logo
Bitcoin's Sons of Liberty

Bitcoin's Sons of Liberty

Coin Geek01-07-2025
Homepage > News > Editorial > Bitcoin's Sons of Liberty
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
This week, America again drapes itself in red, white, and blue.
We'll wave flags, ignite fireworks, and watch fighter jets streak overhead to celebrate our so-called Independence Day. But like most things, the popular story is a cleaner, sanitized version of the hidden truth.
We're taught the Revolution was sparked by a trifling tax on tea—which is not entirely untrue—or that a ragtag band of patriots threw off the yoke of tyranny in a single glorious summer. What we don't mention is that today, the average American surrenders more than half of their income to a government that props up military bases in 80 countries and funds both sides of nearly every war on earth. All while we cheer and toast our 'freedoms' or 'spreading freedom.'
But July 4, 1776, wasn't magic.
It was the violent culmination of decades of resentment: the debt from the French and Indian War, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts, the Boston Massacre… It was mobs dumping East India Company tea into the harbor. It was the First Continental Congress unsure how to even coordinate a militia. It was Lexington and Concord, and finally, Thomas Jefferson's pen slashing ink across paper in a defiant break with the greatest empire the world had ever seen while Ben Franklin and John Adams dictated anecdotes about freedom from tyranny!
The war that followed was unpopular. Loyalists preferred stability over liberty. Pacifists prayed for calm. Many farmers simply wanted to be left alone. The Founding Fathers themselves were a patchwork of contradictions. John Adams was a stern Puritan lawyer. His cousin Sam was a brewer and professional agitator who spent his time pamphleting and making fun of British soldiers in public.
'If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude more than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace.
We ask not your counsels nor your arms.
Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.
May your chains rest lightly upon you, and may… — Naval (@naval) September 27, 2024
Ben Franklin was a printer, a wit, and a legendary womanizer in France. Patrick Henry thundered about liberty or death from the pulpit. George Washington was a stoic, aristocratic Brit who was a slaveholding land baron who reluctantly took up the general's sword. John Hancock was a merchant and smuggler. The British would likely have called him a pirate, and he signed his name large enough on the Declaration of Independence so that King George could read it 'without spectacles!'
.@pmarca on @joerogan:
'Ben Franklin printed newspapers before he was in govt. He had 15 pseudonyms. He was a pseud, an anon. He would have them argue with each other w/o telling people it was him.'
Nothing's changed. Burners and alt even then. Today's BF tweets among us! pic.twitter.com/jblRwqNpvl — JT (@jiratickets) November 27, 2024
They didn't share a monolithic faith or a single economic theory. They were Protestants, Catholics, Freemasons, deists, and even skeptics. But they all agreed on one core truth:
The Crown was wrong, and liberty was worth dying for.
Here's where my historian's heart breaks
The Revolution was short-lived. From 1783 to roughly 1789, the former colonies operated as truly independent states, loosely knit under the Articles of Confederation. Each was a sovereign little republic. But the old dream died quickly. The Constitutional Convention—originally convened just to tweak the Articles—turned into a quiet coup d'etat. Many founders, horrified at the power grabs proposed, walked out. The rest were locked in until they emerged with a compromise: a powerful central government, a Supreme Court designed to be an unaccountable aristocracy, the right to levy taxes, and eventually, the machinery for a central bank.
To sell it, they dangled the Bill of Rights, but it was a thin guarantee against abuses they knew were inevitable. The propaganda was masterful. The Federalists won. And the Revolution, in many ways, was lost right in front of the men who had won it just a few years earlier.
Before the United States Constitution was ratified, the Founding Fathers famously debated the merits and problems of the newly proposed government in a series of public essays that came to be known as the Federalist and Antifederalist Papers.
In this animated documentary,… pic.twitter.com/9QejwANH7l — Federalist Society (@FedSoc) September 21, 2023
In truth, the real Independence lasted less than a decade.
Back then, pamphlets were the blockchain of rebellion. Ben Franklin published scathing essays under aliases like 'Silence Dogood.' Others wrote as 'Brutus,' 'Cato,' 'Federal Farmer,' and 'Centinel' as they lambasted the overreach of the Constitution and Federalists like Alexander Hamilton. Sam Adams flooded Boston with incendiary broadsheets and cartoons. Thomas Paine's Common Sense lit colonial minds like dry tinder. The Sons of Liberty weren't just throwing tea in the harbor. They were plastering their peers with big ideas without tiring. They understood that to defeat the Crown, they had to own the narrative, and to do it, they had to print it themselves.
But The Sons of Liberty weren't just polite dissidents. They were a band of agitators who understood that fear could be as persuasive as reason. Beyond the famous Boston Tea Party, they ransacked loyalist businesses, smashed the windows of customs officers, erected effigies of tax collectors to burn in the streets, and carried out public tar-and-featherings that left men scarred for life, an early form of political theater that doubled as savage intimidation.
This 1774 British illustration depicts the Sons of Liberty tarring and feathering a loyalist tax collector. Good times. pic.twitter.com/Hx7Kzkyoib — The Free State Project (@FreeStateNH) December 13, 2023
In New York, they pulled down a statue of King George III, melted the lead, and cast it into bullets to fire back at British troops. In Rhode Island, they outright burned the HMS Gaspee, a British customs schooner, after luring it aground, which was an act of maritime sabotage that prefigured the full-scale war to come. Their defiance was messy, angry, and often brutal. It was proof that revolutions aren't sparked by polite letters alone, but by men willing to cross the line when justice demands it, and they were clearly crossing that line!
Today
And here we are, centuries later, with a new empire of surveillance and debt. We carry spy devices in our pockets. We pour our lives into social media platforms that will happily censor, demonetize, or algorithmically bury our speech. We bank at institutions that can freeze us at a keystroke.
So I repeat what I've always said: own your own data. In this age of artificial intelligence (AI), where LLMs scrape and remix without credit, where deepfakes blur truth, where centralized servers hold your entire digital life hostage, self-sovereignty isn't optional. It's survival.
Bitcoin was supposed to solve this. It was supposed to decentralize trust, let us transact without middlemen, let us record truth immutably. But BTC betrayed that dream. It became an investment vehicle for institutions, a 'strategic reserve' for big government, a speculative asset chained to ETFs and Wall Street approval…
It's BSV that still holds the original spark: unbounded block size, microtransactions at fractions of a cent, and a stable protocol that's set in stone so developers can build without gatekeepers. It's where you can permanently publish data, filter for facts, and build tools that don't bow to Silicon Valley or Washington. It's a ledger that can be searched, timestamped, and proven: censorship-resistant speech in a world that desperately needs it.
The Founders fought over everything amongst each other, but they unified when they saw tyranny. They didn't wait for consensus. They didn't wait for a poll to tell them it was popular. They threw their lot in, risked the hangman's noose, and went to war. Not because it was profitable. In fact, most lost everything.
Patrick Henry's star continued to rise as his oratorical style attracted supporters to the cause of liberty.
His most famous speech, at the Second Virginia Convention, agitated for freedom from the Crown (though without specificity of how that might be achieved).
5/8 pic.twitter.com/VOrk4bhxOB — joshua steinman (🇺🇸,🇺🇸) (@JoshuaSteinman) June 14, 2025
But because liberty was worth losing everything for.
So what are we waiting for? If we're the children of the Sons of Liberty, it's time to act like it. Stop treating Bitcoin like a stock ticker and start building tools that empower people. Stop waiting for permission to print your ideas. Use the chain. Start businesses. Store truth that can't be erased, and spread the inconvenient truths about Big Tech, Big Banks, and Big BTC that they have been trying to bury!
Because only when we stand firmly against the new Crown (the Fed, the SEC, the White House, Blockstream and Chaincode Labs, or the astroturf cult of small blockers) will we earn the right to celebrate true independence again.
Less fireworks. More fire in our hearts.
Watch: Power, Protocol, and Protection with Mitch Burcham
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump demands UK pharmaceutical giants to lower drug costs sparking fears NHS could pay the price if they refuse
Trump demands UK pharmaceutical giants to lower drug costs sparking fears NHS could pay the price if they refuse

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump demands UK pharmaceutical giants to lower drug costs sparking fears NHS could pay the price if they refuse

Donald Trump has demanded UK pharmaceutical giants lower prices for America and suggested charging others to make up the difference. He said if they didn't, the US would deploy 'every tool in our arsenal' to protect families from 'continued abusive drug prices', sparking fears the NHS will end up paying more. Mr Trump suggested he would use tariffs to push through higher prices if countries resisted. In May Mr Trump signed an executive order demanding drugmakers cut US medicine prices to match those abroad. Yesterday in a letter to 17 pharma companies he said he expected them to deliver on measures by September 29. He asked them to apply 'most favoured nation' pricing to Medicaid, the US health programme for people on low incomes. Mr Trump also asked drugmakers to offer new medicines at the same price in the US as in other developed countries. He said: 'Our citizens pay massively higher prices than other nations pay for the same exact pill... subsidizing socialism aboard [abroad].' British pharma companies AstraZeneca and GSK were among the recipients. Others included Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and Sanofi. The UK Government said it would 'continue to work closely with the US to get the best deal for our pharma industry and deliver mutual benefits for both our countries'.

Trump says Brazil's Lula can call him anytime
Trump says Brazil's Lula can call him anytime

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump says Brazil's Lula can call him anytime

WASHINGTON/BRASILIA, Aug 1 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva can call him anytime to discuss tariffs and other friction between the countries. "He can talk to me anytime he wants," Trump said of Lula, speaking to reporters at the White House. He added he was fond of the Brazilian people but "the people running Brazil did the wrong thing." Later, speaking with reporters in Brasilia, Brazil Finance Minister Fernando Haddad called Trump's remarks "great," saying he is sure Lula feels the same, and would be willing to receive a call from the U.S. president. In a post on his X account, Lula said Brazil has always been open to dialogue, although he did not mention Trump nor his earlier remarks. Trump slapped a 50% tariff on Brazil, with many exemptions, starting next week to fight what he has called a "witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial on charges of plotting a coup following his election loss in 2022. The U.S. also announced sanctions on a Brazilian Supreme Court justice who has been overseeing Bolsonaro's trial. Lula has rejected both the sanctions and the tariffs, calling them "unjustifiable" and an "unacceptable" interference in Brazil's justice system. Haddad said his planned virtual meeting with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent next week will pave the way for an eventual meeting between Lula and Trump, but noted such a move would require preparation. Earlier this week, Haddad said Brazil needed assurance Lula would not face the same treatment as Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who came under fire from Trump and Vice President JD Vance during a heated exchange at the White House earlier this year.

Colombia's ex-president, Álvaro Uribe, sentenced to 12 years of house arrest
Colombia's ex-president, Álvaro Uribe, sentenced to 12 years of house arrest

BBC News

time25 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Colombia's ex-president, Álvaro Uribe, sentenced to 12 years of house arrest

Colombian former President Álvaro Uribe has been sentenced to 12 years of house arrest for witness tampering and a fraud 73-year-old is the first former president in the country's history to be convicted of a crime. He has also been barred from public office and fined $578,000 (£435,000).Uribe, who maintains his innocence, told a judge in Bogotá he would appeal against his conviction. He said the case was meant to "destroy a voice for the democratic opposition".He was president from 2002-2010 and remains popular in Colombia, despite being accused of working with right-wing paramilitaries to destroy leftist rebel groups. A claim he denies. The former president was convicted of two charges on Monday in a witness-tampering case that has run for around 13 jailed ex-paramilitaries gave evidence saying Uribe's former lawyer Diego Cadena had offered them money to testify in Uribe's who is also facing charges, has denied the accusations and testified, along with several other ex-paramilitaries, on Uribe's this week, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned Uribe's conviction, accusing Colombia's judiciary of being former president's "only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland," Rubio wrote on the social media site, groups emerged in Colombia in the 1980s with the stated goal of taking on poverty and marginalisation. They fought the Marxist-inspired guerrilla groups that had themselves battled the state two decades of the armed groups which developed in the standoff made an income from the cocaine trade. Deadly fighting between them and with the state has produced lasting rivalries for trafficking routes and was praised by Washington for his hard-line approach to left-wing Farc rebels – but was a divisive politician, who critics say did little to tackle the inequality and poverty in the signed a peace deal with Uribe's successor in 2016, though violence from disarmed groups persists in Colombia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store