‘Excessive workload' means 44% of teachers work extra day every week, says union
A survey by the EIS teaching union found 44.3% of teachers who took part said they work an additional seven unpaid hours in a typical week.
Meanwhile 11.5% of teachers said they work an extra 15 hours or more per week – the equivalent of two more days.
The results are revealed in a survey the union carries out every two years which looks at workload, health and wellbeing issues.
The findings were made public ahead of the union's annual general meeting later this week – where it will open a consultative ballot for industrial action over the Scottish Government's 'failure' to meet a commitment to reduce time spent in classes for teachers.
EIS general secretary Andrea Bradley said: 'The results of the EIS national survey paint a stark picture on the matter of teacher workload.
'It is a story of persistent, excessive workload demands being placed on teachers at all grades and at all stages of their careers.
'This has serious health, safety and wellbeing implications for teachers, and is contributing to a worrying upward trend in stress-related illness throughout the teaching profession.'
A total of 10,789 teachers from across Scotland took part in the survey – with only 17.5% saying they are either 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with their workload levels.
Two-thirds (66.9%) reported being either 'dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' with workload levels generally.
When looking at the preparation and marking teachers have to do for classes, almost three-quarters (73%) said they are rarely or never able to do this within the working week.
And 64% said they can never complete all the tasks assigned to them within their working week.
Ms Bradley said tackling 'excessive teacher workload' is one of the key aims of the union's Stand Up for Quality Education campaign.
She vowed to press both local councils, who employ teachers, and the Scottish Government on the 'vital issue'.
It comes after the last SNP Holyrood election manifesto pledged to cut the time teachers spend in the classroom by 1.5 hours a week 'to give them the time they need to lift standards'.
But Ms Bradley said: 'Four years on from that pledge being made, there has been absolutely no tangible progress towards delivering it, and no proposals as to how it will be delivered.
'It is the failure to deliver on this vital promise on class contact time that will lead to the EIS opening a consultative industrial action ballot over workload at our annual general meeting later this week.'
The Scottish Government said ministers will continue to work with unions and local government body Cosla to 'agree our approach to delivering a reduction in class contact time'.
A spokesperson added: 'This is also why we are providing local authorities with an additional £186.5 million to restore teacher numbers, alongside an additional £29 million to support the recruitment and retention of the ASN (additional support needs) workforce.
'This funding has been provided on the clear agreement that meaningful progress is made on reducing teacher class contact time.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
We sorely need another McCrone Report on education
It came as something of a shock to find that I, as a headteacher, was regularly working a 50-60-hour week. The Report's findings and recommendations, which included a 35-hour working week, a maximum class contact time and a generous pay settlement of 10%, were warmly welcomed even by the EIS who commended on the 'unique process of discussion and dialogue among employers, teacher representatives and the Scottish Executive…. to create a package of conditions and pay on which to build a confident and highly regarded teaching profession.' Another national inquiry is long overdue. Then there is the need for a guaranteed (and centrally funded) level of staffing for our schools. My generation was brought up in the era of the famous Red Book. This was a very detailed set of calculations prepared by the then HMI that enabled schools and local authorities to work out a customised staffing for each establishment. On top of a basic staffing entitlement based on pupil numbers, additional staff allocations were funded by the Government to support, for example, probationary teachers and what were then referred to as 'remedial pupils'. A Government determination to re-establish agreed national staffing levels for our schools with additional allocations for indicators of deprivation and the integration of special needs youngsters would do much to restore confidence in a service that currently is under siege. A commitment by the Scottish Government to establish these major inquiries as a matter or urgency is not going to bring about any significant results before next year's elections for the Scottish Parliament, but it would set out a clear direction of travel which might remove some of the current pressure and hold out promise for an education system better suited to the challenges of the 21st century. Eric Melvin, Edinburgh. Read more letters Stop the gangs to stop the boats What would be your response if, sitting at home one day content that your home was secure, a young man broke in? Would you put him up in your spare room, give him food and pocket money, and in the coming days arrange for him driving lessons and visits to leisure centres? Or would you possibly try to restrain him and definitely call the police? Astonishingly, our Government favours the former response to the migrants breaking in to the UK illegally by crossing the Channel in small boats, whilst pontificating that the numbers are 'clearly unacceptable" ('Record number of migrants crossing English Channel for first half of year", The Herald, July 2). No wonder these migrants keep coming in ever-increasing numbers. When will the Government accept that paying the French police and trying to 'smash the gangs" simply doesn't work? One sure way to stop this migrant invasion would be to deter them from attempting to cross the Channel by making that crossing pointless. Why does the Government not legislate that anyone arriving here illegally will be disqualified automatically from staying, killing both the migrants demand and the gangs' business? Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop. The lesson of Dounreay Charles Scott (Letters, July 2) says he is not part of the pro-nuclear lobby. Unfortunately he displays the same head-in-the-sand attitudes with regard to financial and environmental costs of this dirty industry. The decommissioning of Dounreay, which has been under way for years, is not expected to be completed until at least 2070. Also, the highly dangerous waste produced will need to be stored for thousands of years. Such legacies would be even more of a "major mistake by our Government". David Hay, Minard. • In his plea for atomic power, Charles Scott writes of the need to "reduce harmful emissions in the (energy) sector". Well, if radioactivity isn't harmful I don't know what is. Two miles from my abode the irradiated hulls of submarines still have to be kept well away from the public, and power stations produce lethal waste which has to be guarded for many decades if not centuries, either on-site at Torness or at Sellafield, both of which are potential war targets. But of course for most folk these places are far away, someone else's problem. George Morton, Rosyth. The decommissioning of Dounreay will last decades (Image: PA) Are turbines elegant symbols? In a consultation document for the proposed Torfichen wind farm – 18 turbines, 180m high near our World Heritage Site of Edinburgh – there is a very revealing comment: "...particularly given user experience is a subjective concept with some users viewing wind turbines as incongruous and intrusive structures in rural locations, whilst others consider them to be elegant symbols of sustainable energy provision". Should we not have a serious discussion as a nation to see how many members of the public see turbines as symbols as we continue with a planning system based on the Scottish Greens' manifesto? During the SNP/Scottish Greens pact the Government voted for the two National Parks and National Scenic Areas to be protected from wind farms but 'where impacts are localised and/or appropriate design mitigation has been applied, they will generally be considered to be acceptable". The developer in the above case considers the effect "localised for national planning purposes"; "the significant landscape and visual effects would only extend out to a maximum of some 5.6km". For comparison, the Glasgow Tower is 127m tall. Celia Hobbs, Penicuik.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
In the wake of childcare allegations, how should I talk to my kids about body safety?
Hearing about alleged child abuse in trusted places such as childcare centres is every parent's worst nightmare. So how can we talk to our kids about it and help them stay safe? While it's not always possible to prevent abuse – and it's never the victim's responsibility – there are practical, age-appropriate ways to help children trust their instincts and feel confident to speak up. These conversations don't have to be frightening. They're about teaching kids body safety, boundaries and trust in a calm, shame-free way. Here's what parents and carers can do right now and some resources that might help. Many of us grew up in families where private parts were given nicknames or not mentioned at all. Basic bodily functions were treated as embarrassing or joked about. But when we flinch or make jokes, we teach our children these topics shouldn't be spoken about. Instead, we need to speak about bodies in a clear, matter-of-fact way. Research shows one of the simplest and most effective protective factors for children is teaching them correct names for their genitals – penis, vulva, vagina, anus, bottom – without shame or secrecy. Using the right words gives children the language to ask questions and tell a trusted adult if something feels wrong. We can use everyday moments, such as bath time or getting dressed, to weave these words in. While your child is in the bath you might say: 'Have you cleaned your vulva/penis? This is your special area and it's up to you to look after it.' It's also important to explain, in simple terms, that some things are just for adults. This isn't about making the topic scary, but about setting safe boundaries: 'Sex is for grownups. It's not for children, and it's never OK for an adult or another child to involve you in anything like that.' If you're unsure how to begin, children's books about bodies and private parts can help start the conversation, from toddlers to primary schoolchildren to pre-adolescent children. Children are often taught to be polite and do as they're told. While manners matter, this can sometimes teach children not to trust their own instincts. It's vital for children to know they are in charge of their own bodies: they get to decide what happens to them. This means they never have to hug, kiss or touch anyone if they don't want to, not even close family members. As parents, this can feel socially awkward. But we can help by offering alternatives, such as high five, a wave or just saying hello. When we respect children saying 'no' to safe adults, we reinforce that their boundaries matter and they always have a right to speak up. Trusting our children helps them learn to trust themselves. Encourage them to listen to their in-built sense when something isn't right – an 'uh-oh' feeling in their tummy. Let them know: 'If someone ever makes you feel weird or yucky inside, you can always tell me, even if someone tells you not to. I'll always listen and believe you.' This helps build the confidence to speak up if something doesn't feel right, whether it's with another child on a play date, an adult at school, or even a date when they're older. Most importantly, it sends the message that adults will listen, believe and protect them. From a young age, children can understand safe grown-ups don't ask them to keep secrets. It's helpful to explain the difference between a secret and a surprise. Surprises are fun and temporary, like hiding a birthday present, and are always revealed. Secrets are about hiding something for a long time, and can make people feel scared or sad. You might say: 'You can tell me anything. You won't get in trouble, even if an adult says it's a secret.' Sometimes children can't find the words or feel too scared to speak up. They might not fully understand what happened until they're older. One of the most protective things you can do is remind your child it's never too late to tell you if something's worrying them. If they raise something from the past, stay calm, listen and thank them for trusting you. If your child ever discloses something distressing, take a deep breath before you respond, let them know you believe them and avoid asking lots of detailed questions – just listen. Seek professional help if needed. This might mean talking to your GP, calling a child protection helpline or speaking to a trusted mental health professional. Not all children will disclose abuse directly. Look for sudden changes in behaviour or language that seems too mature, fear of certain people or places, regression such as bed-wetting or nightmares. These signs don't automatically mean abuse has occurred. But they are cues to gently check in, ask open questions and get help if needed. You don't have to do this perfectly. Small conversations, repeated over time, help protect children and show them you're always there to listen. In Australia, children, young adults, parents and teachers can contact the Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800, or Bravehearts on 1800 272 831, and adult survivors can contact Blue Knot Foundation on 1300 657 380. In the UK, the NSPCC offers support to children on 0800 1111, and adults concerned about a child on 0808 800 5000. In the US, call or text the Childhelp abuse hotline on 800-422-4453. Other sources of help can be found at Child Helplines International
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The dark reality of Anthony Albanese's pledge to slash university student debt
Anthony Albanese 's pledge to slash university student debt by 20 per cent is an unfair policy that will end up favouring the rich, new analysis shows. Labor was resoundingly re-elected in May with a plan to cut student debts by an average of $5,520 with more than three million Aussies having $16billion wiped from their loans on June 1 this year. The total relief approaches $20billion, with the government also reducing student debt by another $3billion by indexing it to either the consumer price index or the wage price index - whichever is lower. The e61 Institute think tank argues Labor's student debt relief policy is unfair because it will mainly benefit those who go on to earn higher salaries later in life. University graduates are much more likely to be paying off a Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) debt rather than a vocational or apprenticeship loan. More than half the benefits of the student debt relief would go to individuals who went on to become the top third of income earners a decade later, with less than 20 per cent of the benefit helping the bottom third of income earners. 'Most of the benefits of a student debt cut will go to future high-income earners,' the research note by Jack Buckley and Matthew Maltman said. 'This raises vertical equity concerns because a student debt cut disproportionately benefits individuals with very high lifetime incomes, and not those with low lifetime incomes.' Even with the debt relief, the e61 Institute calculated that only 20 per cent of students would pay off their debt a year earlier as a result of the debt cuts. The benefit would also disproportionately favour graduates in this financial year. 'Our analysis suggests that individuals who leave university in the year the policy is implemented will receive a debt cut that is more than twice as large as individuals who left only four years earlier, or four years later,' it said. 'Otherwise similar individuals who studied the same degree at slightly different times receive very different levels of debt relief.' Average student debt stood at $27,640 in 2023-24, based on tax office data. University graduates, however, often go on to earn higher salaries compared with those who didn't go to university. 'Individuals who attend university, on average, go on to earn higher incomes than those who do not,' it said. 'People under 30 with a HELP debt in 2012 went on to earn almost $15,000 more per year, on average, than individuals of the same age who did not have a HELP debt. 'The university earnings premium is higher for individuals with a higher HELP debt.' Medical specialists are typically among the top one per cent of income earners, after going to university. Surgeons have Australia's highest average taxable income of $472,475 and this professional requires a Bachelor of Medicine and postgraduate study in a specialty. Outside medicine, finance dealers have the highest incomes of $355,233, after studying finance, commerce or economics at university. Mining engineers have typical pay of $206,423 after doing a degree in engineering while judges and lawyers have average incomes of $206,408 after doing a law degree. The Higher Education Contribution Scheme replaced free university education, which had existed from 1974 to 1989. This meant students would start paying back their loans when their salary reached a certain level instead of taxpayers, who never went to university, funding their study. Under Labor, the minimum income threshold for repaying student debt has increased to $67,000 for 2025-25, up from $54,435 in 2024-25. While it marks a significant jump, the new minimum repayment threshold is still below Australia's median salary of $72,592 for all workers. The Albanese Government's student debt relief policy has been popular with younger voters, with Labor picking up three lower house seats from the Greens, including that of former leader Adam Bandt.
