
Pope Leo XIV resumes the tradition of taking a summer vacation. But he's got plenty of homework
In word and deed since, Leo has seemed intent on almost disappearing into the role. The shy 69-year-old Augustinian missionary has eschewed the headline-grabbing protagonism of past pontiffs in favor of a quieter, less showy and more reserved way of being pope.
Leo will disappear further this weekend when he begins a six-week vacation in his first break since his historic election May 8. Leo is resuming the papal tradition of escaping the Roman heat for the relatively cooler climes of Castel Gandolfo, the papal summer retreat on Lake Alban, south of Rome.
People who know and work with Leo expect he will use these weeks away from the public eye and the daily grind of Vatican audiences to get his head around the most pressing problems facing the church. He's a methodical, hard-working and well-prepared manager, they say, who wants to read entire reports, not just the executive summaries, before making decisions.
Here is a look at Leo's summer homework, the outstanding dossiers he may be studying from now until Aug. 17 in between dips in the pool, walks in the gardens and occasional Masses, prayers and visits in town.
After his election, Leo reappointed all Vatican prefects until further notice, so the Holy See machinery is still working with the old guard in place. But a few major appointments await, most importantly to fill Leo's old job as prefect of the office that vets bishop nominations.
Leo also has to decide who will be his No. 2. The Vatican secretary of state, the equivalent of a prime minister, is still Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Pope Francis' pick who was himself an unsuccessful contender in the conclave that elected Leo pope.
Even before he gets his people in place, Leo has to get a handle on one of the most pressing problems facing the Holy See: Its troubled finances. The Vatican is running a structural deficit of around 50 million to 60 million euros ($59-71 million) and has a 1 billion euro ($1.18 billion) shortfall in its pension fund.
There are plenty of high-profile clergy sex cases that festered during Francis' pontificate that are now are on Leo's desk. History's first American pope will be watched closely to see how he handles them, since he cannot claim ignorance about abuse or its dynamics, given the devastation the scandals have wrought in the United States.
On the eve of his vacation, he made an important appointment, naming French Bishop Thibault Verny head of the Vatican's child protection advisory board, replacing the retiring American Cardinal Sean O'Malley.
Leo has already said it's 'urgent' to create a culture of prevention in the church that shows no tolerance for any form of abuse, be it abuse of authority or spiritual or sexual abuse.
On that score, there is no case more pressing than that of the Rev. Marko Rupnik, a famous mosaic artist who was belatedly thrown out of the Jesuits after its superiors determined he sexually, psychologically and spiritually abused two dozen adult women and nuns. Even though the case didn't involve minors, it became a toxic problem for Francis because of suggestions Rupnik received favorable treatment at the Vatican under the Jesuit pope.
Nearly two years after Francis caved into pressure to reopen the Rupnik file, the Vatican has finally found external canon lawyers to hear the case, the head of the Vatican's doctrine office, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández, told reporters last week. As recently as March, Fernandez had said he was having trouble finding any willing candidates. Now that Francis is dead, the case may be less politically delicate, even as the priest's supporters maintain his innocence.
Leo has already sent a signal, with Vatican News removing Rupnik's artwork from its website.
Another legal headache facing Leo is what to do about Cardinal Angelo Becciu and the Vatican's 'trial of the century,' which is heading into the appeals phase in September. The city-state's criminal tribunal in 2023 convicted Becciu and eight other people of a variety of financial crimes stemming from the Holy See's bungled 350 million euro ($412 million) investment in a London property.
But the trial was itself problematic, with defense claims that basic defense rights weren't respected since Francis intervened on several occasions in favor of prosecutors. In the months since the verdicts were handed down, there have been new revelations that Vatican gendarmes and prosecutors were apparently in regular touch with a woman who was coaching the star witness into testifying against Becciu. The once-powerful cardinal has denounced the contacts as evidence that his conviction was orchestrated from the start, from the top.
Leo, a canon lawyer, may want to steer clear of the whole thing to try to give the tribunal the impression of being independent. But Leo will ultimately have to decide what to do with Becciu, who recused himself from the conclave but remains a cardinal with a very unclear status.
Leo has said his priority as pope is unity and reconciliation in the church. Many conservatives and traditionalists hope that means he will work to heal the liturgical divisions that spread during Francis' 12-year papacy, especially in the U.S., over the old Latin Mass.
Francis in 2021 restricted access for ordinary Catholics to the ancient liturgy, arguing that its spread was creating divisions in the church. In doing so, Francis reversed his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, who in 2007 had relaxed restrictions on its celebration.
Cardinal Raymond Burke, a figurehead of the conservative and traditionalist camp, told a recent conference on the Latin Mass that he had spoken to Leo about the need to 'put an end to the present persecution of the faithful' who want to worship according to the old rite.
'It it is my hope that he will as soon as it is possible take up the study of this question and try to restore the situation as it was' under Benedict's reform, Burke said.
Leo has also identified artificial intelligence as a pressing issue facing humanity, suggesting a document of some sort might be in the works.
Also under study is when he will start traveling, and where.
Leo has a standing invitation to undertake Francis' last, unfulfilled foreign commitment: Marking the 1,700th anniversary of the Council of Nicea, Christianity's first ecumenical council, with a visit to Turkey. Leo has already said a visit is in the works, possibly in late November.
Beyond that, Leo has received plenty of invitations: Vice President JD Vance extended a Trump invitation to visit the U.S., but Leo demurred and offered a noncommittal 'at some point.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy invited him to visit Kyiv, but the Vatican under Francis had refused a papal visit there unless one could also be arranged to Moscow.
Leo's old diocese of Chiclayo, Peru, meanwhile, is waiting for their bishop to come home, and then there's Argentina, which never got a papal visit from the first-ever Argentine pope.
The residents of Castel Gandolfo, meanwhile, are aching for a pope to return. Francis had decided not to use the retreat and instead spent his 12 papal summers at home, in the Vatican. The town has recovered from the economic hit of pope-free summers, after Francis instead opened the papal palace and gardens to the public as a museum year-round.
But townsfolks cannot wait for Leo to take up residence and enjoy the town's gorgeous lake views and quiet starry nights. It's the perfect place for a pope to rest, read, write and think in private, they say.
'Remember, many encyclicals were written here,' noted the Rev. Tadeusz Rozmus, the town's parish priest.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Atlantic
35 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Another Angry Billionaire Wants His Own Political Party
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. If you're old enough, you've seen this movie: An eccentric billionaire, full of bile and nursing grudges against the incumbent Republican president, wants to create a third major political party and shake up the system. In 1992, the billionaire was H. Ross Perot, and his vehicle for attacking the incumbent president, George H. W. Bush, was something called the Reform Party. Perot had a few good ideas; he wanted to balance the federal budget, for example, which is never a bad thing. But mostly, he was something of a rich crank who had a vendetta against the Bush family: In one of many strange moments, Perot claimed that his abrupt exit from the race in the summer of 1992 was because Bush had been plotting a smear campaign against his daughter, something for which he never offered proof. It wasn't a very good movie, and it certainly didn't need a reboot, but we might be getting one anyway. Elon Musk has announced the formation of the 'America Party,' a new political organization whose main idea is … well, the goal isn't clear. Musk hasn't said much about it, other than that it would be dedicated to stopping wasteful government spending. But mostly, his announcement seems dedicated to aggravating President Donald Trump, with whom Musk has had a very public falling out. And Trump is plenty aggravated. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site on Sunday, adding that the 'one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS.' Trump's trademark punctuation aside, the president has a point, at least about the possible disruption of the GOP. Even if Musk is serious—and one never knows with planet Earth's richest jumping jester —the odds of this new party coming into existence are low: Third parties don't get much traction in the U.S. political system. The chances that it will become a force in American politics are even lower. But if that's the case, why is Trump so angry? A few days later, perhaps realizing how panicky his initial reaction sounded, Trump changed his tune. 'It'll help us,' he said of Musk's new party. And here, Trump is wrong: If Musk creates a new party to appeal to disaffected members of the now-defunct coalition that he, Trump, and some of the MAGA movement all cohabited, such a party—if it has any impact at all—is likely to hurt Republicans more than Democrats. Musk is a deeply unpopular figure in American politics, but what public support he enjoys comes heavily from the GOP itself. For now, he seems to be taking Perot's approach, rooting the America Party in anger about the bloated and irresponsible One Big Beautiful Bill that Trump and the Republicans squeaked through Congress. But who's the audience for this appeal? It's not big business or economic conservatives; Musk's record as a business leader has taken a major hit, and those groups have already thrown in their lot with Trump and the GOP. It's not the national-security Republicans, who know that Musk is no better than the fringiest and most isolationist Trumpers when it comes to foreign affairs. It's certainly not the Never Trumpers, who, if Musk even wanted their support in the first place, would never forget his sycophantic embrace of Trump. The real worry for Republicans is that Musk will peel off small numbers of people in two groups, both of them important to Trump's grip on Capitol Hill. One group consists of swing voters who don't much like Trump but who have stayed with him for various reasons; Musk might be able to get them pumped up about another celebrity movement. They could be swayed by Musk's supposed anger about budgets the same way some of them bought into arguments about egg prices and inflation, allowing Musk's candidates to shave away a few points here and there from the GOP. But more worrisome to the Republicans is that Musk will corner the crackpot vote. When Musk first broke with Trump, he claimed on X that the president was named in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein, the pedophile who committed suicide in prison and with whom Trump had a long friendship. Some of Trump's supporters, including FBI Director Kash Patel, had earlier teased the possibility of great revelations from 'the Epstein files.' Then they gained power and perhaps realized that some of these files either didn't exist or didn't contain anything explosive. Musk might sense that he should avoid openly courting this part of the Trump coalition, but it's too late: The MAGA fringe will likely see a natural ally in Musk anyway, not least because Musk engaged in various forms of conspiracism even before he tried to play the Epstein card against Trump. If a number of people in MAGA world think the 'deep state' is even Deeper and Stater now that it's ostensibly captured administration officials who were once trusted by Trump supporters, such as Attorney General Pam Bondi, they are going to look for a new vehicle for their beliefs. Musk and his party could fit that bill. But the actual damage to any party is likely to be small. Even if Musk could present himself as the face of fiscal conservatism, that's not enough to sustain a party in the age of reality-TV politics. Musk can form a party, but he can't run for president as its head, preventing him from taking the Green Party gadfly Jill Stein's role as the spoiler in American elections. Even Perot at the height of his influence won only 19 percent of the popular vote in the 1992 election; he didn't gain a single electoral vote, and his Reform Party exists now mostly as memorabilia that people have stashed in attics for some 30 years. (He tried again in 1996. He got 8 percent of the popular vote.) In the end, this whole project is likely to go nowhere, and I will admit that this suits me fine as an American who likes the two-party system and distrusts third parties in general—even if I am no longer a member of either major party. When I used to teach political science, I would remind students that large parties are meant to serve a useful purpose of aggregating interests, rather than dividing them. Big parties in a winner-take-all system (where the person who gets the most votes wins the seat outright) force people with differing agendas to get along with one another and accept compromises in order to elect candidates who might not be acceptable to any one of them but who overall represent their general desires. Independent and swing voters can make similar judgments, joining or leaving coalitions in various elections. The party system in America has problems: Too many people don't vote—especially in primaries—and many of those who do vote don't comprehend even the rudiments of the issues before them. A fair number of voters have also embraced cruelty and ignorance as virtues. But these are social problems, not constitutional or structural issues. If Musk throws billions of dollars into creating a party that siphons off voters who think the name DOGE was a clever acronym and who worry about chemtrails, thus weakening Trump's power in the short term, so be it. But another party headed by another billionaire who doesn't understand the Constitution, the U.S. government, or democracy itself is not the path to a healthier nation. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: The 'Russia hoax,' revisited He spent his life trying to prove that he was a loyal U.S. citizen. It wasn't enough. The David Frum Show: The courts won't save democracy from Trump. Today's News At least 119 people are dead after the flash flood in central Texas; 161 people are still missing from one county alone, according to officials. President Donald Trump sent letters to seven more countries threatening tariffs as high as 30 percent. Russia launched its largest drone attack on Ukraine last night, with 728 drones and 13 missiles, according to Ukraine's air force and its president. Evening Read The Work of Caring for My Daughter Will Never Be 'Efficient' By Julie Kim After Izzy was diagnosed, in 2018, I wrote about my grief over not knowing if she would ever talk, walk, or recognize me as her mother. I still grieve those milestones. Yet I also marvel at Izzy's many accomplishments: how she has mastered navigating the busy menus on her 'talker,' an augmentative communication device provided by the New York City Department of Education; her stamina during physical-therapy sessions, wedged into breaks between classes; how during social studies, her least-favorite subject, she has figured out that pointing at her diaper and then the exit sign will promptly get her out of class. I am confident that she knows and loves me, even if she might not fully grasp that I'm the one who birthed her. At the same time—and here I think of her orbit of loving teachers, therapists, and other caregivers, particularly those at her school—I would not be surprised if Izzy believes, deep down, that she has many mothers, of which I am but one. Culture Break Watch. My Mom Jayne (streaming on HBO Max) is a documentary about Jayne Mansfield directed by her daughter Mariska Hargitay. It's also a reminder that the star was more than the next Marilyn Monroe. Enjoy the show. When Hulk Hogan turned heel, pro wrestling—and America?—was never the same, James Parker writes.


Atlantic
36 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Atlantic Announces Tom Bartlett as Staff Writer
As The Atlantic continues a major expansion of its editorial team, we are announcing that Tom Bartlett begins today as a staff writer covering health and science under the second Trump administration. Recently, Tom has covered the measles outbreak in West Texas, speaking with a parent of the first child to die of the disease in America in a decade and reporting on what RFK Jr. told grieving families about the measles vaccine. He has also written about the most extreme voice on Kennedy's new vaccine committee. Below is the staff announcement from editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg and executive editor Adrienne LaFrance: Dear everyone, We are very glad to share the news that Tom Bartlett is joining The Atlantic as a staff writer. Tom is an extraordinary reporter and a brilliant, empathetic writer—qualities that were all on display in the stories he wrote for us earlier this year about the Texas measles outbreak. As you no doubt remember, Tom found and interviewed the family of the first American child to die of measles in a decade, and he was also first to report on the conversations that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had with victims' families. At The Atlantic, he will cover a wide range of stories at the intersection of health and science, with a particular focus on attacks against enlightenment values and the remaking of American public health in the second Trump presidency. Tom comes to us with great expertise in scientific controversy and rooting out scientific dishonesty. Most recently, during his 22 years at The Chronicle of Higher Education, he covered the reproducibility crisis in psychology, numerous academic scandals, and even research about falsehoods that was itself falsified. Tom is also a seasoned features writer. (The Tom Bartlett completists among us will also remember his excellent profiles of Tucker Carlson and Gene Weingarten for the Washingtonian.) He has become one of the nation's great experts on the anti-vaccine movement, and is skilled at covering the field's major players with requisite scrutiny while still maintaining respectful curiosity about why people believe what they believe, and always demonstrating a willingness to go where the story—and the truth—lead him. Tom is based in Austin, Texas. Please join us in welcoming him to the team. Adrienne and Jeff The Atlantic has announced a number of new hires this year, including managing editor Griff Witte; staff writers Isaac Stanley-Becker, Tyler Austin Harper, Quinta Jurecic, Nick Miroff, Toulouse Olorunnipa, Ashley Parker, Alexandra Petri, Missy Ryan, Vivian Salama, Michael Scherer, Jamie Thompson, Josh Tyrangiel, Caity Weaver, and Nancy Youssef; and senior editors Jenna Johnson and Dan Zak. Please reach out with any questions or requests.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada to 'align' with U.S. airport screening rules as TSA drops shoes-off policy
OTTAWA — Ottawa says it will work to align its flight security regulations with those in the U.S. after Washington dropped a rule that required passengers to remove their shoes during security screenings. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced Tuesday that passengers at American airports no longer need to remove their shoes because officials have found other ways to keep travellers safe. Canada does not require passengers flying domestically or to non-U.S. destinations to take off their shoes for screening, unless a security officer decides it's necessary. But those flying to the U.S. through the pre-clearance sections of Canadian airports have been required to remove their shoes. The U.S. Transportation Security Administration introduced the no-shoes rule roughly five years after Richard Reid, who became infamous as the "shoe bomber," tried to trigger explosives hidden in his shoes on a Paris to Miami flight in 2001. Transport Canada says in a statement it "will work with the Transportation Security Administration to ensure requirements are aligned." This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 9, 2025. Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press