R. Kelly's lawyers seeking Trump pardon
"The president understands what it's like to be victimized by Obama and Biden era prosecution teams' intent on destroying public figures. He experienced that himself," Brindley continued, comparing the disgraced singer-songwriter to Trump.
"R. Kelly is now living with the consequences of the same kind of shameful and criminal prosecutorial tactics," the lawyer said.
R. Kelly's lawyers: 'Our client fears that he might be killed'
"President Trump has been fighting against this kind of criminal weaponization of the DOJ against public figures since he took office," Brindley added. "And we will ask him to now stand up with us as we advance his fight and as our client fears that he might be killed to cover up the corruption that we seek to expose."
In his statement, Brindley said the need for a pardon from Trump "becomes more imminent by the day," claiming that "immediately after our motion became public, Robert was thrown into solitary confinement" and he "cannot make phone calls to his family" nor does he have "access to commissary."
"He has spiders crawling over him while he tries to sleep," Kelly's lawyer claims. "He has not been able to eat in two days because he's afraid the chow hall food could be poisoned. And they refuse to give him anything else."
R. Kelly's lawyers say prison officials tried to plot his murder, requests release
"The worst of it is that they have told him that, as long as we keep up our investigation and our motions, it is only going to get worse for Robert," Brindley claimed. "This is why we need President Trump to step in now. He is the only force strong enough to quell the corruption before it gets worse."
R. Kelly's lawyers say prison officials tried to plot his murder, requests release
News of the pardon attempt comes a day after lawyers for the "I Believe I Can Fly" singer said on June 11 that Kelly should be moved from federal prison to home detention after an alleged murder-for-hire plot involving prison officials and an inmate.
"Federal officers have solicited the murder of R. Kelly because he intends to expose the corruption underlying his federal prosecutions. We have filed our motion to make sure that they fail," Brindley wrote in a statement to USA TODAY June 11.
"The only thing that can protect Mr. Kelly behind the prison walls now is the fact that now the world is watching," Brindley added. "And we will call on the courts and President Trump to help put an end to the corruption that now threatens Mr. Kelly's life."
The Bureau of Prisons declined to comment on "pending litigation or matters that are the subject of legal proceedings."
R. Kelly pardon attempt comes after Trump pardoned Chrisleys, NBA YoungBoy
The pardon attempt comes just weeks after a pair of star-studded pardons from Trump.
On May 27, Trump announced he was pardoning reality TV couple Todd and Julie Chrisley of "Chrisley Knows Best" fame. The pair were serving respective sentences for bank fraud. The Chrisleys have since been released and returned to their homes.
On May 28, Trump also pardoned Louisiana-born rapper NBA YoungBoy, whose real name is Kentrell Gaulden, who was serving a 23-month sentence for federal gun charges.
Kelly is serving his sentence in North Carolina after his 2021 and 2022 convictions for racketeering, sex trafficking, child pornography and enticement.
He was sentenced to 30 years in prison in a Brooklyn federal court in 2022 and 20 years in a Chicago federal court in 2023, to be served concurrently. One year from the latter sentence is set to be served consecutively.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
8 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Time to park our fears over Trump and use trip to smooth relations with UK
Record View says Trump won't be President forever - so we must play a long-term game to secure a key international relationship. Nobody should be surprised that President Trump's trip to Scotland will generate protests throughout the country. Now in his second term, Trump is a menace who has caused chaos at home and abroad. His inability to accept defeat to Joe Biden in 2020 undermined US democracy and his support for the January 6th insurrectionists was nauseating. He callously undermined President Zelensky on live TV and his fawning over Vladimir Putin is disgusting. The fact he is a convicted felon is another justification for Scots to take to the street. But we also have to separate the man from the office he holds. Scotland and the UK have strong ties with the US going back centuries. The UK and the US have fought wars together and share security intelligence in a way that keeps both countries safe. Trump was elected by over 70 million Americans and we must respect that. Furthering our economic interests is another reason for Keir Starmer and John Swinney to meet Trump. His tariffs are akin to a wrecking ball and if positive relations with Trump reduce the levies, so be it. Starmer seems to have the ear of the President and using leverage with him on Gaza and Ukraine would be sensible. Trump is a difficult man with a volatile temper who doesn't like being challenged. But the UK is adept at soft power and the five-day trip should be used to smooth relations with the UK, not aggravate them. He won't be President forever so we must play a long-term game to secure a key international relationship. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Sort out compo The eye-watering sums paid out by Police Scotland in employment tribunal cases should give cause for concern at a time when it's strapped for cash and making savings. The non-disclosure agreements signed by both parties just adds to the air of secrecy surrounding these claims. The robust nature of police work means there will always be staff grievances and complaints from the public. However Scotland's opposition parties are right to raise concerns that monies paid in compensation mean less cash for frontline policing and crime fighting. While the Scottish Police Federation, which represents most of the claimants, says the force needs to act quicker when they come to it with complaints. The Scottish government in turn insists it brought in new legislation to improve the complaints system. Politicians and police should get round the table and fix this once and for all. We are sure the public would not complain about that.
The Herald Scotland
44 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump targets Ivy League colleges after $220M Columbia deal
His administration's unprecedented deal with Columbia University in New York City has put many of its Ivy League peers in a tough spot. To shake the target off its back and unpause research funding, Columbia agreed on July 23 to pay fines of more than $220 million (and signed on to a sprawling list of other concessions related to admissions, academics and hiring practices). The accord has unnerved leaders at college campuses across the country. "This has opened up a Pandora's box," said Scott Schneider, an attorney and expert in higher education law. Read more: The details of Columbia's extraordinary $220 million deal with Trump, explained Trump, who has halted billions in research grants to a slew of schools, has said he envisions the Columbia deal as the first of many such agreements. His education secretary, Linda McMahon, called it a blueprint for other institutions to follow. Read more: After $220 million Columbia deal, Trump promises more to come "Columbia's reforms are a roadmap for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public," she said in a statement. While it's unclear whether the agreement has set a new precedent, the Trump administration is pushing for other colleges to pay similar types of fines, a White House official confirmed to USA TODAY. Some onlookers, including Larry Summers, a former president of Harvard, have lauded the deal. He called it an "excellent template" for resolutions with the administration. But critics such as Brendan Cantwell, a higher education professor at Michigan State University, believe the short-term benefits of conceding to broad demands from the Trump administration are not worth the long-term implications of redefining the relationship between the federal government and higher education. Still, he understands the arguments of people like Summers. When colleges choose to fight, he acknowledged, "individual people are going to be hurt." "And maybe that's an unacceptable cost," he said. Trump's other deal: the University of Pennsylvania Columbia isn't the only Ivy League school to strike a deal with the Trump administration this summer. On July 1, the University of Pennsylvania, the president's alma mater in Philadelphia, entered into an agreement ending a civil rights investigation brought by the U.S. Department of Education. In February, the agency accused Penn of violating Title IX, the primary sex discrimination law governing schools, when it allowed Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer, to compete in 2022. By March, professors were told their research projects had lost funding. The school's president said $175 million in grants and programs had been jeopardized. As part of the deal, the White House said it would restore Penn's research funding. In return, the university apologized to cisgender athletes who swam against Thomas. The university also agreed to ban transgender women from sports. (Trans women athletes have been banned from competing on women's teams at National Collegiate Athletic Association schools since February, when new rules were imposed, although the NCAA's policy permits trans men to compete in men's sports.) Read more: Lia Thomas, Title IX and $175M -- why Penn struck a deal with Trump Weeks after the deal was announced, many Penn faculty members remain in limbo, unsure about which grants have been revived. "Nobody really knows what was cut and what was restored," said Jonathan Zimmerman, a professor who studies the history of education at the university. "It feels like the theater of the absurd." Harvard keeps fighting Harvard, unlike the other Ivy League campuses immersed in similar conflicts, has continued to battle the Trump administration in court. At a key hearing in Boston on July 21, the university's lawyers urged a federal judge to force the White House to restore billions in funding for the school. Harvard has asked the judge to reach a decision by Sept. 3. But the White House's attacks on Harvard have extended far beyond money for research: The Trump administration has threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status, tried to ban its ability to enroll international students, warned its accreditor, and considered placing a lien on the university's assets. All the while, Trump has hinted he believes Harvard may still be open to coming to a deal. Other colleges in limbo Of the eight schools that make up the Ivy League, only two - Dartmouth College in New Hampshire and Yale University in Connecticut - have avoided targeted federal funding freezes. At Cornell, the government paused more than $1 billion. At Brown, it froze $510 million, and at Princeton it stopped more than $210 million. Asked whether their university leaders were negotiating with the Trump administration to restore their funding, spokespeople for Brown, Cornell and Princeton declined to comment or did not respond to requests for comment. Additional agreements with those schools (and others) could happen before the start of the year, according to Robert Kelchen, a higher education professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Trump, plagued by heightened attention to the president's reported ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, may be looking for ways to change the narrative, Kelchen said. And some schools might feel incentivized to resolve funding problems before students - and protests - return to campus for the fall. "The whole Epstein thing really has the potential to swamp the administration," he said. "They want victories they can point to." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
The Herald Scotland
44 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
TikTok ban: App goes dark if China doesn't agree to US deal
"If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." When asked if the potential agreement is a part of current trade talks with China, Lutnick said it was being discussed, but "not officially." "You can't really go meet somebody and not bring up the topics that are open," Lutnick said during the interview. "It's not officially a part of it, but unofficially, of course, it's going to be discussed. Neither TikTok nor the White House immediately responded for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on July 24. TikTok: Trump signs executive order delaying ban on TikTok - again When could TikTok go dark in the US? The next deadline for TikTok to be sold from ByteDance is Sept. 17. Trump signed an executive order, the third of its kind, to extend the deadline in June. Why could TikTok get banned? TikTok's future in the United States has been up in the air for months. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden. For years, some government officials have been concerned that TikTok is a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. Three times now, Trump has signed executive orders that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
