logo
Thoughts and prayers - the truth about politicians and natural disasters

Thoughts and prayers - the truth about politicians and natural disasters

Metro09-07-2025
Following catastrophic flooding in Texas, hopes of finding survivors have dimmed as the death toll passed 100 today.
27 of those who died were children at summer camp, including two twin sisters who had just finished the second grade.
While some families have yet to recover the bodies of their missing loved ones, many of whom just days ago were having the time of their lives at Camp Mystic, the tragedy is already being manipulated by those in power.
During a recent press conference, White House Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Democrats of turning the floods into a 'political game' – likely alluding to calls from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to investigate if 'preventable failures' contributed to the floods.
She added: 'This is a national tragedy, and the administration is treating it as such. Blaming President Trump for these floods is a depraved lie, and it serves no purpose during this time of national mourning.'
This isn't the first time a climate disaster has been exploited by politicians to serve their own interests, with little regard for those who have suffered and lost loved ones – and it probably won't be the last.
Comparisons to the scale of disaster and response from political leaders have already been made to the devastation in western North Carolina last September, after Hurricane Helene swept through, killing 251 people and destroying thousands of homes.
As walls of water moved quickly through small mountain towns, entire houses and businesses were wiped away in an instant, while hundreds of residents had little chance of escape. Almost a year later, the communities still haven't recovered.
Immediately after the disaster, Trump, who was in the midst of his re-election campaign, began spreading well-documented public lies and conspiracy theories, blaming President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for the flood and lack of help.
During one visit to the small North Carolinian town of Swannanoa in January, which suffered unprecedented damage, he told victims that the Biden government 'failed' them with funding.
While Trump's recent, sombre remarks following the floods in Texas are a far cry from his politically-motivated posts during Hurricane Helene, he still couldn't resist placing blame on another politician, like many leaders before him.
'Melania and I are praying for all the families impacted by this horrible tragedy. God bless the families and God bless Texas,' he posted, later adding: 'If you look at that water situation, that was really the Biden setup.'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Biden's response to Hurricane Helene was also slammed for the 'delayed' response in giving aide to the hardest-hit regions from the storm. He was harshly criticised for his lack of urgency to visit North Carolina after the storm.
This delay from Biden infuriated Trump, who previously blamed Democrats for climate disasters. In early January, he blamed California's governor for the unprecedented wildfires which burned much of Los Angeles – accusing him of prioritising 'fish' over more water in the state.
While comments like these could appear as good-old-fashioned political mud-slinging, the real-world consequences have been felt for decades, often by some of America's poorest regions.
Months after claiming that Biden had let the people of North Carolina down financially, the Trump Administration denied a request for millions of dollars worth of Hurricane Helene relief.
The question is, with extreme weather disasters growing more volatile as the burning of fossil fuels continues across America – and the globe – why do so many politicians prefer to point the finger rather than address the elephant in the room and actually do something?
'It's not a simple story, but it's a very American story. This is where we are,' Lawrence Hamilton, a Professor of Sociology at the University of New Hampshire, tells Metro.
After all, climate change-related extreme weather events have been found to disproportionately affect lower-income areas, further exacerbating already tough living conditions when disaster hits.
When it comes to floods, historically, residents who live on higher ground are often better off than those in lower areas, which see the most damage.
During Hurricane Katrina in 2005, areas at higher elevations in Louisiana, such as the wealthier French Quarter, only more minor flooding and damage.
Meanwhile, the lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans was severely damaged when the levees broke, sending historic levels of water spilling into homes and killing more than a thousand people.
After Katrina moved through, the debris left behind revealed just how real the intersection between poverty and geography is when it comes to weather disasters.
Despite tragic floods, wildfires and climate disasters seen in Texas, North Carolina, California and across the country, many Americans simply 'aren't perceiving' the patterns at play which worsen weather.
'For instance, out West, where wildfires are common, people know it's bad. They often perceive that they're getting worse, but they do not accept any of the science about why they might be getting worse, or they only accept the parts of it that fit with their sociopolitical views,' explains Professor Hamilton.
'There's a theory in social science called elite cues – it's the idea that you know what to believe because your leaders have told you that it goes with your identity.
'Some places are much harder hit, and the impact is harder to overlook, but in other areas, oftentimes, even just the perception of whether it happened or not is being disputed.'
After Helene destroyed western North Carolina, rumours of 'space lasers' controlling the weather ran rampant online.
In the aftermath of the Texas floods, some people began blaming the victims. In one viral TikTok, a woman suggested the campers (who were children) at Camp Mystic 'deserved' to die because the state voted for Trump.
These warped perceptions of reality come from deep-rooted convictions, Professor Hamilton adds, that often change the person's view of what actually happened.
'People's belief systems can overwrite their perceptions of physical reality, so they remember things differently or interpret them in radically different ways,' he explains.
'The climate is changing, and there are layers of scientists who are studying and anticipating it. The National Weather Service was watching the storm develop and issuing warnings.' More Trending
Yet, Professor Hamilton points out, at the same time, the National Weather Service lost 600 of its staff in the past few months due to budget cuts from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
It's unclear if cutbacks directly contributed to potential missteps in warning of the Texas floods, but Professor Hamilton adds: 'There's a whole layer cake of different things, different failures, really, in this cascade.'
The issue is, when there's blame to aim at the expense of the competition, will American politicians ever take the literal higher ground and look at why this is happening and how to stop it, rather than who is at fault?
Until then, the reality is that for every social media post filled with thoughts and prayers and a little dig on the side, the most vulnerable lives will continue to be lost, and our world will carry on burning, with victims picking up the pieces of their lives.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Grammy-winning star battling cancer fears 'cruel' deportation under new Trump law
MORE: Country singer Pat Green confirms little brother and family were swept away in Texas floods
MORE: Nato scrambles warplanes after Putin unleashes heaviest strikes of the war
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump 'told his name appears multiple times' in Epstein files'
Trump 'told his name appears multiple times' in Epstein files'

Metro

time10 minutes ago

  • Metro

Trump 'told his name appears multiple times' in Epstein files'

President Donald Trump was reportedly told by his administration that his name appears in the Jeffrey Epstein files multiple times. US Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in a White House meeting in May that his name is in the Justice Department documents on the late sex offender, senior administration officials told The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday. Trump learned that the 'files contained what officials felt was unverified hearsay about many people, including Trump, who had socialized with Epstein in the past', according to the report. 'Many other high-profile figures were also named.' The meeting, which included Bondi's deputy Todd Blanche, happened weeks before the Justice Department and FBI announced that 'no incriminating 'client list'' existed and that they would not be releasing the files they previously promised to disclose. An administration official quickly shot down the report. 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media,' said White House spokesman Steven Cheung in an email. Bondi and Blanche on Wednesday stated that 'nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts'. 'As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings,' they said. When asked last week if Bondi told him his name appears in the Epstein files, Trump told an ABC News reporter: 'No, no.' He claimed that the files were 'made up by' former FBI Director James Comey and the Obama and Biden administrations. The Journal report comes a week after the newspaper published a story alleging that Trump sent Epstein a letter for his 50th birthday in 2003 with text framed by the outline of a naked woman, at the request of the disgraced financier's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Trump has vehemently denied penning the letter and on Friday filed a defamation lawsuit against The Journal, the two reporters who wrote the story, and the publisher. More Trending On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee also ordered Maxwell, a convicted sex offender, to testify before them on August 11. Maxwell is expected to provide her deposition at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, where she is serving a 20-year sentence her role in conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse and exploit underage girls. 'While the department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to your and Mr. Epstein's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of you and Mr. Epstein,' states the cover letter of the subpoena to Maxwell. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Two women killed after rubber rings plunged down waterfall named MORE: Should we all be more boomer? Reader says boomers hold the most political sway MORE: Idaho killer locks gaze on victims' families as they face 'evil' in dock

Trump floats spectacular name change for AI after admitting he 'can't stand' current term
Trump floats spectacular name change for AI after admitting he 'can't stand' current term

Daily Mail​

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump floats spectacular name change for AI after admitting he 'can't stand' current term

President Donald Trump attended an artificial intelligence summit on Wednesday, even as he revealed to the audience of eager tech moguls he was not a fan of the name. 'Around the globe, everyone is talking about artificial intelligence,' Trump said. 'Artificial. I can't stand it, I don't even like the name.' As the audience stared wordlessly at the president, he suggested they change the name. 'I don't like anything that's artificial so can we straighten that out please?' Trump asked. 'We should change the name.' As some in the audience laughed in response, Trump continued, 'I actually mean that.' 'I don't like the name artificial anything, because it's not artificial its genius. It's pure genius,' he said, indicating he would prefer the name 'genius intelligence' better than 'artificial intelligence.' President Trump spoke after the White House released it's AI Action Plan on Wednesday, which detailed the administration's efforts to boost the development and innovation of the technology. The document recommends that Trump streamline regulations and permitting to allow companies to build massive data centers and energy sources quickly to help accelerate the industry. It also recommends that the administration promote the export of American AI models abroad to help dominate the spread of the technology. The plan also stresses the administration's determination to enshrine the rights of free speech into artificial intelligence models, warning that the federal government would only contract with companies with AI models 'free from top-down idealogical bias.' During his speech, Trump announced he was getting rid of Biden's executive order which outlined a preference preference for companies who prioritized DEI programs and climate goals. 'We're getting rid of woke,' Trump said triumphantly, adding that, 'It's so uncool to be woke.' He said his goal was to root out 'partisan bias' or idealogical agendas from tech companies and artificial intelligence models such as 'critical race theory' which he described as 'ridiculous.' 'The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in the AI models and neither do other countries,' Trump said. 'From now on the US government will only work with AI that works with truth.' Trump acknowledged the dangers of artificial intelligence, but described the race with China and other countries on the technology as one the United States had to win. 'This technology brings the potential for bad as well as for good, for peril as well as for progress but the daunting power of AI is not going to be a reason for retreat from this new frontier,' The president signed two executive orders at the summit, joking he would not sign the executive order with an auto-pen, in a dig to his predecessor former President Joe Biden. 'Good luck because the race has just begun and we're going to win it,' he said to the tech executives as he exited the event.

The Donald and the art of golf diplomacy
The Donald and the art of golf diplomacy

Spectator

time17 minutes ago

  • Spectator

The Donald and the art of golf diplomacy

In 1969, one of the great acts of sportsmanship occurred at Royal Birkdale golf club in Southport, when the Ryder Cup came down to the last green. Britain's Tony Jacklin had a three-foot putt to halve the final match with Jack Nicklaus and make the score 16-16, but the American picked up Jacklin's marker and said he was happy to share the spoils. 'I don't think you would have missed,' he said, 'but I didn't want to give you the chance.' The gesture was immortalised in the naming of a Florida golf course, the Concession, which has just been awarded the next three senior PGA Championships, one of the majors. I suspect that Donald Trump, who owns three courses in that state, might regard Nicklaus as a loser. The coat of arms for Trump's latest course in Scotland has the motto Numquam Concedere ('never let them have a gimme', to paraphrase) and the emblem of an eagle clutching two balls. Subtle. Police and protestors are ready for Trump's visit to Aberdeenshire this weekend, where he will open the course at Menie, which is due to be named the MacLeod after his mother and has, the family boasts, 'the largest sand dunes in Scotland'. That might trigger environmentalists, since the ancient links has lost its Site of Special Scientific Interest status as a result of Trump's development. Sir Keir Starmer is expected to travel north during the visit to bend a knee and watch Trump drive, since the way to the President's heart is by admiring his swing. One of the things Trump would most like the Prime Minister to bring as a gift is the right to host the Open Championship, which was held last week at Royal Portrush in Northern Ireland. When Trump bought the Turnberry course in Ayrshire in 2014, it was with the expectation that the Open would follow. The R&A, which organises the Open, initially made positive noises and it is believed the course had been earmarked to host the tournament in 2020. Turnberry is undeniably a magnificent course, rated the eighth finest outside the US by Golf Digest, and it has hosted four excellent Opens including in 1977, when Nicklaus slugged it out for four days with Tom Watson, and the Open in 2009, when Watson almost won again at the age of 59. It would be a more than worthy venue. Then Trump decided to become president, and his controversial comments made people feel uneasy. In 2015, Peter Dawson, the outgoing chief executive of the R&A, said that a bit of time should pass before returning to Turnberry. His successor, Martin Slumbers, took a harder line, saying it could not be held there because the focus would be on the course's owner rather than the golfers. This came after the PGA of America removed the 2022 PGA Championship from Trump's Bedminster course in New Jersey following the attack on the Capitol in 2021. Since then, the position against giving Trump an Open has become more nuanced. Mark Darbon, the new R&A chief executive, says he would 'love' the Open to return to Turnberry but while he has discussed it recently with Eric Trump, Donald's son, there are 'logistical challenges'. The course is in the middle of nowhere and the transport links and hotel accommodation can't cope. Only 120,000 could attend Turnberry in 2009, while 280,000 came to Portrush. Sorry Donald, nothing personal. A feasibility study, that old favourite for kicking things into the long grass (and the rough can be very long at the Open), has been commissioned to ease the political pressure. If that fails, they can fall back on Sir Humphrey's 'in the fullness of time' tactic. The next two Opens have been allocated – Birkdale in 2026 and St Andrews in 2027 – and it is believed that Muirfield in East Lothian, which last hosted an Open in 2013, will be given 2028 as the reward for agreeing to allow women members. The last time three successive Opens were held in Scotland was 1893, so that means we're looking at 2030, when Trump will be 84 and (presumably) no longer in the White House. This may be nudged back even further if there are difficult scenes at the Ryder Cup in late September, to be held in Bethpage, New York, where the fans are notoriously raucous. Trump will surely be there on the tee, a week after his state visit to Britain, having missed the chance to host a Ryder Cup in his first term. It was to be at Whistling Straits, Wisconsin, in 2020, a few weeks before he fought re-election, but was postponed by the pandemic. A US win might have swayed the election for him. He will not miss this Ryder Cup but if it is a rowdy one – expect no sporting concessions this time – the R&A may find a new reason to delay a decision. One thing that is certain about Trump's visit to Aberdeenshire is that he will have a GREAT opening round. He is a more than decent golfer to judge by footage (though his declared handicap of 2.8 raises eyebrows), but he has never knowingly played badly, certainly not at a club he owns. Two weeks ago, he won the members' championship at Bedminster yet again, while in 2023 he won a two-day competition at his West Palm Beach course, despite being 600 miles away on the first day. Trump explained that he'd had a brilliant practice round two days before and so submitted that as his Saturday scorecard in absentia, meaning the field began Sunday five strokes behind. This performance, Trump declared, proved that he had the 'strength and stamina' to deserve a second term. He certainly has the sneakiness and chutzpah, though he falls a long way behind Kim Jong-il, the Eternal Scratch Champion of Pyong-yang, who famously once had five holes-in-one during a round that was 38 under par. Trump and Kim's sporting prowess matches that of Vladimir Putin, who has scored eight goals in an ice hockey match three times, and Mao Zedong, who was said to have swum ten miles of the Yangtze in just over an hour. It was ever thus with vain leaders, whose sporting boasts are rarely challenged. The Emperor Nero competed at the Olympics in the race for four-horse chariots, steering a vehicle pulled by ten horses. The excessive horsepower meant Nero crashed at the first corner, but he successfully persuaded the judges to award him the laurels since he should have won. Trump's latest visit to Bedminster put him within sight of Barack Obama in the list of golf-mad presidents. Obama played 306 rounds while in office, and Trump is now up to 304 after six months of his second term. During the 2016 election, Trump claimed he would be too busy to play golf as president. He then squeezed in 11 rounds in his first eight weeks. This term, he was back on the course on Day 6. And again on Day 7. Trump is also not far behind Bill Clinton, the only president whose handicap went down in the White House – but he has some way to go to beat the top two. Dwight Eisenhower notched up 800 rounds in office, some quite iffy. Bob Hope quipped: 'If Eisenhower slices the budget like he slices a golf ball, the nation has nothing to worry about.' Way out in front is Woodrow Wilson, who played every other day during the first world war, including at the Versailles peace conference, but he remained mediocre. As a presidential duffer, he comes behind William Taft, who once recorded a 27 on one hole, including 17 to get out of a bunker, but believed that it was gentlemanly to be honest. 'There is nothing which furnishes a greater test of character and self-restraint than golf,' Taft said. Trump takes a different view, which is why it is unsurprising that world leaders now see golf as a tool of diplomacy. Shinzo Abe, the deceased former prime minister of Japan, played five rounds with Trump and in 2016 gave him a $3,700 golden driver. Abe did so well out of this that Yoon Suk Yeol, the President of South Korea, took up the sport to help his own diplomatic game. Nigel Farage's close friendship with Trump may in part be due to this shared interest – the Reform UK leader says he almost took up a US college golf scholarship – though Farage's bad back doesn't allow him to play any more. When Cyril Ramaphosa visited the White House in May, the South African President took with him a pair of major-winning golfers, Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, in the hope that it would impress Trump. Alexander Stubb, the Finnish President and a former college golfer in South Carolina, negotiated the purchase by the US of some Finnish icebreakers after he played (and won) a tournament in Palm Beach with Trump as his partner in March. That will be the challenge for Starmer when he pays homage. Unlike David Cameron, who rewarded Obama for his Brexit intervention in 2016 with a round at the Grove in Hertfordshire, Starmer can't fake an interest in golf. He was the first prime minister to reject honorary membership of the Ellesborough golf club near Chequers. Perhaps he will bring a star golfer like Sir Nick Faldo with him to swing for Britain. Starmer did have a professional golfer on his backbenches in Brian Leishman, MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, but the Socialist Campaign Group member, who recently lost the whip for rebelling, will surely not play ball. How about the Paymaster General? Nick Thomas-Symonds's skill with a mashie niblick is unknown, but he was named Nicklaus by a golf-mad father. For diplomatic reasons, Starmer may want to allow Trump to say that his course was blessed by a British Nicklaus. Just don't expect the President to concede any short putts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store