What we know in the aftermath of the Minnesota shootings
Tremors spread though the political world on Monday after the weekend's fatal shooting of a Democratic lawmaker and her spouse in Minnesota, and another shooting, allegedly by the same perpetrator, that injured a second lawmaker and his wife.
The suspect, Vance Boelter, 57, was apprehended late Sunday. He faces murder charges in state courts. On Monday, federal prosecutors also charged him with murder.
Boelter is accused of killing Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman (D) and her husband, Mark, at their home in a Minneapolis suburb in the early hours of Saturday. Prosecutors allege that, shortly before, he had shot state Sen. John Hoffman (D) and his wife, Yvette, at their home. The Hoffmans have undergone surgery and are expected to survive.
Here's what we know so far.
A major development Monday came with the unveiling of the federal charges against Boelter — and the details from prosecutors that accompanied those charges.
Boelter has been charged with murder and stalking.
Federal prosecutors allege that the suspect had visited a total of four lawmakers' homes. In addition to the two where shootings took place, he is said to have visited an address where his target was not home, and to have left another address without opening fire, perhaps because of police presence there.
Prosecutors did not identify the lawmaker, but state Sen. Ann Rest (D) identified herself, saying that she had been told that Boelter had been close to her home during the hours in question. She thanked local police officers for having 'saved my life.'
Authorities said other documentation appeared to show that Boelter had been planning the attacks for months.
Boelter apparently had a list of targets, as well as copious other plans.
Both of Minnesota's senators, Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D) and Tina Smith (D), have confirmed that they were on the list. An unnamed law enforcement officer told The New York Times that Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Kelly Morrison (D-Minn.) and Angie Craig (D-Minn.) were also among the targets.
Boelter's lists also extended beyond Minnesota. Abigail Leavins, a reporter for a website that covers politics in Wisconsin, said that Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) and Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) were also confirmed to be among the potential targets. Lawrence Andrea of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) was on the list, too.
Multiple media outlets have reported that all the politicians allegedly targeted are Democrats. The list also appears to have included some addresses associated with reproductive rights, including abortion providers and Planned Parenthood clinics.
Federal authorities have declined to identify a clear and specific political motive so far.
But media interviews of Boelter's friends and acquaintances have formed a picture of a socially conservative, vigorously anti-abortion figure who, at least one friend said, supported President Trump in last year's election.
In one clip available online, he delivers a sermon to an audience in Africa complaining that many American churches 'are so messed up they don't know abortion is wrong.'
His roommate told reporters that Boelter was 'a Trump supporter' who 'would be offended if people called him a Democrat.'
The tragedy of the killings was soon followed by a political firestorm.
The instigator was Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who on Sunday posted a photo on social media of the suspect with the caption, 'This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way.'
A short time after, Lee sent another post with two photos of the suspect, including one in which he was wearing a mask, with the caption 'Nightmare on Waltz Street.'
This was widely interpreted as a reference to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), former Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate in the 2024 election. Influencers within the online right have been floating a conspiracy theory about Walz and the shooter, based on the fact that Walz had reappointed Boelter to a state economic panel in 2019.
Democrats and liberals reacted furiously.
Klobuchar told MSNBC on Monday that she 'condemned' what Lee had done and said she would 'speak to him about this' when they next met.
'What I'm going to tell him is: This isn't funny,' Klobuchar added.
Smith, at the Capitol, told reporters she was also seeking out Lee for a conversation. The Hill's Al Weaver posted a photo of the two in conversation soon afterward.
Weaver also reported that Smith told reporters she wanted Lee to hear from her directly 'about how painful that was and how brutal that was to see that on what was just a horrible, brutal weekend.'
Caroline Gleich, who was the Democratic nominee in last year's Senate race in Utah — ultimately losing to Lee's colleague Sen. John Curtis (R) — told The Hill in a video interview that Lee's posts were 'absolutely despicable.'
Lee has not deleted the posts. His office did not respond to an invitation to comment.
The hours since the shooting have seen significant misinformation.
The Minnesota Star Tribune was among the news outlets trying to push the tide of confusion back.
It noted that many members on the state board on which Boelter once served 'were not politically connected [nor] would have meaningful access to the governor.' Board members are purportedly appointed because of their insights into particular industries or areas of knowledge, not because they reflect a governor's ideology. A source in Walz's office also told the Star Tribune the governor did not know Boelter.
The news organization also noted that, contrary to online speculation, Boelter's wife had never served as an intern for Walz. There appears to have been some confusion over another person with the same name, married to someone else.
But at times, careful reporting seems little match for the tsunami of often-erroneous social media speculation.
Reams have been written about the growing polarization of American politics over the past few decades. But there is a lot of evidence that the nation's political gulf just keeps getting wider and more bitter.
The shootings in Minnesota are sure to produce more questions about where this will all lead.
Trump himself was almost killed last July during a rally in Pennsylvania. A California man in April pleaded guilty to trying to kill conservative Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Several men were convicted in a plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) in 2020.
With no end in sight to the enmity in the political system, attention is turning to increasing security for lawmakers and others in public life.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) — along with the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, Rep. Joe Morelle (N.Y.) — wrote to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Monday asking to increase the amount of money available to lawmakers to bolster security.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
25 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Trump and His Online Alpha Males Have a Meltdown Over NYC's Newest Socialist Star
Zohran Mamdani has managed to do something rare in today's fractured political climate: he has united a faction of the Democratic establishment with an army of online alpha males in shared outrage. Since his victory in the Democratic primary for mayor of New York on June 24, the socialist assemblyman has been subjected to a relentless and violent online onslaught, particularly from the influencers of the self described manosphere. For these men, who view feminism, wokeness, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion as existential threats, the attacks are constant. Through a torrent of posts, memes, and reposts, their message boils down to two simple lines: Mamdani, 33, is 'dangerous' because he is a 'socialist,' and he will ruin New York. He must be stopped at all costs. This campaign has taken on a special urgency given that in deep blue New York City, the Democratic candidate is heavily favored to win the mayoralty. The operation to stop Mamdani received its kickoff from the highest level of the Republican party. 'The Democrats have crossed the line,' President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on June 25. 'Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Democratic Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor.' Trump's post signaled the start of a coordinated effort. Realizing a Republican victory would be difficult, if not impossible, pro-Trump billionaire Bill Ackman is offering to fund a 'centrist' candidate willing to challenge Mamdani in the November election. He framed this as a heroic mission to save New York from impending doom. 'New York City under Mamdani is about to become much more dangerous and economically unviable,' Ackman wrote in a lengthy post pinned to his X profile on June 26. 'If someone is ready to raise their hand, I will take care of the fundraising,' he offered, attempting to entice a challenger. 'This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for the right candidate. More importantly, it is an opportunity to save our City and be a superhero. Life is short and you must dare to be great.' I awoke this morning gravely concerned about New York City. I thought 'What has NYC become that an avowed socialist who has supported defunding the police, whose solution to lowering food prices is city-owned supermarkets, who doesn't understand that freezing rents will only… — Bill Ackman (@BillAckman) June 26, 2025Mamdani is a 33‑year‑old Ugandan‑born, naturalized Muslim American state legislator whose progressive platform—fare‑free buses, public child care, rent freezes, wealth taxes—has energized grassroots support. His upset win over Andrew Cuomo represents both a generational and ideological shift within the Democratic Party. His ascent has particularly inspired Muslim, South Asian, and immigrant communities, even as it triggers alarm among conservative and establishment circles Within the core manosphere, sometimes known as the red pill community, which often spreads ideas of white supremacy under the guise of protecting Western civilization, Mamdani is described as an anti white racist. 'Mamdani has been posting racist, anti white musings for over a decade,' conservative activist Charlie Kirk posted on X on June 27. Kirk resurrected a 2013 tweet from Mamdani that quoted comedian Hari Kondabolu criticizing systemic inequality. 'I guess white New Yorkers hate themselves so much they'll vote for him anyway. Sad!!' Kirk deduced. His post quickly generated over half a million views, flooded with comments calling for Mamdani's deportation. Mamdani has been posting racist, anti-white musings for over a decade. I guess white New Yorkers hate themselves so much they'll vote for him anyways. Sad!! — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 27, 2025The quote in question reads, 'The invisible hand of the market, my ass. That hand is white and wearing a ring with a conflict diamond in it.' The line, which Mamdani posted on December 19, 2013, is a satirical critique of capitalism. It riffs on Adam Smith's famous concept of the 'invisible hand' to suggest that markets are not as neutral as claimed, especially for marginalized communities. But in the manosphere, reality and nuance are words that rarely find purchase, especially when they might disrupt a narrative. Other prominent commentators have joined the pile on. Ben Shapiro shared a meme anticipating an exodus of the wealthy from New York to Florida because 'maniacs' have 'blew' the city up. Conservative pundit Matt Walsh claimed Mamdani's victory is tantamount to New York's destruction, making sure to point out that Mamdani is 'Muslim.' 'New Yorkers Embrace The Destruction Of Their City By Voting For Socialist Muslim Mayor,' Walsh posted on X. He has since accused Mamdani of wanting to 'castrate children with tax money, nationalize grocery stores, and abolish the police in the name of 'queer liberation.'' Walsh also attacked Mamdani's citizenship. 'Mamdani became a US citizen in 2018,' he posted. 'Two years later, he was already working to tear down monuments to our historical icons. The incredible arrogance and entitlement of this whiney, ungrateful brat.' Mamdani became a US citizen in 2018. Two years later he was already working to tear down monuments to our historical icons. The incredible arrogance and entitlement of this whiney, ungrateful brat. — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 27, 2025The attacks are not limited to culture warriors. 'The problem with socialism: eventually you run out of other people's money,' charged Congressman Mike Lawler, a New York Republican. 'New York City is headed for disaster if Zohran becomes Mayor.' The problem with socialism: eventually you run out of other people's money. New York City is headed for disaster if Zohran becomes Mayor. — Mike Lawler (@lawler4ny) June 27, 2025Even prominent liberals have joined the hunt, attacking Mamdani's platform. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers took aim at his housing policy. 'Rent control is the second best way to destroy a city, after bombing,' he criticized, adding, 'I think this is likely to exacerbate rather than improve issues around housing affordability in New York. This would be a gross policy error by @ZohranKMamdani.' Rent control is the second-best way to destroy a city, after bombing. And, because of what it leads to in terms of under investment in repairing, maintaining, constructing new apartments, I think this is likely to exacerbate rather than improve issues around housing affordability… — Lawrence H. Summers (@LHSummers) June 27, 2025Meanwhile, conservative journalist Daniel Greenfield questioned Mamdani's appearance in 'a terror mosque that prayed for Hamas to win, cursed Jews and Christians, and teaching urged their children to hate everything about America,' implying Mamdani is an anti-Semitic, anti-American radical. Zohran Mamdani tweeted about his appearance at a terror mosque that prayed for Hamas to win, cursed Jews and Christians, and urged teaching their children to hate everything about America /1 — Daniel Greenfield – "Hang Together or Separately" (@Sultanknish) June 28, 2025For his part, Mamdani campaigned on the high cost of living in New York. His victory upsets the balance within a Democratic Party still finding its footing after the last presidential election. As November approaches, the attacks will only intensify. The lines of assault are clear: he is dangerous because he is Muslim; he will drive away the rich because he is a socialist; and he is an anti Semitic, anti white radical. The manosphere and its allies are using a potent combination of anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant tropes to try and bring him down.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
At Supreme Court, steady wins for conservative states and Trump's claims of executive power
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court term that ended Friday will not be remembered for blockbuster rulings like those recent years that struck down the right to abortion and college affirmative action. The justices scaled back their docket this year and spent much of their energy focused on deciding fast-track appeals from President Trump. His administration's lawyers complained too many judges were standing in the way of Trump's agenda. On Friday, the court's conservatives agreed to rein in district judges, a procedural victory for Trump. What's been missing so far, however, is a clear ruling on whether the president has abided by the law or overstepped his authority in the U.S. Constitution. On the final two days of term, the court's conservative majority provided big wins for Republican-leaning states, religious parents and Trump. The justices gave states more authority to prohibit medical treatments for transgender teens, to deny Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood clinics and to enforce age-verification laws for online porn sites. Each came with the familiar 6-3 split, with the Republican appointees siding with the GOP-led states, while the Democratic appointees dissented. These rulings, while significant, were something short of nationwide landmark decisions — celebrated victories for the Republican half of the nation but having no direct or immediate effect on Democratic-led states. California lawmakers are not likely to pass measures to restrict gender-affirming care or to prohibit women on Medicaid from obtaining birth control, pregnancy testing or medical screenings at a Planned Parenthood clinic. The new decisions echoed the Dobbs ruling three years ago that struck down Roe vs. Wade and the constitutional right to abortion. As the conservative justices noted, the decision in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health did not outlaw abortion nationwide. However, it did allow conservative states to do so. Since then, 17 Republican-led states in the South and Midwest have adopted new laws to prohibit most or all abortions. On this front, the court's decisions reflect a 'federalism,' or states-rights style of conservatism, that was dominant in decades past under President Reagan and two of the court's conservative leaders, Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Both were Arizona Republicans (and in O'Connor's case, a former state legislator) who came to the court with that view that Washington holds too much power and wields too much control over states and local governments. With the nation sharply divided along partisan lines, today's conservative court could be praised or defended for freeing states to make different choices on the 'culture wars.' The other big winner so far this year has been Trump and his broad claims of executive power. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has asserted he has total authority to run federal agencies, cut their spending and fire most of their employees, all without the approval of Congress, which created and funded the agencies. He has also claimed the authority to impose tariffs of any amount on any country and also change his mind a few days later. He has dispatched National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles against the wishes of the governor and the mayor. He has asserted he can punish universities and law firms. He has claimed he can revise by executive order the 14th Amendment and its birthright citizenship clause. So far, the Supreme Court has not ruled squarely on Trump's broad assertions of power. But the justices have granted a series of emergency appeals from Trump's lawyers and set aside lower court orders that blocked his initiatives from taking effect. The theme has been that judges are out of line, not the president. Friday's ruling limiting nationwide injunctions set out that view in a 26-page opinion. The conservatives agreed that some judges have overstepped their authority by ruling broadly based on a single lawsuit. The justices have yet to rule on whether the president has overstepped his power. Justice Amy Coney Barrett summed up the dispute in a revealing comment responding to a dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. 'Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary,' she wrote. Missing from all this is the earlier strain of conservatism that opposed concentrated power in Washington — and in this instance, in one person. Last year offered a hint of what was to come. A year ago, the court ended its term by declaring the president is immune from being prosecuted for his official acts while in the White House. That decision, in Trump vs. United States, shielded the former and soon-to-be president from the criminal law. The Constitution does not mention any such immunity for ex-presidents charged with crimes, but Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said a shield of immunity was necessary to 'enable the the President to carry out his constitutional duties without undue caution.' Since returning to the White House, Trump has not been accused of exercising 'undue caution.' Instead, he appears to have viewed the court's opinion as confirming his unchecked power as the nation's chief executive. Trump advisors say that because the president was elected, he has a mandate and the authority to put his priorities and policies into effect. But the Supreme Court's conservatives did not take that view when President Biden took office promising to take action on climate change and to reduce the burden of student loan debt. In both areas, the Roberts court ruled that the Biden administration had exceeded its authority under the laws passed by Congress. Away from Washington, the most significant decision from this term may be Friday's ruling empowering parents. The six justices on the right ruled parents have a right to remove their children from certain public school classes that offend their religious beliefs. They objected to new storybooks and lessons for young children with LGBTQ+ themes. In recent years, the court, led by Roberts, has championed the 'free exercise' of religion that is protected by the 1st Amendment. In a series of decisions, the court has exempted Catholic schools and charities from laws or regulations on, for example, providing contraceptives to employees. Friday's ruling in a Maryland case extended that religious liberty right into the schools and ruled for Muslim and Catholic parents who objected to new LGBTQ+-themed storybooks. At first, the school board said parents could have their young children 'opt out' of those classes. But when too many parents took the offer, the school board rescinded it. The clash between progressive educators and conservative parents reached the court when the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty appealed on behalf of the parents. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said the parents believed the books and stories offended their religious beliefs, and he ordered school authorities to 'to notify them in advance whenever one of the books in question is to be used ... and allow them to have their children excused from that instruction.' This decision may have a broader impact than any from this term because it empowers parents nationwide. But it too has limits. It does not require the schools to change their curriculum and their lessons or remove any books from the shelves. The conservatives fell one vote short in a case that could have brought about a far-reaching change in American schools. Split 4 to 4, the justices could not rule to uphold the nation's first publicly funded, church-run charter school. In the past, Roberts had voted to allow students to use state tuition grants in religious schools, but he appeared uncertain about using tax money to operate a church-run school. But that question is almost certain to return to the court. Barrett stepped aside from the Oklahoma case heard in April because friends and former colleagues at the Notre Dame Law School had filed the appeal. But in a future case, she could participate and cast a deciding vote.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Schumer to force reading of 1,000-page GOP mega bill, delaying it by half a day
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) told Democratic senators Saturday that he will force the clerks to read the 1,000-page Republican megabill on the Senate floor once Republicans vote to proceed to the legislation, a procedural act of defiance that will take an estimated 12 hours and delay final passage of President Trump's agenda by half a day — at least. Schumer told his caucus to prepare to force a full reading of the bill, according to a Democratic source familiar with the internal discussion over floor strategy. The question is whether Senate GOP leaders will force the clerks to read the bill late into Saturday night and early Sunday morning to complete the time-and energy-consuming task or whether staff will get some time to sleep before the Senate is expected to launch into a multi-hour series of votes known as a vote-a-rama. Senate Republicans were anticipating that Schumer might force a reading of the bill as an act of protest. This is a developing story.
