Residents in Bristol housing block told £18m refurb project not going ahead
The scheme had been due to improve conditions inside five interlinked 1960s housing blocks - Haviland House, John Cozens House, Tyndall House, Langton House and Charleton House.Hundreds of people who live in about 180 homes across the site were informed that the council would not be going ahead with the project earlier this month.
After a long campaign from residents, the council had initially agreed to spend money on insulation, roofing and communal areas in June 2024. However, structural engineering contractor, Ridge, found that although the site was safe to live in, it required work "to ensure the continued safety of the building". The council said: "These works were not budgeted for and therefore the council has made the difficult decision to not move ahead with the full proposed refurbishment plan."
Ms Reid told the BBC the council had previously "promised" to move her out of the block."They told me they were coming to refurbish my flat and they were going to move me out and refurbish it, but I haven't seen them," she said. "I used to have a leak practically every single day. I'd be in my bed at three o'clock in the morning - it's raining in my bedroom, raining in the passages, raining in the bathroom - it's raining everywhere in my flat."And what do they [the council] do? They give me £20 to turn on my humidifier."Ms Reid said she had not used her bath in more than 20 years due to the "nastiness" that comes through the tap.She added: "I don't think they [the council] care - you walk outside and the buildings look disgusting and nasty. "I come home and I don't want to come home. I want to get away from here."
Ms Reid's neighbour John Dyer has lived at Haviland House for 27 years and is also unhappy with conditions in his flat.He said: "The council cancel everything and they never do nothing. It's just a mess."
'Poor conditions'
Parsons said he was "sad" to hear residents' stories.He said: "People have been living with poor conditions in their council homes, especially some of our blocks, for many years now."I know what a blow it is for people to now hear we can't proceed."Unfortunately the structural survey we carried out as part of this work revealed that we need to invest in these blocks to make sure they are safe - that has to be our number one priority."Parsons said structural work would start "over the next few months", with inspections and repairs taking place in the coming weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Keir Starmer must fight for UK drug firms
The life sciences industry is among the brightest jewels in the British economy, generating £100billion a year and employing more than 300,000 people. At its heart is the development and manufacture of pharmaceuticals, notably by AstraZeneca, which spends vast sums on research and is worth £167billion. So, if this hugely successful company were to relocate to the US, it would be a disaster both for the London Stock Exchange and the wider economy. Worryingly, this is not out of the question. AstraZeneca already sells 40 per cent of its drugs to America and, following President Donald Trump 's tariff threat, is ramping up research and production there. While there are no immediate plans to desert the UK, chief executive Pascal Soriot is said to be 'flirting' with the idea. Mr Trump's latest demand that foreign drug companies cut prices to US customers or face penalties may be an added incentive. The Left has always been highly critical of 'Big Pharma', accusing it of profiteering on the backs of NHS patients. Under Jeremy Corbyn, Labour planned to create a state-owned drug manufacturer with the power to override the patents which enable firms to make profits from their research. Only last year, Sir Keir Starmer refused to help fund a new vaccine plant in Liverpool – while pouring public money into our ailing steel industry. This Government must understand that failing to nurture AstraZeneca, GSK and others would be a catastrophic mistake. And Sir Keir should realise that while they say they want to remain in the UK, they may yet change their mind. Car lenders off hook Banks and credit providers will have heaved a huge sigh of relief yesterday after the Supreme Court ruled they will not have to pay compensation to millions of motorists who bought cars on finance without being told the dealers were receiving commission on the loan. The Treasury was also delighted with the result. Had it gone the other way, damages could have been comparable to the PPI scandal, which destabilised the financial industry for more than a decade. The court decided that dealers did not have a duty to act solely for buyers and that commissions were not a form of bribery in the legal sense, as had been alleged. However, it was not a total exoneration. Court President Lord Reed also ruled that excessive commission payments were unfair and ordered one buyer who had been charged 25 per cent of the value of the car to be repaid with interest. This opens the way to further claims. Many brokers and dealers were paid behind-the-scenes commission by lenders to sign buyers up to car finance deals, a practice deemed 'unlawful' by the Court of Appeal in October last year - a decision that was successfully appealed by lenders at the Supreme Court The dealers and lenders have escaped their worst fears, but they do not come out well. They have certainly been guilty of sharp practices even if not illegal ones. The Competition and Markets Authority must now force them to clean up their act. OAPs feel the cold In September, Rachel Reeves promised she would 'put more money in pensioners' pockets'. What she didn't say is that she would take even more out. Research shows pensioner households are an average of £800 worse off after a year of Labour thanks to higher bills – mainly owing to the Chancellor's £40billion Budget tax raid. With more taxes coming down the track to fill Labour's ever-widening financial black hole, the cost of living is set to soar further. For all Ms Reeves' promises, the elderly are in for a bitter winter.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
My haunted Cotswolds house that proves hauntings are real. NADINE DORRIES thought she'd found her forever home. Then after family deaths and sinister encounters that terrified her children, she called a priest...
Do you believe a house can be haunted or cursed? I didn't – until I lived in one. Last month, I read about the tragic death of Beverley Allen, the first wife of former F1 boss Christian Horner and mother of his teenage daughter, who passed away at 58 after a cancer battle.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump demands UK pharmaceutical giants to lower drug costs sparking fears NHS could pay the price if they refuse
Donald Trump has demanded UK pharmaceutical giants lower prices for America and suggested charging others to make up the difference. He said if they didn't, the US would deploy 'every tool in our arsenal' to protect families from 'continued abusive drug prices', sparking fears the NHS will end up paying more. Mr Trump suggested he would use tariffs to push through higher prices if countries resisted. In May Mr Trump signed an executive order demanding drugmakers cut US medicine prices to match those abroad. Yesterday in a letter to 17 pharma companies he said he expected them to deliver on measures by September 29. He asked them to apply 'most favoured nation' pricing to Medicaid, the US health programme for people on low incomes. Mr Trump also asked drugmakers to offer new medicines at the same price in the US as in other developed countries. He said: 'Our citizens pay massively higher prices than other nations pay for the same exact pill... subsidizing socialism aboard [abroad].' British pharma companies AstraZeneca and GSK were among the recipients. Others included Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and Sanofi. The UK Government said it would 'continue to work closely with the US to get the best deal for our pharma industry and deliver mutual benefits for both our countries'.
