US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites: Who backed, who condemned, and who raised concerns? Full list
The United States' overnight airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities — including the heavily fortified Fordow site — have triggered a wave of global political reaction, marking a sharp escalation in Middle East tensions. While the Biden administration hailed the strikes as a targeted blow against Iran's nuclear ambitions, reactions from lawmakers and world leaders have ranged from full-throated support to strong condemnation and deep concern. From Washington to Tehran, and Tel Aviv to Brussels, the world is now watching how this volatile moment could reshape geopolitics and possibly push the region closer to wider conflict.
Israel: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised President Trump's decision, calling it a "pivot of history."
'President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons,' Netanyahu said.
'In Operation Rising Lion, Israel has done truly amazing things, but in tonight's action against Iran's nuclear facilities, America has been truly unsurpassed.'
Signs reading "Thank you, Mr President" appeared in Tel Aviv, reflecting public support.
Republican leaders in the US: Several Republican lawmakers strongly backed the strikes.
'This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC).
'We have the best Air Force in the world. Fly, Fight, Win.'
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) compared the decision to President Obama's military actions in Libya and Yemen.
Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA): 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.'
Vice President JD Vance: "We are not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program."
"Ukraine is convinced that Iran's nuclear programme must be stopped..." the foreign ministry stated.
Progressive Democrats and Independents:
'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorisation is a grave violation of the Constitution,' said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). "It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) echoed her concerns:
'The only entity that can take this country to war is the US Congress. The president does not have the right.'
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) called the strikes "not constitutional."
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA): Though a Trump ally, she urged for peace:
'Let us join together and pray for the safety of our U.S. troops and Americans in the Middle East.'
Iran: Tehran condemned the strikes as "criminal aggression."
"The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory... by all force and means."
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called Trump a "lawless bully" and said he had betrayed his own voters.
'Grossly violates international law,' said the Foreign Ministry, condemning damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
China's foreign ministry "strongly condemns" the strikes, saying they "seriously violate" the UN charter.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer stopped short of endorsing the strikes. "Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon... We must now de-escalate the situation."
Foreign Secretary David Lammy reiterated: 'The UK did not participate in these strikes. We urge Iran to show restraint.'
European Union: EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said: "Iran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon... I urge all sides to step back."
France President Emmanuel Macron called Iranian President Pezeshkian to urge restraint: "This is the only path to peace and security for all."
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he was "gravely alarmed." 'There is a growing risk this conflict could rapidly get out of control.'
Saudi Arabia called for "diplomatic solutions" and warned of "highly sensitive circumstances."
Canada PM Mark Carney said the region remains "highly volatile" despite the intent to neutralise nuclear threats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Qatar thwarted Iran's attack on US base; 300 troops scrambled – missiles lit up Doha sky
Qatar successfully intercepted a wave of Iranian missiles aimed at the US military's Al Udeid Air Base, in what officials described as a swift and coordinated defensive operation that averted catastrophe. The attack came in retaliation for US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and marked a critical flashpoint in the widening Israel-Iran conflict. Despite the scale of the attack, no casualties were reported, and damage was minimal, thanks to a rapid response by Qatari and US forces. President Donald Trump later described the Iranian strike as a 'very weak response,' while Qatar condemned it as a 'flagrant violation' of its sovereignty. Qatari-led response averts major damage According to CNN , Qatari officials were first alerted around 7pm local time when their military detected Iranian missiles airborne and heading toward Al Udeid, a key regional hub for US air operations. Brigadier General Jassim Al-Ansari, speaking to the network, said the response was 'Qatari-led,' even though it was closely coordinated with US forces. Within minutes, 300 Qatari troops were mobilised, and multiple Patriot missile defence systems were activated across two locations. A total of 19 missiles were fired from Iran, according to Qatari sources. Seven were intercepted over the Persian Gulf, and 11 were shot down over the capital, Doha. Only one missile landed in an uninhabited area of the airbase, causing limited damage. President Trump, speaking after the incident, said Iran had fired 14 missiles, 13 of which were intercepted, with one left to land harmlessly as it posed no threat. Despite the discrepancy in numbers, US Central Command confirmed that no personnel were harmed. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi insisted the attack was calibrated not to harm civilians, and on state television, Iran's National Security Council said the strikes posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar.' Al-Ansari, however, dismissed any suggestion that Qatar had prior knowledge of or permitted the strike. 'We would never put our people in danger for any political outcome,' he told CNN. 'This was a complete surprise.' Tensions erupt over nuclear site bombing The missile barrage followed US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordo, last Saturday. Satellite images released Sunday showed damage to the underground enrichment site, reportedly hit with precision bunker-buster bombs. Iran later claimed it had removed key nuclear material from targeted locations ahead of time. The attack on Al Udeid was widely viewed as Tehran's attempt to send a message without causing a direct confrontation with Washington. Trump claimed the US had been warned in advance, which allowed it to take precautionary measures. Iran said the number of missiles matched the bombs dropped by the US. Qatar's airspace was shut down for several hours during the attack, disrupting over 100 flights scheduled to land at Hamad International Airport. Commercial operations resumed on Tuesday. The UK and US embassies had earlier advised citizens in Qatar to shelter in place. Ceasefire emerges but tensions persist The fragile ceasefire officially took effect on June 24, following intensive diplomacy mediated by the US and Qatar, with Israel affirming its acceptance of the terms and Iran agreeing to halt operations in synchrony. However, the truce has been shaky: Iran allegedly launched two missiles into northern Israel on the morning of the ceasefire—intercepted by Israeli defenses—prompting immediate Israeli retaliatory strikes on Tehran's military infrastructure. Both sides accuse each other of early violations, with US intelligence indicating Iran's nuclear enrichment program was only set back by months, and not 'obliterated' like Trump had earlier claimed.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK government condemns 'death to the IDF' chants at Glastonbury
GLASTONBURY: The UK government said on Sunday that the BBC had questions to answer over criticism of Israel by musicians at the Glastonbury festival that police are probing. UK officers are studying videos of rapper Bobby Vylan leading crowds in chants of "Death, death to the IDF", a reference to the acronym for the Israeli army, during his set on Saturday. They are also examining comments by outspoken Irish rap trio Kneecap, one of whose members wore a T-shirt dedicated to Palestine Action Group, which is about to be banned under UK terror laws. The IDF chants, condemned by the Israeli embassy in London, were broadcast on the BBC, which airs coverage of Britain's most popular music festival. "I thought it's appalling, to be honest, and I think the BBC and Glastonbury have got questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens," UK minister Wes Streeting told Sky News. The Israel embassy said in a statement late Saturday "it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival". But Streeting, Labour's health secretary, also took aim at the embassy, telling it to "get your own house in order". "I think there's a serious point there by the Israeli embassy. I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens towards Palestinians more seriously," he said, citing settler violence in the West Bank. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo A spokesperson for the BBC said some of the comments by Vylan, part of British duo Bob Vylan, were "deeply offensive" and the broadcaster had "no plans to make the performance available on demand". 'A joke' Avon and Somerset police said Saturday that video evidence would be assessed by officers "to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation". Kneecap, who have made headlines in recent months with their pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel stance, led crowds in a chant against UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Starmer had said the band should not perform after its member Liam O'Hanna, known by his stage name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence. He appeared in court earlier this month accused of having displayed a Hezbollah flag while saying "Up Hamas, Up Hezbollah" after a video resurfaced of a London concert last year. The Iran-backed Lebanese force Hezbollah and the Palestinian militant group Hamas are banned in the UK, and it is an offence to express support for them. O'Hanna has denied the charge and told the Guardian in an interview published Friday that "it was a joke -- we're playing characters". Kneecap regularly lead crowds in chants of "Free Palestine" during their concerts. Their fans revere them for their anti-establishment stance and criticism of British imperialism but critics call them extremists. The group apologised this year after a 2023 video emerged appearing to show one singer calling for the death of British Conservative lawmakers.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?
Last Updated: Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': In a late-night post on social media, Trump declared a 'GREAT VICTORY' after the bill cleared the Senate Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': Senate Republicans took a major step toward delivering President Donald Trump his ' big, beautiful bill" late Saturday. The bill cleared a key procedural vote, 51-49. Republican leaders must now satisfy numerous holdouts still demanding changes to the bill. In a late-night post on social media, Trump declared a 'GREAT VICTORY" after the bill cleared the Senate, offering praise to four key senators who shifted their votes to get the procedural bill over the finish line. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, however, doubled down on his criticism of the White House's 'Big Beautiful Bill", calling it 'utterly insane" and 'political suicide". The Senate must agree on a final version of the bill before sending it to the floor for a vote. The BBC report said that as it is likely to include some of the changes to the original House bill, it will return to the House for another vote where it may see more challenges. With BBC, CNN, Agencies Inputs About the Author Manjiri Joshi First Published: June 29, 2025, 14:52 IST News explainers Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?
