Gabbard Posts Deranged Infographic to ‘Prove' Obama Claims
President Donald Trump and his team have turned to unsubstantiated conspiracies about Barack Obama when pressed with ongoing questions about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
On Wednesday, Gabbard announced that she had declassified the House Intelligence Committee staff report on the Intelligence Community Assessment of the 2016 election at Trump's direction.
She then proceeded to post a new series of highly-produced graphics highlighting what the Trump administration claimed were Obama-era lies about the election.
It's the latest in a series of information dumps Gabbard has made while arguing Obama officials manufactured claims that Russia worked to influence the election.
However, as Gabbard continues to release documents, she has strategically conflated two separate Russian activities in her messaging. The documents determine Russia did not attack election infrastructure or hack the election, but the intelligence community did find that Russia tried to influence the ballot.
While Gabbard claimed the report she released on Wednesday 'exposes how the Obama Administration manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false' and accused officials of 'promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election,' the report itself directly states Russia worked to undermine the election. What was less conclusive in that specific report was Russia's preferred candidate.
'The key judgments found to be credible include: 1) President Putin ordered conventional and cyber influence operations, notably by leaking politically sensitive emails obtained from computer intrusions; 2) Putin's principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process and to weaken what the Russians considered to be an inevitable Clinton presidency,' the declassified report reads.
The report was based on an investigation conducted by former Republican House Intel Chair Devin Nunes, who now serves as the CEO of Trump Media.
While the House report agreed that Russia did interfere, the GOP report disputed the 2017 intelligence assessment that Putin had a 'clear preference' for Trump and 'aspired to help his chances' in 2016.
It accuses the former CIA Director John Brennan of ordering the release of reports containing previously collected but unpublished intelligence, including info of questionable origins, which became the foundation for the intelligence assessment that Putin preferred Trump.
As Gabbard claimed publicly in a Fox News interview that an intelligence report said Russia did not attempt to affect the outcome of the election, she conveniently left out details of the document she has cited.
The document she points to as evidence Obama officials promoted lies, a Presidential Daily Briefing, specifically addressed one type of influence and stated Russia did not impact the election results 'by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.'
Gabbard, who has long been accused by critics of being a Putin apologist for repeating Russian propaganda to the point where she has been praised on Russian state TV before being tapped as Trump's intel chief, has argued the document she has released details 'a treasonous conspiracy' by members of the Obama White House.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously refuted Gabbard's allegations.
Rubio, as then-acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, led the investigation, which resulted in a bipartisan Russia report that found not only did Russia engage in an effort to influence the 2016 election, but that Putin ordered the hack and leak of information damaging to Hillary Clinton and helped the Trump campaign.
While the Gabbard information drop and accusations are loaded with holes, MAGA Republicans are seizing on her assessment and are accusing Obama of treason. Her accusations have also been promoted by members of the Trump White House.
On Tuesday, Trump pointed directly to her allegations and attacks on Obama officials in response to questions about Epstein in the Oval Office.
Obama's office made a rare move on Tuesday and responded to the accusations coming directly from the White House.
'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 35% tariff kicked in today on Canadian goods. How big of an impact will it have?
With the signing of an executive order, U.S. President Donald Trump upped Canada's tariff rate to 35 per cent, effective at 12:01 a.m. today. That's a 10 per cent increase on the 25 per cent rate that has been in effect on Canadian goods headed south of the border since March, and is a blanket tariff that will apply to Canadian products across the board. However, that doesn't paint the whole picture. A very small number of Canadian products will be subjected to the 35 per cent tariff. That's because the tariffs don't apply to all goods that are subject to the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), the existing free trade deal governing trade between the three countries. Those products can keep going across the border free of tariffs. Most of the goods Canada exports to the U.S. are covered by CUSMA. The Bank of Canada said in its monetary policy report released Wednesday that an estimated 95 per cent of stuff sent south of the border qualifies under that agreement. That means the new, higher 35 per cent rate will be felt by a small fraction of exports that are not CUSMA-compliant, which likely includes a broad array of products across all sectors, according to experts. "[CUSMA] is the one thing that is ensuring normalcy in trade flows in much of the economy," said Eric Miller, president and CEO of Rideau Potomac Strategy Group. "And so the maintenance of that exemption was absolutely crucial." WATCH | Trump increases tariff on Canada to 35%, White House says: There's no simple list of items that are CUSMA-compliant, because products are certified on a case-by-case basis, based on a number of complicated factors. In order to get the exemption, a certain amount of the product needs to be made in Canada, with Canadian inputs. Take the example of a steak versus that of a screwdriver. If a cow is born, raised, slaughtered and prepared in Alberta, then the steak — the end product — is clearly Canadian and would be shielded under CUSMA, says Miller. But a typical screwdriver is made of metal, along with plastic or rubber for the handle. The manufacturer would have to make sure that enough of the materials come from Canada, Mexico or the U.S. That amount is usually about 60 per cent, according to lawyer Daniel Kiselbach, a managing partner at Miller Thompson LLP. WATCH | What we know — and what's still unclear — after tariffs hiked on Canadian goods: Then, you have to make sure you're adding value to those parts and converting them to a finished product before shipping it out. In the case of the screwdriver, you're taking the raw materials and making them into a new, finished item, so that would meet the bar. Overall, anything harvested or mined is usually CUSMA-compliant, Kiselbach said. Anything manufactured or produced in Canada gets more complicated. Electronics and machinery, in particular, are product types that tend to have a harder time getting CUSMA certification. On top of that, the certification process can be challenging, requiring records showing where all a product's components come from, and it is costly. "[Businesses] don't necessarily understand what the rules are telling them," Miller said. "It's almost like cryptography or something." For that reason, Miller says some businesses have simply not acquired CUSMA certification in the past — something that's changing now that the rates are so much higher. WATCH | Is Canada-U.S. free trade dead?: While the fraction of companies that don't qualify for the free trade exemption might be small, Miller says the impact of the new rate should not be overlooked. Many of those who will be hit by the Saturday tariff increase will be small- to medium-sized businesses that rely on components that are made in countries outside of Canada — and can't easily replace them with materials sourced elsewhere. "If you are used to sourcing a particular input from China for the last 10 years, it's not so easy to go and say, 'Now I'm going to buy that good somewhere else,'" Miller said. "They can't easily change and they can't meet the rules, so they have to pay 35 per cent. And for them, going from 25 per cent to 35 per cent is pretty devastating," Miller. Kiselbach says 35 per cent tariffs might be higher than some companies' profit margins, meaning they'd be losing money on each item they sell at the current rate. Sectoral tariffs still in play The 35 per cent rate also has no bearing on the rates Trump has set for specific sectors. Those include a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum, as well as 25 per cent on cars and auto parts, both of which had already been in effect. A new, 50 per cent tariff on some copper products, including copper pipes and wiring, also went into effect today. The Trump administration made carveouts for copper input materials such as ores, concentrates and cathodes, which is providing the industry some relief. And while the sector-specific rates are largely not new, the impact of these steep rates on important sectors cannot be ignored, said Alan Arcand, chief economist with the trade association Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters. "These are very important industries for Canada," Arcand said. "These are tariff rates that are just not … sustainable for these industries. So that's really the rub of the issue right now." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
American Eagle Defends Sydney Sweeney's Jeans Ads After Intense Backlash
American Eagle is defending its new ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney after drawing outrage online and even garnering a response from the White House. In a statement shared Friday on its Instagram account, the clothing retailer attempted to clarify the intention of the ads. ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story,' the statement read. 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone.' Unveiled last week, the American Eagle ads find Sweeney ― whose acting credits include 'Euphoria' and 'Anyone But You' ― donning a variety of denim ensembles alongside a tagline featuring wordplay on 'jeans' and 'genes.' The campaign is believed to have been intended as a tribute to Brooke Shields' 1980 Calvin Klein ad, which was also controversial for its time. However, many viewers interpreted the ad's use of a double entendre as non-inclusive, with some even likening it to 'white supremacy' and 'Nazi propaganda.' The response to the ad was largely divided along political lines, with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and former Fox News host Megyn Kelly among the conservative personalities who defended the ad. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung, meanwhile, said the controversy was an example of 'cancel culture run amok,' and 'why Americans voted the way they did in 2024.' Watch one of Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ads below. Appearing on the 'Ruthless' podcast Friday, Vice President JD Vance echoed some of Cheung's sentiments. 'The lesson [Democrats] have apparently taken is we're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful. Great strategy, guys,' he said. 'That's how you're going to win the midterms.' Whether American Eagle's statement will be enough to quell the criticism remains to be seen. By Friday afternoon, responses to the company's Instagram post appeared similarly divided. 'Ignore the negativity. Brilliant ad,' one person wrote in the comments, while another said they 'didn't think the response could be even worse than the ad but it somehow was.' Related... 'So Hitler': Fans Think Sydney Sweeney's New American Eagle Ads Are Promoting White Supremacy Ted Cruz Is Weirdly Invested In The Backlash To Sydney Sweeney's Jeans Ad Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle Ad Is Disturbing — And Distracting You From Something Worse
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘You failed that child;' Family of Hershall Creachbaum wants murder charges, answers
A member of Hershall Creachbaum's family is speaking out about his death. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] News Center 7's Mike Campbell sat down with Creachbaum's cousin. Hear from her LIVE on News Center 7 at 6:00. Creachbaum's remains were found on July 12. His mother, Ashley Johnson, and her boyfriend, Michael Kendrick, were arrested just hours after police found his remains. TRENDING STORIES: Body of missing Ohio pizza delivery driver found in ravine 'Sick to my stomach;' Ohio mother demands answers after police release missing 12-year-old Man killed in shooting near Dayton apartment complex identified Currently, both are facing charges stemming from his death. Creachbaum's cousin, Chasity Rollins, said she wants to see them face murder charges. 'They have to find the evidence, and I fully support that as well because without that evidence, the two monsters in jail don't get the charges they deserve,' Rollins said We will continue to update this story. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
