UFL, UFL players sign CBA through 2026
The spring league announced on Monday that a new Collective Bargaining Agreement has been signed with the UFL Players Association. The agreement runs through 2026.
Among other things, the new agreement increases salaries and provides full-year health insurance.
'We have reached a Collective Bargaining Agreement with the UFPA,' UFL president and CEO Russ Brandon said. 'We look forward to continuing to work with our players to grow professional spring football at the UFL.'
It was critical to avoid a work stoppage or other labor issues. For both sides. The UFL still faces a steep uphill climb to become sustainable over the long haul. If there's no league, it doesn't matter what the players are getting paid.
The main measurements are down from last year to this year. This weekend, the St. Louis Battlehawks slipped under 30,000 fans for a home game for the first time since the UFL launched in 2024. The Houston Roughnecks drew a paltry 4,134 for a Week 6 game against the Memphis Showboats.
Viewing audiences are down as well. And while it's easy to blame the small numbers on the fact that every weekend of the UFL season has had plenty of other sports on TV, the same alternatives existed in 2024.
We hope the UFL finds its footing. We hope it can cultivate some star power. It's not nearly enough to play games that are almost as good as NFL action. To thrive — and before that, survive — the UFL needs to get people to seek out the games.
The biggest challenge, for all spring football leagues past, present, and future, is a simple one. It's difficult to get people to care about football when it's not football season.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
21 hours ago
- NBC Sports
Bill Polian underscores the influence of the NFL's Management Council on player contracts
The truth often gets told when the topic has changed. In the 61-page collusion ruling, arbitrator Christopher Droney accepted the obvious, self-serving denials from owners and other NFL-aligned witnesses who insisted that the NFL's Management Council does not compel teams to act against their interests. In so doing, Droney ignored strong circumstantial evidence that teams did indeed accept the Management Council's encouragement to restrict fully-guaranteed contracts. In a new article from John Keim of regarding training-camp holdouts, Hall of Fame G.M. Bill Polian said something that undercuts one of the front-line arguments made by the league in defending against the claim that teams did indeed collude. 'You took so many slings and arrows publicly,' Polian told Keim regarding the holdout experience. 'Guys will call up and say, 'Hey, I really empathize with you. This is terrible.' Other people will offer advice: 'Hey, don't cave on this one. This is really important.' On occasion, [NFL] management council will step in.' Wait, what? 'Management Council will step in.' How? When? Most importantly, why? Why would Management Council have anything to say to a team that is holding the rope in a holdout situation? Why would Management Council care if the team blinks on one or more terms that could, in theory, become the start of a new trend? (Such as, you know, the player holding out wanting a fully-guaranteed contract?) Consider this sworn testimony from Giants co-owner and longtime chair of the Management Council's Executive Committee, John Mara, regarding the claim that Management Council doesn't tell teams what to do: 'I'm not going to be told what to do in terms of an individual player contract by anybody from Management Council or by anybody from another club. . . . [T]he thought that I'm going to be influenced by what another owner is saying to me is just absurd.' If that's absurd, it's equally absurd for Management Council to 'step in' during a holdout. And let's apply common sense here. Why would Management Council step in? Would it be to talk sense into a given team in an effort to get them to cave to the player's demands? Or would it be to 'encourage' (there's that word again) the team to remain firm and stand tall and not let a player or his agent score a term that will then be used in other negotiations for other players with other teams? Management Council exists in part to ensure coordination (i.e., collusion) when it comes to contractual trends. For instance, I've argued over the years that franchise quarterbacks should be paid not a set salary but a fixed percentage of the salary cap. The Collective Bargaining Agreement allows it. When asking around about it in the past, multiple sources from multiple teams said, essentially, 'Management Council would never allow it.' Management Council's influence is far stronger than the evidence fed to Droney would suggest. When Management Council 'encourages,' the teams ignore the urging at their own risk. Indeed, what happened after Management Council, sparked by the fully-guaranteed Deshaun Watson contract, encouraged teams to not fully guarantee deals? Kyler Murray didn't get one. Russell Wilson didn't get one. Lamar Jackson. That neutralized the threat. It also helped that Watson's contract has been a disaster for the Browns. The collusion case could still be a disaster for the NFL. The appeal is apparently happening, even though the NFLPA has suddenly decided to not respond to any questions from PFT, regarding the collusion case or any other topic.
USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
NBA two-way contracts: Tracking players signed for the 2025-26 season
The NBA and NBPA introduced two-way contracts beginning in 2017 to enable teams to carry additional players on their rosters who have fewer than four years of experience. Teams were initially allowed to sign up to two players on two-way contracts. The league eventually gave teams the option to sign a third player to a two-way contract starting with the 2023-24 season as part of the new Collective Bargaining Agreement. Players signed to two-way contracts split their time between the NBA and the G League. They are eligible to be active for up to 50 games in the NBA and will earn $636,435 during the upcoming season, equal to 50% of the minimum salary applicable to a player with zero years of service. With the majority of free agent signings completed, teams' rosters are mostly filled following the conclusion of the NBA Summer League. Teams will work to sign additional players for training camp and likely fill their remaining two-way contracts before the start of the season on Oct. 21. Here is every player currently on a two-way contract: Atlanta Hawks Boston Celtics Note: Max Shulga, who has yet to sign, reportedly agreed to a two-way contract Brooklyn Nets Charlotte Hornets Chicago Bulls Cleveland Cavaliers Dallas Mavericks Denver Nuggets Detroit Pistons Golden State Warriors Houston Rockets Indiana Pacers LA Clippers Los Angeles Lakers Memphis Grizzlies Miami Heat Milwaukee Bucks Minnesota Timberwolves New Orleans Pelicans New York Knicks Oklahoma City Thunder Orlando Magic Philadelphia 76ers Phoenix Suns Portland Trail Blazers Sacramento Kings San Antonio Spurs Toronto Raptors Utah Jazz Washington Wizards
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
UFL relocating Michigan Panthers out of Detroit, report says
The Michigan Panthers, which was founded in 2022, may be relocating out of Detroit, according to a report. Pro Football Newsroom's James Larsen first reported on the relocation. A source could not confirm whether the team was moving but told CBS News Detroit that six of seven people at the franchise's front office were laid off, which was considered to be unexpected. In a statement, the UFL said, "Every year, the League office looks at planning for next season and beyond. At this point, we have nothing to report on any unauthorized speculation." "What we're seeing this year is a much larger percentage of full timers being let go from their roles, and folks that need year-round jobs if you want your market to survive," Larsen told CBS News Detroit. Larsen says this includes marketing and ticket sales personnel who boasted some of the best attendance improvements in the league last season for the Panthers. "They had a 43.6% average attendance increase compared to 2024. If you're doing stuff like that and you're still getting fired, that goes to show the league has zero interest in being in this market going forward," he said. Fans can still put $50 deposits down on 2026 season tickets; however, it is unclear if there have been discussions about hosting future Panthers games at Ford Field. Larsen says the league could be moving the franchise out of Detroit due to the cost of playing there. "Ford Field is the most expensive venue the UFL has. If Michigan had won the division, they still wouldn't have been able to play that playoff game at Ford Field because of how expensive it is," he said. Larsen reported similar layoffs at the other three teams in the USFL conference (Birmingham Stallions, Houston Roughnecks, Memphis Showboats), which he reports are also subject to relocation. He says Detroit stands out due to the timing of the alleged layoffs amid an impressive period of growth. If the team does move, Larsen reports that the league could be eyeing new markets in Ohio, Idaho, Florida and Kentucky.
