'Coolly, calmly and collectively forge a deal that is good for America, good for India,' says US Diplomat
American diplomat and the President of the US-India Business Council, Atul Keshap, spoke on the decision by the United States to impose 25 per cent tariffs on India and said that the two countries should calmly forge a deal which benefits them both.He made the remarks while speaking to ANI.While answering a question on how the American companies are viewing the scenario, Keshap said, "I represent 200 of the largest companies in America and India. Let me tell you that they are all nervous. Indian companies in America are feeling very exposed and vulnerable right now. American companies in India are uncertain. Business doesn't like uncertainty; it likes predictability. If the US and India can't agree on a deal that frames the economic relationship and sends a positive psychological message to investors, it is going to very hard to see growth".Highlighting the commitment of both governments to enhance bilateral trade, he said, "Both the President and the PM advocated for getting a 500 billion dollar target in annual trade. We can't do it if we don't get this deal done because the deal is the foundation of what is going to be further deals. So, I think, speaking for the business community, everybody wants to see this drama come to an agreed deal."
Also Read: Trump unleashes new tariffs on 69 countries, set to take effect in 7 days: Full list and details
Answering a query on the latest slew of remarks which emerged from the US in regards to India, Keshap said, "I think people have to understand that Secretary Bessent and the President were talking about their concerns about India's purchases of Russian oil even before he began his second tenure. So, clearly, some of that is being reflected in all of these statements...So, President's frustration has clearly risen and it is starting to impact other countries that he feels directly or indirectly are helping sustain President Putin's very unhelpful stance."Bringing to the forefront the wide-ranging cooperation between India and the US, Keshap highlighted that the two countries have to act collectively and see where the interests are best served. He said, "I think what you are seeing in here is genuine frustration coupled with impatience...The US and India are the two largest and greatest democracies on earth. We have a people-to-people, business-to-business, scientific, academic, outer space, law enforcement, counter-terrorism, relationship that goes to very great extents and reflects the great relationship of our two nations well beyond Washington and Delhi...So, I think we have to take a deep breath collectively, not overreact. Great nations think things through and they act based on interest. We have to see where the interest is best served. In my humble and respectful view, that is in coolly, calmly and collectively forging a deal that is good for America, good for India and good for our businesses."
Also Read: Trump increases tariff on Canada to 35% from 25%, cites fentanyl ahead of August 1 deadline United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has blamed India for "slow-rolling things" in the talks for a Free Trade Agreement and said "the whole trade team has been frustrated with them".The comments, made in an interview with CNBC, came a day after the US President announced a 25 per cent tariff on India and an unspecified penalty for purchasing Russian oil. The new US tariffs on Indian goods are set to take effect from August 1.After announcing a 25 per cent tariff and penalty for purchasing Russian oil, US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (local time) that Washington is continuing trade negotiations with New Delhi. He emphasised that India is one of the countries imposing high tariffs on the United States.India has said that it is examining the impact of Trump's tariff announcement and will take necessary steps to safeguard its national interest.Commerce and Industry Minister told the Parliament on Thursday that the government is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest.
Also Read: While House announces 25% tariff on India, releases list of levies for several countries
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Parliament logjam continues as Opposition parties push for SIR debate
The INDIA bloc has intensified its protests against the Election Commission of India (ECI)'s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, with eight Opposition parties writing to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Friday to push a special discussion on the issue even as their protests threatened to derail the remaining part of the monsoon session. Rajya Sabha deputy chairman Harivansh Narayan Singh conducts the proceedings of the House on Friday. (Sansad TV/ANI Video Grab) 'We… express deep concern over the ongoing voter list revision in Bihar, especially a few months before the state assembly elections. This is unprecedented. The EC has indicated that similar exercises will soon be undertaken across the country. Given the widespread apprehension about the transparency, timing and intent of this process, the matter requires the urgent attention of the House,' said the letter signed by representatives of the Congress, the Samajwadi Party, the DMK, the Trinamool Congress, the NCP (SP), the Shiv Sena (UBT), the RJD and the RSP. The letter highlighted the Opposition's consistent efforts to raise the issue during the ongoing session and in several interactions with the central government. 'While the government has stated its willingness to discuss all issues, including this one, no date has yet been fixed for such a discussion,' it said. Opposition leaders have been holding demonstrations in the Parliament complex seeking a discussion on the SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar, and demanded its rollback. On Friday, too, the Rajya Sabha failed to function, with Opposition leaders like TMC's Nadimul Haque, Sagarika Ghosh, Derek O'Brien, Tiruchi Siva (DMK), and Sanjay Singh (AAP) staging protests in the Well of the House. In the morning session, deputy chairman said he received 30 adjournment notices under Rule 267 for discussion on SIR, alleged discrimination against Bengali migrant workers in other states, impact of the US decision to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, and mass layoffs in the Indian IT sector, among others. Harviansh said that since the notices do not conform to the detailed directions given by the Chair, they were declined. The move triggered protests by Opposition members who raised slogans and stood in the aisle. The Chair then allowed Manoj Kumar Jha (RJD) to speak, who also sought a discussion on SIR, but was denied permission since the matter is sub judice. The Chair's repeated efforts to ensure smooth functioning went in vain, and the proceedings were adjourned within 11 minutes. Similar protests hit the afternoon session too. The government, for its part, has blamed the Opposition for trying to 'politicise the issue of electoral reforms'. 'They know that the issue of SIR is subjudice, they know that the ECI being a constitutional body cannot be discussed in the House. Yet, they are trying to politicise an issue which is essentially a reform that all political parties have sought,' a senior government functionary aware of the matter said. Multiple BJP leaders said various political parties have petitioned the ECI for cleaning up the electoral rolls and ensuring that there is no duplication of names, inadvertent deletions or inclusion of bogus names. A party leader from Bihar said even in the past SIR of the electoral roles have been conducted, but it was for the first time that the issue is being politicised 'with a view to discredit the poll panel'. 'Every party has a polling agent present at every booth. These people are responsible for ensuring the sanctity of the voters list and are familiar with the process that is followed for ensuring that only eligible votes are included. If they find irregularities in the voters list, they should flag it to the election commission instead of creating a false narrative about the exercise,' the leader said. Responding to a question on whether the ruling side will reach any compromise with the Opposition for a discussion on SIR in Parliament, the first functionary quoted above said the government will stick to parliamentary procedures and norms. TMC MP Derek O'Brien said, 'Modi-Shah government have not allowed a debate in the last nine years in Parliament on an issue raised by the Opposition. Last one was Nov 2016 on demonetization. Parliament is supreme. Nothing is out of bounds to discus. Skittish coalition looking for excuses to flee from Parliament.'
Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Sent to Pakistan in Pahalgam aftermath, 63-year-old set to return to family in Jammu as Centre makes an exception
Three months after revoking all short-duration visas issued to Pakistani nationals and deporting nearly 60 individuals to the neighbouring country, the Government of India has decided to issue a visitor's visa to 63-year-old Rakshanda Rashid, the wife of a retired government official, so that she can return from across the border and rejoin her family in Jammu and Kashmir. The woman, a resident of Jammu's Talab Khatikan area, was deported to Pakistan on April 29 via the Atari-Wagah border in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. Her husband, Sheikh Zahoor Ahmed, and four grown-up children continue to stay in J&K since they are Indian nationals. The matter came up in the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court on July 30, with the Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta, saying that 'after much deliberations and considering the peculiarity of facts and unusual factual position obtaining in the mater, an in-principle decision is taken by the authority to grant a visitor's visa to the respondent'. 'Thereafter, she may even, if so advised, pursue the two applications that are purportedly moved by her and pending with the respective authority as regards acquiring Indian citizenship as also the long-term visa,'' he said. Mehta had hinted on July 22 that there could be a reconsideration at the Centre's level, as he had requested the court to defer the proceedings to enable him to explore if the respondent could be helped in any manner. In response to Mehta's statement before the Bench, advocates Ankur Sharma and Himani Khajuria, the counsel for the respondent, submitted that she is agreeable to the course suggested by the Solicitor General of India. 'In principle decision taken by the authorities centred upon the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case shall not constitute a precedent in any manner,' the Bench said. As per court records, Rakshanda, who lived in Islamabad, entered India on February 10, 1990, via Attari on a visitor's visa for 14 days to visit Jammu, but continued to stay owing to a long-term visa (LTV) granted by the authorities on a year-to-year basis. During her stay, she married an Indian national. Her LTV was valid up to January 13, 2025, and she applied for an extension on January 4, which was not granted. Following the Pahalgam attack, the competent authority issued an order on April 25, revoking all existing valid visas with immediate effect. On April 28, Rakshanda was served with a Leave India Notice by the Criminal Investigation Department (Special Branch Jammu). She approached the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court vide a writ petition and prayed for a stay of the order. However, she was issued an exit permit and was escorted to the Attari-Wagah Border, Amritsar, by the authorities. She crossed over to Pakistan on April 29 at 4:30 pm. On June 6, Justice Rahul Bharti ordered the Central government to 'retrieve' Rakshanda. While passing the order, Justice Bharti observed, 'This court is bearing in mind the background reference that the petitioner was having LTV status at relevant point of time which per-se may not have warranted her deportation, but without examining her case in better perspective and coming up with a proper order with respect to her deportation from the authorities concerned, still she came to be forced out.' 'Human rights are the most sacrosanct component of a human life,' observed Justice Bharti, who also referred to the statement of Rakshanda's husband Sheikh Zahoor Ahmed that 'his wife has no one in Pakistan for her care and custody, particularly when she is suffering from multiple ailments and that her health and life is at risk with each passing day and (she is) left to fend for herself as abandoned'. There are occasions when 'a constitutional court is supposed to come up with SOS like indulgence notwithstanding the merits and demerits of a case which can be adjudicated only upon in due course of time', the judge observed. 'Therefore, this court is coming up with a direction to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, to bring back the petitioner from her deportation.' Speaking to The Indian Express earlier, her husband had said that the children were worried sick about Rakshanda. According to him, though she had taken Rs 50,000 in Indian currency, she was running short of money to sustain, as a tray of eggs apparently cost Rs 600 and 1 kg atta cost Rs 250 in Pakistan.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade war: Tariffs notified, government hardens its position on no-go areas
NEW DELHI: On a day when US notified additional levies for countries, with 25% imposed on Indian exports, govt hardened its position asserting that farm and dairy products, genetically modified food, beef and animal feed with meat are no-go areas. Without being confrontational, govt sources made it clear that cultural sensitivities and farmers' interest will be paramount in talks with the US and indicated India's willingness to move ahead with talks, with the next round scheduled to begin on Aug 25. "We are engaged with American officials and securing our national interest is our primary objective. Govt is not going to come under pressure on areas that concern farmers and small businesses," said an official. While there is bound to be some impact on India's exports, sources said that it may shave off around 0.2 percentage points from GDP this year and there may not be a significant impact over the economy. The assessment is based on calculations that a significant part of India's exports to US - $20-25 billion out of overall exports of $86.5 billion last fiscal - was outside the ambit of tariffs notified through US President Donald Trump's executive order, issued early Friday (India time). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Emergency Generators in Miraflores: (Prices May Surprise You) Emergency Generator | Search Ads Search Now Undo In 2024-25, pharma exports were a little under $10 billion, while oil products added up to $4.2 billion and electronics were estimated at over $13 billion, made up largely of smartphones, according to official from medicines, the exemptions include Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, electronics and ICT products such as semiconductors, smartphones and computers and energy products. The US tariffs will now be effective Aug 7 and the penalty for Russian arms and defence purchases was not part of the executive order issued by Trump, indicating he is seeking to use it as a threat to extract a deal to his liking from India. It also said that Indian shipments that are in transit before Aug 7 - and arrive at US ports before Oct 5 - will not face the additional tariff, providing some relief to are seeking sops from govt to tide over possible loss of orders, especially in sectors such as textiles, footwear and chemicals. Commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal is slated to hold consultations with exporters over the next few days. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
