logo
Austin Living: New smiles, familiar tradition

Austin Living: New smiles, familiar tradition

Yahoo7 hours ago

Jun. 28—With gratitude for the past, new owners of The Tendermaid take tradition into the future
For nearly three decades, a person could count on two things when they entered The Tendermaid: a great loose-meat burger and a Sara Nauman smile.
But there are changes coming and while people will still be able to count on the burgers that have become iconic in their own right, visitors to The Tendermaid will have to get used to a pair of new smiles — those of Zach and Betsy Morem.
In April of this year, the couple became the new owners of the cozy, diner-styled burger joint, taking the business over from Nauman, who has run the business for 28 years.
"When I moved back to Austin and started a family here, we kind of had a mutual goal that we wanted to help the community. Invest in the community," Zach said. "If we're going to be here, why not."
"Continuing the legacy," Betsy added.
Nauman bought the business with her then husband, Gary White, who had always nurtured a dream to buy The Tendermaid, in the late 1990s. Gary passed away in August of 2019, and Nauman, who is now married to Brad Nauman, continued to carry on with the establishment until this year when she began entertaining the idea of selling it.
"Just so many changes in my life since then," Nauman said, referring to the time after Gary's passing. "In February I remarried and then in January (the Morems) approached me. April we sold The Tendermaid. I couldn't think of a better family to carry on this precious, cherished Austin tradition."
It's a rich tradition that dates back to 1938, when Jerry and Mildred Thatcher moved to Austin from Iowa. As the story goes, the couple stood on various street corners in Austin until they came to what is today the intersection of Fourth Avenue Second Street NE, the busiest intersection in town at that point.
While the building looks different than it did in 1938, the location has never strayed, and in all of those 87 years The Tendermaid has been creating traditions and memories — traditions and memories that Zach has experienced as well.
"I think a lot of people from Austin have a very similar story, which I have noticed since the change of ownership — the nostalgia factor," he said. "People coming in and saying 'I remember when I came here with my parents or grandparents.' I was a similar story of coming here with my grandfather and being able to have that memory is pretty cool."
While not originally from the area, it was Betsy, who grew up in Olivia, Minnesota, who first saw the opportunity to buy The Tendermaid. It was an opportunity that couldn't go to waste.
"When I found out I came out into the kitchen of our home and was like the Tendermaid was for sale," she said. "He quickly became excited about the idea and then we met with Sara."
"It happened quickly after that," she continued. "It was a good fit. We've known each other and Zach has restaurant experience."
That experience comes from across town at another local and iconic restaurant — The Old Mill — where Zach got his first taste of restaurant experience. Since then, he has built up just over a decade of time in food service.
He said that this opportunity has refreshed the spark in him to be back in the industry once again.
"My very first job was at the Old Mill washing dishes," he said. "I owe a lot of this to Dave and Ann Forland and Dave specifically. I have been close with him since I was 14-years-old. I have a lot to thank him for."
The transaction between the two families came about in a rather natural way as the Morem's have harbored that tradition The Tendermaid has established over the years, while for Nauman it was the ideal situation in which to hand it off.
For Nauman, the next owners had to be someone who cared as much for the Tendermaid and customers as she did.
"The right people came along at the right time," she said. "Just continuing the tradition and knowing that the people are going to love it as much as I did and (Gary) did. I know Zach and Besty have been coming here forever, they've brought their kids in. You look at that and you know they are going to do the right thing with something that is treasured."
That right direction isn't likely to include much change. While there has been some additions to the menu from the days when it was only a burger and a small assortment of condiments available, The Tendermaid sandwich itself continues to be the star of the show.
And it will remain so under the Morem's ownership.
"We don't want to mess with everything because it's been the same for so long. It works," Zach said. "People have stressed that."
That's not to say there might not be some reversal of things, though.
When the COVID-19 pandemic played its upsetting hand, The Tendermaid suffered the same reality as other dining establishments. It had to close shop and was ultimately limited to take-out only.
That took away The Tendermaid's 17 stools and unique seating arrangement in a U-shape around the staging area. It gave the Tendermaid its diner-type feel and allowed Nauman and employees to openly converse with the customers as they waited for their food.
The Morems want to bring that back.
"There have been a lot of people that have asked about the indoor dining thing," Zach said. "We will be doing that eventually, but we don't have a time yet or date."
"People really want to be able to sit inside and I understand that. I was one of those people," he continued. "We want to make sure everyone gets the opportunity to come and sit down."
And along with that, the Morems want to continue the trend of making sure people feel special when they visit.
"Any time I would walk into The Tendermaid, Sara would make me feel like a thousand bucks and I know every person who came through that door felt like that," Betsy said.
Nauman's influence won't entirely be gone going into the future. Her daughter, Jenna White, a fixture in her own right in recent years, will also be working the counter with the Morems.
At the same time, Nauman will always have a place in her heart for The Tendermaid, no less than the thousands of customers who have woven their way through the little restaurant in the heart of Austin.
"It's been a privilege for me to serve and be a part of the Austin community for all these years and I want to thank all of my amazing customers for all of their support for all the years," Nauman said. "I'm just looking forward to the future of The Tendermaid."
For the Morems, this chance is about being able to contribute back to the community in their own way.
"We're just really grateful for the support of the community," Betsy said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he wants interest rate cut to 1%, would 'love' if Powell resigned
Trump says he wants interest rate cut to 1%, would 'love' if Powell resigned

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he wants interest rate cut to 1%, would 'love' if Powell resigned

By Trevor Hunnicutt and Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he would "love" if Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell were to resign, and the president also said he wanted interest rates cut to 1%. KEY QUOTES "I'd love him to resign if he wanted to, he's done a lousy job," Trump said, also labeling the Fed chair as "stupid." "I think we should be paying 1% right now, and we're paying more because we have a guy who suffers from, I think, Trump Derangement Syndrome," Trump added. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Trump has long attacked the Federal Reserve chair over interest rates that the U.S. president wants lowered. Fed chairs have long been seen as insulated from presidential dismissal for reasons other than malfeasance or misconduct, but Trump has threatened to test that legal premise with frequent threats to fire Powell. Powell's term ends in May 2026, and Trump is expected to nominate a successor in the coming months. CONTEXT Trump said he will name as successor to Powell someone who will lower rates. Last week, the Fed decided to leave short-term borrowing costs in the 4.25%-4.50% range.

Senate's ‘big, beautiful bill' faces serious headwinds in the House
Senate's ‘big, beautiful bill' faces serious headwinds in the House

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate's ‘big, beautiful bill' faces serious headwinds in the House

The Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill' is facing serious headwinds in the House with The Hill learning that at least six House Republicans are currently a 'no' on the framework, a daunting sign for GOP leadership as the Senate races towards a vote. Those six House Republicans, some of whom requested anonymity, are enough opposition to tank the package, as GOP leaders grapple with a razor-thin majority. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who was one of two GOP lawmakers to oppose the House version of the bill last month, is also likely to oppose the Senate's edition, deepening the pocket of resistance in the lower chamber. Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and still clear the legislation, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. 'I support the reasonable provisions in H.R. 1 that protect Medicaid's long-term viability and ensure the program continues to serve our most vulnerable, but I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on, including provider taxes and state directed payments, or any provisions that punish expansion states,' Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) wrote in a statement on Saturday. 'President Trump was clear when he said to root out our waste, fraud, and abuse without cutting Medicaid and I wholeheartedly agree,' he continued. 'I urge my Senate colleagues to stick to the Medicaid provisions in H.R. 1 — otherwise I will vote no.' Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) told The Hill that he is also opposed to the bill because of the Medicaid provider tax provision. Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.) is currently a 'no' on the measure because of the Medicaid language, rollback of solar energy credits and public lands provisions, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), meanwhile, told The Hill that he is against the current version of the package because of the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap proposal. The legislation would increase the currently $10,000 SALT cap to $40,000 for individuals making $500,000 or less for five years, then snap back to the original number. 'While I support the President's broader agenda, how could I support the same unfair $10k SALT cap I've spent years criticizing?' LaLota said. 'A permanent $40k deduction cap with income thresholds of $225k for single filers and $450k for joint filers would earn my vote.' It is not, however, just moderates who are signaling issues with the Senate bill: Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, posted an ominous message on X that suggested he was not pleased with the package. 'I will not negotiate via X. But it's important to know that jamming us with a bill before we've had any chance to review the implications of major changes & re-writes, fluid scores, a high likelihood of violating the house framework (deficits) , & tons of swamp buy-offs is bad,' he wrote. The opposition is rising to the surface as Senate Republicans inch closer to holding an initial vote on the 'big, beautiful bill,' which would officially kick off the consideration process and eventually tee up a final vote in the House. It remains unclear, however, if Senate GOP leaders have the votes to move forward. If the motion to proceed passes by a simple majority, the chamber would hold a series of unlimited amendment votes called a vote-a-rama, which could result in changes to the measure. Senate GOP leaders are also still talking to holdouts and could make changes to the bill as written. In the meantime, House Republicans — beginning to review the revised Senate text unveiled overnight — are expressing resistance to the measure, prompting serious questions about whether top GOP lawmakers will be able to enact the legislation by their self-imposed July 4 deadline. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) convened a call with the House Republican Conference Saturday afternoon and urged lawmakers to keep their concerns with the Senate bill private, and instead speak directly with their senators and the White House, two sources told The Hill. Senate Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) told members that it is unlikely they will have to return to Washington on Monday, the sources said. Tuesday or Wednesday is more realistic, he told lawmakers. One source told The Hill that the call was brief and leadership did not take questions. The main qualm among House Republicans appears to be the Medicaid language in the bill. The Senate's legislation includes a proposal that would effectively cap provider taxes at 3.5 percent by 2031, down from the current 6 percent, but only for the states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The decrease was initially supposed to begin in 2027, with a 0.5 percent phase down annually, but Senate Republicans overnight changed the text to delay the implementation to 2028. The upper chamber also inserted a provision to create a $25 billion rural hospital relief fund that would be distributed over five years to assuage those concerns. The changes, however, do not seem to be solving all of the GOP's problems, with House Republicans still voicing opposition to the language. Aside from Medicaid, the Senate bill's rollback of green-energy tax credits is an issue for some House Republicans. The revised legislation for the upper chamber slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) would not say how he plans to vote on the bill, but signaled that he is not happy with the Medicaid provisions and green-energy tax credit language. 'Instead of improving the Medicaid and energy portions of [the] House bill it appears the Senate went backwards,' he told The Hill. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Why QuantumScape Stock Is Plummeting Today
Why QuantumScape Stock Is Plummeting Today

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why QuantumScape Stock Is Plummeting Today

QuantumScape stock is falling today as investors sell shares to take profits. The stock rocketed higher earlier this week after the company announced a major manufacturing breakthrough. QuantumScape could post huge gains if the company's solid-state battery tech is adopted by auto companies, but it's still a high-risk stock. 10 stocks we like better than QuantumScape › On the heels of explosive gains this week, QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) stock is seeing a big sell-off on Friday. The company's share price was down 15.7% as of 3 p.m. ET. QuantumScape's valuation is falling today as investors move to take profits following big gains kicked off by the announcement of major manufacturing progress earlier this week. Even with today's pullback, the stock is up roughly 50% over the last week of trading as of this writing. QuantumScape announced on Tuesday that it had made big progress with its manufacturing process. The company's Cobra separator process has now entered early production stages. The technology is designed to allow for faster and more energy-efficient production and is said to be roughly 25 times better when it comes to heat-treatment speed. The setup is also much smaller than previous technologies, and the smaller footprint should help the company improve its production capabilities. The Cobra news kicked off huge gains for the stock this week, but shares are taking a breather. Investors and analysts are seeing some valuation concerns following the recent rally and are selling shares to take profits. Despite explosive gains this week, QuantumScape stock is still down roughly 95% from the lifetime high it hit after going public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in November 2020. While the stock has posted an impressive rally this week thanks to news about its Cobra separator technology, long-term investors are likely still looking at a binary outcome. If the company's solid-state battery technologies deliver on their promise and wind up seeing meaningful adoption in the automotive market, the stock is poised to skyrocket. If the technology comes up short and fails to find a place in the market, shareholders will likely lose most of their investment. Before you buy stock in QuantumScape, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and QuantumScape wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why QuantumScape Stock Is Plummeting Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store