West Ham's Lucas Paqueta cleared of spot-fixing
Paqueta, 27, was charged with four alleged breaches involving Premier League fixtures between November 2022 and August 2023.
The Brazil international, who had been under investigation since August 2023, denied attempting to influence matches "by intentionally seeking to receive a card from the referee for the improper purpose of affecting the betting market".
An independent regulatory commission found the charges not proven following a hearing.
The FA said two charges against Paqueta, which the player denied, related to a failure to co-operate with its investigation had been found proven.
An FA statement said: "The commission will decide an appropriate sanction for these breaches at the earliest opportunity."
In May 2024, Paqueta was charged with spot-fixing at four Premier League matches - against Leicester City in November 2022, Aston Villa in March 2023, Leeds United in May 2023 and Bournemouth in August 2023.
Responding to the FA decision in a post on Instagram, Paqueta said: "Since the first day of this investigation, I have maintained my innocence against these extremely serious accusations".
"I can't say anything more at this time, but I would like to express how grateful I am to God and how eager I am to return to playing football with a smile on my face.
"To my wife who never let go of my hand, to West Ham United, to the fans who always cheered me on... thank you for everything."
West Ham's vice-chair Karren Brady said: "We're pleased Lucas has been cleared. He has maintained his innocence from the outset, and as a club we have resolutely stood by him and supported him throughout the process.
"Despite the incredible pressure on him, Lucas has performed week in and week out for the club, always giving everything.
"It has been a difficult time for Lucas and his family, but he has remained absolutely professional throughout and he is now looking forward to drawing a line under this episode, as is everyone at West Ham."
Alastair Campbell, a partner at the law firm Level and the head of Paqueta's legal team, said: "Few cases carry the gravity of this one - professionally, personally and emotionally for our client.
"Lucas has faced down immense pressure with remarkable strength and resilience.
"Level is delighted that we've been able to help demonstrate that Lucas' integrity as a player and a person is in no doubt.
"Now, he can finally get back to focusing on the things that matter most to him - playing football and being with his family."
The FA said it was awaiting the written reasons from the independent commission in relation to its decision on the charges, and would not be commenting further until that time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
England and India ready for cliffhanger on final day in dramatic fifth Test
First came bad light, then a burst of rain, and with it the penultimate day of this epic Test series ended with the ultimate cliffhanger overnight. England had seemingly been cruising to their target of 374 and a 3‑1 series victory, driven by sparkling centuries from Harry Brook and Joe Root. But India roared back after tea to leave the hosts six wickets down, still 35 runs short, when the players and umpires walked off to a chorus of jeers. So despite looking like a memorable fourth day would bring finality to the contest, the deciding fifth Test now heads into a fifth day with everything still on the line. England will resume in the morning hoping that Jamie Smith, last of the top seven, guides them home after a night's rest and Chris Woakes, his dislocated left shoulder still in a sling, is not required to bat. India can still level the series at 2-2 – a share of the Anderson‑Tendulkar Trophy – and, having floundered slightly during a 195-run fifth‑wicket stand between Brook and Root, they had perhaps cause to feel most aggrieved when proceedings were paused at 5.30pm. The force was very much with the tourists at this stage; England were scrapping for their lives. Brook's thrilling 10th Test century had been terminated on 111 from 98 balls before tea – bat flying out of his hand when top-edging Akash Deep into the ring – while Jacob Bethell lost his middle stump for five trying to break free from the shackles. But it was Root's removal for 105 to an edge off Prasidh Krishna that truly set alarm bells ringing among the home support. It had been coming, in fairness, with the old ball belatedly starting to move for India's quicks and forcing a succession of lbw appeals. From 337 for six, Smith and Jamie Overton continued the theme, playing out 20 balls of paralysis in which they either beat the bat or squirted off the inside edge. Just two singles were added and both were cheered like boundaries. Most galling of all was that 30 minutes after play was called off at 6pm, the Oval was drenched in sunshine and the last remaining spectators were shouting words like 'disgrace'. If nothing else, the overnight pause handed Smith and the tail time to reset, even if this also meant they would be facing a refreshed Indian attack with the second new ball just 3.4 overs away. While the verbals that have been traded regularly during this series died down after a chirpy start, the battle out in the middle was no less intense, and not least during India's late surge. Krishna and Mohammed Siraj whipped up the Tamasha, with the latter somehow still hitting 87mph on the speed gun in his fifth successive Test. What a cricketer. Up to that point it had chiefly been about the audacity of Brook, plus the 39th entry into Root's catalogue of Test centuries. Hitting 14 fours and two sixes overall – one of which we will get to – Brook initially burst out of the traps. But he then smartly started to roll his wrists on his pull shots when Shubman Gill spread the field to all corners. Control, precision and typical brute strength placed this 91-ball century among his very best. Root, by contrast, was scratchy at first and fortunate to survive a tight lbw shout from Krishna on three in which he was saved by umpire's call. Soon enough, though, he was in his groove, smiling at his opponents after some rare snarl on day two and caressing 12 gorgeous fours. Since Bazball began in 2022, the 34‑year‑old averages a remarkable 82 in the fourth innings. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion There was little doubt as to the moment that changed the day though; a moment that Siraj, much like Trent Boult after the 2019 World Cup final, will replay in his mind over and again should India go on to lose. In a sport that has disappointment baked into it, holding a catch in the deep but carrying the ball over the boundary for six must rank among the worst feelings. Brook was on 19 at the time, England 137 for three, when he hooked Krishna from outside off and sent a high catch to long leg. Siraj snaffled it but planted his heel on the rope simultaneously, before stumbling over completely in full knowledge of the error. A number of India's players were already celebrating, only to spot Siraj with his head in his hands. India had enjoyed a positive start to the day too, even if there were signs of the pitch having lost some of its seam movement. The dangerous Ben Duckett had edged a smart full ball from Krishna behind on 54, while Ollie Pope fell lbw for 27 to a ball that nipped back from Siraj. It completed what has become his standard one century, 30-something average series for Pope. Brook's reprieve changed the mood of a morning in which England reached lunch on 164 for three, before he and Root then dominated the afternoon. Expect the fired up and indefatigable Siraj to come charging in on Monday morning, desperate to ensure his footfault becomes a mere footnote.
Daily Mirror
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Liverpool transfer news: Fresh interest in Darwin Nunez as three youngsters face exit
AC Milan are the latest big club being linked with a move for Darwin Nunez, who Liverpool remain willing to sell for the right price during Arne Slot's summer rebuild Liverpool face Athletic Bilbao twice tonight with Arne Slot's entire squad set to be handed some minutes ahead of next weekend's FA Community Shield against Crystal Palace at Wembley. But all the focus for now remains on whether they can bring in Alexander Isak from Newcastle. A deal of £110m has been rejected by the Toon, who want significantly more for their star striker because he has three years to run on his contract. He was also set to return to the North East from Spain over the weekend. And while Liverpool have already spent close to £300m on new signings they are under no PSR pressure having already sold several fringe members of the squad while commercial and matchday revenues have grown substantially. Here are the transfer stories worth keeping an eye on as the new season rapidly approaches Darwin departure? AC Milan have made contact with the representatives of Darwin Nunez as they eye a deal for the Liverpool forward. The Italian giants are said to have made the Uruguay international their top target for the final weeks of the transfer window. Nunez has been widely expected to leave Anfield this summer and the arrival of Hugo Ekitike and Florian Wirtz would appear to have left him further down Arne Slot's pecking order. Liverpool retain an interest in Newcastle star Alexander Isak too and have seen a bid turned down for the Premier League striker. If the Reds are successful in landing the Sweden star, Nunez's position would appear to be even more untenable. But thus far, Liverpool have not been able to find an agreement with any suitors for the former Benfica forward's signature. Three youngsters to go Liverpool could let three youngsters leave the club this summer as Luca Stephenson, James McConnell and Lewis Koumas gain interest from a number of teams. And the Premier League champions are open to sanctioning more exits for some young players as manager Arne Slot continues to overhaul his squad to keep it in fighting contention for the Premier League title once again. Stephenson has featured in pre-season under Slot and has impressed Slot after being included in the pre-season tour to Asia, but he has interest from Dundee United , Swansea, Reading, Rotherham and Cardiff over a loan move. Past target's Spurs interest Tottenham Hotspur are eyeing up a player who almost moved to Liverpool, as they now look to replace Son Heung-Min. The legendary Spurs forward dropped the bombshell announcement on Saturday that he had made the decision to leave north London. Thomas Frank, while disappointed at the annoucement, will now have to quickly turn his attention to bolstering his frontline, with Paris Saint-Germain's Randal Kolo Muani reportedly at the top of his list. The France international was of interest to Spurs in January, but spent the second half of last season on loan at Juventus, where he scored 10 goals in 22 appearances. He has also courted many suitors in the past, not least the Reds.
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Footballer, journalist, fashionista: whatever French Muslims do, we're treated as the enemy within
Being a Muslim in a country with a long colonial history, which has also had to deal with terrorist attacks carried out in the name of Islam, is an everyday challenge. In January 2015, for example, I was as profoundly shocked as everyone else in France by the massacre of the Charlie Hebdo journalists in Paris. As the country mourned, I was invited by a major radio station to comment, but was first asked, live on air, to 'dissociate' myself from the attackers. I had been critical of Charlie Hebdo's publications in the past, but my comments always fell within the scope of legitimate political debate. Nevertheless, as a Muslim, I was now treated as if I was under suspicion. In order to be tolerated on the airwaves, I had to profess my innocence: state publicly that I had nothing to do with the violence. I couldn't hold back my tears – because, even with a media profile, I was reduced to the most racist perception of my identity. I was strongly defended that night by others who took part in the show, and received much support online, but I couldn't help thinking of the millions of French Muslims who, unlike me, would have no microphone to defend themselves against vile accusations. Some years later I was invited to take part in a TV debate on the thesis: is the white man always guilty. I was expecting a conversation about gender and race. But my opponent, the philosopher Pascal Bruckner, immediately took me to task, claiming that I had used my status 'as a Black, Muslim woman' to incite hatred against Charlie Hebdo. He claimed that I had, in effect, blood on my hands, that my words had 'led to the murder of 12 people at Charlie Hebdo'. I immediately protested, stating as firmly as I could, that I had 'absolutely no responsibility for any terrorist attack'. But Bruckner wouldn't let go. He attacked me for having signed a joint statement in 2011, following a night-time petrol-bomb attack at the Charlie Hebdo premises that caused, fortunately, only material damage. Nothing in the statement – which I did not draft and was co-signed by 20 other academics and activists– had called for hatred or violence. It had been critical of the disproportionate media treatment of the fire at Charlie Hebdo when vandalism of Muslim places of worship featured rarely in the news. Signatories had expressed dismay at the selective nature of French national outrage, highlighting the indifference shown after an arson attack on a Paris building inhabited by Roma people, in which a man died. But Bruckner repeated his accusations in an interview the next day, claiming without any evidence that he had simply 'reminded Rokhaya Diallo of her involvement in political Islam' adding – as if it were a crime – that I had 'criticised Charlie Hebdo by calling them Islamophobic and racist'. I felt I had no option but to file a defamation lawsuit against Bruckner, believing the accusation to be not just outrageous and insulting, but influenced by my origins and my faith. But defending myself was viewed as another provocation. Le Figaro, the leading conservative daily, published a highly offensive article on the eve of the trial, which, without even bothering to interview me, stated: 'Inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood, 'anti-racist' activists like Rokhaya Diallo are multiplying lawsuits to silence critics of Islamism.' Taking legal action as a Muslim woman was framed as a 'jihadist' political plot. This kind of smear tactic is used again and again to discredit any Muslim who calls out Islamophobia. When the footballer Karim Benzema spoke in support of the people of Gaza in October 2023, the then interior minister Gerard Darmanin declared – without a shred of evidence – that the player had 'well-known ties to the Muslim Brotherhood'. In May, a report commissioned by the interior ministry into the Muslim Brotherhood fuelled suspicion of all French Muslims by recycling conspiracy theories around supposed 'infiltration'. The report was as the the socio-anthropologist Hamza Esmili put it, 'intellectually impoverished'. Yet Bruno Retailleau, the current interior minister, used alarmist conspiracy tropes to describe its conclusions, claiming it had identified 'a very clear threat to the republic and to national cohesion' and 'a quiet form of Islamist infiltration whose ultimate goal is to bring all of French society under sharia law'. But even the report stated unequivocally: 'No recent document demonstrates any intent by Muslims of France to establish an Islamic state in France or to enforce sharia law there.' It added that the Brotherhood's members in France today are estimated to number 'between 400 and 1,000 people'. As Esmili argues, French Muslims present a paradox: we are part of every social sphere, yet many of us have not given up our cultural specificities. And that is precisely what we are blamed for – integration without assimilation. This is why the same government can claim it uses the law to fight against Muslim 'separatism' while denouncing the threat of Muslim 'infiltration'. Muslims can't win: we are blamed for being part of the national community and for being outside of it. Thus, no matter what level we reach in the social pecking order, being Muslim always carries the suspicion of association with a radical and dangerous ideology: of being the enemy within. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion So when Léna Situations, a major fashion influencer in France, appeared on the Cannes film festival red carpet wearing a long dress with a headscarf, a senior official in Emmanuel Macron's party suggested on social media that she was practising a form of religious 'infiltration'. As if an outfit was in itself proof of extremism. The influencer never mentioned her religion but it made no difference – her Algerian heritage alone was enough to disqualify her. Even non-Muslims who take a stand against this hostile climate are subjected to similar accusations. Emile Ackermann – a rabbi vocal on Islamophobia – was accused by a self-proclaimed academic 'expert' of being inspired by a 'Brotherist' discourse. Such absurd accusations would be laughable if the situation weren't so volatile, with Islamophobic crime on the increase. Take the case of the hairdresser Hichem Miraoui, killed in June in the south of France, in what investigators are treating as a racially motivated act of domestic terrorism. Miraoui had been the target of racist rhetoric posted on social media by a neighbour who also denounced the French state as 'incapable of protecting us from Muslims'. Yet, the very same state constantly fuels a narrative portraying Muslims as a problem. During the defamation lawsuit I launched against Bruckner, and its appeal, my accuser and his lawyer leaned into these cliches. While the philosopher repeated his accusations and suggested that I was funded by 'foreign powers', his lawyer told the court that, given that Charlie Hebdo's case files amounted to several tonnes of documents, no one could say for sure whether my name was not mentioned in them. Elyamine Settoul, a political scientist and expert on jihadism, testified, however, that terrorists are radicalised through direct contacts and in no way rely on intellectual debates or interventions. And the expert and former Islamic State hostage Nicolas Hénin testified that my name appeared 'neither in the legal proceedings concerning the January 2015 attack, nor in the research conducted on the subject'. He told the court that 'the jihadist sphere holds nothing but contempt' for people like me because of my 'multicultural progressivism, which aligns with none of their religious doctrines'. Bruckner was acquitted in the first instance on the grounds that he had attributed to me only 'purely moral responsibility' and invited me to 'take ownership of the weight of my words and commitments'. The appeal court overturned the initial judgment, recognising the defamatory nature of Bruckner's remarks, yet still acquitted him on the grounds that he had made his statement 'in good faith'. Just like the 'yellow peril' once attributed to east Asians, or the supposed 'cosmopolitanist' trope used about Jews, the image of an allegedly foreign group secretly infiltrating France's circles of influence is once again thriving, in a sadly familiar strain of dangerous racist rhetoric. Rokhaya Diallo is a Guardian Europe columnist
