Musk's X says it won't cooperate with ‘politically motivated' French probe
Earlier this month, Paris prosecutors stepped up a preliminary probe into X for suspected algorithmic bias and fraudulent data extraction, enlisting police to investigate alleged wrongdoing by the company or its executives.
'Based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech,' the social network posted on its Global Government Affairs account.
'For these reasons, X has not acceded to the French authorities' demands, as we have a legal right to do.'
In the blistering attack, X also said the probe had been instigated by Eric Bothorel, a French lawmaker, who had accused 'X of manipulating its algorithm for 'foreign interference' purposes, an allegation which is completely false'.
The Paris prosecutors' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did Bothorel.
Musk, a former ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, has accused European governments of attacking free speech and has voiced support for some of the region's far-right parties.
The French probe could deepen a rift between Washington and European capitals over what sort of discourse is permitted online, with senior officials from Trump's administration alleging the censoring of right-wing voices around the world.
PREVIOUS RESEARCH
X said Paris prosecutors had requested it hand over 'recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform', for analysis by researchers David Chavalarias and Maziyar Panahi, who it said had both exhibited 'open hostility towards X', calling into question the impartiality of the investigation.
Panahi denied any involvement in the investigation.
'My name was mentioned by mistake, based on my previous research projects with David Chavalarias, none of which have ever had any hostile intent toward X,' he said in an email.
'The fact my name has been mentioned in such an erroneous manner demonstrates how little regard they have for the lives of others … I will not hesitate to pursue legal action for defamation should I receive any form of hate speech.'
Chavalarias did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
X also chafed at the fact that it was being investigated under organised crime charges, which it said would grant the police measures including wiretapping its employees' personal devices.
Pavel Durov, the Russian-born founder of the Telegram messaging app, is also under judicial supervision in France after being arrested last year and placed under formal investigation for alleged organised crime on the app. He denies guilt.
Early in July, Musk responded 'true' to a post on X in which Durov said the French 'bureaucrats' investigating X were 'waging a crusade against free speech and tech progress'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
32 minutes ago
- IOL News
Employment, not politics, must be our priority in South Africa
Letter to the Editor Image: File 80 years later, we need to follow France International anti-Israeli sentiment is understandable but misplaced. It's like being anti-American because of Donald Trump. The sitting Israeli Knesset is the elephant in the room, not the Israeli people per se. The mayhem in Gaza is driven by a rightwing-led government with a mere 3% majority. The Times of Israel reports that a recent poll indicates that 70% of Israelis don't trust their government. When the dust settles and the destruction of Gaza ceases, the existing Knesset will go up in smoke and blow away in the wind. The new Knesset will accept that the only way forward isn't the destruction of Hamas, but talks resulting in the formation of the State of Palestine alongside the State of Israel .Those calling for the destruction of Israel are wasting their efforts. An attack on Israel would be like throwing stones at Table Mountain. They need to live with that – that's just the way it is. French President Emmanuel Macron breaking ranks with Western allies by recognising the State of Palestine is a milestone, which, hopefully, others will follow – it is after all almost 80 years overdue! | Colin Bosman Newlands Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Racism will never end unless confronted Why is it so hard for people to stand up to, or act against, racism, discrimination, violent crime, social injustice, and rampant corruption in their local communities and /or countries of birth or countries they have migrated to?Does it inconvenience them or cost them anything to do so? In America for instance, it is said that among white people, solidarity involves an unspoken agreement to protect their advantages and avoid discomfort by not confronting racist behaviour. Correspondingly, for people of colour in the US, seeing racism happening in real time also leans to silence out of fear of reprisal. In both these cases of white and black Americans it is generally acknowledged that these dynamics create critical barriers to bringing about change to racist and socially oppressive systems. | Eric Palm Gympie, Australia We sit on a powder keg of unemployment Our embattled nation is hurtling from crisis to crisis as we wage a losing battle to contain a vast amount of poverty. Corruption land has reached epidemic proportions and is so pervasive that it is destroying the future of this and the next generation. The corruption epidemic is evident in the general climate of unethical leadership and bad governance throughout the political spectrum. After 30 years of democracy, our rich country remains a land of peasants, and increasingly of landless urbanised populations living on the margins of squalid squatter camps that are bursting at the seams – political dynamite waiting to explode in a seismic eruption. Our silent emergency comes in the form of pernicious killers: Poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy and massive unemployment. Statistics do not capture the extent of human suffering and lost opportunities. When democracy dawned in 1994, many hoped for liberty, prosperity and a fresh new start, but were cruelly disappointed. This is unacceptable and untenable. South Africa is a powder keg, waiting to explode and vision, foresight and courage is urgently required to forestall cataclysmic events | FAROUK ARAIE Benoni Employment must be our top priority Last Monday (July 21), Independent Newspapers reported on the horrific reality of youth unemployment. The report reflected that more than a million young South Africans had applied for the police service learning programme. Even more shocking was that over three hundred thousand of those graduates had NQF Level 6 or higher qualifications. The situation is now so bad that six in 10 of our youth are unemployed. These numbers are not just statistics. They are basically almost every family. Despite these stark figures we still have the government putting enormous restrictions on job creation. We constantly see how small businesses are blocked from their very survival because of regulations and harsh restrictions. The labour ministry seems hell bent on trying to control who can be employed and where. We have archaic regulations controlling the employment of people with certain skin pigmentation. We also have legislation telling employers how much they must pay for certain jobs. If the employer can't afford that they are told to apply for an exemption. These are almost impossible to obtain and the few that do get exemptions from the minimum wage in certain categories, that exemption is for only a short period of time and only in very limited circumstances. Even the few exemptions that are obtained don't go far enough, despite the fact that the individuals would rather earn a lower amount than no salary. These individuals are not entitled to agree to take the lower amount. Their only other alternative is to resort to crime, drugs, or nothing but despair. Such circumstances tend to lead to some employers breaking the law and to many employees being complicit in breaching the rules and regulations. In many circumstances in my daily dealing with trade unions even they are willing to overlook these breaches. In my travels across South Africa, I speak to shop stewards who tell me they would rather have their members employed than to strictly enforce the minimum wage. Unfortunately, when an employer breaches one piece of legislation, we invariably see that this leads to other unlawful behaviour. For instance, if an employer is forced to ignore the minimum wage legislation they then feel complete indifference to health and safety regulations. This one wrong leads to many others. To top all of this, we have too few inspectors and the ones that we do have are not properly resourced. When we read about an inspection blitz this normally targets larger businesses in city centres and never reaches informal businesses. Of course, this also leads to businesses rather employing foreign nationals who have no papers at all. Because of the precarious situation that these foreigners find themselves in, we see silence from those individuals who are earning a pittance. This situation in turn leads to xenophobic reaction from South Africans who can't find jobs. Xenophobia is encouraged by community leaders and to a large degree some of the political parties. Instead of the government going all out to tackle unemployment they often find various ministries using foreign labour as the scapegoat. There is, however, light at the end of the tunnel. We are seeing fantastic news come out of our Home Affairs Department where they are encouraging and targeting certain industries to create jobs. Specific visas and a helping hand in the film industry is one such example. Another is where Minister Dean Macpherson has entered into agreements across the board including with foreign governments to engender job creation in the building industry. We've seen the Department of Agriculture doing everything necessary to ensure that our fresh produce is exported to other jurisdictions, despite the American tariffs. It is also extremely pleasing to see enormous efforts being driven in the Western Cape in the call centre industry including all types of beneficiation of our local goods. The Government of National Unity, although under threat, has at least given our economy a boost. Foreigners have been pouring money into various industries around the country. Organisations, such as the Federated Hospitality Association of Southern Africa, have stepped forward and applauded the introduction of two new visa categories. Our conferences and exhibitions sector are growing at an amazing pace. Our people are innovative and for the first time in many years I'm noticing small manufacturing businesses opening up. As the world stage becomes more and more complicated, our consumers are once again turning to home grown manufacture. All of us can play a part in buying South African-made goods and supporting local industry. It is always refreshing to see labels on goods stating, 'Made in South Africa!' | MICHAEL BAGRAIM Cape Town DAILY NEWS
Eyewitness News
5 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals
BRUSSELS - After keeping Donald Trump happy with a pledge to up defence spending at NATO's summit, Europe is now bracing for a key decision from the US president on the future of American forces on the continent. Washington is currently conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide -- set to be unveiled in coming months -- and the expectation is it will lead to drawdowns in Europe. That prospect is fraying the nerves of US allies, especially as fears swirl that Russia could look to attack a NATO country within the next few years if the war in Ukraine dies down. However, the alliance is basking in Trump's newfound goodwill following its June summit in The Hague, and his officials are making encouraging noises that Europe will not be left in the lurch. "We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe," said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, adding he expected the review to come out in "late summer, early fall". "I have daily conversations with our allies about the process," he said. While successive US governments have mulled scaling back in Europe to focus more on China, Trump has insisted more forcefully than his predecessors that the continent should handle its own defence. "There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe," said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. "The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast." When Trump returned to office in January many felt he was about to blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. But the vibe in NATO circles is now far more upbeat than those desperate days. "There's a sanguine mood, a lot of guesswork, but the early signals are quite positive," one senior European diplomat told AFP, talking as others on condition of anonymity. "Certainly no panic or doom and gloom." 'INEVITABLE' The Pentagon says there are nearly 85,000 US military personnel in Europe -- a number that has fluctuated between 75,000 and 105,000 since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. "I think it is inevitable that they pull out some of their forces," a second European diplomat told AFP. "But I don't expect this to be like a dramatic overhaul. I think it's going to be gradual. I think it's going to be based on consultations." Trump's first target is likely to be the troops left over from a surge ordered by his predecessor Joe Biden after Moscow's tanks rolled into Ukraine. Officials say relocating the rump of that 20,000-strong deployment would not hurt NATO's deterrence too much -- but alarm bells would ring if Trump looked to cut too deep into personnel numbers or close key bases. The issue is not just troop numbers -- the US has capabilities such as air defences, long-range missiles and satellite surveillance that allies would struggle to replace in the short-term. "The kinds of defence investments by Europe that are being made coming out of The Hague summit may only be felt in real capability terms over many years," said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund think tank. "So the question of timing really does matter." 'INOPPORTUNE MOMENT' Washington's desire to pull back from Europe may be tempered by Trump now taking a tougher line with Russia -- and Moscow's reluctance to bow to his demands to end the Ukraine war. "It seems an inopportune moment to send signals of weakness and reductions in the American security presence in Europe," Lesser said. He also pointed to Trump's struggles during his first term to pull troops out of Germany -- the potential bill for relocating them along with political resistance in Washington scuppering the plan. While European diplomats are feeling more confident than before about the troop review, they admit nothing can be certain with the mercurial US president. Other issues such as Washington's trade negotiations with the EU could rock transatlantic ties in the meantime and upend the good vibes. "It seems positive for now," said a third European diplomat. "But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease will start in 2026. To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage."
Daily Maverick
14 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
US and EU clinch deal with broad 15% tariffs on EU goods to avert trade war
Deal includes $600 billion EU investments in US, more EU energy, defence purchases 15% tariff better than threatened 30%, in deal mirroring Japan's US steel and aluminium tariffs remain at 50% By Andrew Gray and Andrea Shalal The announcement came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump at his golf course in western Scotland to push a hard-fought deal over the line. 'I think this is the biggest deal ever made,' Trump told reporters after an hour-long meeting with von der Leyen, who said the 15% tariff applied 'across the board'. 'We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world, and it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. It will bring stability. It will bring predictability,' she said. The deal, that also includes $600 billion of EU investments in the United States and significant EU purchases of U.S. energy and military equipment, will indeed bring clarity for EU companies. However, the baseline tariff of 15% will be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal, although it is better than the threatened 30% rate. The deal mirrors parts of the framework agreement the United States clinched with Japan last week. 'We are agreeing that the tariff… for automobiles and everything else will be a straight across tariff of 15%,' Trump said. However, the 15% baseline rate would not apply to steel and aluminium, for which a 50% tariff would remain in place. Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old U.S. trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of '90 deals in 90 days.' He has periodically railed against the European Union saying it was 'formed to screw the United States' on trade. Arriving in Scotland, Trump said that the EU wanted 'to make a deal very badly' and said, as he met von der Leyen, that Europe had been 'very unfair to the United States'. His main bugbear is the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached $235 billion, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The EU points to the U.S. surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance. Trump also talked on Sunday about the 'hundreds of billions of dollars' that tariffs were bringing in. On July 12, Trump threatened to apply a 30% tariff on imports from the EU starting on August 1, after weeks of negotiations with the major U.S. trading partners failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal. The EU had prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods in the event there was no deal and Trump had pressed ahead with 30% tariffs. Some member states had also pushed for the bloc to use its most powerful trade weapon, the anti-coercion instrument, to target U.S. services in the event of a no-deal.
