Thousands of students block traffic in Athens over delays to Tempi rail crash probe
Protesters marched through the city centre, chanting "Murderers! Murderers!" as hundreds of police officers, many in riot gear, monitored the march.
"What is happening today is nothing more than a demand - not only for justice - but, for me, an open and cleaner road. For those who will come after us, for us who are older today and are here. We are not just here for ourselves," said a high school teacher who gave his name only as Pantazi.
"It is for those who will be after us, when we are no longer here. And that is the most important thing - to fight for something better even if you are not there to enjoy it, for others. This is the dispute today."
The protest in Athens comes just over a week after tens of thousands of people protested in more than 100 cities across the country, the largest protest movement in Greece in more than a decade.
That action came after local media released new audio recording suggesting that dozens of the victims may have died in a fire after the collision.
It was previously thought all the victims of the February 2023 crash had been killed in the crash.
Demonstrators held banners with the slogan 'I Have No Oxygen', which was heard in the audio recording.
The crash happened just before midnight on 28 February, 2023, when a freight train and a passenger train crashed head-on on the line linking Athens with Thessaloniki.
The collision triggered mass protests across Greece, with many people saying the collision showed the years of neglect of the rail network after a decade-long financial crisis.
A judicial investigation is still ongoing and the cause of death of many of the victims has still not been determined.
But the slowness of that probe has prompted families of the victims to accuse the government of trying to cover up evidence, something Athens denies.
Greece's centre-right government headed by Kyriakos Mitsotakis was re-elected three months after the crash and promised to reform the country's rail network but the European Commission says that so far progress has been slow.
At the Athens protest, a statement from the victims' families was circulated which claimed the train was carrying an "illegal chemical cargo" which caused the fire after the crash.
"The tragedy in Tempi was not an accident. It was a crime born of indifference, irresponsibility and corruption. A crime which must not go unpunished," the resolution stated.
The Athens protest on the 26 January was largely peaceful but there were some clashes between police and protesters.
Police say one protester was arrested and that violence started out after groups of hooded men broke away from the crowd and attacked the police with Molotov cocktails and stones.
"We are here today as a club to protest for the 57 dead, to protest against the crime that took place in Tempi, but also for the policy that puts profits first and human lives second," said student Odisseas Gountaras at the rally in Athens on Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Cruel summer turns up heat on Ursula von der Leyen's second mandate
It's fair to assume Ursula von der Leyen will be looking forward to her summer break. This July, typically a month of low-intensity in Brussels politics, has been nothing short of a whirlwind for the president of the European Commission, with consequential decisions and pivotal moments that could reshape the trajectory of her five-year mandate. Nobody expected her second term to be an easy ride, certainly not after the electoral victory of Donald Trump, a man whose beliefs are directly at odds with the bloc's defence of predictable rules, open markets and international cooperation. Still, the events of the last five weeks, a powerful blend of domestic bickering, global turmoil and personal scrutiny, crack the president's tightly controlled image and leave her vulnerable to a sort of stinging criticism she had previously avoided. Here's how von der Leyen's summer got crueller and bleaker. First, the motion Von der Leyen never enjoyed hugely harmonious relations with the European Parliament. MEPs have routinely complained about the president's well-known preference for engaging with member states, the real holders of political power, and her perceived tendency to treat the hemicycle as a second-rate legislator. Tensions and discontent had been simmering for months when a hard-right lawmaker, Romania's Gheorghe Piperea, drafted a motion of censure against the European Commission and managed to secure the necessary 72 signatures to put it to a vote. Piperea's motion, which combined the Pfizergate scandal with conspiracies about electoral interference, never had a realistic chance of succeeding. The far-fetched move was ultimately rejected with 360 votes against and 175 in favour. But the arithmetic was not the point. The motion put von der Leyen in a rare position of defiance. The Commission chief was forced to address, one by one, the accusations that Piperea had levelled against her, rejecting them all as "false claims" and "sinister plots". Socialists, liberals and greens, all of whom backed her re-election last year, seized the moment to air their pent-up frustration and run through a shopping list of recriminations, raising serious questions about the viability of the centrist coalition. "I will always be ready to debate any issue that this house wants, with facts and with arguments," she said, offering an olive branch for "unity". The saga polarised the Parliament and weakened von der Leyen. Crucially, it proved how relatively easy it is for MEPs to file a motion of censure at any point. Manon Aubry, the co-leader of The Left, has begun collecting signatures for a fresh attempt. Then, the budget Bruised from the motion of censure, von der Leyen shifted gears to focus on what was expected to be her biggest announcement of the year: the Commission's long-awaited proposal for the bloc's next seven-year budget (2028-2034). It was the perfect opportunity for von der Leyen to showcase her political gravitas, reframe the conversation and turn a page on the acrimonious vote. As it happened, the proposal was marred by internal fights over the total size of the budget, the restructuring of programmes and the financial allocation for each priority. Her novel idea to merge agricultural and cohesion funds into a single envelope leaked in advance and prompted immediate criticism from the powerful farming lobby. Her cabinet's penchant for secrecy left other Commissioners in a scramble to figure out how much money they would have in future for their portfolios. By the time von der Leyen unveiled the €2 trillion budget, the largest ever put forward, attention was split between her ground-breaking blueprint and the behind-the-scenes drama, which stretched through the night until the final meeting. During the press conference, the president was asked the awkward question on whether she had treated her 26 Commissioners with fairness and respect. "Not everyone was satisfied," she said, explaining the one-by-one consultations. "There's strong support. The collegial decision is taken. And now we have to fight to bring this budget further in the next two years." Later, the summit "Unsustainable." That is how Commission officials had described the state of EU-China relations in anticipation of a high-stakes bilateral summit in Beijing. China's generous use of state subsidies to boost domestic production despite lacking the internal demand to absorb it has provoked the fury of Brussels, which fears the intense race-to-the-bottom could decimate European industry. Beijing's decision to curb exports of critical raw materials, hinder market access for foreign firms and continue its "no-limits partnership" with Moscow added to the piled-up tensions. Despite the urgent need for tangible change, Ursula von der Leyen left the summit with little to show. There was a new commitment to address bottlenecks in the supply of rare earths and a joint statement on climate action. Beyond that, no progress was achieved, and the main points of friction were left conspicuously unaddressed. "We have reached a clear inflection point," von der Leyen told reporters. "As we said to the Chinese leadership, for trade to remain mutually beneficial, it must become more balanced. Europe welcomes competition. But it must be fair." The underwhelming summit suggests EU-China relations will remain confrontational for the foreseeable future, trapping von der Leyen between two perilous avenues: retaliate and risk facing Beijing's wrath or offer concessions that might not be reciprocated. "With its rare earth controls, China has given Europe a glimpse of the havoc it can wreak if the trade battle gets hot," Noah Barkin, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, wrote in his latest newsletter. "But if Europe fails to push back forcefully, throwing all the defensive trade tools it has at China, the long-term damage to its industrial base is likely to be profound." And finally, the deal Ursula von der Leyen's admiration for the transatlantic alliance faced its most gruelling test on 2 April 2025, when Donald Trump unveiled his contentious "reciprocal" tariffs to single-handedly redesign the economic order built at the end of World War II. That fateful day triggered frantic negotiations to spare the export-oriented bloc from Trump's sweeping duties. His ultimatum to apply an across-the-board 30% rate, made in a letter addressed to von der Leyen, caused palpable panic across Brussels. With the deadline of 1 August looming ever closer, the Commission chief flew to Scotland and met Trump in a last-ditch attempt to seal a deal of sorts. What emerged from those talks was an agreement to apply a 15% tariff on the majority of EU products and a 0% tariff on the majority of US products. Additionally, the bloc made tentative pledges to spend an astonishing $750 billion on American energy and invest $600 billion in the American market by the end of Trump's mandate. The outcry was loud and fast: critics spoke of capitulation, humiliation and submission to decry the extremely lopsided nature of the deal, which codifies the highest tariffs that transatlantic commerce has seen in over 70 years. Von der Leyen, who had just stood firm against Beijing's demands, struggled to explain why she had offered such far-reaching concessions to satisfy Trump. "15% is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get," she said. The deal, factually disadvantageous for the bloc, takes the shine off von der Leyen's reputation as a reliable manager-in-chief and threatens to become a painful thorn in her second term, which is meant to prioritise competitiveness and growth. If anything, she might take comfort in the fact that none of the 27 EU leaders appear to have the stomach to tear the deal apart and start negotiations from scratch. "Europe does not yet see itself as a power," said French President Emmanuel Macron. "To be free, you must be feared. We were not feared enough."
LeMonde
8 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU artificial intelligence regulation takes effect, sparking new Europe-US clash
Despite provoking the ire of the Trump administration and many large companies on both sides of the Atlantic, European legislation affecting the tech sector has continued to move forward − for now. This is the case with the regulation on artificial intelligence (AI), some of whose central provisions take effect on Saturday, August 2, a little more than one year after the final adoption of the bill – one of the world's most ambitious in this field. This applies in particular to the governance component; the 27 member states must inform the European Commission about which national authorities will be responsible for ensuring the proper enforcement of the rules. Service providers will therefore be subject to closer scrutiny – though that remains mostly theoretical in some member states, which have yet to designate the relevant bodies. In France, the Directorate General for Competition Policy, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control, the French Data Protection Authority, and the Defender of Rights have been chosen for this role.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Trump announces new tariffs across the globe, delaying deadline
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that imposed new tariffs on dozens of countries, which will go into effect in seven days, a deadline that has been delayed by a week so that the tariff schedule could be updated. To many, the tariff hikes do not come as a surprise, as Trump initially announced them in April. He had set a minimum 10% tariff on every country in the world and additional levies on dozens deemed the worst offenders, citing deficits and unfair trade practices with the US. Trump delayed the deadline of the tariff implementation, dubbed "Liberation Day," several times, allowing trading partners to negotiate. Some of them were able to negotiate an agreement and even reach tariff-reducing deals. A 15% tariff rate for the EU, for example, was decided on after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a political agreement with Trump over the weekend. Some countries, however, were unable to negotiate, injecting them with a new dose of uncertainty. And for some, higher tariffs were put into place than initially promised. Brazil, with 50% tariffs on its imported goods, and Canada, with 35% are among the hardest hit, followed by 39% for Switzerland, 25% for India, and 20% for Taiwan. Trump issued a separate order for Canada, stating a levy hike from 25% to 35%, citing the cross-border flow of fentanyl. The announcement from the White House late Thursday said Canada had failed to 'do more to arrest, seize, detain or otherwise intercept ... traffickers, criminals at large and illicit drugs.' Earlier on Thursday, the US president had also said Canada's announcement that it will recognise Palestine as a state as the reason it would be "very hard" for Washington to reach a trade agreement with its northern neighbour. Similarly for Brazil, Trump's tariff decision seemed more about political revenge, as the Republican President directly linked the 50% rate to the trial against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, which Trump called a "witch hunt". The curveballs sharply contrast with Trump's decision on Mexico, to whom he granted a 90-day extension to continue trade negotiations. Trump has previously said the tax increases on nearly $3 trillion worth of imported goods would bring new wealth, create new factory jobs, reduce budget deficits and get other countries to treat the US with more respect.
