at FIU to oppose her impending appointment.
Read more: FIU students and faculty stage walkout in protest of new interim president Jeanette Nuñez
'To them it's just policies. To us, it's our lives,' said Katherine Retamal, an admissions counselor at FIU.
Dean C. Colson, who is on the board of trustees at Florida International University, was on the Board of Governors when they approved the in-state tuition waiver for undocumented students. He said he is disappointed to see these waivers go away, as he understands that students who come to this country illegally at a young age do without a choice.
'I thought it was good policy then, I think it's good policy now,' said Colson.
Rogelio Tovar, chair of the FIU Board of Trustees, said that he is 'a big supporter that everyone who comes into the country, comes in legally,' but understood that many students who benefit from the in-state tuition waiver came at a young age.
'My heart goes out to those students, there is nothing I want more than anyone that is trying to improve where they are in life, building for their future,' said Tovar. But he added that FIU will have to comply with the law.
'I don't think it's our position to take positions against laws,' he said.
Diego Dulante, 26, is on the verge of completing his master's in public health at the University of South Florida. Dulante came to the United States when he was just 4 years old. He told the Herald he would have never been able to get his bachelor's degree if it were not for the in-state tuition waiver.
'I didn't have a lot of options,' he said, 'I wouldn't have been able to continue my education.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas is redrawing congressional map for GOP gains, House Republicans acknowledge
Texas is redrawing congressional map for GOP gains, House Republicans acknowledge

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas is redrawing congressional map for GOP gains, House Republicans acknowledge

Texas legislators are redrawing the state's congressional map to advantage Republican candidates, GOP lawmakers said at a state House hearing Friday, setting aside a legal justification offered by the U.S. Department of Justice and making their political motivations explicit for the first time. 'Different from everyone else, I'm telling you, I'm not beating around the bush,' Rep. Todd Hunter, the Corpus Christi Republican carrying the bill, said about the goal of the map. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Texas Republicans launched the redistricting effort after pressure from President Donald Trump's political operatives, who demanded state leaders redraw the map to help Republicans maintain their slim House majority ahead of a potentially difficult midterm election. The House redistricting committee released its proposed redo of the map Wednesday. It slices up districts in the Houston, Austin and the Dallas areas, yielding five additional districts that would have voted for Trump by at least 10 percentage points in 2024. In 2024, Trump won 56.2% of votes in Texas. Under the current lines, Republicans hold 66% of Texas' 38 House seats. The new map aims to push that share to 79%. 'Political performance does not guarantee electoral success — that's up to the candidates,' Hunter said. 'But it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts.' Gov. Greg Abbott, in adding redistricting to the special session agenda, cited a letter from the Justice Department claiming that four Texas districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered. But on Friday, state Republicans were unequivocal that their goal was not to fix racial gerrymandering — which several have testified under oath does not exist in the current map — but to give the GOP the greatest chance of controlling as many as 30 congressional districts. 'These districts were drawn primarily using political performance,' Hunter said, citing Republican gains made across the state since the Legislature last redistricted in 2021, especially among Latino voters. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds. But under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the map cannot diminish the voting power of people of color. At Friday's hearing, Democrats argued that the proposed map unconstitutionally packed voters of color into some districts while spreading them throughout others to reduce their ability to elect their preferred candidates. 'Every citizen should have equal access to choose their representation, instead of crowding Black people to the point that all the Black people in the state only have two representatives, and all the Latinos in the state are crowded up to the extent that their voting power is diminished,' U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas told state lawmakers during the hearing. Though people of color make up most of Texas and have driven almost all of the state's population growth in recent years, the new map creates 24 districts that are majority-white — two more than the current map, which is under trial for possibly violating the Voting Rights Act. Republicans rejected the idea that the proposed map would suppress voters of color, noting that it would create one new majority Hispanic district and two new majority Black districts. But all three are almost precisely 50% Black or Hispanic, which Democratic lawmakers said at the hearing is not enough to ensure they're able to elect their candidates of choice. U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey of Fort Worth, whose seat would be partially dismantled under the new lines, noted that his district was drawn by a federal court 'to ensure that communities of color, Black and brown Texans, could finally have a voice in Congress.' 'Now, that voice is again under threat,' he said. 'This is a map that was drawn behind closed doors — as we've heard here today — to dismantle representation and weaken our power in turn.' It could take months, if not years, to resolve any legal challenge against the proposed map. A lawsuit against Texas' current maps, passed in 2021, finally went to trial last month, almost four years and several election cycles after they went into effect. In the meantime, Republicans in the Legislature have the votes to pass the map as it's drafted. Chairman Cody Vasut, an Angleton Republican, said the committee, which has 12 Republicans and nine Democrats, will vote to advance the map Friday evening or Saturday. It could be on the House floor as soon as Tuesday, he said. Democrats, locked out of power in the statehouse, have few tools at their disposal to fight the map's passage. The nuclear option is to flee the state and deny Republicans a quorum to pass any legislation — an expensive and politically tenuous move that state House Democrats were still considering ahead of the full chamber vote. At Friday's hearing, the only time the public would have to comment on the House's proposed map, Democrats begged Republicans to slow or stop redistricting entirely. 'This is not a Texas map. It is a Trump map,' said U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, an Austin Democrat. 'It was imposed by President Trump, who has a stranglehold on Congress, and the only question here is whether he also has a stranglehold on this Texas Legislature.' The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary
Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary

From the right: Dems' Grim Outlook for '26 'November 2026 may not go the way conventional wisdom suggests,' and Dems may lose, warns the Washington Examiner's Michael Barone. During midterm elections, 'the president's party almost always loses the House and, slightly less often, Senate seats.' But this time around, 'it looks like the Democrats' baggage, especially from the Biden years, is heavier than the loads Trump Republicans must juggle.' Black marks like 'the Russia collusion hoax, COVID-19 school closings, 'transitory' inflation, the Hunter Biden laptop, and open borders immigration' have too deeply damaged' Dems' credibility. Trump and Republicans are also becoming widely popular, with 'Republican gains' being 'widespread while Democratic gains are scarcely visible.' 'Nothing's inevitable in politics, but so far, the Democrats have not gotten up off the floor.' Mideast beat: 'Palestine' Is a Made-Up Cause Advertisement Westerners should 'understand that the George Soros-funded agents of Jew Hate and chaos' in the streets 'have zero to do with the overwhelming majority of Muslims around the world,' argues Christopher Messina at Messy Times. As Dalia Ziada, an Egyptian political analyst notes, protesters claim ' 'Palestine' is the cause of all Muslims,' but there's 'no trace of anything called 'Palestine' or anything similar to it in the Quran or the Prophetic Hadiths!' Indeed, the 'Palestinian Cause' was 'invented by the Pan-Arabist communists,' who 'attached it to Islam' to 'fool ordinary Muslims' and gain 'legitimacy' to commit crimes against nations 'in the East and the West.' 'I am a Muslim,' but Palestine 'will never be my cause,' because it hinders 'peace' — 'a divine obligation of all Muslims.' Former U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala in Chicago on July 31, 2025. REUTERS Capitol watch: Rep's War on DC Dementia Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) wants a 'way for Congress to evaluate whether some politicians are no longer fit to serve,' reports The Free Press' Gabe Kaminsky. Most Dems 'would rather talk about anything other than the Biden cover-up — and the wider problem of the gerontocracy that runs the party and Washington.' But, Gluesenkamp Perez is pushing'an amendment that would direct the Office of Congressional Conduct to develop a standard to determine House members' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' ' Some Democratic colleagues took her move 'personally,' and it 'failed in her first attempt to tuck it into a federal spending bill, with Democrats and Republicans all voting against its inclusion.' But her office is 'still exploring avenues to build a coalition.' Advertisement Liberal: Democrats' Best Way Back 'The Democratic Party faces a conundrum,' observes the Liberal Patriot's John Halpin. Despite President Trump's struggles with voters on 'his overall job approval rating' and among specific issues, 'Democrats are doing even worse with Americans.' They've tumbled 'from roughly a 3-point net unfavorable rating just before [Joe] Biden was elected in 2020 to a 30-point net unfavorable rating today.' With polls showing more than half of voters believe 'Congress isn't doing enough to keep Trump in line,' a 2026 message 'arguing for divided government to stop Republican overreach' may help 'Democrats to retake the House.' Ahead of 2028, Democrats should offer 'new voices without cultural baggage' and a message of 'economic uplift for America's working- and middle-class families.' Advertisement Foreign desk: Chinese Dam's Regional Threat China has 'officially acknowledged' that it's building 'the biggest dam ever conceived,' gasps Brahma Chellaney at The Hill. The structure will 'generate nearly three times as much hydropower' as the massive Three Gorges Dam but 'portends a looming geopolitical and environmental crisis.' The new dam 'is on a geologic fault line — a recipe for catastrophe.' Moreover, 'capturing silt-laden waters before they reach India and Bangladesh, the dam will starve' farmers of crucial riparian nutrients. While China's dam-building 'has long alarmed downstream nations, from Vietnam and Thailand to Nepal,' this project 'raises profound questions about regional stability.' By seizing control over regional water, 'China is methodically locking in future geopolitical leverage.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Who is Erika McEntarfer, labor statistics chief sacked by Trump
Who is Erika McEntarfer, labor statistics chief sacked by Trump

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Who is Erika McEntarfer, labor statistics chief sacked by Trump

President Trump on Friday accused the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Dr. Erika McEntarfer, of faking jobs numbers, directing his team to fire the former President Biden appointee. Trump blamed McEntarfer for the bad Friday jobs report, showing that the country added 258,000 fewer jobs in May and June than previously reported. The U.S. added just 19,000 jobs in May, significantly lower than the 144,000 reported previously and saw an increase of 14,000 jobs in June, over 90 percent lower than the 147,000 initially shared. The country gained 73,000 jobs in July. In the last three months, the U.S. added 106,000 in total. An administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed to The Hill that McEntarfer was terminated from her post. A BLS official told The Hill that McEntarfer was sacked and that deputy commissioner William Wiatrowski will serve as acting head until the administration finds a replacement. Trump argued that McEntarfer, who was nominated by Biden in 2023 and confirmed to the post the following year, 'faked' the jobs numbers before the 2024 presidential election to 'boost' former Vice President Harris' chance of winning in November. 'This is the same Bureau of Labor Statistics that overstated the Jobs Growth in March 2024 by approximately 818,000 and, then again, right before the 2024 Presidential Election, in August and September, by 112,000,' Trump wrote in a lengthy Friday Truth Social post. 'These were Records — No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' the president said, vowing that McEntarfer will be replaced by someone 'much more competent and qualified.' 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he said. McEntarfer, a labor economist who has worked in the federal government for over two decades, was confirmed by the Senate in early 2024 in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Her nomination was supported at the time by now Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the two former senators representing Ohio and Florida, respectively. Prior to working as the commissioner of BLS, which is part of the Department of Labor, McEntarfer held positions within the Treasury Department, the Executive Office of the President and the U.S. Census Bureau, according to her biography posted on BLS's website. She was the head of research for the Longitudinal Employer–Household Dynamics program at the Census Bureau. The labor economist, who earned a bachelor's degree in social science from Bard College and an economics Ph.D. from Virginia Tech, was a senior economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisors prior to joining BLS. In another post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that Friday's jobs report figures were 'RIGGED' in order to make the president and Republican lawmakers 'look bad.' 'Just like when they had three great days around the 2024 Presidential Election, and then, those numbers were 'taken away' on November 15, 2024, right after the Election, when the Jobs Numbers were massively revised DOWNWARD, making a correction of over 818,000 Jobs — A TOTAL SCAM,' Trump wrote. BLS often revises job number tallies, but the scale of the change on Friday surprised investors and experts after a solid week of economic data. 'Persistent policy uncertainty, tariffs, and diminished immigration flows paralyzing employers, the US economy is now flirting with job losses, revealing a labor market that is much weaker than most Fed policymakers had believed,' EY-Parthenon top economist Gregory Daco wrote. The collection of economic data can take time due to the slow response rates of those surveyed and the size of the economy. The delay does not necessarily mean the data is being manipulated. BLS said in August last year that the U.S. added 818,000 fewer jobs over a one-year period than what was previously reported. DOL Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on Friday that she agrees with Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer and confirmed that Wiatrowski will work as the acting commissioner. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' Chavez-DeRemer said in a Friday post on social media platform X. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS.' William W. Beach, who served as the BLS head during Trump's first term, disagreed with the president's decision to terminate McEntarfer, warning it would set a 'dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store