'We'll see': Hu'akavameiliku on becoming Tongan PM again
Photo:
RNZ Pacific / Lydia Lewis
The former Tongan Prime Minister Hu'akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni will not confirm or deny whether returning to the role is on his mind.
Tonga goes to the polls in November, and several agenda items must be addressed before the Legislative Assembly (parliament) wraps up this week.
Hu'akavameiliku brushed off a question about running for Prime Minister at the end of an interview with RNZ Pacific, which focused on last week's tsunami alert off the coast of Russia.
"One step at a time. I'm just focusing on the needs of my constituencies and the election, and then we'll see what happens after," he said.
Hu'akavameiliku resigned
from his leadership post in December last year, ahead of a no-confidence motion.
That motion had been brought by Dr 'Aisake Eke, the man who eventually became prime minister. Dr Eke had made
allegations
about Hu'akavameiliku, but he has never elaborated or explained to the Tongan public what he was referring to.
Hu'akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni, right, and Crown Prince of Tonga Tupoutoʻa ʻUlukalala in Nuku'alofa. August 2024
Photo:
RNZ Pacific / Lydia Lewis
Tonga's Legislative Assembly is sitting for the final time this week before members disperse and the November election timeline begins next week, Hu'akavameiliku said.
"Right now we're trying to complete some of the agenda items, including legislations, annual reports and so forth," he said.
He said for the last couple of weeks, MPs were busy visiting their constituency.
"I think they're keen to actually table their reports, especially about what the needs of their constituency before the parliament closes."
Hu'akavameiliku looks after the Tongatapu 3 constituency.
He said common issues being raised include roads, street lights, security issues, drug, support for women's groups and support for sports development.
All of these issues, he said, are "pretty common" across all constituencies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Fiji's anti-corruption watchdog charges top prosecutor, initiates extradition proceedings
Fiji's suspended chief prosecutor, New Zealander Christopher Pryde Photo: Christopher Pryde Fiji's anti-corruption watchdog has charged the country's top prosecutor, who is in self-imposed exile in New Zealand, with corruption. The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has also initiated "extradition proceedings" against New Zealander Christopher Pryde. In a press statement on Tuesday, FICAC said Pryde had been charged in absentia on three counts by the Suva Magistrates Court. FICAC claims that while serving as director of Office of Public Prosecutions, Pryde "approved and received" approximately NZ$102,000 without obtaining the necessary approvals from the President's Office and the Judicial Services Commission. "He is charged with causing a loss, on the basis that he dishonestly caused financial loss to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions by accepting these unauthorised payments." FICAC said Pryde faces a second count of abuse of office for allegedly approving and receiving eight reimbursements for airfares for his wife and child (worth approximately NZ$35,000), and has been charged with obtaining a financial advantage by knowingly receiving payments to which he was not entitled. The anti-corruption office is also alleging that, on or about 16 September 2022, Pryde was reimbursed almost NZ$6000 for unused air tickets by Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. It alleged that, although the airline refunded him directly, he failed to return the amount. The court has adjourned the case to 15 September for an update on the status of the extradition process. Pryde had been reinstated to the role in January of this year following a 21-month suspension. In a statement to reporters, Pryde said he is "dismayed" at FICAC's decision "without giving me the right to speak in my defence". "This is a clear violation of my civil and constitutional rights. I categorically deny any wrongdoing," he said. "The decision by FICAC to charge me in absentia lead me to the conclusion that there is a concerted effort to keep me out of Fiji and prevent me from resuming my duties as the Director of Public Prosecutions." Earlier this year, Pryde had written to Foreign Minister Winston Peters to intervene in his case after his salary was cut of by the Fiji government. Pryde is a New Zealand citizen and held Fiji's top prosecutor position from 2011. He was suspended in April 2023, midway into his seven-year contract, over allegations of misconduct. A three-judge Tribunal appointed by the President later cleared him of any wrongdoin, and reinstated on 7 January. However, just two days after this reinstatement, his deputy - who had been serving as the acting director public prosecutions - filed a fresh complaint against him with FICAC. Pryde maintains his innocence and says he has not returned to Fiji because he has not received assurance by the Judicial Services Commission that they would not suspend him upon his return. "And I would be forced to, once again, defend myself whilst being deprived of my income".
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Government forges ahead with foreshore and seabed law
Paul Goldsmith has welcomed Cabinet's move to press ahead with the law change. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government is forging ahead with plans to change the law governing New Zealand's foreshore and seabed, despite a Supreme Court ruling last year that appeared to undercut the rationale for the change. The proposed legislation stems from a clause in National's coalition deal with NZ First, which promised to revisit the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act. That commitment was driven by fears that a 2023 Court of Appeal decision could have made it significantly easier for Māori groups to win recognition of customary rights over parts of the coastline. The government introduced a bill to Parliament last year to prevent that, but it hit pause in December after the Supreme Court effectively overturned the earlier ruling. At the time, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith welcomed the development and said ministers would take time to reassess their plans. On Tuesday, Goldsmith confirmed to RNZ that Cabinet had agreed to press ahead with the law change regardless and to pass it before October. "Everybody in New Zealand has an interest in what goes on in the coastline, and we're trying our best to get that balance right." Goldsmith said he was not convinced that last year's Supreme Court ruling had set a high enough test for judging whether customary rights should be granted. "We've had a couple of cases that have been decided since then - which have shown almost 100 percent of the coastline and those areas being granted customary marine title - which confirmed to us that the Supreme Court test still didn't achieve the balance that we think the legislation set out to achieve." Asked whether he expected an upswell of protest, Goldsmith said that had been an earlier concern but: "time will tell". "There's been a wide variety of views, some in favour, some against, but we think this is the right thing to do." The legislation was one of the key objections raised by Ngāpuhi leaders last year when they walked out on a meeting with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in protest. More than 200 applications for customary marine title are making their way through the courts. Under the amendment bill, any court decisions issued after 25 July 2024, will need to be reconsidered. That would appear to cover seven cases, involving various iwi from around the country. "I understand their frustration over that," Goldsmith said. "But we believe it is very important to get this right, because it affects the whole of New Zealand." Goldsmith said the government had set aside about $15 million to cover the additional legal costs. The Marine and Coastal Area Act was originally passed by the National-led government in 2011, replacing the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, which had extinguished Māori customary rights in favour of Crown ownership. The 2004 law - introduced by Helen Clark's Labour government - provoked widespread protest and led to the creation of the Māori Party, now known as Te Pāti Māori. National's 2011 replacement declared that no one owned the foreshore and seabed but allowed Māori groups to seek to recognition of their rights - or "Customary Marine Title" - through the courts or in direct negotiations with the Crown. Customary title recognises exclusive Māori rights to parts of the foreshore and seabed, provided certain legal tests are met, including proving continuous and "exclusive" use of the area since 1840 without substantial interruption. The 2023 Court of Appeal ruling, however, declared that groups only needed to show they had enough control over the area that they could keep others from using it, and that situations where the law itself had prevented them from doing so could be ignored. The Supreme Court subsequently overturned that and said the Court of Appeal had taken an unduly narrow approach in its interpretation. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Garden shed, sleepout and garage rules to be eased by government
Chris Penk. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Consenting rules for small garden sheds, sleepouts and garages are being changed by the coalition government. Cabinet has agreed to remove the minimum required distance between small single-storey structures under 10 square metres and a property boundary. It has also agreed to reduce the setback distance for single storey buildings between 10 and 30 square metres to just one metre. Previously, garden sheds had to be as far from a property boundary as they were tall - anything closer than that required building consent. Minister for Regulation David Seymour said there was no justification for such generous setback distances on private property. "Section sizes are shrinking, and the cost of living rising. Forcing people to put sheds in the middle of their lawn or pay for a consent to store tools doesn't make sense." David Seymour. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Seymour said space was right and building costs high in today's housing market, making today's changes good news for homeowners. "These types of property developments are practical and affordable improvements. We want people to be able to utilise them without hassle." He credited his 'Red Tape Tipline' for the idea and asked the public to keep the feedback coming. "We're acting on the tips we get through the red tape tipline by removing regulation and making it easier for Kiwis to get things done. "We want to hear about red tape like this that's getting in the way - I encourage anyone with a red tape issue to report it on the Ministry for Regulation website." Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk said people shouldn't be "bogged down in bureaucracy" when making use of their own backyard. "By the end of the year, homeowners will be able to put up a small shed or garage closer to their boundary or another building without needing a consent. "That's a real win for anyone short on space, giving them more freedom to add a bike shed, protect their tools, cover a vehicle, or even create a small sleepout for guests - all without extra paperwork." These changes are expected to be in force by the end of the year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
