Does air pollution raise the risk of brain bleeds over time? University of Utah study
New research from University of Utah Health has for the first time linked the small particulate matter pollution to ruptured brain aneurysm, which is more formally called aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The resulting brain tissue damage can be severe enough to leave patients paralyzed or in a coma, if they survive it.
The study is published in the journal npj Clean Air. The 'npj' indicates it's part of the Nature Partners Journal portfolio.
The findings are preliminary, said lead researcher Dr. Robert Rennert, a neurosurgeon and assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Utah. But it's compelling and shows that pollution from a wildfire or smog can have an impact even several months later.
PM2.5 pollution is made up of tiny particles or droplets that are easy to breathe in and can damage lungs and contribute to risk of ischemic strokes. A university news release says PM2.5 pollution particles are 30 times finer than human hair.
Rennert said earlier research has shown negative health effects from the pollution, including increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, as well as neurological, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases.
'People in the past have naturally thought that there may be a link between air pollution exposure and risk of bleeding from an intracranial aneurysm. These aneurysms occur in 3%-6% of the adult population,' he said.
That type of brain bleed kills about a third of the time, while a like share suffer very severe neurologic injuries," per Rennert.
The study involved a retrospective look at 70 adult patients University of Utah Hospital treated over the course of five years for that type of brain aneurysm. The researchers went backwards from the medical event, looking at close to 13,000 data points to see what the PM2.5 levels were in the days, weeks and months before a brain bleed occurred. Rennert said they wanted to see whether the pollution itself changed each patient's risk of having the hemorrhage.
All of the patients in the study lived within 36 selected ZIP codes within the Salt Lake, Ogden, Provo and surrounding valleys.
Rennert said he thought the research team would find that the patients would have the hemorrhage soon after a spike in PM2.5 pollution. Instead, the brain bleeds occurred between 90 and 180 days after high air pollution levels.
'Over the entire study period, recurring spikes of (the brain bleed) were often seen three to six months after PM2.5 cyclic elevations, suggesting a delayed adverse effect of PM2.5 exposure,' the study reported.
While he said that was unexpected and makes drawing connections more challenging, the researchers believe that the pollution kicks off inflammation, which weakens the blood vessel and makes it more vulnerable to hemorrhage in a process that takes some time.
When they controlled for other factors that have been 'variably linked' to aneurysm in the past, including temperature, season and barometric pressure, he said only the latter on the day of bleeding was found to be associated.
The research team plans to further study how PM2.5 impacts brain health not only locally, but in a larger geographic region and they hope to involve multiple centers in future research. They also want to understand the 'mechanisms and risks of air pollution on cerebrovascular disease more broadly,' as a news release puts it. They'll start with their theory that it's due to inflammation.
Rennert said the working theory is that the pollution kicks off inflammation that does damage, then barometric pressure somehow triggers the aneurysm to bleed. 'I would say that the barometric side is not as well understood, but that is the hypothesis.' He added that a 'long-standing body of literature shows that inflammation within an aneurysm wall is associated with its risk of rupture over time. I and others are interested in pathways to mitigate that inflammation and potentially decrease the risk of an aneurysm rupturing if you do have one.'
Ultimately, they hope people including policymakers will consider the danger of air pollution and do something about it. Among ideas they offer are giving people an incentive to use public transportation, creating stricter rules around pollution levels and dedicating more funding to environmental studies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
4 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Comic-Con 2025 set to kick off in a year that some major superheroes are sitting out
SAN DIEGO, Calif. (AP) — Tens of thousands of fans — many in costumes — will descend Thursday on Comic-Con International, the four day pop culture spectacle that will feature updates on the new 'Predator' movie, 'Alien' series and a special appearance by George Lucas. Just don't expect major news about the future of Marvel's movie slate or what's next for the hit relaunch of DC's high-flying 'Superman' franchise. Both studios are sitting out Comic-Con 2025, as far as their film slates go. An estimated 135,000 people will attend the convention, which will greet Lucas on Sunday for his first Comic-Con appearance. The 'Star Wars' creator will discuss his new Lucas Museum of Narrative Art that will open next year in Los Angeles. Fans of the 'Alien' and 'Predator' franchises will have plenty to cheer. Elle Fanning, star of 'Predator: Badlands,' will discuss the film at Comic-Con's massive Hall H this week. FX will also bring the stars and creators of 'Alien: Earth,' a series that will unleash the Xenomorph species on Earth next month. 'Alien: Earth' will be one of the projects that brings a massive interactive experience to San Diego, with a replica of spacecraft from the series. The attraction will feature what's described as a terrifying mission at night. Marvel may not be presenting new movies, but it will have a 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' attraction near the convention, a tie-in to Friday's release of the latest attempt to successfully launch its 'first family' in theaters. Thousands of fans got a sneak peek at the convention's 460,000 square foot (42,700 square meter) exhibitor section, which features exclusive merchandise, comic book art and exhibits from brands like Star Wars, Lego, Nickelodeon, Paramount and more.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Conspiracies about extreme weather spread faster than life-saving alerts on social media, says study
False information and conspiracy theories about extreme weather events spread faster than life-saving alerts on some social media platforms, according to a new study. Research by the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) claims that Meta, X and YouTube threaten public safety by enabling misleading claims during catastrophic weather events. The CCDH says this practice has resulted in 'impeded emergency response and erosion of public trust in disaster relief efforts' in some cases. 'The rapid spread of climate conspiracies online isn't accidental' CCDH researchers analysed 300 viral posts containing false or misleading information on Meta, X and YouTube during recent extreme weather events, including the LA wildfires and Hurricanes Helene and Milton. The report claims that in the wake of these events, social media platforms 'amplified conspiracy theorists while sidelining vital emergency information.' The researchers analysed five different types of misleading claims: about the causes of severe weather events; about disaster relief aid; about emergency responses; about the impact of climate change; and about political responses. They found that Meta (which operates Facebook and Instagram) lacked fact-checks or community notes on 98 per cent of posts analysed. Related Europe's summer heatwaves: Should you cancel your holiday when extreme weather hits? 'Where conflict, poverty and climate collide': Number of internally displaced people tops 80 million X lacked fact-checks or community notes on 99 per cent of posts analysed, and YouTube had zero fact-checks or community notes on 100 per cent of posts analysed. Instead, the overwhelming majority of posts spreading misleading information about disaster response, climate change causes, and emergency aid were left unmoderated before being algorithmically boosted and monetised, the study claims. 'While families mourned and first responders combed through wreckage after climate disasters in Texas and California, social media companies shamelessly exploited these catastrophes for profit,' says Imran Ahmed, CEO of CCDH. 'The rapid spread of climate conspiracies online isn't accidental, it's baked into a business model that profits from outrage and division.' Social media posts claim hurricanes were 'geo-engineered weapons' The CCDH says recent disasters revealed a dangerous pattern where falsehoods outpaced facts on social media during weather disasters. Following Hurricanes Helene and Milton in late 2024 and the LA fires in early 2025, conspiracy theories flooded platforms. These included claims that hurricanes were "geo-engineered weapons" and wildfires were ignited by "government lasers". Posts also sparked public anger by claiming that migrants were prioritised for aid, while scammers exploited survivors through adverts impersonating federal assistance programs. The research found that this false information spread faster than updates from emergency officials and reliable news outlets. High-profile and verified users spread most false information The report's authors warn that the influence of high-profile conspiracy theorists during climate disasters is drowning out emergency response efforts. During the LA wildfires, American far-right radio show host Alex Jones posted several false claims, including conspiracies about food confiscation and 'globalist' plots. These amassed more views on X than the combined reach of FEMA, the LA Times, and ten major news outlets and emergency agencies from 7 to 31 January 2025, the research found. The study also found that verified users who receive enhanced visibility and monetisation privileges are among the worst offenders. Related British potatoes and Spanish olives: How climate extremes are pushing up food prices Climate shelters: When the heat is on, where can you escape to? 88 per cent of misleading extreme weather posts on X, 73 per cent on YouTube and 64 per cent on Meta were from verified accounts. 'It is appalling to see how the climate science deniers and conspiracy theorists are manipulating extreme weather events to disseminate their fact-free fallacies,' says Sam Bright, international journalism organisation DeSmog's UK deputy editor. 'However, perhaps even more shocking is that social media companies are actively profiting from the disinformation that spreads like wildfire on their platforms. 'This report unequivocally shows that climate disinformation costs lives. As extreme weather events become more and more frequent, these falsehoods will only get more dangerous.' Euronews Green has reached out to Meta and YouTube for comment.


Medscape
33 minutes ago
- Medscape
FDA Declines to Approve New Melanoma Therapy
The FDA has declined to approve a new oncolytic immunotherapy, vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1), to treat advanced melanoma. The agency recently issued a complete response letter to the company, Replimune Group, rejecting its biologics license application that sought approval for the new agent in combination with nivolumab (Opdivo) to treat adults with advanced melanoma. In the complete response letter, the FDA indicated that it can't approve the biologics license application for vusolimogene oderparepvec because the company's IGNYTE trial 'is not considered to be an adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation that provides substantial evidence of effectiveness,' Replimune explained in a press release. According to Replimune, the complete response letter also noted that the trial data 'cannot be adequately interpreted due to the heterogeneity of the patient population,' and that 'there are items related to the confirmatory trial study design which need to be addressed.' 'We are surprised by the FDA decision and disappointed for advanced melanoma patients who have limited treatment options, as highlighted by the granting of breakthrough status at the time we provided the IGNYTE primary data,' stated Sushil Patel, PhD, Replimune's chief executive officer. Vusolimogene oderparepvec is the lead product candidate for the biotech company. Patel further noted that the issues raised in the complete response letter were not 'raised by the agency in mid- and late-cycle reviews.' Additionally, he said, 'we had also aligned on the design of the confirmatory study.' The FDA's response to the biologics license application for the new agent, along with its recently announced policy requiring randomized, controlled trials for approval of COVID vaccines in healthy Americans younger than 65 years, may signal that the agency is taking a tougher stance on new drug approvals. Replimune plans to 'urgently interact with the FDA to find a path forward for the timely accelerated approval of RP1,' according to its statement. Sharon Worcester, MA, is an award-winning medical journalist based in Birmingham, Alabama, writing for Medscape Medical News, MDedge, and other affiliate sites. She currently covers oncology, but she has also written on a variety of other medical specialties and healthcare topics. She can be reached at sworcester@ or on X @SW_MedReporter.