World's biggest iceberg appears to have run aground near remote British island
Known as A23a, the massive slab of ice — roughly the size of Rhode Island and weighing nearly a trillion tonnes — was first reported to be heading toward South Georgia months ago, sparking concerns that it could collide with the island and disrupt the balance for local wildlife.
The British Antarctic Survey (BAS) said Tuesday that the iceberg had apparently struck the continental shelf that surrounds South Georgia, getting stuck roughly 73 kilometres from the island itself.
Whether A23a will be stuck for an extended period — and what impact it could have on local wildlife — is still up in the air.
"It will be interesting to see what will happen now," Andrew Meijers, an oceanographer with BAS, said Tuesday.
The sub-Antarctic island of South Georgia is a British overseas territory that lies north of Antarctica and some 1,850 kilometres east of South America. It supports a tiny, non-permanent population of scientists and researchers, but is known best for its abundance of wildlife, including five million seals across four different species and 65 million birds across 30 different species. Among them are the wandering albatross, the largest flying bird in the world, and several types of penguins.
One of the concerns among researchers is that the iceberg could block wildlife from their normal pathways to feeding sites, forcing them to travel longer distances and bring back less food to their young.
But Meijers noted that icebergs store important micronutrients which are released when they melt, and can also stir up nutrients settled in deep water, potentially benefiting the local ecosystem.
If this "towering wall" of ice stimulates ocean productivity, it could "boost populations of local predators like seals and penguins," he said.
40-year journey
Running aground is the latest development in the dramatic, 40-year life of this ice giant.
A23a broke off from Antarctica's Filchner Ice Shelf in 1986, but remained stuck on the seabed in the Weddell Sea for the next three decades.
After breaking free in 2020 and riding ocean currents north past the tip of the Antarctic Peninsula, A23a hit another snag: an oceanic vortex called a Taylor Column, which trapped it spinning in place for months on end.
Since wriggling out of the vortex, A23a has been slowly spiralling toward South Georgia.
The government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands said in a statement in January that it was "closely monitoring" A23a's progress, and that while shipping and fishing could be affected, "impacts on wildlife are likely to be localised and transient."
Satellite imagery showed the iceberg approaching the continental shelf in late February, before it appeared to freeze in place as it ran aground, with no major movement visible since March 1.
What could happen
Donavan Tremblay, an ice specialist with Canada's Coast Guard, told CBC News that it was "very possible" A23a could start moving again as it's more exposed to storms near the island that could shake or break it.
But "it could also stay there for a while," he said.
Although icebergs of this size are relatively rare, this isn't the first time a megaberg has threatened South Georgia. In 2020, an iceberg called A68a — previously world's largest, and the sixth largest recorded iceberg of all time — split apart near the island after impacting the shelf.
A 2022 study found that A68a released 152 gigatonnes of fresh water and nutrients into the ocean near South Georgia. This changed the salt concentration of the surface water enough for the effect to persist for more than two months after the iceberg's melt, according to a separate 2023 study.
Scientists are still digging into the impact that this had on the local ecosystem — including on whales, seals and plankton levels — and A23a is helping.
One focus Meijers highlighted is how the release of nutrients might help generate blooms of phytoplankton, and potentially increase the ocean's ability to capture more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Other scientists want to know what happened underneath A23a, which would have gouged huge scars into the seabed and potentially triggered underwater landslides, says Alex Normandeau, a research scientist with the Geological Survey of Canada.
"What are the consequences on the marine geology?" he asked. "Because it affects the habitats that are there, where the iceberg is grounded, but it also affects sedimentary suspension and underwater processes."
Icebergs splitting off from Antarctic ice sheets and drifting north is a regular part of the life cycle of ice in the Antarctic, but Meijers says data has shown that ice shelves have been losing more mass over the past 20 years — a development scientists attribute to climate change.
"These are pressing and active areas of research at BAS and elsewhere," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Science and local sleuthing identify a 250-year-old shipwreck on a Scottish island
LONDON (AP) — When a schoolboy going for a run found the ribs of a wooden ship poking through the dunes of a remote Scottish beach, it sparked a hunt by archaeologists, scientists and local historians to uncover its story. Through a mix of high-tech science and community research, they have an answer. Researchers announced Wednesday that the vessel is very likely the Earl of Chatham, an 18th-century warship that saw action in the American War of Independence before a second life hunting whales in the Arctic — and then a stormy demise. 'I would regard it as a lucky ship, which is a strange thing to say about a ship that's wrecked,' said Ben Saunders, senior marine archaeologist at Wessex Archaeology, a charity that helped community researchers conduct the investigation. 'I think if it had been found in many other places, it wouldn't necessarily have had that community drive, that desire to recover and study that material, and also the community spirit to do it,' Saunders said. Uncovered after 250 years The wreck was discovered in February 2024 after a storm swept away sand covering it on Sanday, one of the rugged Orkney Islands that lie off Scotland's northern tip. It excited interest on the island of 500 people, whose history is bound up with the sea and its dangers. Around 270 shipwrecks have been recorded around the 20-square-mile (50-square-kilometer) island since the 15th century. Local farmers used their tractors and trailers to haul the 12 tons of oak timbers off the beach, before local researchers set to work trying to identify it. 'That was really good fun, and it was such a good feeling about the community – everybody pulling together to get it back,' said Sylvia Thorne, one of the island's community researchers. 'Quite a few people are really getting interested in it and becoming experts.' Dendrochronology — the science of dating wood from tree rings — showed the timber came from southern England in the middle of the 18th century. That was one bit of luck, Saunders said, because it coincides with 'the point where British bureaucracy's really starting to kick off' and detailed records were being kept. 'And so we can then start to look at the archive evidence that we have for the wrecks in Orkney,' Saunders said. 'It becomes a process of elimination. 'You remove ones that are Northern European as opposed to British, you remove wrecks that are too small or operating out of the north of England and you really are down to two or three … and Earl of Chatham is the last one left.' Wars and whaling Further research found that before it was the Earl of Chatham, the ship was HMS Hind, a 24-gun Royal Navy frigate built in Chichester on England's south coast in 1749. Its military career saw it play a part in the expansion — and contraction — of the British Empire. It helped Britain wrest control of Canada from France during the sieges of Louisbourg and Quebec in the 1750s, and in the 1770s served as a convoy escort during Britain's failed effort to hold onto its American colonies. Sold off by the navy in 1784 and renamed, the vessel became a whaling ship, hunting the huge mammals in the Arctic waters off Greenland. Whale oil was an essential fuel of the Industrial Revolution, used to lubricate machinery, soften fabric and light city streets. Saunders said that in 1787 there were 120 London-based whaling ships in the Greenland Sea, the Earl of Chatham among them. A year later, while heading out to the whaling ground, it was wrecked in bad weather off Sanday. All 56 crew members survived — more evidence, Saunders says, that this was a vessel blessed with luck. Community effort The ship's timbers are being preserved in a freshwater tank at the Sanday Heritage Centre while plans are discussed to put it on permanent display. Saunders said that the project is a model of community involvement in archaeology. 'The community have been so keen, have been so desirous to be involved and to find out things to learn, and they're so proud of it. It's down to them it was discovered, it's down to them it was recovered and it's been stabilized and been protected,' he said. For locals, it's a link to the island's maritime past — and future. Finding long-buried wrecks could become more common as climate change alters the wind patterns around Britain and reshapes the coastline. 'One of the biggest things I've got out of this project is realizing how much the past in Sanday is just constantly with you — either visible or just under the surface,' said Ruth Peace, another community researcher.
CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
Scientists confirm megathrust quake danger exists not only in southern B.C., but also in the north
The potential for large quakes and tsunamis off the south coast has long been known, but now scientists are confirming another theory in the north of the provin The potential for large quakes and tsunamis off the south coast has long been known, but now scientists are confirming another theory in the north of the province. Following years of debate, scientists can now confirm that a fault zone off B.C.'s northern coast is capable of producing powerful megathrust earthquakes, the kind that can generate tsunamis. The findings reveal what many researchers theorized: That the Pacific Plate is partially dipping beneath the North American Plate. This comes more than a decade after a powerful 7.8-magnitude quake struck near Haida Gwaii, on Oct. 27, 2012. At the time, scientists were puzzled by the quake's characteristics because it resembled activity normally seen much further south, in the Cascadia Subduction Zone off Vancouver Island and Washington State. The 2012 quake had a thrust mechanism which was not typical of the Queen Charlotte Fault, where plates usually slide past each other horizontally. 'So not just sliding, but also going a bit under North America,' said Mladen Nedimovic, a professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Dalhousie University. The research team used a state-of-the-art, 15-kilometre-long hydrophone streamer. Essentially, a very long wire with thousands of underwater microphones attached. They then scoured the fault from northern B.C. to southern Alaska. The breakthrough will allow researchers to better predict what types of earthquakes to expect. 'They're both large,' Nedimovic explained. 'But the ones where one plate pushes under another are the type that can produce tsunamis.' Scientists still can't predict exactly when a quake might hit, but the findings will help governments better prepare. 'It's not just about saving lives, but also about protecting critical infrastructure,' he added. The findings have been published in the journal Science Advances, and included research from Canadian and American scientists, including from Dalhousie University in Halifax.
Globe and Mail
5 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Digital sovereignty is a means to an uncertain goal
Jamie Duncan is a PhD candidate at the Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies at the University of Toronto and a Digital Policy Hub doctoral fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation. Wendy H. Wong is a professor of political science, the Principal's Research Chair at the University of British Columbia, and the author of We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age, which won the 2024 Balsillie Prize for Public Policy. Canadians have been a bit touchy about sovereignty lately, and for good reason. The 'elbows up' attitude that swept the country in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive antics has inspired a newfound enthusiasm for Canadian nation-building. One of the more aspirational aspects of Prime Minister Mark Carney's vision for our country is the idea that we can achieve digital sovereignty while enhancing our effectiveness in other sectors, like energy and Arctic security. Canada has its first Minister of AI and Digital Innovation, who has a broad mandate to bring AI innovation home and promote Canada's digital sovereignty. But even if such a thing were possible, there is no clear vision of what we'd do with it. 'Digital sovereignty' has become a catchphrase in global politics. Essentially, the idea is that countries want more control over the many parts of the digital economy that affect them, including hardware, software and data. Lately, this has meant focusing on AI. Sovereignty typically means having control over a specific place. It's the ability to make and enforce rules (for the most part) without interference. In the physical world, it's easy to picture a country expanding control. For example, building a military base in the Arctic helps Canada protect the area and enforce laws. But sovereignty isn't just about defence; it also applies to daily life. Energy or food sovereignty means producing more of what we need at home, so others can't raise prices or cut off supply. Canada's $2-billion AI computing plan could wind up helping foreign tech giants But digital spaces are fundamentally different from Arctic territory or oil fields. Digital sovereignty means being able to control Canada's digital destiny – which is easier said than done. From access to endless educational resources to bingeable TV in every language, the internet has its perks. But to make our digital choices truly 'ours,' we must acknowledge how our connected world affects our national sovereignty. Nearly every part of our online lives is somehow enabled by foreign companies. Data from more than 30 million Canadian social media users pour through our physical borders and into the hands of multinational companies. Consider Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, all owned by U.S. company Meta. And from the military to the local corner store, almost every part of the Canadian government and economy relies on digital infrastructure and software provided by American tech companies. Nor is there much respect for Canada's physical border among cybercriminals. Ransomware or a cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme can affect anyone from Squamish, B.C., to Ingonish, N.S. – but the perpetrators could be almost anywhere in the world. Digital technologies comprise some combination of infrastructure (servers, cables and the grid), services (or apps) and data streams. Canada's digital sovereignty aspirations around AI hinge on our ability to set and enforce rules about the three major components of those systems: data, code and compute. Data – the lifeblood of the digital economy – are what make fancy large language models and the TikTok algorithm work so well. Data are also responsible for many of their biases and blind spots. Opinion: If a toaster burns you, you can sue. But if Big Tech burns you, you're out of luck Computer code instructs these tools to turn data into something useful or profitable. Code is the secret sauce that transforms an (often patented) idea into cash. And none of this could happen without computing power, or compute. While you can store data and write code on your laptop, most commercial services run in the cloud. And while that may sound dreamy and far away, the cloud is just a bunch of data centres: big buildings filled to the brim with computers designed to process and store enormous quantities of data. Digital sovereignty requires considering several trade-offs simultaneously. Building data centres gives us more capacity to process and store the massive volume of data being harvested daily, but this compute and this data don't do much without equally powerful algorithmic tools. And all the data, while potentially insightful, are of dubious value if we do not have a coherent rationale that justifies and regulates the collection, storage and use of data taken from mostly unaware people. Canada's digital policy efforts over the past decade have mostly failed to strike an effective balance. The pan-Canadian AI strategy has helped some of the world's top AI researchers advance their fields and train the next generation of innovators, but research breakthroughs are just a start. Canadian policy-makers and companies have been far less adept at keeping this taxpayer-subsidized intellectual property and talent at home. Much-needed updates to Canada's outdated privacy law were stuck in Parliament for more than two years, and in the end, they never passed. As a result, Canadians' sensitive data remain poorly protected, with few ways to enforce privacy rights. Worse still, the government gave up its ability to control cross-border data flows when it signed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Canada has also failed to recapture some of the spoils of the digital economy. The Online News Act's imposition of compensation requirements on companies linking to Canadian content online backfired. Rather than boosting the revenue of Canadian media outlets, the law undermined Canada's informational sovereignty when Meta decided to simply stop linking social media users in Canada to news outlets. More recently, the Carney government withdrew Canada's planned Digital Service Tax on digital service providers, after Mr. Trump threatened to terminate trade negotiations over its 'unfairness' to American companies. In its early days, the Carney government took a seemingly different tack. The Liberal election platform promised to use tax incentives to keep more intellectual property in Canada and promote homegrown innovation. The government is also supporting a Canadian Sovereign AI Compute Strategy to build data centres and subsidize Canadian companies' access to high-performance computing. A new approach is welcome, but there are drawbacks. Ideas that focus on building data centres – like Kevin O'Leary's proposed Wonder Valley in Alberta – can have environmental impacts. Tech giants such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon have all reported major increases in emissions owing to the fact that these facilities use huge amounts of energy and water, generate heat and noise, and often affect nearby communities. These largely automated centres would also likely fail to create many new jobs. Tax breaks that keep patents in Canada and support local business growth could help strengthen our digital economy. But it's important to understand that Silicon Valley owes much of its success to operating in a loose regulatory environment. There are Canadian alternatives in the works, but they might not offer real value if global reach – something our platforms may not easily achieve – is what makes social media so popular in the first place. Many companies have been allowed to profit from largely unregulated collection and analysis of data about people. The side effects are serious and well-known. They include rising mental health problems in teens and growing political divisions. Both are made worse by algorithms that aim to keep people hooked instead of helping them understand the world. Digital sovereignty is only useful if it is accompanied by a sensible digital policy agenda designed to address the many harms associated with data-driven technologies. As we have written before, data is harvested individually but has collective impacts. As long as our government ignores the contradiction between building AI with personal data and protecting basic democratic rights – like consent, equality, autonomy, privacy and dignity – there will be a disconnect between the promise of an AI-powered economy and the real social and political problems digital technology can create. Efforts to achieve digital sovereignty represent an important shift in policy. Leaders are starting to realize how much control over Canadians' online lives – and the wealth created by digital technologies funded with public money – has been handed over to foreign governments and Big Tech. But while it's a worthy goal, it will only happen if Canada has a clear plan for building a digital economy that works for all Canadians. That means carefully weighing both the benefits and the costs of relying on data-driven technologies.
