logo
US Borrowers Face Higher Interest If Trump's ‘Revenge Tax' Becomes Law

US Borrowers Face Higher Interest If Trump's ‘Revenge Tax' Becomes Law

Yahoo04-06-2025
(Bloomberg) -- A measure in President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill that's meant to penalize foreign investors may also raise interest costs for some US borrowers.
Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry
The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars
At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access
LA City Council Passes Budget That Trims Police, Fire Spending
ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract
The so-called Section 899 provision takes aim at nations such as Canada, the UK and France that have digital services taxes or other corporate tax rules the US deems unfair. Investors and companies from those countries may see gradually higher tax rates on income they earn from US assets — which some analysts have called a 'revenge tax.'
But Section 899 would affect loan interest payments in a way that would hurt some US companies, according to legal experts. Many lending agreements require borrowers to cover such tax hikes if they're enacted after the deal is signed.
These requirements are known as withholding tax gross-up obligations. Borrowers remit the withholding tax to the US government, but they must 'gross up' their payment to ensure the lender still receives the full amount of interest owed.
For example, a 5% withholding tax would require a borrower owing $1,000 in interest to remit $50 to the US government, and then gross up its payment so the lender still receives $1,000. The borrower's combined tax and interest payment would actually be about $1,053 — because the gross-up payment itself is also subject to withholding tax.
'It's a significant problem,' said Matthew Brown, a partner in the Washington office of law firm A&O Shearman, as the measure would likely touch loans made by foreign banks that lend to US borrowers from outside of a US branch. That scenario is very common for syndicated loans, he said.
The tax bill still faces plenty of hurdles, including opposition from a number of Republican Senators over Medicaid cuts and the size of the deficit. The legislation was attacked by Elon Musk, who called it a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill' and 'a disgusting abomination.'
Some borrowers may be able to sidestep the increased interest costs of the proposed Section 899 by booting non-US lenders from their credit facilities. But whether they do so depends on 'how strong a position the borrower is in and their ability to have lots of options for lending,' Brown said.
Some lenders may also choose to absorb the tax costs, since those demanding a gross-up from borrowers might be denied future deals. 'Memories are long,' said Carolyn Alford, partner with King & Spalding LLP in New York.
If the measure takes effect, lenders — not borrowers — from affected countries would be expected to bear the increased cost of credit deals signed after that. That could make them less willing to lend to US entities.
A French or British bank, for example, 'will have to assess whether or not it wants to continue to make loans if it's running the risk of incurring this uncompensated withholding tax,' said Michael Mollerus, partner with Davis Polk & Wardwell in New York.
House Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith said last week he hopes Section 899 will be a deterrent that is never deployed, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters his chamber is examining the provision.
Nonetheless, the proposal has alarmed Wall Street, where analysts fear it would drive away foreign investors. As written, the tax rate increase is designed to rise over time — it starts at five percentage points and increases another five points each year until it's 20 points above the statutory rate.
Brown said he expects the provision is meant to 'bring countries to the table' to discuss their corporate tax rules. 'I do not believe the intention is to drive up the cost of borrowing in the United States.'
YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom
Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce
Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent?
Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To
Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Final megabill votes are secured, GOP leaders say
Final megabill votes are secured, GOP leaders say

Politico

time13 minutes ago

  • Politico

Final megabill votes are secured, GOP leaders say

Mike Johnson is staring down the legislative challenge of his career. As soon as this morning, the speaker will attempt to ram the Senate-passed megabill through the House as dozens of Republicans threaten to vote it down. The detractors come from across the Republican conference after the Senate sent over a bill with deeper Medicaid cuts, steeper deficit hikes and less onerous clean-energy provisions than expected. And he's gunning to deliver by President Donald Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline, as severe thunderstorms in Washington threaten full attendance. 'We'll see. I've got to play the cards that are dealt to me,' Johnson said Tuesday, after admitting he was 'not happy' with the Senate's changes to the bill. 'And we're working through that. … But we remain optimistic we're going to land it at this point.' Johnson has 24 to 48 hours to persuade reluctant fiscal hawks and Medicaid moderates to swallow the Senate's bill. He spent Monday on calls with concerned lawmakers and caucuses, scrambling to figure out how to pass it this week without making changes to the bill. (John Thune and Johnson have been in contact through much of the process but did not speak in the hours leading up to the Senate vote, the majority leader told POLITICO.) But the Senate bill will be tough to sell. House Freedom Caucus members like Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) blasted the Senate's bill Tuesday for adding to the deficit and softening clean energy tax credits. Roy and Norman both voted against the bill in the Rules Committee overnight. House moderates are worried about the steep cuts to Medicaid, which Johnson has privately said could cost Republicans the House in 2026. Sen. Thom Tillis' (R-N.C.) speech torching the Senate's Medicaid provisions for similar reasons shook many vulnerable Republicans. And a substantial cross section of the two groups of holdouts would rather take time to rework the package and send it back to the Senate, instead of jamming the Senate version through the House under a self-imposed deadline. Norman said the House should go back to the original bill, leave town and come back when Senate Republicans are 'serious.' Some signs of progress for Johnson: Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) appeared more likely to support the bill Tuesday night after previously refusing a deal on a state and local tax deduction. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), previously a strong no on the bill over the Medicaid provider tax, told POLITICO a local provider tax tweak in the wraparound amendment for New Jersey and other states has him feeling better about the bill. But it would still be a gamble for Johnson to put it on the House floor: Many Republicans think the bill would fail without additional changes. However, the speaker has previously succeeded in putting bills on the floor without the votes — and relying on Trump to pressure holdouts to fold. What else we're watching: — Weather problems could delay House vote: Over 200 flights into Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport were either canceled or delayed Tuesday amid thunderstorms in Washington, according to the flight-tracking service FlightAware. Johnson said Tuesday night that the travel issues could push back the House vote on the GOP megabill, which is expected as early as Wednesday. — More reconciliation packages: As the House looks to pass the current reconciliation package without further tweaks, Johnson is suggesting there could be future opportunities for lawmakers to get their priorities into party-line packages. In an interview on Fox News on Tuesday night, Johnson said the House will plan to do two more reconciliation bills during this session of Congress, which ends in 2026. Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill and Benjamin Guggenheim contributed to this report.

'60 Minutes' Correspondents Sent a Letter to George Cheeks Demanding He Name Tanya Simon EP
'60 Minutes' Correspondents Sent a Letter to George Cheeks Demanding He Name Tanya Simon EP

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'60 Minutes' Correspondents Sent a Letter to George Cheeks Demanding He Name Tanya Simon EP

Tanya Simon, the daughter of the late 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon, has been executive-producing the newsmagazine show on an interim basis since Bill Owens' shocking resignation. The current crop of 60 Minutes correspondents have been lobbying Paramount Global to make it official. On Friday, Oliver Darcy's Status newsletter reported that Lesley Stahl, Scott Pelley, Bill Whitaker, Anderson Cooper, Sharyn Alfonsi, Jon Wertheim and Cecilia Vega — the whole gang of 60 Minutes correspondents — collectively wrote and signed a letter in May urging Paramount co-CEO George Cheeks to officially name Simon as the show's executive producer. More from The Hollywood Reporter Bill Moyers, Longtime PBS and CBS Journalist and Documentarian, Dies at 91 Trump, Paramount Global Are in "Active Settlement Discussions" Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit The Twilight of Evening News: Anchor Swaps, Trust Gaps and a Looming AI Threat Owens resigned as 60 Minutes EP in April in protest of what he believed to be a dwindling ability to independently control the show's editorial positions. In other words, Paramount corporate was getting in the way of their reporting. Owens' boss Wendy McMahon resigned as head of CBS News in May, citing similar reasons as Owens. Specifically, Owens and McMahon have taken issue with the way in which Paramount Global and its controlling company National Amusements Inc. (NAI) have handled a lawsuit by Donald Trump alleging 60 Minutes showed preferential treatment to his 2024 presidential-election opponent Kamala Harris. Paramount is in the final throes of a merger with Skydance, which requires federal regulatory approval. Shari Redstone controls Paramount Global — and thus has the final vote on any M&A activity — through her ownership of NAI. Tanya Simon began her career at 60 Minutes 1999 as an associate producer. She is beloved internally, not only because of the familial connection, but because of the respect she has earned over her 25-plus years at the newsmagazine. One staffer told the Status, 'The next E.P. has to be Tanya. There will be a revolt if it's not her.' Internally at 60 Minutes, staffers are already beginning to fret about the show's future under the new ownership, specifically whether the independence from the rest of CBS News that the show has historically enjoyed will continue, or if Skydance will have a heavier hand in directing the show's structure. Status reported earlier this week that Skydance chief David Ellison approached Bari Weiss to see if she was interested in a role at CBS post-merger. The Hollywood Reporter has not seen the reported letter; a spokesperson for 60 Minutes/CBS News did not immediately respond to our request for comment. A separate spokesperson for Paramount Global declined comment on this story. A spokesperson for Redstone did not immediately respond to our request for comment. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire

'Totally Unhinged': Trump Ripped After Bizarre Attack On Lawmaker's 'Ugly Face'
'Totally Unhinged': Trump Ripped After Bizarre Attack On Lawmaker's 'Ugly Face'

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Totally Unhinged': Trump Ripped After Bizarre Attack On Lawmaker's 'Ugly Face'

President Donald Trump on Wednesday launched a wild attack on Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), calling the lawmaker a 'DOPE,' TOTAL LOSER,' and a 'bad politician.' He also said Raskin has an 'ugly face.' Trump's tirade came shortly after Raskin appeared on MSNBC, where he spoke about a report indicating that the president wasn't aware that his signature 'big beautiful bill' would cut Medicaid until a Republican lawmaker pointed it out to him earlier in the day. Raskin said there's a lot of discussion on the floor of the House over just how much Trump knows about his own bill and whether he's 'out of it.' Yet most GOP lawmakers support the bill anyway, even those who aren't happy with it themselves. 'All of these people have gotten in line despite their own misgivings because Trump is leading the way ― but Trump might not even understand what's in the bill,' Raskin said. 'So it's a very dangerous moment when you think about what democracy is, and it doesn't speak well for what has become of the Republican Party.' Yet not everyone in the Republican caucus has backed the bill ― and as a key vote stalled late Wednesday, Trump attacked Raskin on Truth Social: Raskin brushed it off during an MSNBC interview. 'I suppose I don't mind being called a loser several times by Donald Trump given that he's our only president who has lost the popular vote for president in two different elections,' he told Lawrence O'Donnell. 'And the last time, when he lost by more than 7 million votes to Joe Biden, it upset him so much that he incited an insurrection against the Constitution, against his own vice president, and against the Congress of the United States.' He also had a response to Trump calling him 'ugly.' 'I suppose I don't like being called ugly by Donald Trump, but not everybody can live up to his exquisite levels of handsomeness and personal physical grace,' he said. Trump's critics on X also fired back at the president: Donald Trump lashes out at Congressman Jamie Raskin, calling him a 'dope,' a 'total loser,' and mocking his 'ugly face.'Totally unhinged — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) July 3, 2025 Just a really disturbed person. Media has normalized his insanity to a ridiculous degree. This (and most of what he does) is not normal. healthy human behavior. — Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) July 3, 2025 Can you remember another time in modern American history where the president of the country attacked an opponent of his for his 'ugly face'? (Also, do you remember when Republicans with clutch their pearls about civility and etiquette?) — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) July 3, 2025 MAGA is a movement by jerks, for jerks — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 3, 2025 Trump is projecting — again. No world leader speaks about their own officials with such venom. His unhinged rants aren't strength, they're a warning isn't leadership. It's emotional instability wrapped in delusion. America deserves better. — Shahn Khalfan (@ShahnKhalfan) July 3, 2025 When you point your finger at someone else, you point three fingers at yourself. Jesus said to 'love your neighbor as yourself.' Hard, isn't it, Mr. President? Cong. Raskin is a Constitutional expert, the real reason you attack/resent him. @realDonaldTrumphttps:// — Representative Joy Garratt, NM HD29 (@joyousgarratt) July 3, 2025 .@RepRaskin is one of the smartest, kindest, most principled leaders we have - and he has continued to lead through some of the most profound loss a human being can endure. Unlike those who are clinging to cruelty, ego and self interest right now - he has never lost his compass. — Kyra Ellis-Moore (@KyraEllisMoore) July 3, 2025 'I love watching his ugly face.' - the president of the United States of America — Alex Jewell 🧢 (@bestfoodalex) July 3, 2025 The functional illiterate calls the constitutional scholar a dope. — Robert (@avjagfan) July 3, 2025 The walls are red with tomato based products. — The Dr. - ❤️'s Educated Women (@gatesisthedevil) July 3, 2025 Jamie Raskin would eat Donald Trump for lunch in a debate. Raskin is a constitutional lawyer who has taught constitutional law for over 25 years. — Denison Barb (@DenisonBarbs) July 3, 2025 Shame on republicans — On A Bender (@on_bender) July 3, 2025 Trump's tirade isn't just petty—it's part of a pattern. His rhetoric leans hard into violence, personal attacks, and sugar-coated distortions dressed up as 'truth.' Political scientists have tracked a sharp rise in his use of violent language over the years, often rivaling… — SleuthyFella (@SleuthyFella) July 3, 2025 — Tucker&Otis (@Tucker_and_Otis) July 3, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store