The 199 Things You Can't Say in the Trump Administration
Obscenity sure ain't what it used to be.
The Times' list of Trump's banned words, the paper said, is necessarily incomplete. It does not, for instance, include 'Enola Gay,' banned as part of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's DEI purge for the hilarious reason that it included the offending word 'gay.' (The dropping of the first atom bomb has long been controversial, but never for being woke.)
The Trump ban isn't absolute. Some words and phrases, the Times reported, are barred outright from the federal government's websites and government-funded school curricula, but others may be used with extreme discretion. Where encountered, this latter group is automatically flagged for review not only on government websites and in school curricula but also in grant proposals and contracts. As I understand it, when applying for a government grant it's OK to say, 'Give me some fuckin' money' but not OK to say, 'Give me some money to study trauma suffered by at-risk minorities,' because 'trauma,' 'at-risk,' and 'minorities' are on the forbidden list.
Liberals are of course no strangers to playing Word Cop, and indeed in February 2021 the Times reported that the Biden administration nixed 'illegal alien' and required that the word 'tribal,' as applied to Native Americans, be spelled with a capital T. But these were mostly reversals of Trump policies that exiled phrases like 'undocumented immigrant' and 'climate change.' The phrase 'climate change' is now back on Trump's taboo list. With 'undocumented immigrant,' it's a bit more complicated. Both that phrase and 'illegal immigrant' can no longer be used because the word 'immigrant' is forbidden. Is that to encourage usage of the nasty pejorative 'illegals'? Also, Trumpies, despite their own manifest tribalism, may not say 'Tribal,' even with an unassuming lower-case t.
Say goodbye to 'pregnant person,' a phrase the Biden administration favored as a nod to the transgender community. On similar grounds, LGBT and LGBTQ are now demoted to LGB. Regarding pregnancy, Trump's Word Cops created an interesting problem for themselves. 'Pregnant women' would be the logical substitute for 'pregnant person,' but with 'women' and 'females' both on the taboo list we're stuck calling them … 'pregnant ladies'? That's a strikingly inapt term to describe a 12-year-old rape victim who, because the Trump-appointed majority on the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, couldn't get an abortion in the state of Mississippi, and consequently began seventh grade as a 13-year-old mother. The solution here may be the indescribably sad term 'pregnant preteen.'
'Men' is not on the taboo list, in deference to the political ascendency of the Manosphere. 'Men who have sex with men' is on the taboo list, even though we have persuasive evidence that at least some within this homophobic subculture are gay. 'Men who have sex with men' is a circumlocution for 'male homosexual,' which, happily, is not on the taboo list; neither is 'gay.' The Trumpies appear to tolerate gay culture somewhat, so long as it excludes transexuals.
The terms 'equality' and 'inequality' are banned. May I remind our president that the Declaration of Independence and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address both state that all men are created equal? Will Trump functionaries yank these foundational documents from the National Archives and Library of Congress? Variations on the word 'equal' appear seven times in the Constitution. To be on the safe side, perhaps Trump will remove all three to that john at Mar-a-Lago.
Some of the words on the Times list are just baffling. The Trump administration won't let anybody say 'prostitute'? That sounds like a Biden holdover; the left is the only precinct I know where the word 'prostitute' is taboo. You're supposed to say 'sex worker,' but that's out because the Trump Word Cops put 'sex' on their taboo list. I guess they'll have to go back to 'courtesan' or 'tart.' Returning to the question of how a woke taboo became a Trump taboo: Perhaps what Trump intends to prevent is usage of the word 'prostitute' as a verb to describe the groveling behavior of Lindsey Graham, JD Vance, Mike Johnson, and so many other Republican politicians who once scorned Trump.
Also, what's wrong with 'advocate'? That's a neutral term. Conservatives advocate things all the time! Is it because there's a gay magazine called The Advocate? The Advocate also happens to be the title of a play my late father wrote about the Sacco and Vanzetti case that ran for a week on Broadway in 1963. So yes, this is getting personal. In the same vein: I served in the late 1970s on the prose board of an undergraduate literary magazine called The Harvard Advocate, which (at least then) was apolitical to a fault. Maybe 'Harvard' set off a trip wire; it's not on the taboo list, but the Trump Justice Department hates the place and just put it under investigation for alleged antisemitism. Never mind that DOGE chief Elon Musk gave a Sieg Heil salute on inauguration night and that mimicking Musk's gesture (which Musk insisted was misinterpreted) became all the rage among the Trump faithful at last month's Conservative Political Action Conference. Physician, heal thyself.
Another entirely neutral word the Trumpies have banned is 'institutional.' We all know Trump is determined to destroy every government institution he can get his hands on, but to forbid the word itself raises matters to a higher level of fanaticism. You also can't for some reason say 'MSM,' even though that term (which stands for 'mainstream media') is entirely pejorative. Reporters for CNN don't thrust out their chests to declare themselves representatives of the MSM. If Trump wants to ban a self-congratulatory term for the media, he should forbid 'fourth estate.'
If you work in the Trump administration and want to get fired, post something online that includes the phrase 'gender diversity.' 'Diversity' is the single most banned word on the Trump taboo list, appearing no fewer than 10 times (15 if you add 'diverse'). 'Gender' places second, appearing nine times. And yes, the Trump administration specifically bans the phrase 'gender diversity.' Apparently, there is nothing Trump loathes now more than gender diversity.
With that in mind, late Tuesday I searched the website of a government agency for 'gender diversity' and was delighted to find no fewer than 193 entries. I won't identify this agency because I don't want to get its employees in trouble. But it seems the anti-Trump resistance is alive and well in the belly of the beast. As Carlin might say, we must continue to explore every means possible to stop this motherfucker.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
New FEMA grant program gives states $600M to build migrant detention centers
A new $608 million grant program from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will give states money to build detention centers for people suspected of being in the United States unlawfully. FEMA was already slated to cover some of the costs for Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' using a Biden-era program meant for helping asylum seekers. The new facility, quickly constructed in a remote part of the Florida Everglades, is expected to run a tab of about $450 million a year. The new FEMA grant program comes as the Trump administration has increasingly slashed FEMA's ability to assist disaster response, and as the president has mulled closing the agency altogether. CNN reported Friday that FEMA has proposed cutting nearly $1 billion in grant funding to help local first responders better prepare for disasters and to help bolster cybersecurity. A webpage for the program also said it would help reduce 'overcrowding' in facilities maintained by Customs and Border Patrol. A Human Rights Watch report released this week charged that three facilities run by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Florida faced 'extreme overcrowding,' and that many detainees were denied access to medical care. FEMA has come under scrutiny in the wake of deadly flash floods in Texas, including reports that the federal response was hamstrung by budget cuts or controls designed to limit large expenditures. Applications for the program are open through August 8. It's not clear if states beyond Florida are yet planning make pushes to build their own detention centers.
USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
The Trump administration is telling immigrants 'Carry your papers.' Here's what to know.
Immigrants have long been required to carry ID proving they're in the US legally, but the rule was not enforced. Until now. Amid the Trump administration's ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration, the nation's immigration service is warning immigrants to carry their green card or visa at all times. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services posted the reminder July 23 on social media: "Always carry your alien registration documentation. Not having these when stopped by federal law enforcement can lead to a misdemeanor and fines." Here's what immigrants – and American citizens – need to know. 'Carry your papers' law isn't new The law requiring lawful immigrants and foreign visitors to carry their immigration documents has been on the books for decades, dating to the 1950s. The Immigration and Nationality Act states: "Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate of alien registration or alien registration receipt card issued to him." But the law had rarely been imposed before the Trump administration announced earlier this year that it would strictly enforce it. The "carry your papers" portion fell out of use for cultural and historical reasons, said Michelle Lapointe, legal director of the nonprofit American Immigration Council. In contrast to the Soviet bloc at the time the requirement was written, "We have never been a country where you have to produce evidence of citizenship on demand from law enforcement." In a "Know Your Rights" presentation, the ACLU cautions immigrants over age 18 to follow the law and "carry your papers with you at all times." "If you don't have them," the ACLU says, "tell the officer that you want to remain silent, or that you want to consult a lawyer before answering any questions." A 'precious' document at risk Many immigrants preferred to hold their green card or visa in safe-keeping, because, like a passport, they are expensive and difficult to obtain. Historically, it was "a little risky for people to carry these precious documents such as green card, because there is a hefty fee to replace it and they are at risk of not having proof of status – a precarious position to be in," Lapointe said. But as immigration enforcement has ramped up, the risks of not carrying legal documents have grown. Failure to comply with the law can result in a $100 fine, or imprisonment of up to 30 days. Immigration enforcement and 'racial profiling' U.S. citizens aren't required to carry documents that prove their citizenship. But in an environment of increasing immigration enforcement, Fernando Garcia, executive director of the nonprofit Border Network for Human Rights in El Paso, Texas, said he worries about U.S. citizens being targeted. "With massive raids and mass deportation, this takes a new dimension," he said. "How rapidly are we transitioning into a 'show me your papers' state?" "The problem is there are a lot of people – Mexicans, or Central Americans – who are U.S. citizens who don't have to carry anything, but they have the burden of proof based on racial profiling," he said. "There are examples of U.S. citizens being arrested already, based on their appearance and their race." Not just immigrants: Why some Native American citizens worry about getting caught in ICE's net American citizens targeted by ICE The Trump administration's widening immigration crackdown has already netted American citizens. In July, 18-year-old Kenny Laynez, an American citizen, was detained for six hours by Florida Highway Patrol and Border Patrol agents. He was later released. Federal agents also detained a California man, Angel Pina, despite his U.S. citizenship in July. He was later released. Elzon Limus, a 23-year-old U.S. citizen from Long Island, New York, decried his arrest by ICE agents in June, after he was released. In a video of the arrest, immigration agents demand Limus show ID, with one explaining he "looks like somebody we are looking for." In updated guidance, attorneys at the firm of Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, which has offices in Chicago, Detroit and Los Angeles, advise U.S. who are concerned about being stopped and questioned "to carry a U.S. passport card or a copy of their U.S. passport as evidence of U.S. citizenship." Lauren Villagran can be reached at lvillagran@
Politico
15 minutes ago
- Politico
Academic with history of incendiary remarks to lead US Institute of Peace
'We look forward to seeing him advance President Trump's America First agenda in this new role,' the statement said. USIP has been in turmoil in recent months as the administration and its Department of Government Efficiency sought to close the organization and withhold funding. The State Department said the institute has in recent decades 'slipped in its mission' to provide research, analysis and training in diplomacy. In February, several dozen Democratic House members signed a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio opposing Beattie's appointment to his current role. They cited his 'white nationalist loyalties and public glorification of our adversaries' authoritarian systems,' which included praise of the Chinese Communist Party and dismissal of its campaign against the largely Muslim Uyghurs. Beattie also drew widespread condemnation for a 2024 social media post on X in which he wrote 'competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work.' Beattie, who previously served as a visiting instructor at Duke University, has since been at the forefront of the Trump administration's efforts to overhaul the State Department's Fulbright Program and shutter its Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Hub. Trump signed an executive order firing USIP President George Moose and most of USIP's board in February. The remaining board members, including Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, subsequently installed Department of Government Efficiency staffer Kenneth Jackson, as acting president. DOGE staffer Nate Cavanaugh later took over as acting president. The Trump administration laid off most of the embattled institute's staff in March following a tense standoff between USIP staffers and DOGE employees at the institute's headquarters. A federal judge subsequently blocked the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle the organization, which was founded in 1984.
