A Pixel 8 was left in a hot tub for four days, here's what happened
TL;DR A Pixel 8 owner lost their phone during vacation.
Their device was found four days later, submerged in a hot tub.
The phone continues to work without issue.
There are plenty of mishaps that can occur while on travel, but one of the worst may arguably be losing your phone. A Pixel 8 owner recently found themselves in just such a situation. In what turned out to be a real-life stress test, the ending to this story is quite surprising.
According to Reddit user Intrepid-Ad3513, to celebrate a holiday and four additional days off, they traveled to Poland with a group of friends. While on vacation, the group stayed at an Airbnb with various amenities, including a hot tub. The Redditor states that one night, they got so drunk that they lost their Pixel 8 on the first day of the trip. Despite searching for it, the group was unable to locate the missing device.
On the fifth day, as the group headed back home, Intrepid-AD3513 was surprised by a video the Airbnb owner sent them. The video showed the owner fishing the missing Pixel 8 out of the hot tub. The Redditor mentions that the water in the hot tub reached up to 45 degrees Celsius (113 degrees Fahrenheit).
After finding the phone, the Airbnb owner packaged the Pixel 8 up and sent it to Intrepid-AD3513. In a huge upset to expectations, the phone was still in working order after the user unwrapped the package and plugged the device into the charger. The user also shared an image of the handset working without issue.
The Pixel 8 has an IP68 rating, meaning it can prevent ingress of dust and protect against water for long periods of time. However, this rating is for 30 minutes of water immersion, not four days. So, the fact that the phone seems perfectly intact is astonishing.
One commenter jokes that the water was probably keeping the device cooler than usual, as Pixel phones are commonly known to get warm. The Redditor says that they wrote the post with their Pixel 8 and that, 'I will never buy another phone other than a Pixel.'
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Celebrus Technologies plc's (LON:CLBS) Stock Is Going Strong: Is the Market Following Fundamentals?
Celebrus Technologies' (LON:CLBS) stock is up by a considerable 22% over the past month. Given the company's impressive performance, we decided to study its financial indicators more closely as a company's financial health over the long-term usually dictates market outcomes. In this article, we decided to focus on Celebrus Technologies' ROE. Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. How To Calculate Return On Equity? The formula for return on equity is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Celebrus Technologies is: 15% = UK£6.4m ÷ UK£43m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every £1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn £0.15 in profit. Check out our latest analysis for Celebrus Technologies Why Is ROE Important For Earnings Growth? We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. Based on how much of its profits the company chooses to reinvest or "retain", we are then able to evaluate a company's future ability to generate profits. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes. Celebrus Technologies' Earnings Growth And 15% ROE To begin with, Celebrus Technologies seems to have a respectable ROE. Yet, the fact that the company's ROE is lower than the industry average of 20% does temper our expectations. Celebrus Technologies was still able to see a decent net income growth of 13% over the past five years. We reckon that there could be other factors at play here. Such as - high earnings retention or an efficient management in place. However, not to forget, the company does have a decent ROE to begin with, just that it is lower than the industry average. So this also does lend some color to the fairly high earnings growth seen by the company. As a next step, we compared Celebrus Technologies' net income growth with the industry, and pleasingly, we found that the growth seen by the company is higher than the average industry growth of 10.0%. Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). Doing so will help them establish if the stock's future looks promising or ominous. Has the market priced in the future outlook for CLBS? You can find out in our latest intrinsic value infographic research report. Is Celebrus Technologies Making Efficient Use Of Its Profits? Celebrus Technologies has a three-year median payout ratio of 33%, which implies that it retains the remaining 67% of its profits. This suggests that its dividend is well covered, and given the decent growth seen by the company, it looks like management is reinvesting its earnings efficiently. Moreover, Celebrus Technologies is determined to keep sharing its profits with shareholders which we infer from its long history of paying a dividend for at least ten years. Based on the latest analysts' estimates, we found that the company's future payout ratio over the next three years is expected to hold steady at 35%. However, Celebrus Technologies' future ROE is expected to decline to 10% despite there being not much change anticipated in the company's payout ratio. Summary On the whole, we feel that Celebrus Technologies' performance has been quite good. Specifically, we like that it has been reinvesting a high portion of its profits at a moderate rate of return, resulting in earnings expansion. With that said, on studying the latest analyst forecasts, we found that while the company has seen growth in its past earnings, analysts expect its future earnings to shrink. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Android Authority
25 minutes ago
- Android Authority
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is my first foldable phone, and it totally caught me off guard
Adamya Sharma / Android Authority I've handled every foldable phone Samsung has ever launched. I have admired their engineering. I have watched with jealousy as people at airport lounges and hotel lobbies dramatically unfold their devices like they were unfolding a future I have purposely denied myself. But despite my curiosity and awe, I've stayed far, far away from foldables, especially book-style devices. Samsung's flip phones still felt closer to home for someone like me who's used only slab phones all their life, but larger foldables are where I inevitably drew the line for many reasons. Early foldable models from Samsung had their fair share of red flags, be it peeling screen protectors, fragile hinges, a deep and distracting crease, and apps that behaved like they forgot what display size they were on. The phones also felt bulky and awkward, with their outer screens too cramped to be useful. But something changed with last year's Galaxy Z Fold 6. It was slimmer, lighter, and finally looked like it belonged in a regular person's hand. Still, it wasn't enough to make me want to cough up the kind of money that could buy a midrange phone and a holiday. Enter the Galaxy Z Fold 7. I assumed I'd enjoy the novelty for a few days and then smoothly return to my trusty candy bars. The new Fold 7 is the first book-style foldable I've used as my daily driver and primary phone. Like most of you, I've been firmly in the slab phone camp for years and am currently rotating between the Pixel 8 Pro, Pixel 9a, and iPhone 16 Pro. And while I don't mind splurging on a flagship that truly impresses me, a phone as expensive as a Samsung Fold has to seriously deliver to justify the price. So when Samsung handed me a Fold 7 to try out, I assumed I'd enjoy the novelty for a few days and then smoothly return to my trusty candy bars. But what happened next caught me completely off guard. Folding old habits Adamya Sharma / Android Authority After using the Galaxy Z Fold 7 for over a week now, I've had to unlearn over a decade's worth of slab-phone instincts. Nobody tells you just how much of a shift it is. For one, I initially found myself clinging to the familiar. I was defaulting more often to the outer screen and resisting the full experience. But within a day or so, the Fold 7 made it easier to let go of old habits. I've had to unlearn over a decade's worth of slab-phone instincts. The phone is incredibly skinny. At just 215 grams, it's lighter than the iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Galaxy S25 Ultra. I just couldn't wrap my head around it, but I gladly wrapped both hands around it. Speaking of which, if you're thinking of getting Samsung's latest foldable phone and are new to the experience like me, get ready to have your hands occupied more often than not. Sure, One UI offers enough tricks to manage one-handed use, like seamless screen transitions, the new Now Bar, and a dead-simple one-handed mode, but you'll still end up needing your other hand if you want to properly enjoy that beautiful 8-inch AMOLED display. It's addictive in the best way. Just like reading a book, you'll default to both hands most of the time, but you won't mind it. The crease took me by surprise. While we're on the topic of the displays, the crease took me by surprise. Not because I hated it, like I was expecting to, but because I hardly felt bothered by it. Yes, the crease running down the middle of the main screen is still there. It's more noticeable on darker backgrounds than lighter ones, but honestly, it didn't take away from my experience of navigating the UI, watching videos, reading, or generally doing anything on the big screen. You really only feel it when you swipe your finger across the inner screen and notice the dip. I got used to it surprisingly quickly and didn't feel like it was a huge distraction. Samsung has also made the inner Ultra-Thin Glass (UTG) 50% thicker this time, which makes the screen feel sturdier and adds a more premium touch compared to the earlier models I've tried. Grip woes and going case-free C. Scott Brown / Android Authority If you're used to bracing a slab phone with one hand, get ready to adjust. With the thin devices like the Galaxy Z Fold 7, there's not much frame to hold onto when unfolded, and your fingers inevitably land somewhere on the screen. It takes a while to retrain your grip. I've even considered buying one of those ring holders to get a good one-handed grip on the device in its unfolded state. I guess this is where a case would make all the difference, but that's another thing I'm struggling with at the moment. When it comes to slapping a case on the Galaxy Z Fold 7, I've gone rogue. When it comes to slapping a case on the Galaxy Z Fold 7, I've gone rogue. The phone feels so good in hand that covering it up with plastic just feels like a crime against its design. I know this decision could come back to bite me in the future, but for now, I'm staying case-free. That said, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 definitely feels more delicate than my usual slab phones. The barrage of warnings that popped up during the setup didn't exactly calm my nerves. It's so slim and lightweight, it practically screams 'handle with care.' But then I remind myself, it's not totally defenseless. With Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 on the front, Victus 2 on the back, and a sturdy Armor Aluminum frame, I'm not exactly taking a swim without a life vest. The IP48 rating? Well, it's… something. I'm still not taking this thing anywhere near a beach unless it's in a ziplock bag, but given its improved design, with barely any visible gap when folded, the Fold 7 does seem to keep dust from entering the inner screen, which was one of my biggest worries. Built for work, multitasking, and killing my Kindle Adamya Sharma / Android Authority Now here's where things get fun. I'm doing way more on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 than I ever did on my slab phones. It really is the multitasking machine it's advertised to be. I've never been this productive on a phone. Asana and Slack are the two apps I use back and forth all the time for my work, and opening them simultaneously on one screen, without having to squint my way through the experience, was just sublime. I can even add a third app, like WordPress, to the mix without cluttering the display. That's because on the Galaxy Z Fold 7, you can adjust the size of each multitasking window, a neat touch that allows me to give more space to the app I am focused on, while the others hang around in smaller windows. Unlike typical split-screen tricks on other phones, multitasking actually feels usable here, and dare I say, elegant. The Fold 7 is the Kindle replacement I didn't know I was waiting for. Thanks to Samsung's close collaboration with Google, even AI features like Circle to Search queries and Gemini Live sessions have become smoother and more immersive on the large screen. Reading is also a joy again. The Fold 7 is the Kindle replacement I didn't know I was waiting for. I won't deny the appeal of E-Ink readers for comfort, battery life, and fewer distractions, but getting that book-like experience without needing a separate device has genuinely reignited my reading habit. Streaming, mistouches, and mild annoyances Amazon Prime video in Flex Mode on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 Netflix in Flex Mode on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 Of course, no tech is perfect. One area where I ran into issues was streaming. I watch a lot of content on my phone, and while apps like Netflix and YouTube are well-optimized for both the inner and outer displays and handle transitions between them smoothly, others, like Prime Video, Apple TV, and some local streaming apps here in my country, aren't quite there yet. As shown in the images above, all streaming apps are also not optimized to use the phone's Flex Mode. I've never appreciated the screen lock feature on streaming apps more than I have on the Fold 7. Moreover, I've never appreciated the screen lock feature some streaming apps offer more than I have on the Fold 7. As I mentioned earlier, there's very little frame to grip when the phone is unfolded, so it's easy to accidentally tap the screen while just holding the device. On apps like Prime Video, which don't offer a screen lock while watching content, this leads to constant interruptions, whether it's the X-Ray feature or the playback controls popping up every time your finger brushes the display. That said, One UI does let you adjust the aspect ratio on a per-app basis, which sometimes helps improve the viewing experience on apps that don't scale properly to the large screen, but isn't always an ideal solution. Why the Galaxy Z Fold 7 changed my mind C. Scott Brown / Android Authority After years of watching foldables mature from a distance, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 finally feels like a device designed not only for tech enthusiasts but for anyone looking to buy a premium smartphone. It's sleeker, lighter, and more durable, has a good set of cameras (more on that in our upcoming review), and is more thoughtfully made than any Fold before it. The improvements in app continuity, multitasking, and hardware make the form factor more appealing than ever before. I still wouldn't switch to a foldable from any other brand, though. Samsung's One UI is a huge part of what makes this experience work. The UI feels well-tailored to the foldable form factor, yet is familiar enough for anyone who has ever used a Samsung phone. Add to that the promise of seven years of updates and a robust ecosystem with Galaxy Watches, Buds, tablets, and more that talk to each other, and you've got a compelling reason to stay in Samsung's corner. Sure, foldables from HONOR, vivo, HUAWEI, and others are also pretty impressive. But I'm not ready to give up that polished, fully-integrated Samsung experience for the unknown. Not when I've only just now come around to the idea of switching from a trusty slab to a foldable phone. For the first time since foldables became a thing, I'm seriously thinking — yeah, this one is worth the plunge. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Thinnest, lightest Z Fold to date • More durable design • 200MP primary camera • Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy MSRP: $1,999.99 Thin, light, high-powered, and it folds! The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 offers an 8-inch OLED screen, a 200MP camera, the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chipset, and a 4,400mAh battery. The Galaxy AI experience is baked in, offering tools across the camera, Circle to Search, and much more. Best of all, Samsung continues to evolve their fold folding hinge assembly, promising reduced visibility of the crease. See price at Amazon See price at Samsung See price at Amazon Save $420.00
WIRED
26 minutes ago
- WIRED
This Is the Commodore Comeback Fans Have Waited for—but the Odds Are Still Against It
After years of mismanagement and questionable product tie-ins, the 80s computer brand is back, now with a fan at the helm. But is the appetite for retro gaming still big enough for it to succeed? The Commodore 64U Starlight Courtesy of Commodore In 1994, Commodore crashed and burned. Once a home computing giant across the US and Europe, the company was undone by mismanagement and misfires. The carcass was picked clean and the pieces resold so many times that it was hard to keep track, but with each new owner came the inevitable—an attempt to make a fast buck by slapping the famous C= logo on any old junk. Fans watched in horror as the brand appeared on the mediocre all-in-one PC, the bizarrely named Gravel in Pocket media player, and the Commodore smartphone. There was even a Commodore-branded shredder. So when retro gaming YouTuber Christian 'Perifractic' Simpson announced he wanted to buy what remained of Commodore and give it a new life, questions were asked. Chief among them: does the world still even need Commodore? When I'm 64 Commodore as a brand initially focused on typewriters and calculators, but its glory days arrived with the rise of home micros, causing a swift rebirth as Commodore International Computing. Its biggest success was the Commodore 64, which hit the sweet spot between affordability and potential. While the CPU was sluggish, powerful graphics and a surprisingly capable sound chip (which remains revered today) spurred creativity on both sides of the Atlantic. Over 5,000 commercial games were released during the machine's heyday, and more than 15 million units were sold, making the C64 still one of the highest-selling single computer models ever. It's this legacy Simpson aims to revive. Initially, he sought a licensing deal with the Commodore brand owners, imagining 'official' boards and replacement components as part of an inclusive, community-friendly conglomerate. These plans snowballed during discussions, and Simpson found himself securing an agreement to buy Commodore outright for a 'low seven-figure' sum. He now serves as Commodore CEO and promises to revive the company in a sustainable way—one that won't repeat the failures of the past. But here's where things get tricky. Simpson doesn't actually own the original company because that company no longer exists. Commodore's 1990s dismemberment means the current iteration owns a number of trademarks, but essential parts of the ecosystem remain scattered. C64 ROMs and Amiga (Commodore's 16-bit micro) rights belong to Cloanto and Amiga Corporation. AmigaOS is controlled by Hyperion Entertainment. And aside from the odd mass-market flirtation from clone machines, like the C64DTV all-in-one joystick and the plug-and-play THEC64 Mini, major developments that mattered for the past 30 years have all come from the community, not the brand. Computers for the Masses It's for these reasons Simpson finds himself walking multiple tightropes. He must avoid alienating enthusiasts that kept the Commodore flame alive, and not imply that only his new Commodore confers legitimacy. He must collaborate closely with owners of other key puzzle pieces and license the Commodore brand fairly to interested third parties. And to recoup that seven-figure sum, the new Commodore must sell enough new hardware, which means moving beyond a dwindling core fanbase. For now, Simpson's initial play banks heavily on nostalgia—not solely for the C64, but for an entire era. The new Commodore website pitches the company as a 'digital detox brand [that's] grounded in digital minimalism.' It rails against social media, glorifies the good old days of 'techno optimism'—apparently, the 1980s through to the mid-1990s—and hints that Commodore can help users reclaim their childhoods. But the company also wants to be seen as an innovator with an eye on the future, and this results in a kind of branding whiplash. The new Commodore wants to be both reboot and original; past and future. Fittingly, this iteration's debut product, the Commodore 64 Ultimate, embodies such tensions. The $500 gold-bling Founders Edition and $350 LED-laden disco case Starlight Edition don't exactly scream digital minimalism. But the $300 BASIC Beige is the spitting image of the original hardware. All models bridge authenticity and modernity by supporting original C64 peripherals and current connectivity, including 1080p HDMI output so you needn't hunt down a CRT TV. Inside, it's all FPGAS—field programmable gate arrays—which ultimately mean simulation rather than the less-accurate emulation found in Chinese retro handhelds and cheap plug-and-play TV devices. Some critics nonetheless grumble that even this 'new' machine is past and present in another way, effectively being an amalgamation of existing products, from the keycaps to the having the Ultimate64 board at its core. However, Ultimate64 creator Gideon Zweijtzer has publicly disagreed that Simpson is merely assembling other people's hard work and slapping on a logo. He believes the Commodore 64 Ultimate was a 'joint effort between parties to create a cohesive package' and credits Simpson as someone with reach who can 'bring people together.' The $64,000 Question That reach will be essential because noble efforts, sentiment, and saying the right thing won't bring sustainability. Even pent-up demand for a new Commodore 64—at the time of writing, over 4000 units have been sold, amounting to $1.5 million in revenue—is a one-off trick that can't be repeated. History shows retro appeal can be short-lived. Outside the hardcore enthusiasts, fans tend to rapidly move beyond rose-tinted, wide-eyed nostalgia; the retro devices they've bought then gather dust. Few remain on sale for long because the market is finite and fickle. And then, there's the question of games. A large slice of the annual retro gaming market—estimated to be around $2.5 billion, though no one has a great handle on the numbers—comes from software rather than hardware. The issue for Commodore here is that it never released any notable games of its own, so it can't mimic Atari's ability to remake the Atari 2600 with modern connectivity while also reimagining 1980s classics like Pong and Missile Command . And even if Commodore were to license games, nothing in the entire C64 catalog has the cultural clout of Pac-Man , Space Invaders , Sonic the Hedgehog , or Super Mario Bros . The Commodore 64 Ultimate menu. The alternate mainstream option would be an attempt to reestablish Commodore's reputation as a brand that offers computing for the masses, not the classes, ringing in Simpson's desire for a 'simpler, distraction-free computing experience.' But what would that mean in practice? Unplugging? Educational and creative tools? Commodore 64 BASIC is notoriously bad, and it's unclear whether enough newcomers will see value in a relatively expensive beige retro box when a Raspberry Pi costs a fraction of the price and can tap into a massive existing ecosystem. But an entirely new platform would be a colossally risky endeavor. The Last Byte of a Legend What is the endgame, then? Without hit games and obvious mainstream appeal, how does Commodore survive, let alone thrive? Is it even possible for this 1980s cultural icon to move beyond people who were there at the time and break out of its bubble? It's hard to say. Perhaps it doesn't have to. Simpson envisions a 'single, joined-up family of Commodore machines,' and that could be enough. Commodore would become a community-focused brand, presiding over a modest ecosystem, acting as a benevolent curator that elevates quality projects, brings just enough polish and legitimacy to help the scene flourish, and simply refuses to let the legacy fade. Although investors who've pumped in cash might see things differently. A much worse scenario would be a repeat of the past: panic over income, leading to the brand again being stamped on unremarkable products, or the mismanagement and misfires that alienate partners and fans. There's also the very real possibility that Commodore might just discover the harsh reality of being a very niche, small player in an industry of giants. Any one of those could deal a final, fatal blow to the brand from which it would never recover, taking down swathes of the community with it. Still, this time feels different. This revival doesn't come from cynicism but from genuine passion and love for the brand. Even so, the odds of success feel slim, whether that means sparking a new wave of computing optimism or returning the brand to cultural relevance. But for a while at least, fans can remain optimistic this might finally be the play that truly brings Commodore back to life.
